BACKGROUND: A lamellar macular hole (LMH) is characterized by a distinct morphologic configuration and can be distinguished from related entities such as macular pseudohole (MPH) and epiretinal membrane with foveoschisis (ERM-FS) by clear morphologic features.
OBJECTIVE: Based on current knowledge, the pathophysiologic function of LMH in the spectrum of vitreomacular interface diseases will be described and therapeutic concepts will be presented.
METHODS: Current studies are supplemented by case reports to provide a schematic overview of the natural history and therapeutic concepts at the vitreomacular interface.
RESULTS: The LMH is as a retrospective marker for pathologic posterior vitreous detachment in adult patients and may be interpreted as the pathophysiologic center of tractional maculopathies. Various vitreomacular pathologies can result in LMH: a detached vitreomacular traction, a spontaneously closed penetrating macular hole, or an epiretinal membrane with foveoschisis. Pathophysiologically, a degenerative, progressive loss of the architecture of the foveal muller cell cone may be the underlaying mechanism, resulting in the typical undermining of the hole edges and occasionally in a full thickness macular hole. The optimal timing and the appropriate surgical method are the focus of current clinical studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The pathophysiology of LMH indicates a smooth transition of tractive maculopathies. These should be prospectively evaluated in order to develop evidence-based treatment strategies for LMH.
UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND: Das Makulaschichtforamen (LMH) zeichnet sich durch eine differenzierte, morphologische Konfiguration aus und lässt sich anhand eindeutiger morphologischer Merkmale von nahestehenden Entitäten wie dem makulären Pseudoforamen (MPH) und der epiretinalen Membran mit Foveoschisis (ERM-FS) abgrenzen. ZIEL: Anhand des aktuellen Wissenstands soll die pathophysiologische Funktion des LMH im Spektrum vitreoretinaler Grenzflächenerkrankungen beschrieben und therapeutische Konzepte sollen vorgestellt werden.
METHODS: Die verfügbare Studienlage wird durch Fallberichte erweitert, um zu einer schematischen Übersicht der Spontanverläufe und Therapiekonzepte am vitreomakulären Übergang zu gelangen.
UNASSIGNED: Das Makulaschichtforamen kann beim erwachsenen Patienten als retrospektiver Marker für eine stattgehabte pathologische hintere Glaskörperabhebung interpretiert werden und steht im pathophysiologischen Zentrum der traktiven Makulopathien. Verschiedene vitreomakuläre Pathologien können in einem LMH resultieren: eine gelöste vitreomakuläre Traktion, ein spontan verschlossenes durchgreifendes Makulaforamen oder eine epiretinale Membran mit Foveoschisis. Pathophysiologisch ist von einem degenerativen, progressiven Verlust der Architektur des fovealen Müller-Zell-Konus auszugehen, der in der typischen Unterminierung der Lochränder und vereinzelt im Verlauf auch in einem durchgreifenden Makulaforamen münden kann. Der optimale Zeitpunkt sowie die adäquate Operationsmethode stehen im Fokus aktueller klinischer Studien.
UNASSIGNED: Die Pathophysiologie des LMHs deutet auf einen fließenden Übergang der traktiven Makulopathien hin, die standardisiert und prospektiv ausgewertet werden sollten, um evidenzbasierte Therapiestrategien beim LMH entwickeln zu können.

