UNASSIGNED: Anterior combined latissimus dorsi and teres major (aLDTM) tendon transfer has shown promise as a treatment for anterior superior irreparable rotator cuff tears (ASIRCTs). Our study aimed to compare aLDTM clinical outcomes for ASIRCTs between young and elderly patients.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study reviewed data from patients who underwent aLDTM tendon transfer for ASIRCTs. Exclusion criteria were unavailability for assessment, <2-year follow-up, or loss to follow-up. Clinical evaluations included visual analog scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), active range of motion (aROM), strength, and complications. Radiologic assessments included acromiohumeral distance, Hamada classification, and integrity of transferred tendon. Patients were divided into group total (all ages), group old (≥70 years), and group young (≤60 years).
UNASSIGNED: A total of 123 patients were enrolled with 39 in group young (mean age, 56.6±4.9 years) and 27 in group old (mean age, 73.6±2.3 years). Postoperatively, both groups showed significant improvements in VAS, ASES, and SANE scores and improved aROM for forward elevation, abduction, and internal rotation. No significant differences were noted between the groups. Strength increment was not significantly different between the groups. In comparison to the total cohort, both group young and group old demonstrated comparable results in VAS, ASES, and SANE scores and in aROM and radiological assessments. Furthermore, similar rates of complications, including re-tears and postoperative infections, were observed across all three groups.
UNASSIGNED: Our study highlights the effectiveness of aLDTM transfer for ASIRCTs with minimal glenohumeral arthritis, demonstrating similar outcomes in both Group Young and group old patients. Moreover, patients in these distinct age groups showed comparable clinical results when compared to Group Total. Level of evidence: III.

OBJECTIVE: To compare side-to-side superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with over-the-top SCR in terms of functional outcomes, pain relief and allograft survival rates.
METHODS: Patients who had undergone arthroscopic dermal allograft SCR for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears and clinical follow-up for ≥2 years were recruited. All patients underwent postoperative assessment with routine radiographic analysis for acromiohumeral distances, ultrasound imaging 1 and 3 months after SCR and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at least 12 months after SCR. The outcome measures were visual analogue scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores.
RESULTS: SCR was performed in 56 patients including side-to-side SCR in 32 and over-the-top SCR in 24. Postoperative MRI showed that the grafts were intact in 46 patients (82.1%; 26 who underwent side-to-side SCR and 20 who underwent over-the-top SCR). The proportion of nonhealing grafts in the over-the-top group was significantly higher with concomitant subscapularis tears (60% vs. 5.3%; p = 0.02). VAS scores and functional outcomes improved postoperatively in both groups and postoperative VAS (1.4 vs. 1.7; n.s.), Constant (74.8 vs. 76.0; n.s.), mean ASES (87.4 vs. 89.1; n.s.) and mean SANE (81.7 vs. 84.3; n.s.) scores did not differ significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: For massive rotator cuff tears, over-the-top and side-to-side SCR achieve similar pain relief and functional improvement, and the rate of healing allografts is high. However, over-the-top SCR is not recommended for massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears with repairable subscapularis tendon tears due to a higher nonhealing rate.
METHODS: Level III.

UNASSIGNED: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has revolutionized the treatment landscape for a spectrum of shoulder pathologies, extending its indications from rotator cuff arthropathy to encompass irreparable rotator cuff lesions, fractures, inflammatory arthritis, and tumors. However, the exponential increase in RTSA usage has brought a proportional rise in associated complications, with dislocation being one of the most common early post-operative complications.
UNASSIGNED: This case report details a 65-year-old right-hand dominant male patient presenting with chronic pain and weakness in the right shoulder, diagnosed with advanced glenohumeral arthritis and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. The patient underwent a Bony Increased- Offset RTSA (BIO-RTSA) procedure, coupled with subscapularis repair. Postoperatively, the patient experienced pain and instability, culminating in an atraumatic anterior dislocation at 4 months. Despite conservative management, recurrent dislocations persisted. Revision surgery was performed with an increase in the linear component size for containment. About 1 year postoperative of the revision surgery, recurrent dislocation reoccurred. Re-revision surgery was performed with secondary pectoralis major (PM) transfer for subscapularis deficiency due to re-tear from recurrent dislocation, and with an increased humeral tray size for better containment. About 1-year and 6-month post-operative to the re-revision surgery, the patient achieved restored stability, improved range of motion, and reported satisfaction with the outcome.
UNASSIGNED: This case report underscores the challenges of managing recurrent anterior dislocation after RTSA. The successful use of secondary PM transfer highlights its efficacy as a salvage procedure in restoring stability for persistent anterior dislocation after RTSA. Yet, further clinical studies are warranted to establish the role of such interventions in the management for RTSA-associated complications.
UNASSIGNED: Case report.

