intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)

调强放射治疗 (IMRT)
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    甲状腺相关眼病(TAO)是一种标志性的自身免疫性疾病,而TAO的治疗需要多学科的方法。放射治疗(RT)是主动TAO的可行治疗选择,IMRT是放射肿瘤学中更精确的技术。本研究旨在评估疗效,可行性,眼眶调强放疗(IMRT)治疗TAO的安全性。进行了单中心回顾性分析,包括放射肿瘤科诊断为中度至重度活动性TAO的患者,北京大学第三医院,从2020年10月到2023年10月,他们对皮质类固醇治疗的反应不佳。这些患者随后接受了IMRT治疗,随后进行了一段时间的随访和回顾性分析.这项研究的重点是治疗效果的结果,安全,和放射治疗引起的急性毒性反应。4个月和12个月时临床活动评分(CAS)的改善被认为是主要和次要研究终点,分别,以及不良事件的发生率。中位随访期为12个月。放疗后中位随访时间为12个月。放疗前和放疗后4个月的CAS差异无统计学意义(CAS:5.53±2.07vs.4.68±2.62;R平方:0.21;95%CI:-1.01-0.02;P=0.054)。然而,与治疗前相比,治疗后12个月的CAS显着减少(CAS:5.53±2.07vs.3.06±2.38;R平方:0.66;95%CI:3.42-1.52;P<0.001)。CAS在治疗后4个月和12个月均显示出逐渐降低的趋势。在放疗联合糖皮质激素治疗组中,CAS在治疗前和放疗后12个月之间发现了统计学上的显着差异(CAS:6.38±2.00vs.3.88±2.85;R平方:0.66;95%CI-4.11至0.89;P=0.008)。在单纯放疗组中,CAS在治疗前和放疗后12个月之间发现了统计学上的显着差异(CAS:4.78±1.92vs.2.33±1.73;R平方:0.66;95%CI-3.89至1.00;P=0.005)。少数患者出现I级眶周水肿,结膜充血,干眼症,但没有白内障等不良事件,放射性视网膜病变,在随访期结束时观察到辐射诱导的视神经病变。轨道IMRT是中重度活动性TAO的有效治疗方式,即使在以前使用皮质类固醇等治疗未取得成功的患者中,也显示出显著的疗效。本回顾性研究获得北京大学第三医院伦理委员会批准。许可证编号为M2024220,注册数据为4月1日,2024.
    Thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) is a hallmark autoimmune condition, and the treatment of TAO requires a multidisciplinary approach. Radiation therapy (RT) is a viable treatment option for active TAO, IMRT is a more precise technology in radiation oncology. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of orbital intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of TAO. A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted, including patients diagnosed with moderate to severe active TAO at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, from October 2020 to October 2023, who had poor responses to corticosteroid treatment. These patients subsequently received IMRT treatment, followed by a period of follow-up and retrospective analysis. The study focused on the outcomes of treatment efficacy, safety, and acute toxic reactions induced by radiation therapy. Improvements in clinical activity score (CAS) at 4 and 12 months were considered as primary and secondary study endpoints, respectively, along with the incidence rate of adverse events. The median follow-up period was 12 months. The median follow-up time after radiation therapy was 12 months. There was no statistically significant difference in CAS between before and 4 months after radiation therapy (CAS: 5.53 ± 2.07 vs.4.68 ± 2.62; R squared: 0.21; 95% CI: - 1.01-0.02; P = 0.054). However, there was a significant reduction in CAS 12 months post-treatment compared to pre-treatment (CAS: 5.53 ± 2.07 vs. 3.06 ± 2.38; R squared: 0.66; 95% CI: 3.42 - 1.52; P < 0.001). The CAS showed a progressively decreasing trend at both 4 months and 12 months post-treatment. In the combined radiotherapy with glucocorticoid treatment group, a statistically significant difference was found between the CAS before treatment and 12 months after radiotherapy (CAS: 6.38 ± 2.00 vs. 3.88 ± 2.85; R squared: 0.66; 95% CI - 4.11 to 0.89; P = 0.008). In the radiotherapy alone group, a statistically significant difference was found between the CAS before treatment and 12 months after radiotherapy (CAS: 4.78 ± 1.92 vs. 2.33 ± 1.73; R squared: 0.66; 95% CI - 3.89 to 1.00; P = 0.005). A few patients experienced Grade I periorbital edema, conjunctival congestion, and dry eye syndrome, but no adverse events such as cataracts, radiation retinopathy, or radiation-induced optic neuropathy were observed by the end of the follow-up period. Orbital IMRT is an effective treatment modality for moderate to severe active TAO, demonstrating significant efficacy even in patients who had not achieved success with previous treatments such as corticosteroids. This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital. The permit number was M2024220 and data of registration was April I, 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    用于胸壁照射的新型混合方法在目标覆盖和保留危险器官(OAR)方面显示出有希望的结果。