Users of social platforms often perceive these sites as supportive spaces to post about their mental health issues. Those conversations contain important traces about individuals\' health risks. Recently, researchers have exploited this online information to construct mental health detection models, which aim to identify users at risk on platforms like Twitter, Reddit or Facebook. Most of these models are focused on achieving good classification results, ignoring the explainability and interpretability of the decisions. Recent research has pointed out the importance of using clinical markers, such as the use of symptoms, to improve trust in the computational models by health professionals. In this paper, we introduce transformer-based architectures designed to detect and explain the appearance of depressive symptom markers in user-generated content from social media. We present two approaches: (i) train a model to classify, and another one to explain the classifier\'s decision separately and (ii) unify the two tasks simultaneously within a single model. Additionally, for this latter manner, we also investigated the performance of recent conversational Large Language Models (LLMs) utilizing both in-context learning and finetuning. Our models provide natural language explanations, aligning with validated symptoms, thus enabling clinicians to interpret the decisions more effectively. We evaluate our approaches using recent symptom-focused datasets, using both offline metrics and expert-in-the-loop evaluations to assess the quality of our models\' explanations. Our findings demonstrate that it is possible to achieve good classification results while generating interpretable symptom-based explanations.

Adaptive interpretable ensemble model based on three-dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (3DCNN) and Genetic Algorithm (GA), i.e., 3DCNN+EL+GA, was proposed to differentiate the subjects with Alzheimer\'s Disease (AD) or Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and further identify the discriminative brain regions significantly contributing to the classifications in a data-driven way. Plus, the discriminative brain sub-regions at a voxel level were further located in these achieved brain regions, with a gradient-based attribution method designed for CNN. Besides disclosing the discriminative brain sub-regions, the testing results on the datasets from the Alzheimer\'s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) and the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS) indicated that 3DCNN+EL+GA outperformed other state-of-the-art deep learning algorithms and that the achieved discriminative brain regions (e.g., the rostral hippocampus, caudal hippocampus, and medial amygdala) were linked to emotion, memory, language, and other essential brain functions impaired early in the AD process. Future research is needed to examine the generalizability of the proposed method and ideas to discern discriminative brain regions for other brain disorders, such as severe depression, schizophrenia, autism, and cerebrovascular diseases, using neuroimaging.

暂无摘要。

Biomaterials with osteoinductivity are widely used for bone defect repair due to their unique structures and functions. Machine learning (ML) is pivotal in analyzing osteoinductivity and accelerating new material design. However, challenges include creating a comprehensive database of osteoinductive materials and dealing with low-quality, disparate data. As a standard for evaluating the osteoinductivity of biomaterials, ectopic ossification has been used. This paper compiles research findings from the past thirty years, resulting in a robust database validated by experts. To tackle issues of limited data samples, missing data, and high-dimensional sparsity, a data enhancement strategy is developed. This approach achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.921, a precision of 0.839, and a recall of 0.833. Model interpretation identified key factors such as porosity, bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2), and hydroxyapatite (HA) proportion as crucial determinants of outcomes. Optimizing pore structure and material composition through partial dependence plot (PDP) analysis led to a new bone area ratio of 14.7 ± 7 % in animal experiments, surpassing the database average of 10.97 %. This highlights the significant potential of ML in the development and design of osteoinductive materials. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: This study leverages machine learning to analyze osteoinductive biomaterials, addressing challenges in database creation and data quality. Our data enhancement strategy significantly improved model performance. By optimizing pore structure and material composition, we increased new bone formation rates, showcasing the vast potential of machine learning in biomaterial design.

Text classification plays an essential role in the medical domain by organizing and categorizing vast amounts of textual data through machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). The adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in healthcare has raised concerns about the interpretability of AI models, often perceived as \"black boxes.\" Explainable AI (XAI) techniques aim to mitigate this issue by elucidating AI model decision-making process. In this paper, we present a scoping review exploring the application of different XAI techniques in medical text classification, identifying two main types: model-specific and model-agnostic methods. Despite some positive feedback from developers, formal evaluations with medical end users of these techniques remain limited. The review highlights the necessity for further research in XAI to enhance trust and transparency in AI-driven decision-making processes in healthcare.

