integrative review

综合复习
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这篇综合综述的目的是探索18-25岁青少年促进身心健康的信念和实践,识别为LGBTIQ+经历住房不安全。
    方法:该方法使用了Whittemore和Knafl描述的策略。同行评议,使用八个电子数据库识别英语发表的研究文章。18份研究报告使用定性,定量,并确定了混合方法。使用美国重症监护护士协会证据等级等级评估工具对文章进行质量评估。使用Braun和Clarke的方法分析和合成数据。
    结果:提取了与目的相关的四个主题:污名和歧视的普遍经历,不断适应风险,对健康信息和护理的参与不一致,以及通过个人和社区经验发展的内在力量。
    结论:对未来的研究有很大的影响,公共卫生护理实践,和卫生政策。公共卫生护士应纳入健康的社会决定因素(解决有害的社会过程,如同性恋恐惧症和种族主义)以及基于力量的上游研究方法,教育,和医疗保健实践。还必须进行更多的研究来评估对身心健康信息和护理的参与。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this integrative review was to explore the beliefs and practices used to promote physical and mental health among youth ages 18-25 years, identifying as LGBTIQ+ experiencing housing insecurity.
    METHODS: The approach used strategies described by Whittemore and Knafl. Peer-reviewed, published research articles in English were identified using eight electronic databases. Eighteen research reports using qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods were identified. Articles were evaluated for quality using the American Association of Critical Care Nurses Evidenced-Level Hierarchy evaluation tool. Data were analyzed and synthesized using Braun and Clarke\'s method.
    RESULTS: Four themes related to the purpose were extracted: pervasive experiences of stigma and discrimination, constantly attuned to navigating risks, inconsistent engagement in health information and care, and inner strength developed through personal and community experiences.
    CONCLUSIONS: There are strong implications for future research, public health nursing practice, and health policy. Public health nurses should incorporate social determinants of health (addressing harmful social processes such as homophobia and racism) as well as a strength-based upstream approach in research, education, and health care practices. More research must also be done to assess engagement in physical and mental health information and care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:疗养院文化变革(NHCC)运动提倡以个人和关系为中心的方法,NHs的家庭模型。本研究旨在整合有关NHCC对居民的影响的最新经验发现,工作人员,家庭,和组织成果。
    方法:综合综述。
    方法:不适用。
    方法:OVIDMEDLINE,PsycINFO,Embase,和CINAHL数据库进行了搜索,以获取2018年至2022年间以英语发表的定量或混合研究,并检查了NHCC对居民的影响,工作人员,家庭,和/或组织成果。提供了结果的叙述和表格综合。
    结果:共确定了1687个参考文献。重复删除后,标题和摘要筛选,和全文筛选,75项研究被保留用于合成,并表明NHCC对居民有积极影响(例如,生活质量和神经精神功能),工作人员(例如,工作满意度和压力),家庭(例如,满意度和抑郁症状),和组织(例如,NH吸引力和入住率)结果。
    结论:NHCC在所有研究的结果类别中均显示有希望的结果。未来的研究应该进一步调查NHCC实施的障碍,在适当的统计测试的支持下进行成本效益分析,并确定改善NH员工教育以及NH政策和法规的方法,以更好地支持NHCC计划。
    OBJECTIVE: The Nursing Home Culture Change (NHCC) movement promotes a person- and relationship-centered approach and a small-scale, homelike model for NHs. The present study aimed to integrate the most recent empirical findings regarding the impact of NHCC on resident, staff, family, and organizational outcomes.
    METHODS: Integrative review.
    METHODS: Not applicable.
    METHODS: OVID MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL databases were searched for quantitative or mixed studies published in English between 2018 and 2022 and examining the effect of NHCC on resident, staff, family, and/or organizational outcomes. A narrative and tabular synthesis of the results is provided.
