BACKGROUND: Ocrelizumab is an approved intravenously administered anti-CD20 antibody for multiple sclerosis (MS). The safety profile and patient preference for conventional versus shorter ocrelizumab infusions were investigated in the ENSEMBLE PLUS study.
METHODS: ENSEMBLE PLUS was a randomized, double-blind substudy to the single-arm ENSEMBLE study (NCT03085810), comparing outcomes in patients with early-stage relapsing-remitting MS receiving ocrelizumab 600 mg over the approved 3.5-h (conventional) versus 2-h (shorter) infusion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with infusion-related reactions (IRRs) following the first randomized dose (RD); the secondary endpoint included IRR frequency at subsequent RDs.
RESULTS: At first RD, the number of patients with an IRR in the conventional (101/373; 27.1%) versus shorter (107/372; 28.8%) infusion group was similar (difference, stratified estimates [95% CI]: 1.9% [- 4.4, 8.2]). Most IRRs (conventional: 99.4%; shorter: 97.7%) were mild/moderate. IRR frequency decreased over the course of RDs; three patients discontinued from the shorter infusion arm but continued with conventional infusion. Overall, > 98% of IRRs resolved without sequelae in both groups. Pre-randomization throat irritation was predictive of future throat irritation as an IRR symptom. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were consistent with the known ocrelizumab safety profile. On completion of ENSEMBLE PLUS, most patients chose to remain on (95%) or switch to (80%) shorter infusion.
CONCLUSIONS: ENSEMBLE PLUS demonstrates the safety and tolerability of shorter ocrelizumab infusions. Most patients remained on/switched to shorter infusion after unblinding; IRRs did not strongly influence patient decisions.
BACKGROUND: Substudy of ENSEMBLE (NCT03085810).
BACKGROUND: March 21, 2017.

BACKGROUND: Avelumab, durvalumab, and atezolizumab are anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies approved for clinical application in Japan. Despite targeting the same molecule, avelumab elicits a different frequency of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) compared with durvalumab and atezolizumab, leading to differences in premedication recommendations. This study aimed to collect information to verify the relationship during IRRs and the characteristics of antibody molecules, by investigating the frequency of IRRs caused by three types of antibodies and the actual status of prophylactic measures.
METHODS: This single-center, retrospective observational study collected the medical records of 73 patients who received avelumab, durvalumab, or atezolizumab at Osaka University Hospital.
RESULTS: The frequency of IRRs was 50.0% (12/24) for avelumab, 31.0% (8/27) for durvalumab, and 18.2% (4/22) for atezolizumab. The IRRs were grade 2 in seven patients and grade 1 in five patients treated with avelumab, grade 2 in six patients and grade 1 in two patients treated with durvalumab, and grade 1 in all patients treated with atezolizumab. Among patients in whom symptoms were observed during the first administration, measures were taken to prevent IRRs for the second administration, but cases were confirmed in which symptoms reappeared, especially in patients who received durvalumab.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the frequency of IRRs due to anti-PD-L1 antibodies is higher than that previously reported in clinical trials and different modifications in antibody molecules may affect the difference in IRR frequency.

UNASSIGNED: Cadonilimab (AK104) is an innovative human programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) bispecific antibody. Compared with the combination therapy of PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockers, less cellular toxicity of cadonilimab was significantly manifested. As one of the characteristic adverse effects of cadonilimab, infusion-related reactions (IRRs) represent fever, chills, rash, decreased blood pressure, and other symptoms.
UNASSIGNED: Here, we documented seven cases of IRRs after the administration of cadonilimab. The symptoms of IRRs were relieved after the discontinuation of cadonilimab and the administration of diphenhydramine, dexamethasone, and cimetidine. Notably, 3 patients were able to tolerate the subsequent cadonilimab therapy under the pretreatment.
UNASSIGNED: In this study, we discovered that cadonilimab-related IRRs might be lessened or prevented by administering medication and the proper pretreatment and lowering the infusion rate.