在这次系统审查中,我们比较了混合体积调制电弧治疗(H-VMAT)或混合调强放疗(H-IMRT)技术与非混合技术,如三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT),场中场(FIF),强度调制电弧疗法(IMRT),和体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT),用于乳腺癌患者的乳房切除术。我们的重点是OAR的计划质量和剂量分配。使用系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)清单的首选报告项目,我们对评估胸壁和OAR混合治疗的主要研究进行了系统回顾和质量评估.使用适当的关键字对PubMed和Scopus数据库进行了广泛的在线搜索。OAR的剂量(肺,心,和对侧乳房),规划目标量(PTV),同质性指数(HI),提取了一致性指数(CI)。然后将数据制成表格,并比较研究模式之间的结果。选择了符合搜索标准的9项研究来评估混合和非混合技术的PTV覆盖率和剂量测定结果。就95%的PTV覆盖率而言,在九项审查的研究中,两种技术之间的最大差异是VMAT(47.6Gy)和H-VMAT(48.4Gy);对于合格指数,3DCRT(0.58)和H-VMAT(0.79)差异最大.在这两种情况下,差异有统计学意义(P<0.005)。两项研究显示,与3DCRT(0.41和0.12)相比,H-VMAT(0.15和0.07)治疗目标内的剂量均匀性改善,P值<0.001。两项研究没有报告同质性指数,和其他三个观察到没有统计学差异。关于OAR,在H-VMAT和VMAT的比较中,最年夜的显著变更是同侧肺的接收容积5Gy(V5Gy)和对侧肺的V10Gy。对于同侧肺,V5Gy在VMAT中为90.7%,在H-VMAT中为51.45%。对侧肺,V10Gy在VMAT中为54.9%,在H-VMAT中为50.5%。在六项研究中,混合技术中对侧乳房的平均剂量低于单一模式:VMAT(4.2%,6.0%,1.9%,7.1%,4.57%)与H-VMAT(1.4%,3.4%,1.8%,3.5%,2.34%)和IMRT(9.1%)与H-IMRT(4.69%)。虽然大多数研究没有报告监测单位和治疗时间,包括它们的那些表明杂种具有较低的监测单位和较短的处理时间。放射治疗中的混合技术,例如结合两种模式,确实可以为具有高毒性风险的患者提供较低剂量的OAR。需要前瞻性临床研究来确定混合技术治疗乳腺癌的结果。
    Novel hybrid approaches for chest wall irradiation show promising outcomes regarding target coverage and sparing organs at risk (OARs). In this systematic review, we compared hybrid volumetric modulated arc therapy (H-VMAT) or hybrid intensity-modulated radiotherapy (H-IMRT) techniques with non-hybrid techniques, such as three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), field-in-field (FIF), intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), for breast cancer patients with mastectomy. Our focus was the plan quality and dose distribution to the OARs. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist, we performed a systematic review and quality appraisal of primary studies evaluating hybrid therapy to the chest wall and the OARs. An extensive online search of PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted using appropriate keywords. The dose to the OARs (lung, heart, and contralateral breast), planning target volume (PTV), homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI) were extracted. The data were then tabulated and compared for the outcomes between modalities among the studies. Nine studies that met the search criteria were selected to evaluate the PTV coverage and dosimetric results of hybrid and non-hybrid techniques. In terms of 95% PTV coverage, among nine reviewed studies, the largest difference between the two techniques was between VMAT (47.6 Gy) and H-VMAT (48.4 Gy); for the conformity index, the largest difference was noted between 3DCRT (0.58) and H-VMAT (0.79). In both cases, differences were statistically significant (P < 0.005). Two studies showed dose homogeneity improvement within the treatment target in H-VMAT (0.15 and 0.07) compared with 3DCRT (0.41 and 0.12), with a P value of <0.001. Two studies did not report on the homogeneity index, and three others observed no statistical difference. Regarding OARs, in the comparison of