intrinsic subtype

内在亚型
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OncotypeDX乳房复发评分®测试(ODx)是一种基因谱分析测定,可预测辅助化疗对早期激素受体(HR)阳性和人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性乳腺癌的益处。同时,为了避免病人不必要的经济负担,许多研究试图建立替代ODx使用传统的临床病理因素,但是这些还没有成功。因此,我们回顾性调查了临床病理因素以建立ODx的替代方法.
    对114名接受ODx的日本妇女的数据进行回顾性检查,以研究ODx复发评分(RS)与临床病理特征之间的关系,包括免疫组织化学评估的MUC1染色模式。0-25的RS被定义为低,和26-100一样高。
    90例患者(79%)具有低RS,24例患者(21%)具有高RS。单因素分析显示肿瘤分级低,孕激素受体(PgR)高表达,和低Ki67标记指数(LI)与低RS显著相关(分别为p=0.025,p<0.001和p<0.001)。具有MUC1染色顶端模式的肿瘤也经常具有低RS(p=0.024)。在多变量分析中,PgR表达和Ki67LI是与RS相关的独立因素(两者p<0.001)。当ODx结果与这两个因素的组合进行分类时,PgR高组和Ki67低组(51例中的1例)中只有2%具有高RS。
    PgR表达和Ki67LI是与RS相关的独立因素。MUC1染色模式也有可能成为有用的标记物。我们认为,继续尝试确定不太可能从ODx中受益的患者至关重要。
    UNASSIGNED: Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score® test (ODx) is a gene profiling assay predicting the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. Meanwhile, to avoid unnecessary financial burden on the patient, many studies have attempted to establish alternatives to ODx using conventional clinicopathological factors, but these have not yet been successful. Thus, we retrospectively investigated clinicopathological factors to establish alternatives to ODx.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from 114 Japanese women who underwent ODx were retrospectively examined to investigate the relationship between ODx recurrence score (RS) and clinicopathological features, including MUC1 staining patterns on immunohistochemical assessment. An RS of 0-25 was defined as low, and 26-100 as high.
    UNASSIGNED: Ninety patients (79%) had low RS and 24 patients (21%) had high RS. Univariate analysis revealed that low tumor grade, high progesterone receptor (PgR) expression, and low Ki67 labeling index (LI) were significantly associated with low RS (p=0.025, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively). Tumors with an apical pattern of MUC1 staining also frequently had a low RS (p=0.024). In multivariate analysis, PgR expression and Ki67 LI were independent factors associated with RS (p<0.001, for both). When the ODx results were categorized with a combination of these two factors, only 2% of the PgR-high and Ki67-low group (one in 51 cases) had a high RS.
    UNASSIGNED: PgR expression and Ki67 LI were independent factors correlated with RS. MUC1 staining pattern also has the potential to be a useful marker. We believe that it is crucial to continue attempts to identify patients who are unlikely to benefit from ODx.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:STK3在维持细胞稳态方面具有核心作用,扩散,增长,和凋亡。以前,我们研究了MCF-7乳腺癌细胞中STK3/MST2与雌激素受体之间的功能联系。为了扩大调查,这项研究使用公开数据评估了STK3在乳腺癌固有亚型中的高表达和相关基因.
    方法:使用描述性和多变量分析来分析临床病理特征与STK3高表达之间的关系。
    结果:STK3在乳腺癌中的表达增加与更高的病理分期显着相关,在乳腺癌的内在亚型中观察到不同的表达水平。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,与STK3低表达的乳腺癌患者相比,高表达STK3的乳腺癌患者生存率较低(p<0.05)。多变量分析揭示了STK3表达与IDC患者生存率之间的强相关性。显示较低表达的风险比。在TCGA数据集中,肿瘤死亡患者的风险比为0.56(95%CI0.34-0.94,p=0.029),所有死亡患者为0.62(95%CI0.42-0.92,p=0.017)。此外,在METABRIC数据集中,肿瘤死亡患者的风险比为0.76(95%CI0.64-0.91,p=0.003).根据GSEA结果,基于统计学显著性(FDR<0.25和p<0.05)选择7个基因集。与STK3相关的加权和模型(WSM)衍生的前5%基因在基底中也具有较高的表达,而在腔A中具有较低的表达。
    结论:通过引入一种结合了GSEA和WSM的新型生物信息学方法,该研究成功确定了与STK3高表达相关的前5%基因。
    OBJECTIVE: STK3 has a central role in maintaining cell homeostasis, proliferation, growth, and apoptosis. Previously, we investigated the functional link between STK3/MST2, and estrogen receptor in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. To expand the investigation, this study evaluated STK3\'s higher expression and associated genes in breast cancer intrinsic subtypes using publicly available data.