BACKGROUND: Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are major side effects of rituximab administration. Male sex, high body weight, body surface area (BSA), and body mass index are predictive markers of rituximab-induced IRRs. However, as rituximab was not administered at a fixed dosage in a previous study, whether a higher dosage or factors associated with a larger physique are more strongly associated with rituximab-induced IRRs is unknown.
METHODS: Thirteen adults with frequently relapsing minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) who received an initial rituximab dose of 500 mg between September 2015 and November 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Data on IRRs were collected from medical records. The incidence of rituximab-induced IRRs was 38.5% (5/13). The IRR group had a significantly higher BSA than the non-IRR group (median, 1.86 vs. 1.48 m2; p = 0.045). Additionally, rituximab dosage normalized by BSA in the IRR group was significantly lower than that in the non-IRR group (median, 268.8 vs. 337.9 mg/m2; p = 0.045).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that adults with frequently relapsing MCNS who experienced IRRs tend to have a higher BSA, even with fixed-dose rituximab treatment. Therefore, when patients with higher BSA receive rituximab treatment, clinicians should be careful about monitoring patient condition whether the dosage is fixed or not.

Stress cardiomyopathy is a transient left ventricular dysfunction caused by physiologic or pathologic stressors. Anaphylaxis is a hypersensitivity disorder that can lead to a rapid life-threatening respiratory collapse. It happens due to exposure to allergens including medications. During anaphylaxis, there is a compensatory release of catecholamines that can lead to stress cardiomyopathy. In this case, nab-paclitaxel infusion led to anaphylaxis with respiratory failure. Echocardiogram showed features of diffuse hypokinesis with preserved basal segment contractility, and cardiac catheterization did not show any evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease. The overall clinical picture suggested stress cardiomyopathy. The patient was treated with guideline-directed medical therapy which resulted in normalization of the ejection fraction with no symptoms of congestive heart failure at any point. The patient was thereafter resumed on a reduced dose of nab-paclitaxel. This case report adds to the spectrum of infusion-related reactions associated with paclitaxel and demonstrates the course of events in the management of anaphylaxis and stress cardiomyopathy in this scenario.

Paclitaxel has a risk of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) and despite no prospective evidence, is often given with premedication including a corticosteroid, H1 antagonist, and H2 antagonist (H2RA). Backorders impacted the supply of intravenous H2RAs at our center, and it was removed as routine premedication. The authors compared the incidence of IRR in patients treated without H2RA to patients receiving standard H2RA premedication.
The authors reviewed outpatients starting paclitaxel at the Ottawa Hospital from December 2019 to October 2021. Two cohorts were created: patients treated without H2RA premedication (intervention), and those receiving standard H2RA (control). Demographics, treatment, and IRR information were collected retrospectively. Primary end point was rate of grade ≥2 IRRs during first two doses of paclitaxel.
A total of 182 patients were treated without H2RA premedication, compared to 184 control patients treated during non-backorder periods. Baseline characteristics included: median age, 63 years; 86% female; and primary tumor 52% breast/24% gynecologic/10% gastric/esophageal/8% lung/6% other. There were no significant differences between cohorts in baseline characteristics. There was no difference in the rate of grade ≥2 IRR between cohorts; 12.1% (22 of 182; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7%-17.7%) for patients treated without H2RA, and 15.1% (28 of 185; 95% CI, 10.3%-21.1%) for control patients. The rate of grade ≥3 IRRs were also similar, 4.4% in intervention cohort versus 3.8% in control cohort.
The removal of H2RAs from premedication for paclitaxel did not result in an increased incidence of IRRs. The use of H2RAs in preventing IRRs to paclitaxel should be re-evaluated.

Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are the major side effects of rituximab administration. Although several studies have reported predictive markers for IRRs in patients with malignancies, there are no such reports for patients without malignancies. Accordingly, we aimed to clarify the predictive markers for rituximab-induced IRRs in renal transplant recipients. This retrospective study included 116 inpatients aged ≥18 years who received an initial dose of 150 mg/m2 of rituximab for desensitization before renal transplantation with loxoprofen and diphenhydramine before rituximab infusion between June 2007 and February 2022. Overall, 45 patients were evaluated and 71 patients were excluded in this study. IRRs were observed in 12 (26.7%) patients. The proportion of men in the IRRs group was significantly higher than that in the non-IRRs group (p = 0.023). Additionally, body weight, body surface area (BSA), and body mass index (BMI) were significantly higher in the IRRs group than in the non-IRRs group (body weight, p = 0.0058; BSA, p = 0.0051; BMI, p = 0.017). Their cutoff values for predicting rituximab-induced IRRs, based on the receiver-operating characteristic curve, were 74.850 kg, 1.910 m2 and 24.164 kg/m2, respectively. In conclusion, the male sex, high actual body weight, BSA, and BMI may be new predictive markers for rituximab-induced IRRs in renal transplant recipients. Therefore, clinicians should carefully monitor patients who receive rituximab before renal transplantation and present with the predictive markers.