H-VMAT and VMAT, the largest significant change was in the volume receiving 5 Gy (V5Gy) of the ipsilateral lung and the V10Gy of the contralateral lung. For the ipsilateral lung, V5Gy was 90.7% with VMAT versus 51.45% with H-VMAT. For the contralateral lung, V10Gy was 54.9% with VMAT versus 50.5% with H-VMAT. In six studies, the mean dose of the contralateral breast was lower in hybrid techniques than in single modalities: VMAT (4.2%, 6.0%, 1.9%, 7.1%, 4.57%) versus H-VMAT (1.4%, 3.4%, 1.8%, 3.5%, 2.34%) and IMRT (9.1%) versus H-IMRT (4.69%). Although most studies did not report on monitor units and treatment time, those that included them showed that hybrids had lower monitor units and shorter treatment times. Hybrid techniques in radiotherapy, such as combining two modalities, can indeed facilitate lower doses to OARs for patients with a high risk of toxicities. Prospective clinical studies are needed to determine the outcomes of breast cancer treated with hybrid techniques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    介绍头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)在印度是一个重要的健康问题,每年大约有100万新病例。HNSCC在亚洲的患病率很高,尤其是在印度,由于咀嚼烟草等习惯,槟榔的用法,和酒精消费。治疗通常包括手术的组合,辐射,化疗,和生物治疗,旨在控制肿瘤,同时保持功能和生活质量。然而,幸存者经常面临吞咽困难等长期副作用,导致吸入性肺炎等并发症。调强放疗(IMRT)已显示出通过保留关键的吞咽结构来改善结果的希望。尽量减少辐射相关吞咽困难的努力对于提高患者治疗后的生活质量至关重要。我们的研究重点是检查与吞咽困难误吸相关的剂量学参数,同时使用RTOG量表评估两个治疗组的吞咽困难等级。材料和方法2018年11月至2020年4月,我们将组织学证实的非转移性头颈部癌患者纳入研究。总共56名患者被纳入我们的研究,每臂28名。他们接受了根治性放疗(RT),总剂量为66-70Gy,有或没有同步化疗,符合特定的纳入标准,排除接受再照射或远处转移的患者。将患者分为两组:I组接受三维适形放疗(3D-CRT),第二组接受了IMRT。治疗计划涉及固定,CT成像,目标体积和危险器官的轮廓,和吞咽结构的轮廓。剂量-体积直方图参数(平均剂量,最大剂量,V30,V70,V80,D50和D80)用于评估计划目标体积(PTV)之外的吞咽结构的平均剂量,平均剂量约束为50Gy。在基线时使用RTOG标准评估吞咽困难,治疗期间,治疗后六个月。统计分析采用SPSS,显著性设置为p<0.05。结果在我们的研究中,IMRT和3D-CRT组的平均年龄略有不同:58岁与55岁,分别。两组患者中出现症状三到六个月的比例较高,53.6%的3D-CRT和42.9%的IMRT。阶段分布各不相同,IV在3D-CRT中最常见,而II期在IMRT中最常见。两组中约有56%的患者有吸烟史。在3DCRT和IMRT技术之间观察到脊髓剂量的显着差异(p<0.001)。同样,在3D-CRT和IMRT组之间,吞咽困难误吸相关结构(DARSs)接受的平均剂量存在显著差异(p=0.04).与3D-CRT组患者相比,IMRT组患者的吞咽困难等级更高,在第三个月(p=0.008)和第六个月(p=0.048)观察到统计学意义。结论我们的研究发现,与3D-CRT组相比,IMRT组3个月和6个月时的平均DARS剂量显着降低,吞咽困难严重程度降低。然而,由于研究人群的多样性,在DARS剂量和吞咽困难严重程度之间建立明确的相关性具有挑战性.需要未来的大规模研究来验证这些发现,以改善DARS结构的保存。
    Introduction Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a significant health concern in India, with around one million new cases annually. The prevalence of HNSCC is notably high in Asia, especially in India, due to habits like tobacco chewing, betel nut usage, and alcohol consumption. Treatment typically involves a combination of surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and biological therapy, aiming for tumor control while preserving function and quality of life. However, survivors often face long-term side effects like difficulty swallowing, leading to complications such as aspiration pneumonia. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has shown promise in improving outcomes by sparing critical swallowing structures. Efforts to minimize radiation-related dysphagia are crucial for enhancing patients\' quality of life post-treatment. Our study focuses on examining dosimetric parameters associated with dysphagia aspiration, alongside evaluating dysphagia grades in both treatment groups using the RTOG scale. Material and methods Patients with histologically confirmed non-metastatic head and neck carcinomas were included in our study in November 2018-April 2020. A total of 56 patients were taken into our study with 28 in each arm. They underwent radical radiotherapy (RT) with a total dose of 66-70 Gy, with or without concurrent chemotherapy, meeting specific inclusion criteria and excluding those receiving reirradiation or with distant metastasis. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I received three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), and Group II received IMRT. Treatment planning involved immobilization, CT imaging, delineation of target volumes and organs at risk, and contouring of swallowing structures. Dose-volume histogram parameters (mean dose, maximum dose, V30, V70, V80, D50, and D80) were used to assess mean dose to swallowing structures outside the planning target volume (PTV), with a mean dose constraint of 50 Gy. Dysphagia was evaluated using the RTOG criteria at baseline, during treatment, and six months post-treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results In our study, the mean age at presentation differed slightly between the IMRT and 3D-CRT arms: 58 years versus 55 years, respectively. A higher proportion of patients in both arms experienced symptoms for three to six months, with 53.6% in 3D-CRT and 42.9% in IMRT. Stage distribution varied, with IV being most common in 3D-CRT and stage II in IMRT. Approximately 56% of patients in both groups had a history of smoking. Significant differences were observed in spinal cord dose between 3DCRT and IMRT techniques (p < 0.001). Similarly, a significant difference was found in the mean dose received by dysphagia aspiration-related structures (DARSs) between the 3D-CRT and IMRT arms (p = 0.04). Patients in the IMRT arm exhibited superior dysphagia grades compared to those in the 3D-CRT arm, with statistical significance observed in the third month (p = 0.008) and sixth month (p = 0.048). Conclusion Our study found a notable decrease in the mean DARS dose and reduced dysphagia severity at three and six months in the IMRT group compared to the 3D-CRT group. However, due to the diverse study population, establishing a definitive correlation between the DARS dose and dysphagia severity was challenging. Future large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings for improved preservation of DARS structures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    放射诱导的臂丛神经病变(RIBP)是乳房切除术后小分割放疗(HF-PMRT)对胸壁和区域淋巴结的最关注的晚期放射效应之一。本研究的目的是研究通过螺旋断层疗法使用调强放疗(IMRT)在HF-PMRT后乳腺癌患者中发生的RIBP事件。此外,报告了同侧臂丛神经的剂量学参数。
    包括在我们研究所通过HT使用IMRT进行HF-PMRT的乳腺癌患者。在第一个队列中,使用QuickDASH问卷测量主观RIBP症状,而客观RIBP事件在第二队列中使用综合体格检查进行评估.所有符合条件的患者治疗计划的同侧臂丛神经轮廓,并对剂量学参数进行了探索。
    从2014年3月到2022年12月,共纳入229名患者;第一和第二队列中有107名和72名患者,分别。第一队列的中位随访期为27个月,第二个队列为31个月.在第一个队列中,80例(74.77%)患者功能正常,21名(19.63%)轻度,和6(5.61%)的中度等级;没有观察到严重或非常严重的RIBP。然而,第二队列的综合身体评估显示无RIBP事件.剂量学分析显示,所有患者的中位最大剂量为44.52、44.52和44.60Gy;中位平均剂量为33.00、32.23和32.33Gy;0.03cc的中位剂量为44.33、44.36和44.39Gy,第一和第二队列中的患者,分别。评估每个剂量测定参数,并且没有检测到有统计学意义的差异。
    RIBP事件的不存在支持HT对胸壁和所有区域淋巴结采用HF-PMRT的安全性。我们建议将ICRU报告83标准应用于IMRT计划,将最大剂量(规定剂量的107%)限制为小于计划目标体积的2%,并将臂丛神经区域排除在最大剂量区域之外,是将HF-PMRT的RIBP风险降至最低的实用方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) is one of the most concerning late radiation effects after hypofractionated postmastectomy radiotherapy (HF-PMRT) to the chest wall and regional lymph nodes. The purpose of this study was to investigate the RIBP events occurring in breast cancer patients after HF-PMRT using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) by helical tomotherapy. Furthermore, the dosimetric parameters of the ipsilateral brachial plexus were reported.