Purpose: To characterize the change in visual acuity (VA) in eyes treated with vitrectomy using the 2020 international consensus-based optical coherence tomography (OCT) definition of lamellar macular hole (LMH), macular pseudohole (MPH), and epiretinal membrane with foveoschisis (ERMF). Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed from 2000 to 2022 of patients who had vitrectomy for symptomatic decreased VA from LMH, MPH, or ERMF performed by the same surgeon at a community hospital. Preoperative spectral domain (SD-OCT) was reviewed to classify patients using the consensus guidelines. Primary outcomes were the mean change in best-corrected VA at 3 months, 1 year, and the final postoperative examination. Results: Fifty-one patients were included, 30 with LMH, 14 with MPH, and 7 with ERMF. The VA was 20/63 at baseline, 20/62 (P = .79) 3 months postoperatively, 20/40 (P = .003) at 1 year, and 20/52 (P = .10) at the final examination for LMH; 20/64, 20/50 (P = .16), 20/40 (P = .040), and 20/40 (P = .02), respectively, for MPH; and 20/53, 20/50 (P = .42), 20/30 (P = .03), and 20/38 (P = .04), respectively, for ERMF. Subgroup analysis showed that eyes with LMH without ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption on SD-OCT improved from 20/57 at baseline to 20/39 (P = .01) at the final examination. Conclusions: There was no significant improvement in VA at the final postvitrectomy examination in eyes with LMH, while there was significant improvement in eyes with MPH and ERMF. This supports surgery in selected eyes with MPH and ERMF but possibly not in eyes with LMH, unless OCT shows no EZ disruption.

Lamellar macular holes (LMHs) are a manifestation of myopic tractional maculopathy (MTM). Owing to the complex and multidirectional traction force in the elongated eyeball, the clinical features, development, evolution, and treatment algorithms of LMH in highly myopic eyes may differ from those of idiopathic LMH or MTM in general. This review aimed to specifically explore the LMHs in highly myopic eyes. Several developmental processes of LMH and their association with macular retinoschisis have been demonstrated, with the tractional component identified in all processes. Epiretinal proliferation was more prevalent and more extensive in LMHs in highly myopic eyes than in idiopathic LMHs. LMHs in highly myopic eyes may remain stable or progress to foveal detachment and full-thickness macular hole with or without retinal detachment. The predictive factors associated with disease progression were summarized to facilitate monitoring and guide surgical intervention. The treatment of LMHs in highly myopic eyes was based on an algorithm for treating myopic tractional maculopathy, including gas tamponade, pars plana vitrectomy, macular buckling, and a combination of vitrectomy and macular buckling. New internal limiting membrane (ILM) manipulation techniques such as fovea-sparing ILM peeling or fovea-sparing ILM peeling combined with ILM flap insertion could reduce the risk of developing iatrogenic full-thickness macular holes postoperatively. Further research should focus on the treatment of LMH in highly myopic eyes.

Introduction: To review the literature regarding surgical management of full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) spontaneously arising from lamellar MHs (LMHs). Methods: The literature on surgically managed FTMHs arising from LMHs was reviewed via Ovid MEDLINE and Embase through June 5, 2022. Results: Seventy-six eyes from 16 articles were included. Forty eyes had internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, 32 inverted ILM flap techniques, and 4 an unclear surgical technique. The FTMH closure rate was not significantly different between ILM peeling (34/40 [85%]) and the inverted ILM flap techniques (28/32 [88%]) (P = .761). The mean (±SD) logMAR visual acuity improved from 0.64 ± 0.46 to 0.25 ± 0.22 (Snellen 20/87 to 20/36) with ILM peeling (n = 30); similar data were not available for inverted ILM flap techniques. Conclusions: Foveal tissue loss, flat hole edges, and limited retinal hydration may result in inverted ILM flap techniques having outcomes similar to those of ILM peeling in repairing FTMHs from LMHs. Future studies are needed to compare techniques.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe differences in the vitreomacular interface (VMI) in idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) foveoschisis compared to macular pseudohole (MPH) and lamellar macular hole (LMH).
METHODS: We analysed surgically excised epiretinal material and internal limiting membrane (ILM) specimens obtained from 16 eyes of 16 patients with ERM foveoschisis (6 eyes), MPH (5 eyes), and LMH (5 eyes) during standard pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with membrane peeling. The three entities were classified according to the newly introduced optical coherence tomography (OCT) terminology. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to describe the ultrastructural features.
RESULTS: We found fibrocellular epiretinal tissues in all samples analysed. However, the cell and collagen composition of the VMI differed between groups. Eyes with ERM foveoschisis were characterized by a higher number of cells, multilayered membranes, and thick strands of vitreous collagen embedding the major cell types of myofibroblasts compared to MPH. Eyes with MPH also showed a predominance of myofibroblasts, but these were located directly on the ILM with no collagen between the cells and the ILM. Eyes with LMH showed a thick, multilayered epiretinal proliferation consisting mainly of non-tractional glial cells, corresponding to hypodense epiretinal proliferation on OCT. Eyes with ERM foveoschisis and MPH were more likely to have incomplete PVD compared to LMH in terms of posterior hyaloid status.
CONCLUSIONS: Tractional ERMs in eyes with ERM foveoschisis and MPH differ in their ultrastructure. The main difference is in the amount and topographical distribution of vitreous collagen. However, the epiretinal cell types are predominantly myofibroblasts in both entities. This highlights the importance of distinguishing ERM foveoschisis from both MPH and LMH in terms of pathogenesis and surgical peeling procedures.

