BACKGROUND: Reduced ankle quasi-joint stiffness affects propulsion in the paretic side of patients with hemiparesis, contributing to gait asymmetry. We investigated whether the use of an ankle-foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance to compensate for reduced stiffness would increase quasi-joint stiffness and spatiotemporal symmetry in patients with hemiparesis.
METHODS: Seventeen patients walked along a 7-m walkway in both ankle-foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance and control (i.e., ankle-foot orthosis) conditions. Dorsiflexion resistance by spring and cam was set to increase linearly from zero-degree ankle dorsiflexion. Gait data were analyzed using a three-dimensional motion analysis system.
RESULTS: Ankle-foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance significantly increased the quasi-joint stiffness in the early and middle stance phase (P = 0.028 and 0.040). Furthermore, although ankle power generation in the ankle-foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance condition was significantly lower than in the control condition (P = 0.003), step length symmetry significantly increased in the ankle-foot orthosis with dorsiflexion resistance condition (P = 0.016). There was no significant difference in swing time ratio between conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Applying dorsiflexion resistance in the paretic stance phase increased quasi-joint stiffness but did not lead to an increase in ankle power generation. On the other hand, applying dorsiflexion resistance also resulted in a more symmetrical step length, even though the ankle joint power generation on the paretic side did not increase as expected. Future research should explore whether modifying the magnitude and timing of dorsiflexion resistance, considering the biomechanical characteristics of each patients\' ankle joint during gait, enhances ankle joint power generation.

BACKGROUND: A third of the population aged 65 and over experiences a fall during a given year, often with severe traumatic consequences, dependence, and consequently, a decline in quality of life. The fear of falling itself leads to avoidance behavior from daily activities leading to a downward spiral of dependence, loss of confidence, and therefore an increased risk of falling. Joint stiffness is often observed during clinical examination of elderly people. However, the association between lumbopelvic stiffness and fear of falling has not been studied.
OBJECTIVE: Osteopathic manipulative treatment/medicine (OMT/OMM), targeted to improve the stiffness of the pelvic girdle, may improve the prognosis of patients afraid of falling and slow down their loss of autonomy.
METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study enrolling hospitalized patients and nursing home residents over 75 years of age. Patients able to walk and without significant cognitive impairment completed the International Fall Efficacy Scale (FES-I) questionnaire to assess their intensity of fear of falling. The modified Schober test and hip goniometry (flexion and extension) were measured and compared to the FES-I score.
RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were included. A high fear of falling (FES-I≥28) was associated with female sex (31 [79.5 %] vs. 29 [47.5 %]; p=0.002) and with a reduction in the amplitudes tested by the Schober test (2 [1.5-3] vs. 3 [2-4]; p=0.002), the hip extension goniometry (7 [4-10] vs. 10 [7-15]; p<0.001) and the hip flexion goniometry (70 [60-77] vs. 82 [71-90]; p<0.001). The association between FES-I score and each anthropometric variable was strongly linear (p<0.001 for all), especially with hip flexion goniometry (R2=30 %).
CONCLUSIONS: Lumbopelvic stiffness, especially in hip flexion, is strongly associated with a high fear of falling in patients over 75 years of age. When combined with other movement-based therapies, OMM targeted to improve the stiffness of the pelvic girdle may improve the prognosis of patients afraid of falling and slow down their loss of autonomy.

UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the functional outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic arthrolysis of the knee and find the ideal timing for arthrolysis to achieve maximum range of motion (ROM) of the knee.
UNASSIGNED: All patients who underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis for post-operative joint stiffness following surgery for injuries around knee joint at a tertiary care centre from 2009 to 2023 were included in this study. The patients\' details such as primary injury, time interval between the index surgery and arthrolysis, improvement in knee range of ROM and Lysholm score from prior to arthrolysis to last follow-up post arthrolysis were retrieved from hospital database and analysed.
UNASSIGNED: Total of 42 patients who underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis of knee from 2009 to 2023 were included in this study. Follow-up range was 6 months to 6 years. ROM after arthrolysis significantly improved in the early and delayed arthrolysis groups as compared to late arthrolysis groups (mean 126.25 and 115.62 vs 106.3, p < 0.05). Patients treated with early arthroscopic arthrolysis (within 3 months) showed significant increase in post operative Lysholm score compared to other groups (p < 0.05). ROM of 120° and beyond was achieved in 75% of cases in early arthrolysis group compared to 62.8% and 39% in delayed and late arthrolysis group (p < 0.05).
UNASSIGNED: Arthroscopic arthrolysis done within 6 months (with maximum effect when done within 3 months) after the primary surgery leads to significant improvement in ROM and functional scores as compared to those with late arthrolysis group.

(1) Background: This study investigated the relationship between weather conditions, diurnal patterns, and total knee range of motion (ROM), as well as the severity of symptoms (pain and stiffness) in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. (2) Methods: An exploratory longitudinal study was conducted on 28 older adults with knee osteoarthritis (mean age 71.86 ± 4.49 years; 46.4% men, 53.6% women). We used as assessment tools the Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for self-reported local knee pain and stiffness, and goniometry for ROM. Measurements were taken twice, six months apart, in winter and summer, in the morning and evening of each selected day. Recorded weather factors comprised temperature, relative humidity, barometric pressure, and maximum wind speed. (3) Results: The study revealed significant effects of season and time of day on pain and stiffness, respectively (p < 0.001). Additionally, a significant interaction between season and time influenced total knee ROM (p < 0.001). Moreover, there was a statistically significant relationship between time and total knee ROM (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: This research underscores the complex link between seasonal fluctuations and daily variations in some symptomatic and functional aspects of knee osteoarthritis in older adults.