    UNASSIGNED: Breast cancer patients who underwent HF-PMRT using the IMRT via HT at our institute were included. In the first cohort, subjective RIBP symptoms were measured using a QuickDASH questionnaire, whereas objective RIBP events were assessed using a comprehensive physical evaluation in the second cohort. The ipsilateral brachial plexus from all eligible patients\' treatment plans was contoured, and the dosimetric parameters were explored.
    UNASSIGNED: From March 2014 to December 2022, 229 patients were enrolled; 107 and 72 individuals were in the first and second cohorts, respectively. The first cohort\'s median follow-up period was 27 months, and the second cohort was 31 months. In the first cohort, 80 patients (74.77%) had a normal function, 21 (19.63%) had a mild grade, and 6 (5.61%) had a moderate grade; no severe or very severe RIBP was observed. However, the comprehensive physical evaluation of the second cohort indicated no RIBP events. Dosimetric analysis revealed that the median maximum dose was 44.52, 44.52, and 44.60 Gy; the median mean dose was 33.00, 32.23, and 32.33 Gy; and the median dose at 0.03 cc was 44.33, 44.36, and 44.39 Gy for all patients, patients in the first and second cohort, respectively. Each dosimetric parameter was evaluated, and no statistically significant differences were detected.
    UNASSIGNED: The absence of RIBP events supports the safety of employing HF-PMRT by HT for the chest wall and all regional lymph nodes. We propose that applying the ICRU Report 83 criteria for IMRT planning, which limit the maximum dose (107% of the prescribed dose) to less than 2% of the planning target volume and exclude the brachial plexus region from the maximal dose area, is a practical way to minimize the risk of RIBP from HF-PMRT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    放射治疗(RT)通常用于治疗前列腺癌,其中强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)和质子束治疗(PBT)是所利用的模式。此病例报告概述了在IMRT后接受质子治疗的右会阴肌肉组织复发性前列腺癌病变的治疗过程。一名64岁的日本男子,根据国家综合癌症网络指南,诊断为前列腺癌并归类为高风险,接受了六个月的雄激素剥夺治疗,其中包括比卡鲁胺和醋酸地加瑞克。在39次IMRT中完成78Gy的六个月后,患者报告会阴至肛门疼痛。实验室检查显示血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平升高,盆腔MRI显示右侧会阴肌肉组织有肿块。因此,患者被诊断为复发性前列腺癌。此后,患者接受了八个周期的多西他赛全身化疗;然而,他的疼痛逐渐加重。随后,治疗改为12个周期的卡巴他赛,导致疼痛逐渐缓解。对于复发性病变,患者接受了60Gy相对生物学有效性的PBT,分为30个部分。PBT五年后,盆腔MRI显示前列腺或周围组织无肿块性病变。PSA水平仍然很低,小于0.008ng/ml,并且没有明显的晚期并发症。
    Radiation therapy (RT) is commonly used for the treatment of prostate cancer, with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT) being the utilized modalities. This case report outlines the treatment course of a recurrent prostate cancer lesion in the right perineal musculature managed with proton therapy following IMRT. A 64-year-old Japanese man, diagnosed with prostate cancer and categorized as high risk according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, underwent six months of androgen deprivation therapy, which included bicalutamide and degarelix acetate. Six months after completing 78 Gy in 39 fractions of IMRT, the patient reported perineal to anal pain. Laboratory tests showed an elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and pelvic MRI showed a mass lesion in the right perineal musculature. Consequently, the patient was diagnosed with recurrent prostate cancer. Thereafter, the patient underwent eight cycles of systemic chemotherapy with docetaxel; however, his pain progressively worsened. Subsequently, the treatment was switched to 12 cycles of cabazitaxel, which led to gradual pain relief. The patient received PBT at 60 Gy relative biological effectiveness in 30 fractions for the recurrent lesion. Five years after PBT, pelvic MRI showed no mass lesions in the prostate or surrounding tissues. The PSA levels remained low, less than 0.008 ng/ml, and there were no apparent late complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胸腺瘤是罕见的胸腔内恶性肿瘤,可在手术后复发。术后放疗(PORT)是否应在手术后进行仍然是一个主要问题。无线电是一个持续的,多中心,在R0完全切除Masaoka-KogaIIb/III期胸腺瘤的患者中解决这个问题的随机3期试验。该领域的专家开会为港口提出建议。