    METHODS: The relationship between clinical pathologic features and STK3 high expression was analyzed using descriptive and multivariate analysis.
    RESULTS: Increased STK3 expression in breast cancer was significantly associated with higher pathological cancer stages, and a different expression level was observed in the intrinsic subtypes of breast cancer. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that breast cancer with high STK3 had a lower survival rate in IDC patients than that with low STK3 expression (p < 0.05). The multivariate analysis unveiled a strong correlation between STK3 expression and the survival rate among IDC patients, demonstrating hazard ratios for lower expression. In the TCGA dataset, the hazard ratio was 0.56 (95% CI 0.34-0.94, p = 0.029) for patients deceased with tumor, and 0.62 (95% CI 0.42-0.92, p = 0.017) for all deceased patients. Additionally, in the METABRIC dataset, the hazard ratio was 0.76 (95% CI 0.64-0.91, p = 0.003) for those deceased with tumor. From GSEA outcomes 7 gene sets were selected based on statistical significance (FDR < 0.25 and p < 0.05). Weighted Sum model (WSM) derived top 5% genes also have higher expression in basal and lower in luminal A in association with STK3.
    CONCLUSIONS: By introducing a novel bioinformatics approach that combines GSEA and WSM, the study successfully identified the top 5% of genes associated with higher expression of STK3.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自2000年代初以来,使用免疫组织化学染色(IHC)和荧光原位杂交(FISH)将乳腺癌分为分子亚型。然而,最近的研究表明基因表达测试,特别是Prosigna®微阵列50预测分析(PAM50),提供了更准确的分类方法。在这项回顾性研究中,我们比较了IHC/FISH和PAM50检测的结果.我们还检查了各种PAM50参数对总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的影响。
    结果:我们分析了42个单侧乳腺癌样本,18分为管腔A,10为管腔B,8为人类表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阳性,和6使用PAM50作为基底样。有趣的是,42个样品中的17个(40.47%)显示组织病理学评估与PAM50分类器之间的不一致结果。虽然常规IHC/FISH导致每个亚型中四分之一到三分之一的样本存在分类差异,所有基底样肿瘤均被错误分类.激素受体阳性肿瘤(危险率:8.7803;p=0.0085)和10年复发风险评分较高的患者(危险率:1.0539;p=0.0201)的OS和PFS较短。
    结论:我们的研究支持对乳腺癌分子亚型的现有理解,并强调临床特征和分子亚型之间的重叠。这些发现强调了基因表达谱的价值,例如PAM50,在改善乳腺癌患者的治疗决策方面。
    Breast cancer has been categorized into molecular subtypes using immunohistochemical staining (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) since the early 2000s. However, recent research suggests that gene expression testing, specifically Prosigna® Prediction Analysis of Microarray 50 (PAM50), provides more accurate classification methods. In this retrospective study, we compared the results of IHC/FISH and PAM50 testing. We also examined the impact of various PAM50 parameters on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
    We analyzed 42 unilateral breast cancer samples, with 18 classified as luminal A, 10 as luminal B, 8 as Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, and 6 as basal-like using PAM50. Interestingly, 17 out of the 42 samples (40.47%) showed discordant results between histopathological assessment and the PAM50 classifier. While routine IHC/FISH resulted in classification differences for a quarter to a third of samples within each subtype, all basal-like tumors were misclassified. Hormone receptor-positive tumors (hazard rate: 8.7803; p = 0.0085) and patients who had higher 10-year recurrence risk scores (hazard rate: 1.0539; p = 0.0201) had shorter OS and PFS.