Gyrate atrophy (GA) is a hereditary condition characterized by ornithine aminotransferase deficiency-related large areas of retinal pigment epithelium and choriocapillaris lobular-shaped atrophy in the peripheral retina. In this report, we present a case of atypical presentation of GA. The aim of this report is to present two siblings, one of which was associated with a lamellar macular hole and with a history of previous diagnosis of retinitis pigmentosa. The delayed diagnosis of GA was made only after her brother, who was 5 years younger than her was diagnosed with GA. In addition, in this report, we evaluated GA in terms of multimodal imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and treatment of macular complications.

OBJECTIVE: To identify preoperative OCT markers that correlate with postoperative visual acuity (VA) changes in eyes with lamellar macular hole (LMH) and epiretinal membrane foveoschisis (ERMF) after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).
METHODS: Cross-sectional retrospective study.
METHODS: Patients seen at the Wilmer Eye Institute between 2011 and 2021 with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, or International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, code for \"macular hole\" that underwent PPV, and demonstrated all OCT criteria present for either LMH or ERMF based on the Hubschman et al (2020) classification.
METHODS: OCT markers including hole dimensions, retinal layer continuity, and ellipsoid zone (EZ) convexity and pixelated intensity were quantified. Visual acuity immediately before PPV and at the last follow-up date available were both recorded.
METHODS: Preoperative OCT variables that are correlated with postoperative changes in VA.
RESULTS: Forty-two eyes from 42 patients with LMH (n = 11) and ERMF (n = 31) that underwent PPV were identified. Visual acuity in the ERMF cohort significantly improved at last follow-up compared with preoperative VA (P < 0.001), whereas VA in the LMH cohort did not (P = 0.14). In the LMH cohort, retinal layer continuity at the hole edge was positively correlated with change in VA at final follow-up, whereas hole height was negatively correlated with VA. In the ERMF cohort, preoperative VA was negatively correlated with change in VA at final follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Retinal layer continuity at the hole and hole height are novel preoperative markers that predict postoperative VA change in LMH. After identifying the type of macular lesion, surgeons should consider using these preoperative OCT markers when counseling patients on potential postoperative VA outcomes and when managing patient expectations.
BACKGROUND: The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