    方法:来自RYTHMIC网络的一个科学委员会确定了关于完全切除胸腺瘤的PORT模式的关键问题。采用DELPHI方法对24名国家专家进行了提问,与115个问题有关:1/成像技术,2/临床目标体积(CTV)和边缘,3/对风险器官的剂量限制,4/剂量和分馏,5/跟进和记录。当意见达成≥80%的一致意见时,就定义了共识。
    结果:我们提出了以下建议:建议进行术前对比增强CT扫描(94%的协议);辐射递送的优化包括基于4D-CT的计划(82%的协议),屏住呼吸的灵感基于屏住呼吸的计划,或日常控制CT成像(81%的一致性);建议根据术前和计划CT扫描的心血管结构进行成像融合(82%的一致性);右冠状动脉和左冠状动脉前降降支应勾画为心脏亚结构(88%的一致性);建议旋转RCMI/VMAT(88%的一致性);总剂量为50Gy(81%的一致性),每分1.8-2Gy(94%的一致性);心脏建议对有心血管疾病史的患者进行随访(88%一致),在5年和10年时进行EKG和LVEF评估。
    结论:这是PORT在胸腺瘤中的第一个共识。实施将有助于协调做法。
    BACKGROUND: Thymomas are rare intrathoracic malignancies that can relapse after surgery. Whether or not Post-Operative RadioTherapy (PORT) should be delivered after surgery remains a major issue. RADIORYTHMIC is an ongoing, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial addressing this question in patients with completely R0 resected Masaoka-Koga stage IIb/III thymoma. Experts in the field met to develop recommendations for PORT.
    METHODS: A scientific committee from the RYTHMIC network identified key issues regarding the modalities of PORT in completely resected thymoma. A DELPHI method was used to question 24 national experts, with 115 questions regarding the following: (1) imaging techniques, (2) clinical target volume (CTV) and margins, (3) dose constraints to organs at risk, (4) dose and fractionation, and (5) follow-up and records. Consensus was defined when opinions reached more than or equal to 80% agreement.
    RESULTS: We established the following recommendations: preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan is recommended (94% agreement); optimization of radiation delivery includes either a four-dimensional CT-based planning (82% agreement), a breath-holding inspiration breath-hold-based planning, or daily control CT imaging (81% agreement); imaging fusion based on cardiovascular structures of preoperative and planning CT scan is recommended (82% agreement); right coronary and left anterior descending coronary arteries should be delineated as cardiac substructures (88% agreement); rotational RCMI/volumetric modulated arc therapy is recommended (88% agreement); total dose is 50 Gy (81% agreement) with 1.8 to 2 Gy per fraction (94% agreement); cardiac evaluation and follow-up for patients with history of cardiovascular disease are recommended (88% agreement) with electrocardiogram and evaluation of left ventricular ejection fraction at 5 years and 10 years.
    CONCLUSIONS: This is the first consensus for PORT in thymoma. Implementation will help to harmonize practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:涎管癌(SDC)是一种罕见且侵袭性的涎腺肿瘤亚型。它们可以呈现不同的免疫谱,如雄激素受体(AR)和HER-2/Neu阳性。迄今为止,关于如何最好地管理这个实体没有共识。
    方法:纳入2013年至2019年诊断为腮腺非转移性AR+SDC的所有患者。使用24种不同的标志物进行免疫肿瘤谱分析。Kaplan-Meier分析用于估计局部复发(LRR),远程控制,总生存率(OS)。
    结果:纳入15例患者。9例(60%)患者患有T4疾病,8例(53%)同侧颈淋巴结肿大阳性。10例(67%)患者接受了三联疗法,包括手术后辅助放疗和同步全身治疗。中位随访时间为5.5年(四分位距,4.8-6.1)。LRR的估计5年期利率,遥远的进展,OS为6%,13%,87%,分别。
    结论:尽管仅包括腮腺的AR+SDC,免疫谱,如HER-2的表达,是高度可变的,强调了未来根据个体组织学特征定制系统治疗方案的潜力。使用肿瘤特异性分子谱分析和肿瘤异质性分析对更多患者进行的研究是合理的,以更好地了解这些肿瘤的生物学。分子知情的治疗方法,包括在确定的环境中预先使用AR和HER-2/Neu指导的疗法,未来有望进一步改善这些患者的预后.