    RESULTS: A total of 1687 references were identified. Following duplicate removal, title and abstract screening, and full-text screening, 75 studies were retained for synthesis and suggest a positive impact of NHCC on resident (eg, quality of life and neuropsychiatric function), staff (eg, job satisfaction and stress), family (eg, satisfaction and depressive symptoms), and organizational (eg, NH attractiveness and occupancy rate) outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: NHCC shows promising results in all studied outcome categories. Future research should further investigate obstacles to NHCC implementation, conduct cost-benefit analyses supported by appropriate statistical tests, and define ways to improve NH staff education as well as NH policies and regulations to better support NHCC initiatives.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    采用了综合审查方法,遵循PRISMA指南以及Whittemore和Knafi的综合审查方法。因此,这篇评论综合了2005年至2023年之间发表的来自四个数据库的实证文献的发现:CINAHL,MEDLINE,PsycINFO和Scopus。从符合纳入标准的七项研究中,出现了许多主题:(a)减轻照顾者的负担;(b)患有精神疾病(MI)的个人的福利;(c)获得临时护理的障碍;(d)为MI患者提供临时护理的不适当服务模式。审查结果表明,使用喘息护理服务可以减轻护理人员的负担,并对护理人员和MI患者产生积极影响。相反,由于缺乏服务可用性,喘息护理可能会导致护理人员的压力水平增加,对护理人员的喘息护理服务的认识和理解不足,MI患者可获得的喘息可及性挑战以及MI患者不愿接受喘息护理。
    An integrative review methodology was employed, following PRISMA guidelines and Whittemore and Knafi\'s method for integrative review. Thus, the review synthesised the findings of empirical literature published between 2005 and 2023 drawn from four databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Scopus. From the seven studies that met the inclusion criteria, a number of themes emerged: (a) relief of carer burden; (b) benefits for individuals with Mental Illness (MI); (c) barriers to accessing respite care; and (d) inappropriate services model for respite care for individuals with MI. The review findings indicate that using respite care services can decrease a carer\'s burden and can positively impact both carers and individuals with MI. Conversely, respite care may cause an increase in carers\' stress levels due to the lack of service availability, insufficient knowledge and understanding about respite care services for carers, respite accessibility challenges accessible for people with MI and the reluctance of people with MI to accept respite care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:怀孕期间未经治疗的抑郁和焦虑症状与孕妇的严重不良反应有关,出生结果,和儿童发展。然而,与非孕妇相比,孕妇接受筛查和治疗的可能性较小。在这次系统审查中,我们旨在探索个人,提供者,和影响筛查的系统因素,identification,以及怀孕期间抑郁和焦虑的治疗模式。
    方法:如果研究在美国境内进行,并在2012年1月至2023年1月期间以英文发表,则有资格纳入研究。每一项研究都包括比较筛查率的分析,identification,或治疗参与,并明确讨论了边缘化群体的差距或健康公平。15篇文章符合完全纳入标准。
    结果:结果显示筛查存在差异,identification,以及不同组患者怀孕期间抑郁和焦虑的治疗。筛查率从波多黎各的51.3%到阿拉斯加的90.7%不等。在特定的临床人群中,比率低至2.0%。当通过筛查或诊断指示时,不到一半的患者被转介接受治疗。患者特征,如年龄,种族,种族,社会经济和健康因素,心理健康史,肥胖与筛查率的变化有关,诊断,或治疗参与。语言因素是与筛查和治疗获得率较低相关的最常见因素。
    结论:结果表明,许多孕妇被忽视,缺乏适当的转诊或资源来获得治疗。结果与先前的发现一致,即角色混乱和时间不足,提供者培训,和兴趣有助于低比率的筛选和治疗。未来的研究必须集中在系统水平的因素上,以系统和公平的方式解决怀孕期间筛查和治疗抑郁和焦虑的障碍。
    BACKGROUND: Symptoms of untreated depression and anxiety during pregnancy are associated with serious adverse effects for the pregnant person, birth outcomes, and child development. However, pregnant persons are less likely to be screened and treated compared with nonpregnant people. In this systematic review, we aimed to explore individual, provider, and systems factors that impact screening, identification, and treatment patterns for depression and anxiety during pregnancy.
    METHODS: Studies were eligible for inclusion if they were conducted within the United States and published in English between January 2012 and January 2023. Each study included analysis that compared rates of screening, identification, or treatment engagement and explicitly discussed disparities or health equity in marginalized groups. Fifteen articles met full inclusion criteria.
