OBJECTIVE: Guidelines recommend insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) in the early phases of the evaluation of unexplained syncope (US) syncope, when an arrhythmic etiology is suspected. We examined the diagnostic yield of the last generation ICM (LG-ICM) to establish the causes of US, by assessing in the clinical practice the incidence of: relevant arrhythmia diagnosis, syncope recurrences and CM-guided cardiac electronic device (CIED) implantation. We investigated also baseline patient characteristics associated to an increased risk of relevant arrhythmias and of syncope recurrence.
METHODS: Data prospectively collected from consecutive patients receiving LG-ICM for investigation of US or presyncope in our institution between November 2020 and January 2023 were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 109 patients (mean age 64.4 ± 16.1 years, 40.4% women) with US or pre-syncope episodes underwent implantation of the LG-ICM. During a mean follow-up of 11.7 ± 8.1 months, LG-ICM diagnostic yield was 42%. In particular, LG-ICM detected cardiac arrhythmias in 29 (27%) patients (in 6 out of them during a syncope recurrence) and to exclude the arrhythmic origin of the syncope in additional 19 (17%) patients. LG-ICM guided the implantation of a CIED in 16 (15%) US patients, due to the diagnosis of asystole or severe bradycardia. Age ≥ 65 years (p = 0.012) and atrial arrhythmia history (p = 0.004) are significant independent predictors of arrhythmic diagnoses performed by LG-ICM, while CAD is predictor of syncope recurrence (bordering on statistical significance, p = 0.056).
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic yield of LG-ICM in US syncope is comparable to those of ILR and previous generation ICM. The advantages of LG-ICM should be sought in lower hospital workload necessary to manage ICM data. Age ≥ 65 years and atrial arrhythmia history are independent predictors of significant ICM-detected arrhythmias.

Insertable cardiac monitor (ICM), used for long-term heart rhythm monitoring, often experiences diagnostic challenges such as T-wave oversensing, leading to false positives. This case report presents a novel approach to rectifying T-wave oversensing in ICM implantations. In this case, we are sharing a 38-year-old female with recurrent syncopal episodes who underwent ICM implantation (LUX-Dx™, ICM-Boston Scientific, Marlborough, United States). Post-implantation, T-wave oversensing was detected. Instead of the usual readjustment or reinsertion, we employed a non-invasive method of repositioning the ICM at a 45-degree angle toward the right side of the heart through the existing incision. This effectively resolved the oversensing issue without complications or the need for a new incision. ICMs are vital in linking symptoms to arrhythmias, especially in cases where standard diagnostic tools fall short. Despite their utility, ICMs are susceptible to T-wave oversensing due to subcutaneous placement. Our case demonstrates a successful alternative approach to address this, enhancing ICM\'s diagnostic accuracy without invasive procedures. This case highlights the potential of repositioning ICMs as a simple, non-invasive solution to overcome T-wave oversensing issues. It calls for further research and discussion within the medical community to explore its wider applicability, thereby improving ICM efficacy in clinical practice. The patient experienced no complications following the procedure during the three-month visit with appropriate sensing, validating this approach as a feasible option in similar cases.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: The LUX-Dx™ is a novel insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) introduced into the European market since October 2022.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to provide a comprehensive description of the ICM implantation experience in Europe during its initial year of commercial use.
METHODS: The system comprises an incision tool and a single-piece insertion tool pre-loaded with the small ICM. The implantation procedure involves incision, creation of a device pocket, insertion of the ICM, verification of sensing, and incision closure. Patients receive a mobile device with a preloaded App, connecting to their ICM and transmitting data to the management system. Data collected at European centers were analyzed at the time of implantation and before patient discharge.
RESULTS: A total of 368 implantation procedures were conducted across 23 centers. Syncope (235, 64%) and cryptogenic stroke (34, 9%) were the most frequent indications for ICM. Most procedures (338, 92%) were performed in electrophysiology laboratories. All ICMs were successfully implanted in the left parasternal region, oriented at 45° in 323 (88%) patients. Repositioning was necessary after sensing verification in 9 (2%) patients. No procedural complications were reported, with a median time from skin incision to suture of 4 min (25th-75th percentiles 2-7). At implantation, the mean R-wave amplitude was 0.39 ± 0.30 mV and the P-wave visibility was 91 ± 20%. Sensing parameters remained stable until pre-discharge and were not influenced by patient characteristics or indications. Procedural times were fast, exhibited consistency across patient groups, and improved after an initial experience with the system. Operator Operator feedback on the system was positive. Patients reported very good ease of use of the App and low levels of discomfort after implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: LUX-Dx™ implantation appears efficient and straightforward, with favorable post-implantation sensing values and associated with positive feedback from operators and patients.

Background: Long-term rhythm monitoring (LTRM) can detect undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients at risk of AF and stroke. Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs), which have been shown to play a role in atrial electrical and structural remodelling, could help to select patients who would benefit most from LTRM. The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension and screen-detected subclinical AF (SCAF) using an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) have significantly different plasma baseline levels of five selected miRNAs playing a role in the modulation of atrial electrical and structural remodelling (miR-21-5p, miR-29b-3p, miR-150-5p, miR-328-3p, and miR-432-5p) compared to those without SCAF. Methods: This study was performed at the outpatient clinic of a secondary academic teaching hospital between December 2013 and November 2015. Eligible patients were ≥65 years of age with DM and hypertension but without known heart diseases. All patients received an ICM. On the day of ICM implantation, blood samples for the measurement of plasma levels of the five miRNAs were drawn. In this post hoc analysis, we investigated their expression by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. MiRNA plasma levels in patients with and without newly detected SCAF were compared. Results: We included 82 consecutive patients (median age of 71.3 years (IQR 67.4-75.1)), who were followed for a median of 588 days (IQR: 453-712 days). Seventeen patients (20.7%) had ICM-detected SCAF. Plasma levels of miR-328-3p, miR-29b-3p, miR-21-5p, miR-432-5p, and miR-150-5p were slightly but not significantly different in patients with incident SCAF compared with patients without. Conclusions: In patients with hypertension and DM, newly detected SCAF was not significantly associated with changes in expression levels of miR-21-5p, miR-29b-3p, miR-150-5p, miR-328-3p, and miR-432-5p.

