在亚洲,人际暴力的发生率越来越高,地区差异显著。然而,长期的,考虑到亚洲地区区域差异的大陆尺度研究是有限的。以生态模式为指导,我们检查了五个生态风险因素(低生活满意度/幸福感,经济困难,邻里劣势,父权价值观,和宗教信仰)与人际暴力正当性的观念(即,亲密伴侣暴力[IPV]对妻子,儿童身体虐待,和对他人的暴力行为)在亚洲的五个地区(即,东,西,中央,南,和东南)。使用世界价值观调查(n=32,307),使用多组多元回归模型,并使用Mplusver进行稳健的最大似然估计.8.在整个亚洲样本模型中,IPV对妻子的正当性观念与低生活满意度/幸福感呈正相关;经济困难;邻里劣势;和父权制价值观,而它们与宗教信仰呈负相关。对虐待儿童的合理性的看法与低生活满意度/幸福感呈正相关;邻里劣势;和父权制价值观,而它们与经济困难和宗教信仰呈负相关。对暴力侵害他人的合理性的看法与经济困难和邻里劣势呈正相关,而它们与宗教信仰呈负相关。每个地区都呈现独特的风险因素关联。考虑到亚洲人际暴力的高发率,了解与为特定类型的人际暴力辩护相关的风险因素,可以为预防亚洲的暴力提供初步见解。Further,许多居住在亚洲地区以外的亚洲人仍然受到他们文化的影响,宗教,语言,和原产地的规范,研究结果可能会阐明未来在人际暴力文献中需要考虑的研究。
In Asia, rates of interpersonal violence are increasing, with significant regional disparities. However, long-term, continental-scale research considering regional differences across the Asia regions is limited. Guided by the ecological model, we examined five ecological risk factors (low life satisfaction/happiness, economic hardship, neighborhood disadvantage, patriarchal values, and religiosity) associated with perceptions of justification of interpersonal violence (i.e., intimate partner violence [IPV] against wife, child physical abuse, and violence against others) in five regions in Asia (i.e., East, West, Central, South, and Southeast). Using the World Values Survey (n = 32,307), a multigroup multiple regression model was used with robust maximum likelihood estimation using Mplus ver. 8. In the entire Asia sample model, perceptions of justifiability of IPV against wife were positively associated with low life satisfaction/happiness; economic hardship; neighborhood disadvantage; and patriarchal values, while they were negatively associated with religiosity. Perceptions of justifiability of child abuse were positively associated with low life satisfaction/happiness; neighborhood disadvantage; and patriarchal values, while they were negatively associated with economic hardship and religiosity. Perceptions of justifiability of violence against others were positively associated with economic hardship and neighborhood disadvantage, while they were negatively associated with religiosity. Each region presented unique risk factor associations. Considering the high rates of interpersonal violence in Asia, understanding the risk factors associated with perceptions of justifying specific types of interpersonal violence can provide an initial insight into preventing violence in Asia. Further, as many Asians dwelling outside Asian regions are still influenced by their culture, religion, language, and norms of the region of origin, the study findings may shed light on future studies to consider in the interpersonal violence literature.