    RESULTS: Results demonstrated variation in the screening, identification, and treatment of depression and anxiety during pregnancy among diverse groups of patients. Screening rates ranged from 51.3% in Puerto Rico to 90.7% in Alaska. Among specific clinical populations, rates were as low as 2.0%. Fewer than half of patients were referred to treatment when indicated by screening or diagnoses. Patient characteristics such as age, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic and health factors, mental health history, and obesity were associated with variation in the rates of screening, diagnoses, or treatment engagement. Language factors were the most common factor associated with lower rates of screening and treatment access.
    CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that many pregnant people are being overlooked and lack appropriate referrals or resources to access treatment. Results are consistent with previous findings that role confusion and lack of time, provider training, and interest contribute to low rates of screening and treatment. Future research must focus on system level factors to address perceived barriers to screening and treating depression and anxiety during pregnancy in a systematic and equitable way.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的死亡并不少见。PICUs中的临终护理通常被认为比其他设置更具挑战性,因为它是在一种背景下进行的,其中护理侧重于对重病儿童的治愈或维持生命的治疗。这篇综述旨在从医疗保健专业人员(HCP)和家庭的角度来识别和综合与PICU中提供临终护理的基本要素有关的文献。
    方法:通过搜索EMBASE进行系统综合综述,CINAHL,MEDLINE,护理和联合健康数据库,PsycINFO,Scopus,WebofScience,和谷歌学者数据库。灰色文献是通过电子论文在线服务(EthOS)搜索的,OpenGrey,灰色文献报告。此外,通过检查所有收录论文的参考列表进行手工搜索。纳入和排除标准用于由两名审阅者独立筛选检索的论文。使用恒定的比较方法对研究结果进行了分析。
    结果:21项研究符合纳入标准。确定了为PICU中的儿童提供临终关怀的三个要素:1)评估进入临终关怀阶段;2)与父母讨论和决策;3)临终关怀过程,包括在死亡阶段提供的护理,死亡时提供的护理,以及死后提供的护理。
    结论:PICU临终关怀的重点因HCP和家庭偏好而异,在不同的阶段,例如在死亡阶段,在死亡的时候,在孩子死后.为家庭的信仰和仪式量身定制临终护理被PICUHCP认为是重要的。这篇综述还强调了HCP合作在PICU中提供最佳临终关怀的重要性,并让姑息治疗团队参与临终关怀。
    BACKGROUND: Deaths in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) are not uncommon. End-of-life care in PICUs is generally considered more challenging than other settings since it is framed within a context where care is focused on curative or life-sustaining treatments for children who are seriously ill. This review aimed to identify and synthesise literature related to the essential elements in the provision of end-of-life care in the PICU from the perspectives of both healthcare professionals (HCPs) and families.
    METHODS: A systematic integrative review was conducted by searching EMBASE, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Nursing and Allied Health Database, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Grey literature was searched via Electronic Theses Online Service (EthOS), OpenGrey, Grey literature report. Additionally, hand searches were performed by checking the reference lists of all included papers. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to screen retrieved papers by two reviewers independently. The findings were analysed using a constant comparative method.
    RESULTS: Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Three elements in end-of-life care provision for children in the PICUs were identified: 1) Assessment of entering the end-of-life stage; 2) Discussion with parents and decision making; 3) End of life care processes, including care provided during the dying phase, care provided at the time of death, and care provided after death.