    BACKGROUND: Salivary duct carcinomas (SDC) are a rare and aggressive subtype of salivary gland neoplasm. They can present with distinct immunoprofiles, such as androgen receptor (AR) and HER-2/Neu-positivity. To date, no consensus exists on how to best manage this entity.
    METHODS: All patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic AR+ SDC of the parotid from 2013 to 2019 treated with curative intent were included. Immunologic tumor profiling was conducted using 24 distinct markers. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to estimate locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant control, and overall survival (OS).
    RESULTS: Fifteen patients were included. Nine (60%) patients presented with T4 disease and eight (53%) had positive ipsilateral cervical lymphadenopathy. Ten (67%) patients underwent trimodality therapy, including surgery followed by adjuvant radiation and concurrent systemic therapy. The median follow-up was 5.5 years (interquartile range, 4.8-6.1). The estimated 5-year rates of LRR, distant progression, and OS were 6%, 13%, and 87%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite only including AR+ SDC of the parotid, immunoprofiles, such as expression of HER-2, were highly variable, highlighting the potential to tailor systemic regimens based on individual histologic profiles in the future. Studies with larger patient numbers using tumor-specific molecular profiling and tumor heterogeneity analyses are justified to better understand the biology of these tumors. Molecularly informed treatment approaches, including the potential use of AR- and HER-2/Neu-directed therapies upfront in the definitive setting, may hold future promise to further improve outcomes for these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于使用当代放射治疗技术对疗效和毒性的随机对照研究,中度大分割放射治疗(MHRT)已成为局部前列腺癌的首选治疗方式。在MHRT的设置中,关于剂量学参数和晚期直肠毒性的现有数据有限.目的:介绍MHRT对晚期直肠毒性的影响,同时结合直肠镜检查结果进行广泛的剂量学分析。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,包括中危前列腺腺癌患者。所有患者均接受MHRT44Gy分16个部位的精囊和前列腺治疗,随后通过三维适形放射治疗(3DCRT)在6个部分中单独对前列腺进行16.5Gy的顺序增强。评估急性和晚期毒性。在基线时进行内窥镜检查,第一年治疗后每3个月,第二年每6个月。维也纳直肠镜检查评分(VRS)用于评估与放疗相关的直肠粘膜损伤。直肠的剂量学分析,直肠壁,及其子部分(上部,mid,和低1/3)进行。结果:2015年9月至2019年12月,20名患者入选。1级晚期胃肠道毒性发生在10%的患者中,而5%的患者≥2级。放疗后12个月:4例(20%)患者有VRS1;2例(10%)患者有VRS2;1例(5%)患者有VRS3。放疗后24个月,4例患者(20%)观察到VRS1,3例(15%)观察到VRS2。剂量学分析表明直肠之间有明显的变化,直肠壁,和直肠壁亚段。直肠的剂量学分析,直肠壁,关于直肠镜检查的中段和低段结果表明,较高剂量终点V52.17Gy和V56.52Gy与直肠粘膜损伤有关。结论:直肠壁及其子段的彻底描绘,连同这些结构的剂量学分析,可以减少晚期直肠毒性。确定诸如V52.17Gy和V56.52Gy的剂量学参数对直肠粘膜损伤具有显著影响;需要额外的剂量终点验证及其与晚期GI毒性的关系。
    Background: Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy (MHRT) has emerged as the preferred treatment modality for localized prostate cancer based on randomized controlled studies regarding efficacy and toxicity using contemporary radiotherapy techniques. In the setting of MHRT, available data on dosimetric parameters and late rectal toxicity are limited. Aim: To present the effects of MHRT on late rectal toxicity while conducting an extensive dosimetric analysis in conjunction with rectoscopy results. Methods: This is a prospective study including patients with intermediate-risk prostate adenocarcinoma. All patients were treated with MHRT 44 Gy in 16 fractions to the seminal vesicles and to the prostate, followed by a sequential boost to the prostate alone of 16.5 Gy in 6 fractions delivered with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT). Acute and late toxicity were assessed. Endoscopy was performed at baseline, every 3 months post-therapy for the first year, and every 6 months for the year after. The Vienna Rectoscopy Score (VRS) was used to assess rectal mucosal injury related to radiotherapy. Dosimetric analysis for the rectum, rectal wall, and its subsegments (upper, mid, and low 1/3) was performed. Results: Between September 2015 and December 2019, 20 patients enrolled. Grade 1 late gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 10% of the patients, whereas 5% had a grade ≥2. Twelve months post radiotherapy: 4 (20%) patients had VRS 1; 2 (10%) patients had VRS 2; 1(5%) patient had VRS 3. 