BACKGROUND: This was a prospective study to investigate the antimicrobial efficacy of a novel ophthalmic solution comprising ozonated sunflower oil in liposomes plus hypromellose in conjunction with liposomal foam (BlefOX), in patients undergoing intravitreal injection, in comparison to povidone iodine 5%.
METHODS: The study employed a paired-eye design with n = 195 patients and a total of n = 390 eyes divided into two groups. Conjunctival swabs were collected from both eyes of each patient at baseline (T0-3 days before the injection). The study group underwent home therapy, which included instilling two drops of an isotonic ophthalmic solution containing 0.5% ozonated sunflower oil in liposomes plus hypromellose (Ozodrop) four times daily and applying liposomal foam twice daily to the eye undergoing intravitreal injections. In contrast, the control group (contralateral eyes) received treatment with povidone iodine 5%. This treatment regimen was maintained for 3 days. At T1 (10 min before injection), all patients instilled one drop of a topical solution of povidone iodine 5% into the conjunctival sac of both eyes. After 30 seconds had elapsed, a conjunctival swab was obtained for each eye in both study groups.
RESULTS: The results, derived from conjunctival swabs, exhibited a significant reduction in the microbial load of the study group on both chocolate agar and blood agar (p ≤ 0.007). The study demonstrated that the combination of povidone iodine 5% + Ozodrop + BlefOX provides a greater reduction in microbial load than povidone iodine 5% alone on both chocolate agar (141 [72.31%] vs. 98 [50.26%], p < 0.0001) and blood agar (130 [66.67%] vs. 97 [49.74%], p = 0.0007). The combination of povidone iodine 5% + Ozodrop + BlefOX resulted in the killing of approximately 41% to 49% of bacteria compared to povidone iodine 5% alone on the chocolate agar and blood agar, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal ozonated oil treatment, coupled with liposomal foam, in patients undergoing intravitreal injection led to a substantial reduction in conjunctival microbial load compared to eyes treated solely with povidone iodine 5%.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of escalating the dosage of intravitreal brolucizumab in patients with refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
METHODS: This retrospective study included 17 eyes of 17 patients with refractory AMD treated with high-dose brolucizumab (12 mg/0.1 ml) for over 12 months. Patients initially received at least one anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent and were switched to standard-dose brolucizumab (6 mg/0.05 ml). Those who showed a suboptimal response to standard-dose treatment had their dosage of brolucizumab escalated.
RESULTS: Visual acuity was maintained from 68.3 ± 3.4 letters to 70.7 ± 3.2 letters after 12 months of high-dose treatment (P = 0.128). Central subfield thickness was 343.7 ± 17.0 μm before high-dose treatment and 316.7 ± 18.5 μm at 12 months (P = 0.083). The proportions of patients with subretinal fluid and serous pigment epithelial detachment significantly decreased from 82.4% to 41.2% and from 52.9% to 17.6%, respectively, after high-dose treatment (P = 0.039 and P = 0.031, respectively). The treatment interval extended from 7.2 ± 2.4 weeks to 10.2 ± 2.2 weeks after switching to standard-dose brolucizumab (P < 0.001) and was maintained at 13.5 ± 2.8 weeks after increasing the dose (P = 0.154). No severe ocular adverse events were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: High-dose brolucizumab was effective in patients who did not respond to standard-dose brolucizumab after switching from previous anti-VEGF agents. Increasing the dosage could offer sustained disease control and reduce the treatment burden for patients with refractory AMD.

Background and Objectives: Our study compared the visual and anatomical outcomes of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) patients receiving intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) with or without photodynamic therapy (PDT) over 12 months. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was performed for 60 eyes from 60 patients with treatment-naïve PCV. Thirty eyes were treated using IVA monotherapy (IVA group), and thirty eyes were treated using a combination of IVA with PDT (IVA/PDT group). The baseline characteristics, treatment outcomes, and retreatment rates were compared between the two groups over a one-year follow-up period. Results: The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was found to have improved significantly in the IVA/PDT group at every 3-month visit. However, no significant BCVA improvement was observed in the IVA group. A significantly lower retreatment rate and higher dry macula rate were found in the IVA/PDT group than that in the IVA group. In the entire population of the study, a better baseline vision and younger age were associated with better final visual outcomes. Retreatment was associated with poor baseline BCVA and IVA monotherapy. Conclusions: The combination of IVA and PDT may offer superior visual improvement and a higher dry macula rate compared to IVA monotherapy in the treatment of PCV patients while requiring fewer retreatments over 12 months.