Arrhythmia detection is essential when assessing the safety of novel drugs and therapies in preclinical studies. Many short-term arrhythmia monitoring methods exist, including non-invasive ECG and Holter. However, there are no reliable, long-term, non-invasive, or minimally invasive methods for cardiac arrhythmia follow-up in large animals that allows free movement with littermates. A long follow-up time is needed when estimating the impact of long-lasting drugs or therapies, such as gene therapy. We evaluated the feasibility and performance of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) in pigs for minimally invasive, long-term monitoring of cardiac arrhythmias that allows free movement and species-specific behavior. Multiple implantation sites were tested to assess signal quality. ICMs recognized reliably many different arrhythmias but failed to detect single extrasystoles. They also over-diagnosed T-waves, resulting in oversensing. Muscle activity and natural startles of the animals caused noise, leading to a heterogeneous signal requiring post-recording evaluation. In spite of these shortcomings, the ICMs showed to be very useful for minimally invasive long-term monitoring of cardiac rhythm in pigs.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: Detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) is challenging due to its paroxysmal nature. We sought to assess AF detection with an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) and to perform cost analysis for various AF monitoring strategies post-ESUS We applied this cost analysis modeling to recently published Stroke AF and Per Diem trials.
UNASSIGNED: Retrospective chart review was performed in consecutive hospitalized patients with ESUS who had ICM placed prior to discharge. Utilizing rate of ICM-detected AF and Medicare average payments, we modeled 30-day per-patient diagnostic costs of Immediate ICM insertion prior to discharge versus using a wearable monitor followed by ICM in patients with ESUS, from Medicare and patient out-of-pocket perspectives. Similar modeling strategy and cost analysis was applied to the Stroke AF and Per Diem trials.
UNASSIGNED: In 192 ESUS patients, AF detection increased with length of monitoring: 7.3 % at 14 days, 9.4 % at 30 days, and 17.2 % after a median ~ 6 months (189 days). Cost modeling predicted that immediate ICM leads to $3683-$4070 lower Medicare payments per-patient and $1425-$1503 lower patient out-of-pocket costs compared to Wearable-to-ICM strategies. Using similar modeling in the PER DIEM and STROKE AF trials, the additive costs of the 30-day ELR to ICM strategy ranged from $3786-$3946 from a payer perspective and $1472-$1503 from a patient out-of-pocket perspective.
UNASSIGNED: Use of ICM immediately after ESUS is cost-saving compared to Wearable-to-ICM strategies, due to the cost and low diagnostic yield of short-term wearable cardiac monitoring.

Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are increasingly used in equine cardiology to detect arrhythmias in the context of collapse, poor performance or monitoring for recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). However to date, the ILR has never been reported to be used with a remote monitoring functionality in horses, therefore the arrhythmia is only discovered when a clinician interrogates the ILR using dedicated equipment, which might delay diagnosis and intervention. This case report describes the use of an ILR with remote monitoring functionality in a horse with recurrent AF. The remote monitoring consisted of a transmission device located in the stable allowing daily transmission of arrhythmia recordings and functioning messages to an online server, available for the clinician to evaluate without specialised equipment. The ILR detected an episode of paroxysmal AF approximately three months after implantation. Seven months after implantation, initiation of persistent AF was seen on an episode misclassified by the ILR as bradycardia, and the horse was retired. This report shows the feasibility and benefits of remote monitoring for ILRs in horses, but also the shortcomings of current algorithms to interpret the equine electrocardiogram.

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are small electrocardiographs implanted subcutaneously to automatically record electrocardiograms when arrhythmia is detected in patients with syncope. If the ICM misses a significant arrhythmia, it may delay the diagnosis of arrhythmogenic syncope and put the patient at risk. Herein, we describe a case of undetected cardiac arrest in a patient with ICM. An 87-year-old man with syncope was admitted to the hospital. After 8 days of monitoring, the cause could not be determined, and an ICM was implanted. Nine hours after implantation, the patient experienced cardiopulmonary arrest. Despite a body surface electrocardiogram showing ventricular flatline and fibrillation, the ICM failed to record. The cause of failure to record was considered to be the fluctuation in the R-wave amplitude of the ICM and noise oversensing. In conclusion, albeit infrequently, ICMs might overlook life-threatening arrhythmias. Even in cases where the ICM fails to detect an arrhythmia matching the symptoms, it may not be feasible to entirely rule out the presence of arrhythmias.
UNASSIGNED: Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) are used to diagnose arrhythmogenic syncope. However, extremely infrequently, ICM may fail to record life-threatening arrhythmias. Failure to capture arrhythmias can happen due to an unfortunate combination of factors such as a low amplitude of the recorded R wave and noise. Even in cases where the ICM does not detect an arrhythmia that matches the symptoms, it may not be feasible to completely exclude the presence of arrhythmias.