Aim: Glioneuronal and neuronal tumors are rare primary central nervous system malignancies with heterogeneous features. Due to the rarity of these malignancies diagnosis and treatment remains a clinical challenge. Methods: Here we performed a narrative review aimed to investigate the principal issues concerning the diagnosis, pathology, and clinical management of glioneuronal tumors. Results: Diagnostic criteria have been recently overturned thanks to a better characterization on a histological and molecular biology level. The study of genomic alterations occurring within these tumors has allowed us to identify potential therapeutic targets including BRAF, FGFR, and PDGFRA. Conclusion: Techniques allowing molecular sequencing DNA methylation assessment of the disease are essential diagnostic tools. Targeting agents should be included in the therapeutic armamentarium after loco-regional treatment failure.
[Box: see text].

UNASSIGNED: The 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors updates glioma subtyping and grading system, and incorporates EGFR amplification (Amp) as one of diagnostic markers for glioblastoma (GBM).
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to describe the frequency, clinical value and molecular correlation of EGFR Amp in diffuse gliomas based on the latest classification.
UNASSIGNED: We reviewed glioma patients between 2011 and 2022 at our hospital, and included 187 adult glioma patients with available tumor tissue for detection of EGFR Amp and other 59 molecular markers of interest. Clinical, radiological and pathological data was analyzed based on the status of EGFR Amp in different glioma subtypes.
UNASSIGNED: 163 gliomas were classified as adult-type diffuse gliomas, and the number of astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma and GBM was 41, 46, and 76. EGFR Amp was more common in IDH-wildtype diffuse gliomas (66.0%) and GBM (85.5%) than IDH-mutant diffuse gliomas (32.2%) and its subtypes (astrocytoma, 29.3%; oligodendroglioma, 34.8%). EGFR Amp did not stratify overall survival (OS) in IDH-mutant diffuse gliomas and astrocytoma, while was significantly associated with poorer OS in IDH-wildtype diffuse gliomas, histologic grade 2 and 3 IDH-wildtype diffuse astrocytic gliomas and GBM.
UNASSIGNED: Our study validated EGFR Amp as a diagnostic marker for GBM and still a useful predictor for shortened OS in this group.

Purpose: The driver mutations of gliomas have been identified in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Here we compared the concordance between CSF and tumor tissue for integrated diagnosis in gliomas using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to evaluate the feasibility of CSF detection in gliomas. Patients and methods: 27 paired CSF/tumor tissues of glioma patients were sequenced by a customized gene panel based on NGS. All CSF samples were collected through lumbar puncture before surgery. Integrated diagnosis was made by analysis of histology and tumor DNA molecular pathology according to the 2021 WHO classification of the central nervous system tumors. Results: A total of 24 patients had detectable circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and 22 had at least one somatic mutation or chromosome alteration in CSF. The ctDNA levels varied significantly across different ages, Ki-67 index, magnetic resonance imaging signal and glioma subtypes (p < 0.05). The concordance between integrated ctDNA diagnosis and the final diagnosis came up to 91.6% (Kappa, 0.800). We reclassified the clinical diagnosis of 3 patients based on the results of CSF ctDNA sequencing, and 4 patients were reassessed depending on tumor DNA. Interestingly, a rare IDH1 R132C was identified in CSF ctDNA, but not in the corresponding tumor sample. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a high concordance between integrated ctDNA diagnosis and the final diagnosis of gliomas, highlighting the practicability of NGS based detection of mutations of CSF in assisting integrated diagnosis of gliomas, especially glioblastoma.

UNASSIGNED: Integrated testing, treatment and care are key strategies for addressing the dual burdens of tuberculosis and HIV. The GeneXpert instrument allows simultaneous HIV and tuberculosis testing, but its utilisation for integrated testing remains suboptimal.
UNASSIGNED: The study determined the extent to which tuberculosis testing and HIV early infant detection (EID) were integrated on the GeneXpert platform, or the potential for integration at selected health facilities.
UNASSIGNED: A mixed methods evaluation was conducted using retrospective secondary data analysis of laboratory records from 2017 to 2019, and semi-structured interviews. Data were collected between January 2020 and March 2020 in Lesotho.
UNASSIGNED: Forty-four health staff were interviewed across 13 health facilities: one regional, nine district, and three clinic level. Six were government facilities, six were mission hospitals, and one was a non-profit clinic. All facilities selected had at least one GeneXpert instrument used for tuberculosis or HIV testing; none included simultaneous testing for tuberculosis and HIV. In 2017, the average utilisation rate for the GeneXpert instrument for tuberculosis and EID testing was 63% and 24%, while in 2019, the average utilisation rate was 61% for tuberculosis testing and 27% for EID.
UNASSIGNED: Except for three sites where the testing rates were high, utilisation rates were sufficiently low that all the HIV EID and tuberculosis tests undertaken in 2017 and 2019 could have been performed using only the instruments currently dedicated to tuberculosis testing. There is a missed opportunity for the integration of testing for tuberculosis and HIV on the GeneXpert instrument.
UNASSIGNED: This study adds to the body of evidence on the need for integration of testing and highlights some practical and technical considerations for successful implementation of integrated tuberculosis and HIV testing.