UNASSIGNED: Development and spontaneous closure of a macular hole (MH) in a vitrectomized eye is relatively rare. We report our findings in a case in which vitrectomy was performed successfully to treat a vitreous hemorrhage (VH), but a MH developed eight months later. The MH spontaneously closed 2 weeks later, but then reopened. A second vitrectomy was performed with insertion of the internal limiting membrane flap into the MH which led to the successful closure of the MH. The purpose of this article is to present an explanation of how MH developed in this eye without vitreous traction.
UNASSIGNED: A 64-year-old woman visited an eye clinic with vision reduction in her right eye of 3 days duration. A VH was detected in the right eye and pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was performed. A retinal tear was detected which was the origin of the VH. The vision was restored to a decimal visual acuity of 1.2. Eight months later, the patient noticed that her vision was distorted and was referred to our hospital.
UNASSIGNED: Optical coherence tomographic (OCT) images showed a thin epiretinal membrane on the macula, cystoid changes in the macular area, and a full-thickness MH.
UNASSIGNED: The MH closed spontaneously in two weeks, however a lamellar MH with an epiretinal proliferation (EP) developed 11 months later. Two months later, OCT showed cyst-like changes in the retina and a full-thickness MH. A second PPV was performed with the insertion of the ILM flap and EP into the MH to close the MH. Her visual acuity improved, and distorted vision was not present.
UNASSIGNED: Clinicians should be aware that a MH can develop in a vitrectomized eye without vitreous traction but can close spontaneously. We conclude that careful follow-up examinations are necessary even in vitrectomized eyes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the natural history and surgical outcomes of lamellar macular holes (LMHs).
METHODS: Retrospective and consecutive case series.
METHODS: Patients with LMHs from multiple tertiary care centers.
METHODS: Clinical charts and OCT scans were reviewed.
METHODS: The visual acuity (VA) changes and the occurrence rate of full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) were studied in both groups. Within the operated group, factors associated with 6-month VA and development of FTMH were explored.
RESULTS: One hundred seventy-eight eyes were included, of which 89 were monitored and 89 underwent surgery. In the observation group, the mean VA decreased from 0.25 ± 0.18 to 0.28 ± 0.18 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR; P = 0.13), with 14 eyes (15.7%) that lost ≥ 0.2 logMAR VA, after 45.7 ± 33.3 months. Nine eyes (10.1%) spontaneously developed an FTMH. In the operated group, the mean VA increased from 0.47 ± 0.23 to 0.35 ± 0.25 logMAR at 6 months (P < 0.001) and 0.36 ± 0.28 logMAR (P = 0.001) after 24.1 ± 30.1 months. By multivariate analysis, better baseline VA (P < 0.001), the presence of an epiretinal membrane (P = 0.03), and the peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM; P = 0.02), with a greater effect of ILM perihole sparing, were associated with a greater 6-month VA. Perihole epiretinal proliferation sparing was associated with a better postoperative VA by univariate analysis (P = 0.03), but this was not significant by multivariate analysis. Eight eyes (9.0%) developed a postoperative FTMH. Using Cox proportional hazard ratios [HRs], pseudophakia at baseline (HR, 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00-0.75; P = 0.03) and peeling of the ILM (HR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.39; P = 0.004) were protective factors, while ellipsoid zone disruption (HR, 10.5; 95% CI, 1.04-105; P = 0.05) was associated with an increased risk of FTMH.
CONCLUSIONS: Observed eyes with LMH experienced, on average, progressive VA loss. Patients with LMH and altered vision may benefit from surgery. Internal limiting membrane peeling, with perihole ILM sparing, represents a crucial step of the surgery associated with a greater VA and a lower risk of postoperative FTMH.
BACKGROUND: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

OBJECTIVE: To propose a novel technique of an internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap using ophthalmic viscoelastic device (OVD) with no requirement for postoperative head posture for the treatment of lamellar macular hole (LMH) repair.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 16 consecutive eyes of LMH patients who underwent vitrectomy with ILM flap with OVD. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), simultaneous cataract extraction, and ellipsoid zone disruption preoperatively and at the final follow-up were compared.
RESULTS: The mean age was 73.19 ± 7.26 years, and ten patients (62%) were females. The mean follow-up was 5.06±1.43 months (range 3-6). For all patients, BCVA was significantly improved at the final visit, from 0.65±0.36 logMAR units to 0.42±0.29 (p < 0.001). None of the patients had visual loss. Six patients had epiretinal membrane (ERM) foveoschisis, and the rest had LMH with epiretinal proliferation. Both subgroups presented a significant improvement in their BCVA with a trend for better improvement in the latter (p=0.09). Ellipsoid zone disruption was seen in 7 patients including one patient with a macular scar. There was no significant effect of ellipsoid zone disruption on the final BCVA (p=0.33). Twelve eyes (75%) underwent simultaneous cataract extraction. Mean BCVA at the final postoperative visit improved regardless of whether the eyes underwent simultaneous cataract surgery (p=0.39). CMT was also significantly improved at the final visit, from 200.06±46.8 μm preoperatively to 305.00±85.5 μm (p<0.001). No full-thickness macular holes were developed postoperatively. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of LMH with ILM flap with OVD showed promising anatomical and functional results with no postoperative head position requirements.