In response to the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), which lowered the lens equivalent dose limit, Japan lowered the lens dose limit from 150 mSv/year to 100 mSv/5 years and 50 mSv/year, with this new rule taking effect on April 1, 2021. DOSIRIS® is a dosimeter that can accurately measure lens dose. Herein, we investigated lens dose in interventional cardiology physicians one year before and after the reduction of the lens dose limit using a neck dosimeter and lens dosimeter measurements. With an increase in the number of cases, both personal dose equivalent at 0.07 mm [Hp(0.07), neck dosimeter] and personal dose equivalent at 3 mm depth [Hp(3), lens dosimeter] increased for most of the physicians. The Hp(3) of the lens considering the shielding effect of the Pb glasses using lens dosimeter exceeded 20 mSv/year for two of the 14 physicians. Protection from radiation dose will become even more important in the future, as these two physicians may experience radiation dose exceeding 100 mSv/5 years. The average dose per procedure increased, but not significantly. There was a strong correlation between the neck dosimeter and lens dosimeter scores, although there was no significant change before and after the lens dose limit was lowered. This correlation was particularly strong for physicians who primarily treated patients. As such, it is possible to infer accurate lens doses from neck doses in physicians who primarily perform diagnostics. However, it is desirable to use a dosimeter that can directly measure Hp(3) because of the high lens dose.

A patient presented with acute respiratory failure and shock due to severe prosthetic mitral valve stenosis. A valve-in-valve transcatheter mitral valve replacement procedure was performed via the transeptal approach due to his high-risk presentation with good results.

The field of interventional cardiology (IC) has evolved dramatically over the past 40 years. Training and certification in IC have kept pace, with the development of accredited IC fellowship training programs, training statements, and subspecialty board certification. The application process, however, remained fragmented with lack of a universal process or time frame. In recent years, growing competition among training programs for the strongest candidates resulted in time-limited offers and high-pressure situations that disadvantaged candidates. A grassroots effort was recently undertaken by a Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions task force, to create equity in the system by establishing a national Match for IC fellowship. This manuscript explores the rationale, process, and implications of this endeavor.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has become the gold standard for noninvasive anatomic assessment of the coronary arteries. With high positive predictive value and even higher negative predictive value, CCTA allows for rapid determination of the presence or absence of coronary plaque and triage of patients\' need for further invasive evaluation and treatment. From an interventional cardiologist\'s perspective, CCTA (more so than stress testing) is helpful in determining the need for invasive therapy. In conjunction with functional assessments, the anatomic evaluation from CCTA mirrors the anatomical assessment of a coronary angiogram more than any other noninvasive assessment. This allows for catheter selection, percutaneous coronary intervention preplanning, as well as additional decision making before the patient has entered the catheterization laboratory. This manuscript explores some of the more recent developments in noninvasive coronary angiography and discusses the use and utility of CCTA from an interventional cardiologist\'s perspective.

Virtual reality technology provides an environment for advanced 3-dimensional visualization of complex cardiac anatomy from cross-sectional imaging. Visualization and case planning with procedural simulation is very relevant and likely critical for overall procedural success in complex congenital interventions. We report this case series demonstrating the use of virtual reality to conduct remote, collaborative interinstitutional consultations on computed tomography angiography prior to congenital percutaneous interventions.

Transcatheter atrial shunt therapies, designed to dynamically lower left atrial (LA) pressure by shunting blood into the larger reservoir of the right atrium and central veins, have been developed as a novel treatment for heart failure (HF) over the past 10+ years. Several atrial shunt devices and procedures are currently in development with several pivotal randomized clinical trials (RCT) underway; however, only 2 sham-controlled RCT (both with the Atrial Shunt Device [Corvia Medical] in HF with EF ≥ 40%) have been reported thus far; a mechanistic RCT (n = 44) that demonstrated a reduction in exercise LA pressure at 1 month and a pivotal RCT (n = 626) that was neutral with no difference in outcomes or health status between shunt and sham groups. Subsequent analyses of the single completed pivotal RCT found that peak exercise pulmonary vascular resistance <1.74 WU plus the absence of a cardiac rhythm management device identified a responder group that benefited from LA unloading with atrial shunt implantation, a finding that is currently being confirmed in a follow-up RCT. Here we provide a comprehensive review of the field of atrial shunt therapeutics with a description of the following: (1) current HF treatment; (2) rationale and history of atrial shunt development; (3) design of and accumulated evidence for the various atrial shunt devices and procedures under investigation; (4) unanswered questions in the field; and (5) future considerations. Atrial shunts represent a potential innovative therapeutic for HF but the optimal design/approach and phenotype of HF most likely to benefit are yet to be determined.

暂无摘要。

Shared decision-making (SDM) and multidisciplinary team-based care delivery are recommended across several cardiology clinical practice guidelines. However, evidence for benefit and guidance on implementation are limited. Informed consent, the use of patient decision aids, or the documentation of these elements for governmental or societal agencies may be conflated as SDM. SDM is a bidirectional exchange between experts: patients are the experts on their goals, values, and preferences, and clinicians provide their expertise on clinical factors. In this Expert Panel perspective, we review the current state of SDM in team-based cardiovascular care and propose best practice recommendations for multidisciplinary team implementation of SDM.