Daratumumab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, is worldwide approved for treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients and is available as intravenous or subcutaneous formulations. Intravenous daratumumab is associated with frequent infusion-related reactions, while eye complications, especially refractive shifts, are very rare, with only previously reported cases. Here, we described a rare case of multi-refractory MM who developed transient myopic shift during intravenous daratumumab infusion successfully treated only with cycloplegic collyrium not requiring infusion rate lowering or drug discontinuation. This conservative therapeutic approach allowed termination of induction therapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation resulting in durable complete remission.

To clarify the incidence and risk factors of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) caused by trastuzumab in breast cancer patients and verify the preventive effects of dexamethasone.
All breast cancer patients newly treated with trastuzumab at the Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2020 were included. The electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed. The outcome measure was the occurrence of IRRs of grade 1 or higher during trastuzumab infusion. Only dexamethasone and anticancer drugs administered concomitantly before trastuzumab were used as explanatory variables.
The 176 patients included in the study received 2320 infusions. Fifty-eight patients (33.0%) experienced IRRs, and IRRs occurred in 80 (3.4%) of the total 2320 infusions. Owing to the hierarchical structure of the data, the independence of the observed values was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Multivariate multilevel logistic regression analysis showed that premedication with dexamethasone lowered the risk of trastuzumab-induced IRRs (mg, per 1 unit, odds ratio [OR] = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.43-0.85, P = .003). In addition, preoperative status (OR = 38.9, 95% CI 5.4-278.7, P < .001) and high-dose trastuzumab (mg/kg, per 1 unit, OR = 60.6, 95% CI 20.1-182.9, P < .001) were independent risk factors for IRRs.
The results of this study suggest that premedication with dexamethasone exhibits preventive effects on trastuzumab-induced IRRs in breast cancer patients. Future studies are needed to determine the optimal dose of dexamethasone to prevent IRRs and the impact of dexamethasone on the efficacy of trastuzumab in breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Intravenous anticancer therapy can be associated with hypersensitivity- and/or infusion-related reactions (IRRs) which may result in life-threatening symptoms. As part of a quality improvement project, oncology pharmacists developed and implemented a nurse-driven, symptom-based IRR protocol. The objective of the evaluation was to evaluate IRR treatment failure after implementation of a symptom-based protocol in an ambulatory infusion center. Secondary objectives included determining the most common anticancer agents requiring IRR treatment, documentation of ED visits or hospital admissions within 72 h of treatment, documentation of mortality due to an IRR, and evaluating whether there were multiple documented IRRs to the same medication.
METHODS: A total of 456 patients, who received an infusion of anticancer therapy at Grady Health System (GHS) between February 2014 and March 2018, were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were included if they received a protocol-specific medication for infusion reaction management of a parenterally administered anticancer agent. The primary outcome was the rate of treatment failure within 72 h of treatment for an IRR.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients experiencing 108 IRRs were included in the analysis. Five percent of IRRs consisted of rigors only, 57% of IRRs were mild/moderate severity, 31% of IRRs were severe/anaphylactic severity and 7% of IRRs were rigors in addition to a mild/moderate/severe reaction. Of the 108 IRRs, treatment failure within 72 h was observed in eight reactions; six were evaluated in the emergency department and two required a hospital admission. Overall, 93% of reactions resolved in the infusion center and patients were discharged home; there were no patient deaths. The most common offending agents were paclitaxel and oxaliplatin.
CONCLUSIONS: Following implementation of a novel pharmacist-developed, symptom-based nurse-driven protocol, infusion reaction treatment failure occurred in 7% of IRRs evaluated. Although the failure rate was low, additional nurse education and improved access to protocol-directed medications may optimize use of the protocol.