OBJECTIVE: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a modern concept that aims to improve the perioperative patient care by implementing an evidence-based, patient-centered team approach. This paper aims to analyze the outcome, variations and limits of the ERAS-protocols used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: We performed a systematic review on PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science to document the outcomes of applying various ERAS protocols in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 papers, totaling 1453 patients that underwent LC, were included in the qualitative analysis. ERAS-protocols applied in those studies include various pre-, intra- and postoperative measures intended to boost the surgical recovery of the patients and shorten their hospital stay, without exposing them to hazardous encounters. Results: Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within an ERAS-specific protocol are proven to have lower levels of postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, with no statistically significant risk of postoperative complications. The postoperative results show that ERAS-laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a feasible and safe procedure, that may shorten the postoperative recovery after LC. Conclusions: Further studies are needed to establish a consensus regarding the perioperative protocol, before implementing ERAS for LC in clinical routine.

In this prospective, randomized, double blind control trial we aim to investigate which of the most used analgesic techniques after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the most efficient. Methods: This study included 81 patients that were randomly distributed into 3 groups using a computer-generated random number which was enclosed in a sealed envelope: group A (control) received classic multimodal iv opioid analgesia, group B received Tap block in oblique subcostal approach (OSTAP) and group C received local anesthetic infiltration of the trocar insertion sites (LAI). The primary outcome of this trial was to evaluate the efficacy of each analgetic technique by measuring VAS pain scores. Secondary outcome included intraoperative opioid requirement and the opioid consumption in the first 24h postoperatively. Intraoperative parameters and outcome data were recorded by an anesthesiologist who was blinded to the study groups. Results: We analyzed a total of 75 patients. For the primary outcome variable, VAS pain scores at rest were significantly reduced in OSTAP group at each time point assessed in the first 24 hours after surgery compared with LAI group and IV opioid analgesia group (p 0.001). Intraoperative fentanyl consumption and 24h pethidine consumption were also significantly reduced in TAP block group compared with LAI group and IV opioid analgesia group (p 0.001). Conclusions: Our study showed that OSTAP block is a more efficient analgesia technique compared with IV opioid analgesia and with local anesthetic infiltration of trocar sites after laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02707250).

Background: Gallstone disease is a common problem and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a common elective procedure. This operation was performed by a general surgeon, colorectal surgeons, breast and vascular surgeons according to the largest UK\'s audit (CholeS study). Objectives: To compare the outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a specialist upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgeon to that of CholeS and large international studies. Our hypothesis is: UGI specialist is producing better outcomes for LC patients. Methods: All patient who underwent LC between 1999 and 2019 at one hospital by an UGI consultant and 2014-2019 at another hospital by another UGI consultant surgeon were included. The inclusion criteria were LC performed by UGI surgeon. Lost to follow up, procedures done by trainees and gallbladder cancer patients were excluded. The outcome measures of bile leak, bile duct injuries, bleeding, infectious complications, bowel injuries, vascular injuries and pseudoaneurysms, neuralgia, port site hernia, mesenteric haematoma, 30-day mortality and conversion to open were reported. Statistical tests were used to assess the significant differences, the confidence interval was 95% and the p-value was taken as 0.05. Results: Two UGI specialists performed 5122 LC, 4396 (86%) were female and 715 (14%) male. The age was 13-93 year (median of 48 years). 3681 (72 %) was done as a day surgery case. 1431(28%) as an inpatient and 287 (5.6%) emergency LC. There was no death in the 30 days periods of surgery, 8 (0.15%) biliary leak from the duct of Luschka, 4 (0.19%) common bile duct (CBD) injuries, 9(0.02%) conversions and 17(0.33%) procedures were abandoned. There were significant differences in the above complications between our study and the CholeS report. Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with acceptable outcomes, low risk of bile duct injury and no mortality when performed by a specialist upper GI surgeon.

Surgical clip migration in the common bile duct with consecutive stone formation is a rare occurrence after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, less than 100 cases being reported so far. We report a case of a 55-year-old woman with obstructive jaundice due to bile duct stone formed around a migrated surgical clip 9 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patient presented with pain in the upper abdomen and jaundice. Abdominal ultrasound diagnosed dilation of the common bile duct and intrahepatic bile ducts. The diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomography which revealed a metal clip in the distal part of the common bile duct. The patient was managed successfully by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and the surgical clip was retrieved using the Dormia basket. The exact mechanism of clip migration is not fully understood but may be explained by local inflammation and ineffective clipping. Although a rare occurrence, clip migration should not be excluded when considering the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with obstructive jaundice or cholangitis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Minimally invasive management by ERCP is the procedure of choice for migrated clips related complications but surgical common bile duct exploration may be necessary.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard procedure in patients with cirrhosis and symptomatic gallbladder disease or acute cholecystitis. In this retrospective study we evaluated laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cirrhosis based on Child-Pugh score as a predictor of morbidity. In the First Surgical Clinic of Iasi, from 01 jan 2010 to 31 jan 2020, we performed 111 laparoscopic cholecystectomies in Child-Pugh A, B, and C cirrhotic patients. Intraoperative difficulty (grade 3 Cuschieri) was experienced in 32 patients (28.8%). Highly vascular sub hepatic adherences have been reported in a quarter of all patients. Intraoperative incidents were more frequent 27 (24.3%) compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed in other patient groups. The conversion rate to open cholecystectomy was 6.3% (7 cases). Mean operative time was 84 min. Mean duration of hospitalization stay was 4.7 days. The morbidity rate was 16.2% of patients and included bleeding, intraabdominal fluid collections and wound complications more common in patients with Child-Pugh Cirrhosis B and C. The results are dependent of the perioperative management of the liver function.

Duodenal injury is an unusual complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, mostly caused by direct injury of the duodenum by laparoscopic instruments, either mechanical or thermal. The management is usually surgical, with satisfactory results, as long as the complication is detected early. We report two cases of duodenal perforations during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. One was treated with primary closure of the defect, while the other was managed conservatively with abdominal drainage and food deprivation. Both techniques proved successful in the management of that complication.

Rouviere-Gans incisura (RGI) is a relatively frequent hepatic anatomosurgical structure (it appears in 52%-80% of cases), but it is not wellknown in hepatic surgery. The presence of RGI is an important landmark to avoid biliary lesions during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, since it allows the isolation of the right posterior glissonean pedicle in 70% of cases, therefore simplifying the resection of the posterior right hepatic section or its segments (Sg6 and Sg7). While performing a right posterior hepatic resection for living-donor liver transplantation, the presence of the RGI facilitates the dissection of the vasculo-biliary structures in the right posterior glissonean pedicle.