UNASSIGNED: Repairing massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) can often be technically challenging due to tendon retraction, bursal fibrosis, and muscular fatty infiltration that usually occurs, often resulting in poor outcomes and an unpredictable prognosis. Although some other surgical management options have been reported, there is a lack of literature supporting tendon transfers in the presence of combined anterior and posterior-superior irreparable rotator cuff tears. We describe a case where a combined transfer of the latissimus dorsi and lower trapezius tendons was employed to treat an MRCT affecting the anterior and posterior superior portions of the rotator cuff.
METHODS: A 64-year-old male presented significant pain and limited range of motion in the right shoulder following a traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation seven months prior. MRI showed retracted tears (> 5 cm) of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis tendons with significant fatty infiltration (Goutallier IV). The patient underwent an open transfer of the lower trapezius tendon to the greater tuberosity and the latissimus dorsi to the lesser tuberosity. At the final follow-up, 2.5 years postoperatively, the patient exhibited a painless functional range of motion and could resume daily activities.
UNASSIGNED: Although there are alternative surgical options available, the positive outcomes observed in the presented case may be attributed to the restoration of rotational strength and the re-establishment of force coupling across the shoulder.
CONCLUSIONS: This report describes the successful implementation of a surgical treatment option for managing MRCT affecting the anterior and posterior superior portions of the rotator cuff.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) often deteriorate shoulder function, necessitating careful consideration of treatment approaches. While reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is the first line of treatment in patients with arthropathy, preserving the joint is crucial for highly demand patients without arthritis. For those patients, various tendon transfer techniques have been established to address different types of IRCTs, including lower trapezius tendon (LTT) transfer for posterior superior IRCTs (PSIRCTs) and middle trapezius tendon (MTT) transfer for isolated supraspinatus IRCTs (ISIRCTs).
UNASSIGNED: A 66-year-old male with persistent right shoulder pain and weakness for 2 years, diagnosed with PSIRCTs, sought an alternative to RTSA due to occupational concerns as a restaurant owner. Preoperatively, patients showed limited range of motion (ROM) and weakness, especially in forward elevation (FE) and external rotation (ER). Radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan indicated superior humeral head translation without advanced arthritis and concurrent tears in the supraspinatus and infraspinatus with atrophy. After the consultation, patients underwent a combined transfer of LTT and MTT with a split Achilles tendon allograft in Y-configuration. By postoperative 1 year, the patient exhibited notable improvement, including reduced pain (VAS 4-2), enhanced function (ASES 50-83, Constant 42-78), and increased ROM (FE, 120°-160° and ER, 10°-40°). Radiographic assessments demonstrated an increased in acromiohumeral distance without arthritic progression. Post-operative MRI confirmed tendon integrity, and the patient successfully resumed work at 6 months.
UNASSIGNED: A combined transfer of the MTT and LTT with a split Achilles tendon allograft in Y-configuration has been shown to alleviate pain, enhance functional scores, and improve the ROM in patients with PSIRCTs without arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is often used to surgically address massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCT) without arthritis. The impact of prior attempted rotator cuff repair (RCR) on outcomes is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to compare functional outcomes, range of motion, and complications in patients with a MIRCT without arthritis who underwent RSA as a primary procedure versus after prior RCR.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed on RSA for a MIRCT. The search was conducted from February to March of 2022 using the MEDLINE database. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs), range of motion (ROM), and complications were extracted. These outcomes were weighted and analysed based on whether the reverse was performed as the primary procedure or following a prior RCR.
RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the analysis, consisting of 343 cases in the primary RSA group and 95 cases in the prior RCR group, with a mean follow-up of 40.8 months. There were no demographic differences between cohorts. Postoperative PROs and ROM were comparable between groups, although the prior RCR group had a higher maximal percentage of improvement (MPI%) for the Constant-Murley Score and Simple Shoulder Test. There was a higher risk for complications (relative risk [RR] 6.26) and revisions (RR 3.91) in the prior RCR group. The most common complications were acromial stress fractures and prosthetic dislocation.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing RSA for MIRCT following a prior RCR have functional outcomes that are largely comparable to those who have a primary RSA, but they may be at higher risk of complications and revision.
METHODS: IV.