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has gained momentum in many fields of daily live. In healthcare, AI can be used for diagnosing or predicting illnesses. However, explainable AI (XAI) is needed to ensure that users understand how the algorithm arrives at a decision. In our research project, machine learning methods are used for individual risk prediction of hospital-onset bacteremia (HOB). This paper presents a vision on a step-wise process for implementation and evaluation of user-centered XAI for risk prediction of HOB. An initial requirement analysis revealed first insights on the users\' needs of explainability to use and trust such risk prediction applications. The findings were then used to propose step-wise process towards a user-centered evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Tinnitus is a neuropathological condition that results in mild buzzing or ringing of the ears without an external sound source. Current tinnitus diagnostic methods often rely on subjective assessment and require intricate medical examinations. This study aimed to propose an interpretable tinnitus diagnostic framework using auditory late response (ALR) and electroencephalogram (EEG), inspired by the gap-prepulse inhibition (GPI) paradigm.
METHODS: We collected spontaneous EEG and ALR data from 44 patients with tinnitus and 47 hearing loss-matched controls using specialized hardware to capture responses to sound stimuli with embedded gaps. In this cohort study of tinnitus and control groups, we examined EEG spectral and ALR features of N-P complexes, comparing the responses to gap durations of 50 and 20 ms alongside no-gap conditions. To this end, we developed an interpretable tinnitus diagnostic model using ALR and EEG metrics, boosting machine learning architecture, and explainable feature attribution approaches.
RESULTS: Our proposed model achieved 90 % accuracy in identifying tinnitus, with an area under the performance curve of 0.89. The explainable artificial intelligence approaches have revealed gap-embedded ALR features such as the GPI ratio of N1-P2 and EEG spectral ratio, which can serve as diagnostic metrics for tinnitus. Our method successfully provides personalized prediction explanations for tinnitus diagnosis using gap-embedded auditory and neurological features.
CONCLUSIONS: Deficits in GPI alongside activity in the EEG alpha-beta ratio offer a promising screening tool for assessing tinnitus risk, aligning with current clinical insights from hearing research.

Predicting the capacity of lithium-ion battery (LIB) plays a crucial role in ensuring the safe operation of LIBs and prolonging their lifespan. However, LIBs are easily affected by environmental interference, which may impact the precision of predictions. Furthermore, interpretability in the process of predicting LIB capacity is also important for users to understand the model, identify issues, and make decisions. In this study, an interpretable method considering environmental interference (IM-EI) for predicting LIB capacity is introduced. Spearman correlation coefficients, interpretability principles, belief rule base (BRB), and interpretability constraints are used to improve the prediction precision and interpretability of IM-EI. Dynamic attribute reliability is introduced to minimize the effect of environmental interference. The experimental results show that IM-EI model has good interpretability and high precision compared to the other models. Under interference conditions, the model still has good precision and robustness.

Reliability learning and interpretable decision-making are crucial for multi-modality medical image segmentation. Although many works have attempted multi-modality medical image segmentation, they rarely explore how much reliability is provided by each modality for segmentation. Moreover, the existing approach of decision-making such as the softmax function lacks the interpretability for multi-modality fusion. In this study, we proposed a novel approach named contextual discounted evidential network (CDE-Net) for reliability learning and interpretable decision-making under multi-modality medical image segmentation. Specifically, the CDE-Net first models the semantic evidence by uncertainty measurement using the proposed evidential decision-making module. Then, it leverages the contextual discounted fusion layer to learn the reliability provided by each modality. Finally, a multi-level loss function is deployed for the optimization of evidence modeling and reliability learning. Moreover, this study elaborates on the framework interpretability by discussing the consistency between pixel attribution maps and the learned reliability coefficients. Extensive experiments are conducted on both multi-modality brain and liver datasets. The CDE-Net gains high performance with an average Dice score of 0.914 for brain tumor segmentation and 0.913 for liver tumor segmentation, which proves CDE-Net has great potential to facilitate the interpretation of artificial intelligence-based multi-modality medical image fusion.

Safefy-critical domains often employ autonomous agents which follow a sequential decision-making setup, whereby the agent follows a policy to dictate the appropriate action at each step. AI-practitioners often employ reinforcement learning algorithms to allow an agent to find the best policy. However, sequential systems often lack clear and immediate signs of wrong actions, with consequences visible only in hindsight, making it difficult to humans to understand system failure. In reinforcement learning, this is referred to as the credit assignment problem. To effectively collaborate with an autonomous system, particularly in a safety-critical setting, explanations should enable a user to better understand the policy of the agent and predict system behavior so that users are cognizant of potential failures and these failures can be diagnosed and mitigated. However, humans are diverse and have innate biases or preferences which may enhance or impair the utility of a policy explanation of a sequential agent. Therefore, in this paper, we designed and conducted human-subjects experiment to identify the factors which influence the perceived usability with the objective usefulness of policy explanations for reinforcement learning agents in a sequential setting. Our study had two factors: the modality of policy explanation shown to the user (Tree, Text, Modified Text, and Programs) and the \"first impression\" of the agent, i.e., whether the user saw the agent succeed or fail in the introductory calibration video. Our findings characterize a preference-performance tradeoff wherein participants perceived language-based policy explanations to be significantly more useable; however, participants were better able to objectively predict the agent\'s behavior when provided an explanation in the form of a decision tree. Our results demonstrate that user-specific factors, such as computer science experience (p < 0.05), and situational factors, such as watching agent crash (p < 0.05), can significantly impact the perception and usefulness of the explanation. This research provides key insights to alleviate prevalent issues regarding innapropriate compliance and reliance, which are exponentially more detrimental in safety-critical settings, providing a path forward for XAI developers for future work on policy-explanations.