    CONCLUSIONS: The focus of end-of-life care in PICUs varies depending on HCPs\' and families\' preferences, at different stages such as during the dying phase, at the time of death, and after the child died. Tailoring end-of-life care to families\' beliefs and rituals was acknowledged as important by PICU HCPs. This review also emphasises the importance of HCPs collaborating to provide the optimum end-of-life care in the PICU and involving a palliative care team in end-of-life care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:探讨患者和社区护士对家庭共同决策的看法和经验。
    方法:综合综述。
    方法:CINAHL,英国护理指数,Psycinfo,Medline和社会服务摘要进行了定性搜索,2001年12月1日至2023年10月31日发表的定量和混合方法论文。
    方法:使用定义的纳入标准对电子数据库进行系统搜索。使用JoannaBriggs研究所关键评估清单对所包含的论文进行了质量评估,以进行定性研究。提取相关数据并进行主题分析。
    结果:包括13项研究的14篇论文。患者非常重视参与决策的权利,并注意到自己作为独特个体的价值。病人和护士之间的沟通和信任被认为是基本的。然而,在实践中,共享决策并不总是发生。护士描述了管理患者参与决策的紧张关系。
    结论:研究结果表明,尽管患者和社区护士喜欢参与家庭内部的共同决策,实现协作过程存在障碍。当对正在做出的决定有根本不同的观点时,这一点尤其重要。需要更多的研究来进一步了解共享决策在实践中如何发挥作用,并了解患者和护士可能经历的紧张关系。
    本文认为,共同决策不仅仅是发展一种关系,在这种关系中,患者可以表达自己的观点(当然,这很重要)。共享决策需要承认患者有权获得完整信息,并且应有权在选项之间进行选择。护士不应该认为社区护理中的共同决策很容易促进,并且应该认识到当真正的患者选择成为可能时可能存在的紧张关系。
    结论:本文展示了如何根据日常实践探索共同决策的想法,以便克服挑战和障碍。特别是,当病人和护士观点不一致时出现的紧张关系。本文谈到了理论上围绕共享决策的差距的潜力,以及在实践中如何发挥作用。
    本综述的报告以2020年系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目指南为指导(Page等。,2021)。
    这项审查是作为一项更广泛的研究的一部分进行的,该研究已向服务用户进行了咨询。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore patients\' and community nurses\' perceptions and experiences of shared decision-making in the home.
    METHODS: Integrative review.
    METHODS: CINAHL, British Nursing Index, Psycinfo, Medline and Social Services Abstracts were searched for qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods papers published between 1 December 2001 and 31 October 2023.
    METHODS: A systematic search of electronic databases was undertaken using defined inclusion criteria. The included papers were appraised for quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research. Relevant data were extracted and thematically analysed.
    RESULTS: Fourteen papers comprising 13 research studies were included. Patients attached great importance to their right to be involved in decision-making and noted feeling valued as a unique individual. Communication and trust between the patient and nurse were perceived as fundamental. However, shared decision-making does not always occur in practice. Nurses described tension in managing patients\' involvement in decision-making.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate that although patients and community nurses appreciate participating in shared decision-making within the home, there are obstacles to achieving a collaborative process. This is especially relevant when there are fundamentally different perspectives on the decision being made. More research is needed to gain further understanding of how shared decision-making plays out in practice and to understand the tensions that patients and nurses may experience.
    UNASSIGNED: This paper argues that shared decision-making is more than the development of a relationship where the patient can express their views (though of course, this is important). Shared decision-making requires acknowledgement that the patient has the right to full information and should be empowered to choose between options. Nurses should not assume that shared decision-making in community nursing is easy to facilitate and should recognize the tensions that might exist when true patient choice is enabled.
    CONCLUSIONS: This paper demonstrates how the idea of shared decision-making needs to be explored in the light of everyday practice so that challenges and barriers can be overcome. In particular, the tensions that arise when patients and nurses do not share the same perspective. This paper speaks to the potential of a gap surrounding shared decision-making in theory and how it plays out in practice.
    UNASSIGNED: The reporting of this review was guided by the 2020 guidelines for the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (Page et al., 2021).