UNASSIGNED: Excellent short-term outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have been reported, but longer term outcomes in the existing literature are sparse and vary widely. The purpose of this study is to systematically assess the existing literature to quantify functional outcomes and complication rates after RSA at a minimum of five years of follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses-compliant systematic literature search of the PubMed and Embase databases was undertaken. Studies reporting outcomes after primary RSA for nontrauma-related indications with a minimum of 5-year follow-up were included.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 20 studies satisfied all inclusion criteria. This represented 1591 shoulders in 1556 patients (32.1% males), with a mean age of 70.2 ± 5.0 years and mean follow-up of 8.8 years, or 106.2 ± 30.1 months (60-243). At final follow-up, the mean reported Constant Murley score was 62.1 ± 5.0 (49.0-83.0). The mean adjusted Constant Murley score was 83.5 ± 12.5 (58-111.9). The mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 81.8 ± 4.6, while the mean subjective shoulder value was 74.6 ± 6.4. Overall, 88% of patients rated their satisfaction as either good or very good. The range of active forward flexion, abduction, external, and internal rotation were respectively, 126° ± 13°, 106° ± 11°, 22° ± 11°, and 6° ± 2°. The overall rate of revision surgery was 4.9% (0%-45.5%). Regarding complications, the rate of prosthetic joint infection was 4.3% (0%-26.7%), shoulder dislocation was 3.7% (0%-20.4%), and acromial fracture was 2.0% (0%-8.8%). At final follow-up, 30.9% of shoulders had some degree of scapular notching.
UNASSIGNED: This systematic review shows that RSA results in high satisfaction rates, good clinical outcomes, as well as modest complication and revision rates at minimum 5-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: While the well-established correlation between increased muscle volume and enhanced muscle strength is widely recognized, there have been no studies assessing volumetric muscle changes in transfer surgery in the shoulder. This study aimed to evaluate changes in transferred muscle volume and their clinical implications in anterior latissimus dorsi and teres major (aLDTM) tendon transfer in patients with anterior superior irreparable rotator cuff tears (ASIRCTs).
METHODS: The study retrospectively examined 40 patients who underwent aLDTM tendon transfers for ASIRCTs between August 2018 and January 2022. Using ImageJ software, the LDTM muscle was segmented in T2-weighted oblique axial images, and total muscle volume (tLDTMV) of both immediate and postoperative 1-year were calculated. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between ΔtLDTMV and ΔASES scores, Δactive-ROM, and Δstrength.
RESULTS: The current study revealed an 11.4% increase in tLDTMV at 1-year postoperative. Patients were grouped based on postoperative ASES score: Group 1 (Optimal, n = 17) and Group 2 (Suboptimal, n = 23). Although tLDTMVimmediate postoperative values were similar between groups (P = 0.954), tLDTMV1-year postoperative value was significantly higher in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (P = 0.021). In correlation analysis, ΔtLDTMV showed significant correlations with ΔASES score (r = 0.525, P < 0.001), ΔaROM of forward elevation (FE) (r = 0.476, P = 0.002), ΔaROM of internal rotation (IR) at back (r = 0.398, P = 0.011), Δstrength of FE (r = 0.328, P = 0.039), Δ strength of IR at 90° abduction (r = 0.331, P = 0.037), and IR at side (r = 0.346, P = 0.029).
CONCLUSIONS: Significant increase in tLDTMV was observed at 1-year postoperative for ASIRCT patients. Notably, greater ΔtLDTMV exhibited a correlation with better ASES scores, increased aROM and strength in both FE and IR. Nevertheless, further research is required by employing more robust standardized measurement tools and a larger sample size.

BACKGROUND: Margin convergence (MC) and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) are common treatment options for irreparable rotator cuff tears in younger patients, although they differ in associated costs and operative times. The purpose of this study was to compare range of motion, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and reoperation rates following MC and SCR. We hypothesized superior outcomes after SCR relative to MC regarding functional outcomes, subjective measures, and reoperation rates.
METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective review of 59 patients from 3 surgeons treating irreparable rotator cuff tears with either MC (n = 28) or SCR (n = 31) and minimum 1-year follow-up from 2014-2019. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), active forward flexion (FF), external rotation (ER), retear rate, and conversion rate to reverse shoulder arthroplasty were evaluated. t tests and χ2 tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively (P < .05).
RESULTS: Baseline demographics, range of motion, and magnetic resonance imaging findings were similar between groups. Average follow-up was 31.5 months and 17.8 months for the MC and SCR groups, respectively (P < .001). The MC and SCR groups had similar postoperative FF (151° ± 26° vs. 142° ± 38°; P = .325) and ER (48° ± 12° vs. 46° ± 11°; P = .284), with both groups not improving significantly from their preoperative baselines. However, both cohorts demonstrated significant improvements in VAS score (MC: 7.3 to 2.5; SCR: 6.4 to 1.0) and SSV (MC: 54% to 82%; SCR: 38% to 87%). There were no significant differences in postoperative VAS scores, SSV, and rates of retear or rates of conversion to arthroplasty between the MC and SCR groups. In patients with preoperative pseudoparesis (FF < 90°), SCR (n = 9) resulted in greater postoperative FF than MC (n = 5) (141° ± 38° vs. 67° ± 24°; P = .002).
CONCLUSIONS: Both MC and SCR demonstrated excellent postoperative outcomes in the setting of massive irreparable rotator cuff tear, with significant improvements in PROs and no significant differences in range of motion. Specifically for patients with preoperative pseudoparesis, SCR was more effective in restoring forward elevation. Further long-term studies are needed to compare outcomes and establish appropriate indications.