    Our study supports the existing understanding of molecular subtypes in breast cancer and emphasizes the overlap between clinical characteristics and molecular subtyping. These findings underscore the value of gene expression profiling, such as PAM50, in improving treatment decisions for breast cancer patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于各种固有亚型,MRI评估腋窝淋巴结(ALN)在乳腺癌中的价值和实用性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是测试结合乳腺MRI和临床病理因素来识别ALN转移的低风险组并提高诊断性能的潜力。
    方法:回顾性收集了2009年1月至2021年12月在一家机构进行的原发性可手术浸润性乳腺癌术前乳腺MRI和术后病理报告。确定ALN状态的MRI和病理的一致性,并分析了不同的内在亚型。设计了逐步策略以提高ALN转移的MRI阴性预测值(NPV)。
    结果:纳入2473例患者。MRI在检测转移性ALN方面的诊断性能在内在亚型之间存在显着差异(p=0.007)。多因素分析确定肿瘤大小和组织学类型是ALN转移的独立预测因素。HER-2(MRI肿瘤大小≤2cm)患者,或TNBC(MRI肿瘤大小≤2厘米)发现MRI-ALN-NPV高于90%,这些假病例仅限于低腋窝肿瘤负荷。
    结论:MRI预测ALN转移的诊断性能因固有亚型而异。合并术前临床病理因素和固有亚型可增加ALNMRINPV,并进一步确定一些低ALN转移风险的患者组,高净现值,即使在假阴性病例中,腋窝疾病的负担也很低。
    BACKGROUND: The value and utility of axillary lymph node (ALN) evaluation with MRI in breast cancer were not clear for various intrinsic subtypes. The aim of the current study is to test the potential of combining breast MRI and clinicopathologic factors to identify low-risk groups of ALN metastasis and improve diagnostic performance.
    METHODS: Patients with primary operable invasive breast cancer with pre-operative breast MRI and post-operative pathologic reports were retrospectively collected from January 2009 to December 2021 in a single institute. The concordance of MRI and pathology of ALN status were determined, and also analyzed in different intrinsic subtypes. A stepwise strategy was designed to improve MRI-negative predictive value (NPV) on ALN metastasis.
    RESULTS: 2473 patients were enrolled. The diagnostic performance of MRI in detecting metastatic ALN was significantly different between intrinsic subtypes (p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis identified tumor size and histologic type as independent predictive factors of ALN metastases. Patients with HER-2 (MRI tumor size ≤ 2 cm), or TNBC (MRI tumor size ≤ 2 cm) were found to have MRI-ALN-NPV higher than 90%, and these false cases were limited to low axillary tumor burden.
    CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic performance of MRI to predict ALN metastasis varied according to the intrinsic subtype. Combined pre-operative clinicopathologic factors and intrinsic subtypes may increase ALN MRI NPV, and further identify some groups of patients with low risks of ALN metastasis, high NPV, and low burdens of axillary disease even in false-negative cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    未经批准:CDK4/6抑制剂(CDKi),即,palbociclib,ribociclib,和abemaciclib,联合芳香化酶抑制剂(AI)或氟维司群是激素受体阳性(HR+)/HER2阴性(neg)转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的标准一线/二线治疗方案.然而,一个特定的CDKi的选择是任意的,基于医生对药物的经验,毒性概况,和病人的喜好,而用于最佳患者选择的生物标志物迄今尚未建立。此外,在有内脏危象的临床表现的情况下,仍然推荐预先化疗,尽管没有证据表明化疗方案优于基于CDKi的方案。palbociclib和ribociclib关键试验的近期相关生物标志物分析显示,HR+/HER2-negMBC可能根据分子内在亚型做出不同的反应。管腔A和B肿瘤对CDKi都敏感,基底对内分泌治疗不敏感,不管CDKi,和HER2富集的肿瘤显示仅在基于瑞博西尼的治疗中获益。
    未经证实:我们特此介绍一例女性患者的临床病例,患者为复发性HR+/HER2-negMBC伴骨骼和结节病变,以淋巴管炎癌病的形式出现内脏危象,并被诊断为富含HER2的分子肿瘤,成功治疗前期瑞博西尼+氟维司群。患者经历了淋巴管炎的完全症状和放射学缓解,部分反应为最佳反应。根据RECIST1.1标准。无进展生存期(PFS)为20个月,与瑞博西尼+氟维司群关键试验中观察到的中位PFS一致,where,然而,有内脏危象的患者被排除在外.