    UNASSIGNED: This review was carried out as part of a wider study for which service users have been consulted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:证据表明,再创伤对那些获得围产期服务的妇女有不利影响。全球五分之一的女性有童年逆境的历史。18%到34%的女性经历过创伤,这是众所周知的慢性精神疾病发病的危险因素。缺乏关于妇女在围产期护理环境中的再创伤经历以及如何防止再创伤发生的证据。这项研究的目的是对妇女的再创伤经历进行综合审查,以确定围产期服务中的预防措施。
    方法:这一综合审查遵循了Whittemore和Knafl的5阶段框架,因为它允许将不同的研究方法纳入和整合到证据的整体综合中。对5个数据库进行了系统搜索(WebofScience,MEDLINE,CINAHL,ASSIA,和PsychINFO)没有日期,语言,或由于该主题领域发表的研究不足而设定的地理限制。本综述是根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行和报告的。
    结果:15项研究符合纳入标准,纳入主题综合。审查发现,所有研究的参与者都有儿童性虐待史,性虐待,和强奸。确定了三个主要主题加上子主题:(1)激活(子主题:劳动职位,亲密的程序,与医疗保健专业人员的沟通,失去控制);(2)结果(次主题:情绪反应);和(3)减少或预防再创伤的干预措施(次主题:卫生保健专业人员的作用,筛查虐待和创伤史)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,妇女在围产期服务中正在经历再创伤,并且有证据表明在临床环境中应用了形式化的方法来防止再创伤的发生。这项研究首次研究了导致围产期服务再创伤的因素,并提出了减少围产期护理环境中有害做法的建议。
    BACKGROUND: Evidence indicates that retraumatization has a detrimental effect for those women who are accessing perinatal services. One in five women worldwide has a history of childhood adversity. Between 18% and 34% of women experience trauma, which is a well-known risk factor for the onset of chronic mental health disorders. There is a lack of evidence on women\'s experiences on retraumatization in perinatal care settings and how to prevent retraumatization from occurring. The purpose of this study was to conduct an integrative review on women experiences of retraumatization to determine preventive measures within perinatal services.
    METHODS: This integrative review followed Whittemore and Knafl\'s 5-stage framework as it allows for the inclusion and integration of diverse research methodologies into an overall synthesis of the evidence. A systematic search of 5 databases was conducted (Web of Science, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ASSIA, and PsychINFO) with no date, language, or geographical limits set due to the paucity of research published in this subject area. This review was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
    RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the thematic synthesis. The review identified that participants across the studies had a history of child sexual abuse, sexual abuse, and rape. Three main themes plus subthemes were identified: (1) activating (subthemes: positions in labor, intimate procedures, communications with health care professionals, loss of control); (2) outcomes (subtheme: emotional responses); and (3) interventions reducing or preventing retraumatization (subthemes: role of the health care professional, screening for abuse and history of trauma).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that women are experiencing retraumatization in perinatal services, and there is evidence of formalized approaches being applied in clinical settings to prevent retraumatization from occurring. This study is the first to examine the factors that contribute to retraumatization in perinatal services and make recommendations to reduce the harmful practices in place in perinatal care settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:描述,通过综合文献综述,在重症监护病房工作的护理专业人员中,导致职业倦怠和道德困扰发展的因素,并确定最常用于评估职业倦怠和道德困扰的评估工具。
    方法:进行了综合文献综述。PubMed,CINAHL,PsycINFO,SciELO,Dialnet,WebofScience,Scopus,和Cochrane数据库在2012年1月至2023年2月进行了审查。此外,使用雪球采样。采用综合综合法对结果进行了分析,正如Whittemore等人提出的那样。,用于文献综述的关键评估技能计划,加强流行病学中的观察研究报告,定量观察研究指南,和JoannaBriggs研究所的定性研究清单被用来评估证据质量。
    结果:选择了41篇文章进行审查:36篇是横截面描述性文章,五是文献综述。文章分为五个因素类别:1)个人因素,2)组织因素,3)劳动关系因素,4)临终关怀因素,和5)与2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)相关的因素。Maslach倦怠清单-人类服务调查和道德困扰调查-修订的工具是最常用的衡量倦怠和道德困扰的工具。
    结论:这篇综述强调了多个人,组织,关系,情境,以及导致重症监护护士职业倦怠和道德困扰的临终因素。在这些领域的干预措施是必要的,以实现护士的工作满意度和保留,同时提高护士的护理质量。
    OBJECTIVE: To describe, through an integrative literature review, the factors contributing to the development of burnout and moral distress in nursing professionals working in intensive care units and to identify the assessment tools used most frequently to assess burnout and moral distress.
    METHODS: An integrative literature review was carried out. PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, SciELO, Dialnet, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were reviewed from January 2012 to February 2023. Additionally, snowball sampling was used. The results were analysed by using integrative synthesis, as proposed by Whittemore et al., the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for literature reviews, the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines for quantitative observational studies, and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for qualitative research were used to evaluate evidence quality.