24 months post radiotherapy, VRS 1 was observed in 4 patients (20%) and VRS 2 in 3 (15%) patients. The dosimetric analysis demonstrated noticeable variations between the rectum, rectal wall, and rectal wall subsegments. The dosimetric analysis of the rectum, rectal wall, and its mid and low segments with respect to rectoscopy findings showed that the higher dose endpoints V52.17Gy and V56.52Gy are associated with rectal mucosal injury. Conclusions: A thorough delineation of the rectal wall and its subsegments, together with the dosimetric analysis of these structures, may reduce late rectal toxicity. Dosimetric parameters such as V52.17Gy and V56.52Gy were identified to have a significant impact on rectal mucosal injury; additional dose endpoint validation and its relation to late GI toxicity is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    法布里病是由溶酶体酶缺乏引起的代谢紊乱,并且作为X-染色体紊乱遗传。法布里病患者的癌症发病率较低,和恶性肿瘤的报道,尤其是在胸部,是罕见的。在这个案例报告中,我们描述了我们在左乳腺癌和法布里病患者保乳手术后进行放射治疗的经验,我们回顾了现有的文献。病人,一个40多岁的女人,左乳腺癌需要术后放疗(pT1N0M0)。她家里有几个法布里病患者,法布里病的诊断是五年前做出的。心功能评估显示无明显异常,但是心肌活检显示存在法布里病。由于心脏和胸壁之间的距离相对保留,患者接受了心脏屏蔽三维适形放射治疗,剂量为53.2Gy,分20次,不使用深吸气屏气或调强放疗。治疗完成后,仅观察到轻度放射性皮炎。治疗已经过去了六个月,并且没有发生严重的不良事件。
    Fabry disease is a metabolic disorder caused by a deficiency in lysosomal enzymes and is inherited as an X-chromosomal disorder. Patients with Fabry disease have a low incidence of cancer, and reports of malignant tumors, especially in the thoracic region, are rare. In this case report, we describe our experience with radiation therapy following breast-conserving surgery in a patient with left breast cancer and Fabry disease, and we review the existing literature. The patient, a woman in her 40s, required postoperative irradiation for left breast cancer (pT1N0M0). There were several patients with Fabry disease in her family, and the diagnosis of Fabry disease was made five years ago. Cardiac function evaluation revealed no significant abnormalities, but a myocardial biopsy had suggested the presence of Fabry disease. Due to the relatively preserved distance between the heart and the chest wall, the patient received heart-shielded three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy at a dose of 53.2 Gy in 20 fractions, without the use of deep-inspiration breath-hold or intensity-modulated radiotherapy. After treatment was completed, only mild radiation dermatitis was observed. Six months have passed since treatment, and there have been no serious adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    局部晚期前列腺癌可能很少出现巨大的盆腔淋巴结而无远处转移。患者可以治愈性治疗。包括黄体生成素释放激素激动剂与阿比特龙或恩杂鲁胺的组合的双重激素疗法可以新佐剂地用于缩小庞大的疾病。随后可以进行激进剂量的放射治疗。这种强化治疗是可以忍受的。前列腺特异性膜抗原扫描可用于评估分期和治疗反应。这里,我们介绍一例非转移性局部晚期前列腺癌伴巨大盆腔淋巴结。患者接受双重激素疗法的新辅助治疗,然后进行根治性放疗。患者对治疗的耐受性良好,早期反应良好。
    Locally advanced prostate cancer may rarely present with bulky pelvic lymph nodes without distant metastasis. Patients may be treated with curative intent. Dual hormonal therapy including luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist in combination with abiraterone or enzalutamide can be utilized neoadjuvantly to shrink bulky disease. This can be followed by radical doses of radiotherapy. This intensified treatment is tolerable. Prostate-specific membrane antigen scan can be utilized to assess staging and treatment response. Here, we present a case of a non-metastatic locally advanced prostate cancer with bulky pelvic lymph nodes. The patient was treated neoadjuvantly with dual hormonal therapy followed by radical doses of radiotherapy. The patient tolerated the treatment well and had a promising early response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号