    UNASSIGNED:该临床病例在现实环境中证实,在HR+/HER2-neg疾病中可以发现非腔亚型,并且可能在转移环境中具有潜在的治疗意义。在基于CDKi的方案时代,在内脏危象的情况下,它也质疑预先化疗的建议。这些问题值得在前瞻性和更大规模的研究中进一步评估。
    UNASSIGNED: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDKi), namely, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, combined with either an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant are the standard first/second line for hormone receptor-positive(HR+)/HER2-negative(neg) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the choice of one specific CDKi is arbitrary and based on the physician\'s experience with the drug, toxicity profile, and patient\'s preferences, whereas biomarkers for optimal patient selection have not been established so far. Moreover, upfront chemotherapy is still recommended in case of clinical presentation with visceral crisis, despite no evidence of superior benefit for chemotherapy regimens against CDKi-based regimens. Recent correlative biomarker analyses from pivotal trials of palbociclib and ribociclib showed that HR+/HER2-neg MBC might respond differently according to the molecular intrinsic subtype, with Luminal A and B tumors being sensitive to both CDKi, Basal-like being insensitive to endocrine therapy, irrespective of CDKi, and HER2-enriched tumors showing a benefit only with ribociclib-based therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: We hereby present a paradigmatic clinical case of a woman affected by a relapsed HR+/HER2-neg MBC with bone and nodal lesions, presenting with a visceral crisis in the form of lymphangitis carcinomatosis and diagnosed with a molecularly HER2-enriched tumor, successfully treated with upfront ribociclib + fulvestrant. The patient experienced a complete symptomatic and radiologic remission of the lymphangitis with a partial response as best response, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. The progression-free survival (PFS) was of 20 months, in line with the median PFS observed in the ribociclib + fulvestrant pivotal trial, where, however, patients with visceral crisis had been excluded.
    UNASSIGNED: This clinical case confirms in the real-world setting that non-luminal subtypes can be found in HR+/HER2-neg disease and may have potential therapeutic implications in the metastatic setting. It also questions the recommendation of upfront chemotherapy in the case of a visceral crisis in the era of CDKi-based regimens. These issues merit further evaluation in prospective and larger studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    内分泌治疗(ET),与CDK4/6抑制剂相关,代表HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌(mBC)的首选治疗。原发性或继发性内分泌抗性可能发展;然而,无法获得能够预测此类病症的经验证的生物标志物。一些研究表明HR+/HER2-mBC包含5种固有亚型。本系统综述的目的是分析内在亚型之间的潜在相关性,治疗效果,和患者的结果。在七项III期临床试验(EGF30008,BOLERO-2,PALOMA-2,3,MONALEESA-2,3,MONALEESA-2,3,7)中,用PAM50测定分析了用ET治疗的HR/HER2-mBC患者(pts)的固有亚型。非腔亚型在内分泌耐药患者和转移部位更为常见(与原发性肿瘤),从ET中受益较少,预后更差。其中,富含HER2的亚型与HER2+肿瘤相似,并且受益于添加抗HER2药物(拉帕替尼)和,出于不太明确的原因,ribociclib(palbociclib和依维莫司的未经证实的数据)。基底样亚型与三阴性肿瘤相似,让他们对化疗更敏感.固有亚型也不是静态的,而是可以随着疾病的演变而随时间变化。目前,内在亚型在临床实践中的治疗选择中没有决定性作用,但具有潜在的预后和预测价值,应进一步研究。