    RESULTS: Forty-one articles were selected for review: 36 were cross-sectional descriptive articles, and five were literature reviews. The articles were grouped into five-factor categories: 1) personal factors, 2) organisational factors, 3) labour relations factors, 4) end-of-life care factors, and 5) factors related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey and the Moral Distress Survey-Revised instruments were the most commonly used to measure burnout and moral distress.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the multiple personal, organisational, relational, situational, and end-of-life factors promoting burnout and moral distress among critical care nurses. Interventions in these areas are necessary to achieve nurses\' job satisfaction and retention while improving nurses\' quality of care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:癌症疼痛在整个生存过程中仍然非常普遍和持续,研究利用移动健康(mHealth)应用程序的高级功能使个人能够自我管理疼痛的潜力至关重要。
    目的:这篇综述旨在全面了解可接受性,用户体验,以及mHealth应用程序在支持癌症疼痛自我管理方面的有效性。
    方法:我们遵循Souza和Whittemore和Knafl的6个审查过程进行了综合审查。文献在PubMed中搜索,Scopus,CINAHLPlus与全文,PsycINFO,和Embase,从2013年到2023年。关键词包括“癌症患者,\"\"疼痛,\"\"自我管理,\"\"mHealth应用程序,搜索中使用了\"和相关同义词。约翰·霍普金斯大学研究证据评估工具用于评估符合条件的研究的质量。进行叙事综合以分析提取的数据。
    结果:共纳入20项研究,总体质量被评为高(n=15)到好(n=5)。对于大多数癌症患者来说,使用mHealth应用程序来监测和管理疼痛是可以接受的。mHealth测量疼痛的内部一致性为0.96。报告的每日评估或参与率从61.9%到76.8%不等。所有mHealth应用程序都是为多模式干预而设计的。参与者通常使用疼痛应用程序有积极的体验,他们评价为愉快和用户友好。此外,6项研究报告了健康结果的显着改善,包括疼痛缓解的增强(严重程度和强度),药物依从性,减少突破性疼痛的频率。mHealth应用程序最常强调的角色包括疼痛监测,跟踪,提醒,教育促进,支持协调。
    结论:mHealth应用程序在支持疼痛自我管理方面是有效且可接受的。他们为患者提供了一种有前途的多模式方法来监测,轨道,管理他们的痛苦。这些发现为利用mHealth应用程序支持癌症疼痛自我管理提供了基于证据的见解。需要更多高质量的研究来检查基于数字技术的干预措施对癌症疼痛自我管理的有效性,并确定在现实世界实践中实施这些干预措施的促进因素和障碍。
    BACKGROUND:  Cancer pain remains highly prevalent and persistent throughout survivorship, and it is crucial to investigate the potential of leveraging the advanced features of mobile health (mHealth) apps to empower individuals to self-manage their pain.
    OBJECTIVE:  This review aims to comprehensively understand the acceptability, users\' experiences, and effectiveness of mHealth apps in supporting cancer pain self-management.
    METHODS:  We conducted an integrative review following Souza and Whittemore and Knafl\'s 6 review processes. Literature was searched in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL Plus with Full Text, PsycINFO, and Embase, from 2013 to 2023. Keywords including \"cancer patients,\" \"pain,\" \"self-management,\" \"mHealth applications,\" and relevant synonyms were used in the search. The Johns Hopkins research evidence appraisal tool was used to evaluate the quality of eligible studies. A narrative synthesis was conducted to analyze the extracted data.
    RESULTS:  A total of 20 studies were included, with the overall quality rated as high (n=15) to good (n=5). Using mHealth apps to monitor and manage pain was acceptable for most patients with cancer. The internal consistency of the mHealth in measuring pain was 0.96. The reported daily assessment or engagement rate ranged from 61.9% to 76.8%. All mHealth apps were designed for multimodal interventions. Participants generally had positive experiences using pain apps, rating them as enjoyable and user-friendly. In addition, 6 studies reported significant improvements in health outcomes, including enhancement in pain remission (severity and intensity), medication adherence, and a reduced frequency of breakthrough pain. The most frequently highlighted roles of mHealth apps included pain monitoring, tracking, reminders, education facilitation, and support coordination.