Anti-VEGF agents, e.g., bevacizumab, are used in retinal surgery, while their interaction with silicone oils and novel hydrogels remains unclear. This study examines the in vitro pharmacokinetics of bevacizumab in silicone oil-filled eyes compared to various hydrogel replacements and the porcine vitreous body as well as its impact on the interface tension of silicone oils. An in vitro model filled with light or heavy silicone oil, porcine vitreous bodies, or hydrogels (alginate and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based) was equilibrated with a balanced salt solution. Monitoring of bevacizumab in the aqueous phase was conducted for up to 24 h, and its effect on interfacial tension was studied. Significant differences in bevacizumab partitioning were observed across endotamponades after 24 h. In silicone oils, bevacizumab was found exclusively in the aqueous phase, while in the other endotamponades, it accumulated in the gel phase (96.1% in porcine vitreous body, 83.5% in alginate, and 27.6% in PEG-based hydrogel). Bevacizumab significantly reduced interfacial tension (40 to 8 mN/m), possibly enhancing silicone oil emulsification. The type of endotamponade heavily influenced the bevacizumab concentration in the aqueous. The vitreous body and replacement hydrogels likely serve as a drug reservoir, highlighting the need for in vivo studies to explore these interactions prior to clinical application.

Purpose: Commercially available chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) has a beyond-use date of 24 h. This study evaluated the stability and sterility of 0.05% CHG for 30 days after opening and compared its cost to povidone iodine (PI) for intravitreal injection antisepsis. Methods: 0.05% CHG was aliquoted into 1-mL syringes and stored at room temperature or refrigerated. Turbidity, pH, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and sterility testing were performed. A cost analysis was conducted. Results: 0.05% CHG remained stable for at least 30 days. All samples had measured turbidity <0.5 nephelometric turbidity units. The pH of all samples remained between 5.0 and 7.0. HPLC demonstrated CHG concentration at day 30 relative to day 0 of 98.52% ± 4.16% at room temperature and 99.99% ± 3.38% at 2°C -6°C. The cost per week to perform 150 injections using 0.05% CHG was $463.25 when opening a new bottle daily compared with $16.73 for 5% PI. This cost decreased to $23.16 when utilizing a bottle of CHG for 30 days. Conclusion: 0.05% CHG remains stable and sterile for at least 30 days after opening. The ability to use CHG for at least 30 days after its opening significantly decreases its utilization expense.

UNASSIGNED: Sturge-Weber syndrome, a congenital vascular disorder, is associated with diffuse choroidal hemangiomas in which the current mainstay of treatment is radiation therapy, including external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The purpose of this case report was to present a novel combination of treatments for diffuse choroidal hemangioma.
UNASSIGNED: A 37-year-old man with a history of Sturge-Weber-associated glaucoma presented with an acute-onset decrease in vision in the right eye. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the presentation was 20/400 in the right eye. Examination revealed a total macula-off, bullous, folded exudative retinal detachment and findings consistent with diffuse choroidal hemangioma. The patient was treated with a single injection of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent bevacizumab and 10 fractions of EBRT of the right eye. Follow-up examination at 17 months demonstrated complete resolution of subretinal fluid and no evidence of choroidal elevation on B-scan. Final BCVA in the right eye was 20/1,000.
UNASSIGNED: This case uses simultaneous treatment with EBRT and bevacizumab in the treatment of diffuse choroidal hemangioma and associated exudative retinal detachment. Clinicians may use anti-VEGF agents early in the course of the disease in determining whether they may assist in preventing visual decline.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab therapy administered on a pro re nata (PRN) basis without loading dose in treatment naïve patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) for 1 year follow-up.
METHODS: Patients with recent DME (<6 months) received a mandatory brolucizumab injection at inclusion and other injections could be given on a PRN basis with an 8-week interval (between injections) at minimum. Rescue therapy with other anti-VEGF was possible in case of incomplete DME resolution after the second brolucizumab with a minimum of 1-month treatment free interval between 2 injections. The primary outcome measure was the change in (BCVA) at 12 months. Secondary outcome measures included the change in central subfield thickness (CST), the change in hard exudate surface area and microaneurysms at 1 year.
RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were included. At 12 months, the mean (SD) number of injections was 2.6 (0.8) in addition to the first mandatory injection. The mean (SD) interval between 2 consecutive injections was 3.2 (1.4) months. The mean (SD) BCVA improved from 0.62 (0.1) logMAR to 0.40 (0.16) logMAR (p = 0.012). The mean CST reduced from 397.0 (47.2) µm to 224.5 (28.1) µm (p = 0.013). The hard exudate surface area decreased significantly (p = 0.012) as did microaneurysms (p = 0.02). Seven patients required at least 1 rescue therapy. No patients experienced intra-ocular inflammatory adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Brolucizumab therapy for DME is a safe and effective modality for the treatment of recent DME and has the potential to reduce the number of injections.