    Endocrine therapy (ET), associated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors, represents the first choice of treatment for HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Primary or secondary endocrine resistance could develop; however validated biomarkers capable of predicting such a conditions are not available. Several studies have shown that HR+/HER2- mBC comprises five intrinsic subtypes. The purpose of this systematic review was to analyze the potential correlations between intrinsic subtype, efficacy of treatment, and patient outcome. Five papers that analyzed the intrinsic subtype with PAM50 assay in patients (pts) with HR+/HER2- mBC treated with ET (alone or in combination) within seven phase III clinical trials (EGF30008, BOLERO-2, PALOMA-2,3, MONALEESA-2,3,7) were identified. Non-luminal subtypes are more frequent in endocrine-resistant pts and in metastatic sites (vs. primary tumors), have less benefit from ET, and worse prognosis. Among these, HER2-enriched subtypes are similar to HER2+ tumors and benefit from the addition of anti-HER2 agents (lapatinib) and, for less clear reasons, of ribociclib (unconfirmed data for palbociclib and everolimus). Basal-like subtypes are similar to triple-negative tumors, making them more sensitive to chemotherapy. The intrinsic subtype is also not static but can vary over time with the evolution of the disease. Currently, the intrinsic subtype does not play a decisive role in the choice of treatment in clinical practice, but has potential prognostic and predictive value that should be further investigated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在评估激素受体(HR)阳性和人类表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性(HR/HER2-)早期乳腺癌中基于RNA测序(RNA-seq)的不同分子分型方法和免疫状态的预后意义。
    方法:使用OncotypeDx复发评分(RS)的RNA-seq评估了87例HR/HER2-早期乳腺癌患者的基因表达谱,PAM50复发风险(ROR),和免疫评分。使用基于PAM50和IHC的雌激素受体检测确定内在肿瘤亚型,孕激素受体,Ki-67,表皮生长因子受体,和细胞角蛋白14和5/6。通过Cox回归分析无病生存期(DFS)和无远处转移生存期(DMFS)分析预后变量。
    结果:生存分析表明,与RS相比,ROR更好地预测复发和远处转移(对于DFS:ROR,P=0.000;RS,P=0.027;对于DMFS,ROR,P=0.047;RS,P=0.621)。HR+/HER2-早期乳腺癌患者被分类为管腔A,管腔B,HER2富集,和PAM50的基底样亚型。基底样亚组显示最短的DFS和DMFS。用于固有亚型分析的改良的基于IHC的替代将PAM50的一致性从66.7%提高到73.6%,特别是用于基底样亚型鉴定。高水平的TILs和免疫基因的高表达预示着不良预后。多因素Cox分析表明,基于IHC的基底样标志物是影响DMFS的唯一独立因素。
    结论:在早期HR+/HER2-乳腺癌中,通过PAM50ROR可以更好地评估预后,并且在内在亚型之间存在显著差异。改良的基于IHC的亚型可以提高PAM50的基底样亚型鉴定。高免疫状态和基于IHC的基底样标志物是负面预后因素。
    BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic significance of different molecular typing methods and immune status based on RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) in hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (HR + /HER2-) early-stage breast cancer and develop a modified immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based surrogate for intrinsic subtype analysis.
    METHODS: The gene expression profiles of samples from 87 HR + /HER2- early-stage breast cancer patients were evaluated using the RNA-seq of Oncotype Dx recurrence score (RS), PAM50 risk of recurrence (ROR), and immune score. Intrinsic tumor subtypes were determined using both PAM50- and IHC-based detection of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, epidermal growth factor receptor, and cytokeratins 14 and 5/6. Prognostic variables were analyzed through Cox regression analysis of disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).