    CONCLUSIONS:  mHealth apps are effective and acceptable in supporting pain self-management. They offer a promising multi-model approach for patients to monitor, track, and manage their pain. These findings provide evidence-based insights for leveraging mHealth apps to support cancer pain self-management. More high-quality studies are needed to examine the effectiveness of digital technology-based interventions for cancer pain self-management and to identify the facilitators and barriers to their implementation in real-world practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着男性气概的概念在全球范围内演变,了解它们在地理区域和生活环境中的维度是很重要的。在同行评审的文献中,对非洲男性参与其伴侣怀孕和分娩的程度进行了有限的探讨。此分析对有关非洲大陆父亲的各种经历的现有文献进行了全面的研究。
    本研究旨在概述非洲父亲参与伴侣怀孕和分娩的经历。
    系统综合文献综述指导了这一过程。审查包括问题识别,文献检索,数据评估,数据分析和结果呈现。在Cinahl进行了系统搜索,PubMed和Scopus数据库。
    搜索确定了70篇文章,其中31篇文章涉及11个非洲国家,被使用。其中,20是定性的,9项是定量的,2项是混合方法研究。男性与医疗服务的疏远,传统的性别规范阻碍了父亲在怀孕期间的支持作用,这是普遍的主题。财务压力也主导了父亲的经历。同时,在18项研究中,父亲表达了参与伙伴和支持父亲的动机,尽管耻辱和被排除在产妇服务之外。
    这项综合审查表明,非洲国家的父亲“参与伴侣怀孕和分娩的经历”受到多种因素的影响。虽然不受欢迎的医疗服务,传统的性别规范,低收入是男性参与的障碍,教育,年龄较小,现代性别规范与更多的男性参与有关。
    主要发现:非洲大陆的父亲们有着不同的经历,随着医疗系统的疏远,有影响力的性别规范,和财务压力是共同的主题。增加的知识:不受欢迎的健康服务,传统的性别规范,低收入被发现是男性参与伴侣怀孕和分娩的障碍,而教育,年龄较小,现代性别规范与更多的男性参与有关。全球健康对政策和行动的影响:对男性的信息和教育以及有利的医疗保健环境将为男性带来更积极的体验,并鼓励他们更多地参与。
    As notions of masculinity evolve globally, it is important to understand their dimensions within geographic regions and life contexts. African men\'s involvement in their partners\'pregnancy and childbirth has been explored to a limited extent in the peer-reviewed literature. This analysis provides a comprehensive examination of the existing literature on the diverse experiences of fathers across the African continent.
    This study aims to provide an overview of fathers\' experience of involvement in their partners\' pregnancies andchildbirth in Africa.
    A systematic integrative literature review guided the process. The review comprised problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis and presentation of results. Systematic searches were conducted in the Cinahl, PubMed and Scopus databases.
    The search identified 70 articles of which 31, relating to 11 African countries, were used. Of these, 20 were qualitative, 9 were quantitative and 2 were mixed-methods studies. Men\'s alienation from health services, and traditional gender norms that discourage fathers\' supportive role during pregnancy were prevalent themes. Financial pressures also dominated fathers\'experiences. At the same time, in 18 studies fathers expressed motivation to be involved partners and supportive fathers, despite stigma and exclusion from maternity services.
    This integrative review shows that fathers\' experiences of their involvement in their partners\' pregnancy and childbirth across African countries are influenced by multiple factors. While unwelcoming health services, traditional gender norms, and low income are barriers to male involvement, education, younger age, and modern gender norms are associated with greater male involvement.
    Main findings: There is a diversity of experiences among fathers across the African continent, with healthcare system alienation, influential gender norms, and financial pressure being common themes.Added knowledge: Unwelcoming health services, traditional gender norms, and low income were found to be impediments to male involvement in their partners’ pregnancy and childbirth, while education, younger age, and modern gender norms were associated with greater male involvement.Global health impact for policy and action: Information and education for men and conducive healthcare environments would enable more positive experiences for men and encourage their greater involvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号