BACKGROUND: Intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor is considered the first-line treatment for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. It has potential risks for circulatory system, which should be particularly carefully evaluated in older patients. In this case study, we aim to discuss the potential impact of this treatment regimen on cardiac health.
METHODS: This case report describes an elderly patient with no prior history of heart disease who exhibited unexpected heart enlargement and dysfunction. Throughout the patient\'s hospital stay, various potential causes were investigated, leading to the hypothesis that a 10-year history of intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor could be related to the observed clinical manifestations. The patient was advised to discontinue this treatment, and after a 2-month follow-up period, there was a gradual improvement in the patient\'s cardiac structure and function.
CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript highlights the importance of conducting cardiac examinations before and after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment, especially for individuals at risk of heart diseases like the elderly. It emphasizes the need to carefully weigh the benefits and risks of treatment regimens to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes.

Purpose: To determine the recurrence rate of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) during a 5-year period after the suspension of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatments. Methods: Thirty-four eyes of 34 nAMD patients who met the inclusion criteria and were treated by anti-VEGF drugs were studied. All met the treatment suspension criteria and were followed for 5 years after the suspension of the anti-VEGF treatment. Patients with a recurrence within one year were placed in Group A, and patients with a recurrence between 1 and 5 years were placed in Group B. The rate and time of a recurrence were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. We also examined whether there were differences in the baseline factors of age, sex, subtype, treatment period, and treatment interval between Groups A and B. Results: Twenty-five of 34 eyes (73.5%) had a recurrence within 5 years of stopping the anti-VEGF treatments. Thirteen (52.0%) of the 25 eyes had a recurrence within 1 year, 4 (16.0%) eyes between 1 and 2 years, 4 (16.0%) eyes between 2 and 3 years, 2 (8%) between 3 and 4 years, and 2 eyes (8%) between 4 and 5 years. The baseline factors were not significantly different between Groups A and B. Conclusions: The results showed that the recurrence rate was highest within one year after the suspension of the anti-VEGF treatments, with a number of recurrences one year after the suspension. Clinicians should remember that nAMD may recur several years after the suspension of anti-VEGF treatments.

In ophthalmology, intravitreal therapies are currently not personalized/customized and are not adjusted to the individual vitreous volume. With reference to the recently published calculation formula for a more accurate estimation of the vitreous body, we determined the dose of intravitreal medication for different vitreous volumes and compared them with the average volume. Using the axial length of the eye, the formula for the vitreous volume exact (VIVEX) can provide a more accurate indication of the vitreous volume in individual cases than an assumed standard volume of 4 mL. The concentration of active substances in small eyes may be twice as high as that in normal-sized emmetropic eyes. In contrast, large eyes may show less than half of the recommended drug concentration. The calculated concentrations of the investigated intravitreal drugs in small and large eyeballs showed impressive differences with large deviations from the recommended doses. Further systematic studies should follow to find out whether this has any impact on the effectiveness or side effects of the injected drugs.