调查使用侵入性图像和使用图像过程是否对治疗抑郁症有益,基于图像的干预(图像重新编写,IR)与更常用的基于言语的技术(认知重组,CR)。该研究不仅旨在测试IR作为抑郁症的简短模块化治疗的功效,但是要探索这种对图像的体验性使用是否会减轻抽象评价,沉思和担忧的言语过程。
41名被诊断为临床抑郁症并且还报告侵入性图像的参与者在被随机分配到IR组或CR的主动对照组之前接受了一次图像属性评估。然后他们每周接受三次治疗,治疗前后测量结果,以及两个月的随访。
结果表明,在缓解抑郁症方面,IR与CR同样有效。沉思的显著差异减少,治疗之间的担忧和经验性回避增加了对该技术经验性质的支持,而且可能,从抽象评估的处理模式中解脱出来。
只使用了自我报告措施,由一名临床医生进行少量治疗。
这些发现支持了意象模式在抑郁症治疗中的治疗潜力,与认知重组相比,随着时间的推移,似乎会带来更显著的情绪变化(在CUHK-NTECCRECRef联合注册的临床试验。不。2015.458)。
To investigate whether working with intrusive images and the use of imagery processes would be beneficial to treating depression, an imagery-based intervention (imagery rescripting, IR) was compared with a more commonly used verbal-based technique (cognitive restructuring, CR). The study aimed not only to test the efficacy of IR as a brief modular treatment for depression, but to explore whether such experiential use of imagery would alleviate the abstract-evaluative, verbal processes of rumination and worry.
Forty-one participants diagnosed with clinical depression and who also reported intrusive images underwent one assessment session of imagery properties before they were randomly assigned to an IR group or to an active control group of CR. They then received three weekly sessions of treatment, and outcomes were measured before and after treatment, as well as at two-month follow-up.
The results showed that IR was equally if not more effective than CR in alleviating depression. Significant differential reductions in rumination, worry and experiential avoidance between treatments added support to the technique\'s experiential nature, and possibly, a defusing out of an abstract-evaluative mode of processing.
Only self-report measures were used, with a small number of treatment sessions by one clinician.
The findings support the therapeutic potential of imagery modalities in the treatment of depression, which compared to cognitive restructuring, appear to bring about more significant emotional change with time (clinical trial registered at the Joint CUHK-NTEC CREC Ref. No. 2015.458).