    RESULTS: Survival analysis showed that ROR better predicted recurrence and distant metastasis compared to RS (for DFS: ROR, P = 0.000; RS, P = 0.027; for DMFS, ROR, P = 0.047; RS, P = 0.621). Patients with HR + /HER2- early-stage breast cancer was classified into the luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, and basal-like subtypes by PAM50. Basal-like subgroups showed the shortest DFS and DMFS. A modified IHC-based surrogate for intrinsic subtype analysis improved the concordance with PAM50 from 66.7% to 73.6%, particularly for basal-like subtype identification. High level of TILs and high expression of immune genes predicted poor prognosis. Multi-factor Cox analysis showed that IHC-based basal-like markers were the only independent factors affecting DMFS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis is better evaluated by PAM50 ROR in early-stage HR + /HER2- breast cancer and significantly differs among intrinsic subtypes. The modified IHC-based subtype can improve the basal-like subtype identification of PAM50. High immunity status and IHC-based basal-like markers are negative prognostic factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    乳腺癌患者的长期结局因分子亚型而异,HER2-E是最具侵略性的。临床实践的进展已经显著改变了HER2+乳腺癌的预后。个体化治疗的风险适应策略是必要的。基于临床病理因素的风险,鼓励采取降级方法。分子基因分型可以进一步准确定义抗HER2治疗敏感的HER2成瘾肿瘤。从而节省不必要的治疗。讨论了HER2乳腺癌从免疫化学到分子谱分析的转变。
    Long-term outcomes in breast cancer patients differ based on the molecular subtype, with HER2-E being the most aggressive one. Advances in clinical practice have dramatically shifted HER2+ breast cancer prognosis. Risk adapted strategies to individualize therapies are necessary. De-escalation approaches have been encouraged based on the risks of clinical-pathological factors. Molecular gene subtyping could further accurately define HER2 addicted tumours that are sensitive to anti-HER2 therapies, thus sparing unnecessary treatments. The transition from immunochemistry to molecular profiling in HER2+ breast cancer is discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogenous disease. For personalized medicine, it is essential to identify and classify tumor subtypes to develop effective therapeutic strategies. Although gene expression profiling has identified several TNBC subtypes, classification of these tumors remains complex. Most TNBCs exhibit an aggressive phenotype, but some rare types have a favorable clinical course. In this review, we summarize the classification and characteristics related to the various TNBC subtypes, including the rare types. Therapeutic methods that are suitable for each subtype are also discussed. Of the intrinsic breast cancer subtypes identified by gene expression analysis, the basal-like subtype specifically displayed decreased expression of an estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) cluster. We also present results that characterize the TNBC and basal-like phenotypes. TNBC may be categorized into four major classes : basal-like, immune-enriched, mesenchymal, and luminal androgen receptor. Therapeutic strategies for each subtype have been proposed along with newly approved targeted therapies for TNBC, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors. Understanding the classification of TNBC based on gene expression profiling in association with clinicopathological factors will facilitate accurate pathological diagnosis and effective treatment selection. J. Med. Invest. 68 : 213-219, August, 2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Breast cancer intrinsic subtypes have been identified based on the transcription of a predefined gene expression (GE) profiles and algorithm (prediction analysis of microarray 50 gene set, PAM50). The present study compared molecular subtyping with oligonucleotide microarray and NanoString nCounter assay. A total of 109 Taiwanese breast cancers (24 with adjacent normal breast tissues) were assayed with Affymetrix Human Genome U133 plus 2.0 microarrays and 144 were assayed with the NanoString nCounter while 64 patients were assayed for both platforms. Subtyping with the nearest centroid (single sample prediction (SSP)) was performed, and 16 out of 24 (67%) matched normal breasts were categorized as the normal breast-like subtype. For 64 breast cancers assayed for both platforms, 41 (65%, one unclassified by microarray) were predicted with an identical subtype, resulting in a fair κ statistic of 0.60. Taking nCounter subtyping as the gold standard, prediction accuracy was 43% (3/7), 81% (13/16), 25% (5/20), and 100% (20/20) for basal-like, human epidermal growth factor receptor II (HER2)-enriched, luminal A and luminal B subtypes predicted from microarray GE profiles. Microarray identified more luminal B cases from luminal A subtype predicted by nCounter. It is not uncommon to use microarray for breast cancer molecular subtyping for research. Our study showed that fundamental discrepancy existed between distinct GE assays, and cross-platform equivalence should be carefully appraised when molecular subtyping was conducted with oligonucleotide microarray.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号