Mucopolysaccharidosis II (MPS II) is a rare, life-limiting lysosomal storage disease caused by reduced iduronate-2-sulfatase activity. Patients experience broad ranging signs and symptoms, including bone and joint manifestations. This study reported on orthopedic involvement and management in patients with MPS II using 15 years of data from the Hunter Outcome Survey (HOS). Of the 245 patients in the study population, 90.2% had skeletal deformity (median onset, 2.8 years), 76.7% had upper body stiffness (onset, 4.2 years), and 61.2% had lower body stiffness (onset, 5.3 years); 63.7% of patients had at least three joint manifestations. Orthopedic manifestations were common in adults and children with MPS II, and in patients with and without cognitive impairment. Joint range of motion (JROM) was restricted in all joints assessed (shoulder, elbow, hip, wrist, knee, and ankle). Little correlation was observed between JROM measurements, subjective reports of joint stiffness and limited function, and 6-minute walk test results. Patients with joint stiffness and limited function were generally more likely to have central and peripheral nervous system, pulmonary, and cardiovascular manifestations than those without these symptoms. Carpal tunnel decompression was the most common orthopedic surgery (recorded in 49/245 patients [20.0%]), but orthopedic surgeries were uncommon overall. Our findings highlight the need for routine monitoring of orthopedic manifestations using multiple assessment types in patients with MPS II to help inform clinical decision-making and improve patient quality of life. They also underline the contribution of factors other than orthopedic manifestations to the walking ability of patients with MPS II.

Soccer players with chronic ankle instability (CAI) may stabilize their supporting leg by the proximal joint to compensate for the ankle instability during kicking motion. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of leg and joint stiffness of the supporting leg during side-foot kicking in soccer players with CAI. Twenty-four male collegiate-level soccer players with and without CAI participated in this study. The kinematic and kinetic data were obtained using a three-dimensional motion analysis system. Leg stiffness and joint (hip, knee, and ankle) stiffness in the sagittal and frontal planes were calculated and analyzed. The results clarified that soccer players with CAI (0.106 ± 0.053 Nm/°) had greater knee stiffness in knee adduction during the kicking cycle compared to those without CAI (0.066 ± 0.030 Nm/°; p = 0.046), whereas no characteristic differences were observed in knee stiffness in knee flexion and hip and ankle stiffness (p > 0.05). Knee stiffness is believed to occur to compensate for ankle joint instability in the supporting leg. Therefore, adjusting knee stiffness to accommodate ankle joint instability is crucial for maintaining kicking performance. Based on results of this study, it may be important to consider training and exercises focused on joint coordination to improve knee stiffness in soccer players with CAI.

Ankle joint stiffness and viscosity are fundamental mechanical descriptions that govern the movement of the body and impact an individual\'s walking ability. Hence, these internal properties of a joint have been increasingly used to evaluate the effects of pathology (e.g., stroke) and in the design and control of robotic and prosthetic devices. However, the reliability of these measurements is currently unclear, which is important for translation to clinical use.
Can we reliably measure the mechanical impedance parameters of the ankle while standing and walking?
Eighteen able-bodied individuals volunteered to be tested on two different days separated by at least 24 h. Participants received several small random ankle dorsiflexion perturbations while standing and during the stance phase of walking using a custom-designed robotic platform. Three-dimensional motion capture cameras and a 6-component force plate were used to quantify ankle joint motions and torque responses during normal and perturbed conditions. Ankle mechanical impedance was quantified by computing participant-specific ensemble averages of changes in ankle angle and torque due to perturbation and fitting a second-order parametric model consisting of stiffness, viscosity, and inertia. The test-retest reliability of each parameter was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). We also computed the minimal detectable change (MDC) for each impedance parameter to establish the smallest amount of change that falls outside the measurement error of the instrument.
In standing, the reliability of stiffness, viscosity, and inertia was good to excellent (ICCs=0.67-0.91). During walking, the reliability of stiffness and viscosity was good to excellent (ICCs=0.74-0.84) while that of inertia was fair to good (ICCs=0.47-0.68). The MDC for a single subject ranged from 20%- 65% of the measurement mean but was higher (>100%) for inertia during walking.
Results indicate that dynamic measures of ankle joint impedance were generally reliable and could serve as an adjunct clinical tool for evaluating gait impairments.

A critical missing component in the study of real-world falls is the ability to accurately determine impact forces resulting from the fall. Subject-specific rigid body dynamic (RBD) models calibrated to video captured falls can quantify impact forces and provide additional insights into injury risk factors. RBD models were developed based on five backward falls captured on surveillance video in long-term care facilities in British Columbia, Canada. Model joint stiffness and initial velocities were calibrated to match the kinematics of the fall and contact forces were calculated. The effect of joint stiffnesses (neck, lumbar spine, hip, and knee joint) on head contact forces were determined by modifying the calibrated stiffness values ±25%. Fall duration, fall trajectories, and maximum velocities showed a close match between fall events and simulations. The maximum value of pelvic velocity difference between Kinovea (an open-source software 2D digitization software) and Madymo multibody modeling was found to be 6% ± 21.58%. Our results demonstrate that neck and hip stiffness values have a non-significant yet large effect on head contact force (t(3) = 1, p = 0.387 and t(3) = 2, p = 0.138), while lower effects were observed for knee stiffness, and the effect of lumbar spine stiffness was negligible. The subject-specific fall simulations constructed from real world video captured falls allow for direct quantification of force outcomes of falls and may have applications in improving the assessment of fall-induced injury risks and injury prevention methods.