The latest WHO Classification of tumours of the Central Nervous System (CNS) emphasizes the necessity of an integrated diagnostic approach during the workup of a CNS neoplasm. In addition to the mutational status, assessment of methylation profile of a tumour emerged as a helpful (often necessary) tool to make a correct and unequivocal diagnosis. Here we present a case of a Pleomorphic Xanthoastrocytoma with clinical, radiological and histopathological findings remarkably overlapping with a recently described paediatric-type glioma namly Polymorphic Low-grade Neuroepithelial Tumour of the Young (PLNTY). The differential diagnosis here discussed represents a methodological paradigm in the modern neuropathology. In fact, the presentation of this case is a demonstration that in day-to-day practice, clinical, radiological, and histopathological data can all be misleading, and the correct diagnosis can only be reached by integration with molecular analysis. In the modern neuro-oncology, it is by far mandatory for all the specialists dealing with cerebral tumours to \"contaminate\" their own cultural heritage with other ones, to optimally manage a patient with CNS tumour.

UNASSIGNED: The 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumors incorporated specific molecular alterations into the categorization of gliomas. The major revision of the classification scheme effectuates significant changes in the diagnosis and management of glioma. This study aimed to depict the clinical, molecular, and prognostic characteristics of glioma and its subtypes according to the current WHO classification.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent surgery for glioma at Peking Union Medical College Hospital during 11 years were re-examined for tumor genetic alterations using next-generation sequencing, polymerase chain reaction-based assay, and fluorescence in situ hybridization methods and enrolled in the analysis.
UNASSIGNED: The enrolled 452 gliomas were reclassified into adult-type diffuse glioma (ntotal=373; astrocytoma, n=78; oligodendroglioma, n=104; glioblastoma, n=191), pediatric-type diffuse glioma (ntotal=23; low-grade, n=8; high-grade, n=15), circumscribed astrocytic glioma (n=20), and glioneuronal and neuronal tumor (n=36). The composition, definition, and incidence of adult- and pediatric-type gliomas changed significantly between the 4th and the 5th editions of the classification. The clinical, radiological, molecular, and survival characteristics of each subtype of glioma were identified. Alterations in CDK4/6, CIC, FGFR2/3/4, FUBP1, KIT, MET, NF1, PEG3, RB1, and NTRK2 were additional factors correlated with the survival of different subtypes of gliomas.
UNASSIGNED: The updated WHO classification based on histology and molecular alterations has updated our understanding of the clinical, radiological, molecular, survival, and prognostic characteristics of varied subtypes of gliomas and provided accurate guidance for diagnosis and potential prognosis for patients.

The classification of tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) is a rapidly evolving field. While tumors were historically classified on the basis of morphology, the recent integration of molecular information has greatly refined this process. In some instances, molecular alterations provide significant prognostic implications beyond what can be ascertained by morphologic examination alone. Additionally, tumors may harbor molecular alterations that provide a therapeutic target. Pediatric CNS tumors, in particular, rely heavily on the integration of molecular data with histologic, clinical, and radiographic features to reach the most accurate diagnosis. This review aims to provide insight into a neuropathologist\'s approach to the clinical workup of pediatric brain tumors with an ultimate goal of reaching an integrated diagnosis that provides the most accurate classification and informs prognosis and therapy selection. The primary focus will center on how histology and molecular findings are used in combination with clinical and radiographic information to reach a final, integrated diagnosis.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Diffuse gliomas are represented in the 2007 WHO classification of CNS tumors as astrocytomas, oligoastrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma of grades II/III and glioblastomas WHO grade IV, which was a pure morphologic classification. WHO 2016 classification combines morphology with molecular markers like IDH, ATRX, and 1p/19q codeletion to give an integrated diagnosis.
UNASSIGNED: The study was carried out on formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues from 54 patients including three pediatric patients. Molecular studies were performed to know the 1p/19q codeletion status, IDH1R132H, and ATRX immunoexpression. Also, the IDH1R132H status was correlated with survival data.
UNASSIGNED: The study included 54 tumors with oligodendroglial morphology. IDH1R132H positivity was seen in 85% of total cases and codeletion was seen in 72%. The integrated diagnosis revised the cases into oligodendroglioma (39), astrocytoma (5), and glioblastoma (6).IDH mutant tumors were found to have better survival than negative ones which was statistically significant.
UNASSIGNED: This study emphasizes the need for molecular work up of tumors with oligodendroglial morphology with readily available techniques like IHC and Fluorescence in situ hybridization.

BACKGROUND: Recent genomic studies identified four discrete molecular subgroups of medulloblastoma (MB), and the risk stratification of childhood MB in the context of subgroups was refined in 2015. In this study, we investigated the effect of molecular subgroups on the risk stratification of childhood MB.
METHODS: The nCounter® system and a customized cancer panel were used for molecular subgrouping and risk stratification in archived tissues.
RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were included in this study. In clinical risk stratification, based on the presence of residual tumor/metastasis and histological findings, 24 and 20 patients were classified into the average-risk and high-risk groups, respectively. Molecular subgroups were successfully defined in 37 patients using limited gene expression analysis, and DNA panel sequencing additionally classified the molecular subgroups in three patients. Collectively, 40 patients were classified into molecular subgroups as follows: WNT (n = 7), SHH (n = 4), Group 3 (n = 8), and Group 4 (n = 21). Excluding the four patients whose molecular subgroups could not be determined, among the 17 average-risk group patients in clinical risk stratification, one patient in the SHH group with the TP53 variant was reclassified as very-high-risk using the new risk classification system. In addition, 5 out of 23 patients who were initially classified as high-risk group in clinical risk stratification were reclassified into the low- or standard-risk groups in the new risk classification system.
CONCLUSIONS: The new risk stratification incorporating integrated diagnosis showed some discrepancies with clinical risk stratification. Risk stratification based on precise molecular subgrouping is needed for the tailored treatment of MB patients.