A 43-year-old Japanese male, who had undergone open liver surgery for tumor resection, presented with decreased hemoglobin levels on Day 13 post-emergency-release transfusion of 16 units of Fy(a +) red blood cells. As the anemia was accompanied by increased lactate dehydrogenase, indirect bilirubin, and reticulocytes, as well as decreased haptoglobin, it was attributed to hemolysis. In the diagnostic workup for hemolytic reaction, the direct antiglobulin test result for IgG was positive and the antibody dissociated from the patient\'s peripheral red blood cells was identified as anti-Fya (titer, 4). The hemolytic reaction was transient (approximately 10 days), of moderate severity, and did not result in any obvious organ damage. However, a single compatible red blood cell transfusion of 2 units was required on Day 17 after the causative transfusion. Notably, HLA typing revealed that the patient carried the HLA-DRB1*04:03 allele, which has been implicated in immunogenicity and induction of anti-Fya response in Caucasian populations. In summary, this is the first documented case of definitive anti-Fya-mediated delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction associated with HLA-DRB1*04:03 in the Japanese population.

A 74-year-old woman with a history of pregnancies, but without previous transfusions, received a red blood cell transfusion for aplstic anemia. She lost consciousness due to severe anemia two weeks later and was transported by ambulance to our hospital. Delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction (DHTR) was diagnosed based on the detection of anti-E antibody and positive E antigen of the previously transfused product. A transfusion of E antigen-negative red cell products was performed. However, DHTR due to anti-c antibody developed 16 d after the transfusion of a c antigen-positive product. Based on the onset of ≥14 d after the transfusions and the detection of a causative IgM-type antibody, DHTR due to a primary immune response was diagnosed. Because the incidence of DHTR is low, physicians rarely experience it in clinical practice. However, in our case, DHTR due to a primary immune response, which is even rarer in DHTR cases, developed twice within a short period. A history of transfusion and pregnancy as well as preexisting irregular antibodies have been identified as risk factors for DHTR. Thus, more attention should be paid to the risk of DHTR redevelopment by repeated transfusions.

We report a case of a patient with high titer anti-H antibody showing broad thermal amplitude and variable reactivities against group A red cells. A 62-year-old Korean female was diagnosed with diffuse large B cell lymphoma involving multiple organs. Her ABO/RhD type was A+ and her genotype was ABO*A.01.01/ABO*O.01.02. Antibody screening test (AST) and antibody identification test (IDT) were strongly positive for all reagent cells. Anti-human globulin (AHG) test revealed an antibody titer of 1:256 for 37 °C phase and trace positivity for poly- and mono-specific C3d. Reactivity was stronger for O+ red cells than that for A+ red cells across all temperatures tested (4 °C, room temperature (RT) and 37 °C). This was also found for AHG phase. Anti-IH was ruled out based on agglutination of O+ cord cells (CCs). Antibody was determined as IgM anti-H after DTT treatment. Three batches of 10 A+ red cells from random donors were tested with three consecutive serums for crossmatching using tube method. Interestingly, out of thirty A+ red cells tested, 20 cells at RT, 11 cells at 37 °C and 11 cells in the AHG phase showed reactivity of greater than 2+. The patient was transfused with 6 units of packed RBCs subsequently. Chemotherapy (R-CHOP regimen) and Helicobacter pylori eradication were then started. Her antibody titer gradually decreased following such treatment. In conclusion, we identified a case of patient with high titer anti-H with broad thermal amplitude, suggesting that anti-H antibodies might need to be considered for cases with pan-agglutination in AST and IDT.

Liver transplant procedure acts as a challenge for transfusion services in terms of specialized blood components, serologic problems, and immunologic effects of transfusion. Red cell alloimmunization in patients awaiting a liver transplant complicate the process by undue delay or unavailability of compatible red blood cell units. Compatible blood units can be provided by well-equipped immunohematology laboratory, which has expertise in resolving these serological problems. This report illustrates resolution of a case with multiple alloantibodies using standard techniques, particularly rare antisera. Our case re-emphasizes the need for universal antibody screening in all patients as part of pretransfusion testing, which helps to identify atypical antibodies and plan for appropriate transfusion support well in time. We recommend that the centers, especially the ones that perform complex procedures like solid organ transplants and hematological transplants should have the necessary immunohematological reagents including rare antisera to resolve complex cases of multiple antibodies as illustrated in this case.

BACKGROUND: Unexpected allo-antibody identification is difficult serological test requiring in-depth knowledge of antibody behavior, identification rules, knowledge of zygosity of antigens and dosage phenomenon. Software which uses an algorithm based on characteristics of antibodies is now available to interpret specificity of allo-antibody. A study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of one such software (Resolvigen) for antibody identification compared with manual antibody identification method.
METHODS: The study was a retrospective observational study where 238 allo-antibody results were re-evaluated using Resolvigen software (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Johnson and Johnson, Raritan, NJ, USA) and agreement between manual and software approaches was studied. Resolvigen software was also evaluated for usefulness, ease of use and predicted future usage by administering investigators a questionnaire with Likert scale.
RESULTS: Agreement between the results of manual and automated methods ranged from 98.6% for single antibody to 65% for two antibodies (p = 0.000). Resolvigen software came out as very useful, easy to use, and with high predicted future usage.
CONCLUSIONS: This study concludes that Resolvigen can either replace manual method or be used as adjuvant to routine manual method.