informants

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是检查自闭症特征的父母和教师报告中的性别差异和线人差异。数据来自SimonsSimplexCollection,以创建自闭症青年(N=388;4-17岁)的性别匹配样本。包括参与者的父母和老师都有来自社会反应量表(SRS)的自闭症特征报告。在每个性别群体中,比较了家长和老师的原始SRS评分.评估每个线人组中(父母/老师)的性别差异。检查了家长与教师差异的预测因素。尽管父母报告的自闭症特征没有性别差异,教师报告说,与女性相比,男性有更多的自闭症特征。女性父母报告的自闭症特征明显多于多个领域的教师。年龄较大和女性是多个领域父母与老师差异增加的重要预测因素。这些结果表明,在家庭和学校中观察到的女性自闭症特征之间存在差异,并且建立在越来越多的文献基础上,这些文献强调了自闭症青年在整个发展过程中的潜在伪装:父母与教师之间的差异可能反映出自闭症女性由于有意识的行为变化或对女性特征的基于性别的期望而被教师忽视的方式。因此,对个人差异的讨论可能会减轻伪装的潜在长期后果。
    The purpose of this study was to examine sex differences and informant discrepancies in parent- and teacher-reports of autism traits. Data were drawn from the Simons Simplex Collection to create a sex-matched sample of autistic youth (N = 388; 4-17 years). Included participants had both parent and teacher reports of autistic traits from the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS). Within each sex group, parent and teacher raw SRS scores were compared. Scores within each informant group (parent/teacher) was assessed for sex differences. Predictors of parent-teacher discrepancies were examined. Despite no sex differences in parent-reported autistic traits, teachers reported males as having more autistic traits compared to females. Parents of females reported significantly more autistic traits than teachers across multiple domains. Being older and female were significant predictors of increased parent-teacher discrepancy for multiple domains. These results suggest discrepancies between the observed autistic traits for females at home and school and builds on the growing body of literature highlighting potential camouflaging across development in autistic youth: parent-teacher discrepancies may reflect ways that autistic females are overlooked by teachers due to conscious changes in behavior or gender-based expectations of female characteristics. Discussion of discrepancies on an individual basis may therefore alleviate potential long-term consequences of camouflaging.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:信息报告是痴呆症诊断的关键组成部分,但是各国举报人报告的可比性还没有得到很好的理解。
    方法:我们使用美国的人口代表性调查(N=3183),比较了告密者问卷对老年人认知下降(IQCODE)的表现,英格兰(N=1050),印度(N=4047)。
    结果:回归样条和模型拟合比较的分析显示,在美国和英国,IQCODE与认知功能低下的客观认知之间存在很强的关联;在印度,这种关联较弱,但在认知范围内是一致的.IQCODE评分与线人生成之间的关联(方差分析[ANOVA]p=0.001),照顾者状态(p<0.001),在调整客观认知后,线人已知的年份(p=0.015)在不同国家是不同的。
    结论:在印度,IQCODE对认知功能最低水平的损伤较不敏感.根据线人特征对IQCODE评分进行特定国家的调整可能会改善跨国比较。
    结论:IQCODE和认知测试之间的关联在美国和英国相似,但在印度不同。在印度,IQCODE对低认知和未受过教育的人的损伤可能不太敏感。线人特征可能会对各国线人下降的报告产生不同的影响。调整或对文化敏感的调整可能会提高跨国可比性。
    Informant reports are a critical component of dementia diagnoses, but the comparability of informant reports across countries is not well understood.
    We compared the performance of the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE) using population-representative surveys in the United States (N = 3183), England (N = 1050), and India (N = 4047).
    Analyses of regression splines and comparisons of model fit showed strong associations between IQCODE and objective cognition at low cognitive functioning in the United States and England; in India, the association was weaker but consistent over the range of cognition. Associations between IQCODE score and informant generation (analysis of variance [ANOVA] p = 0.001), caregiver status (p < 0.001), and years known by the informant (p = 0.015) were different across countries after adjusting for objective cognition.
    In India, the IQCODE was less sensitive to impairments at the lowest levels of cognitive functioning. Country-specific adjustments to IQCODE scoring based on informant characteristics may improve cross-national comparisons.
    Associations between IQCODE and cognitive testing were similar in the United States and England but differed in India. In India, the IQCODE may be less sensitive to impairments among those with low cognition and no education. Informant characteristics may differentially impact informant reports of decline across countries. Adjustments or culturally sensitive adaptations may improve cross-national comparability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    外部问题的最佳实践临床评估通常需要从父母那里收集信息,青春自己,和老师。本研究测试了心理测量驱动的评分程序的预测有效性,以整合多信息人,外化问题的维度评级。参与者是2264名6-18岁的诊所转诊青年。父母,教师,和年轻人完成了外部化问题的问卷评级(多动-注意力不集中,行为问题,和对立-蔑视)在初次临床预约之前。测试了简单(最高线人评级;以及所有线人评级分别)和更复杂(具有特定线人因子的潜在S-1双因子模型;以及考虑儿童年龄和性别的适度非线性因子分析)线人整合方法的预测有效性,合并症,和临床接触的次数。一个简单的模型,其中包括所有线人评级,显示出最佳的预测效度,与使用最高的线人评分或更复杂的潜在变量模型相比,表现良好或更好。在因子模型中加入儿童年龄和性别作为调节因子并没有提高预测效度。每个线人(父母,老师,和青年)为临床相关结局的预测提供重要信息。目前没有足够的证据表明,复杂的潜在变量模型应该比保留每个线人评级的简单模型更受欢迎。
    Best practice clinical assessment of externalizing problems often necessitates collection of information from parents, youth themselves, and teachers. The present study tested the predictive validity of a psychometrically-driven scoring procedure to integrate multi-informant, dimensional ratings of externalizing problems. Participants were 2264 clinic-referred youth ages 6-18. Parents, teachers, and youth completed questionnaire ratings of externalizing problems (hyperactivity-inattention, conduct problems, and oppositionality-defiance) prior to an initial clinical appointment. The predictive validity of simple (highest informant rating; and all informant ratings separately) and more complex (latent S-1 bifactor model with specific informant factors; and moderated nonlinear factor analysis accounting for child age and sex) methods of informant integration was tested in predicting impairment, comorbidity, and number of clinical encounters. A simple model, in which all informant ratings were included, showed the best predictive validity across outcomes, performing as well or better than the use of the highest informant ratings or more complex latent variable models. The addition of child age and sex as moderators in the factor model did not improve predictive validity. Each informant (parent, teacher, and youth) contributes important information to the prediction of clinically-relevant outcomes. There is insufficient evidence at present to suggest that complex latent variable models should be favored over simpler models that preserve each informant\'s ratings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究检查了儿童时期注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)症状与社会隔离之间的纵向关联。这项研究测试了这种关联在不同时间的方向,在考虑已有特征的同时,并评估这种关联是否因多动症的表现而有所不同,线人,性别,和社会经济地位。
    参与者包括来自环境风险(E-Risk)纵向双胞胎研究的2,232名儿童。在5、7、10和12岁时测量ADHD症状和社会隔离。随机截距交叉滞后面板模型用于评估整个儿童期关联的方向性。
    多动症症状增加的儿童在儿童后期变得社会孤立的风险不断增加。超过稳定特性(β=0.05-.08)。这些纵向关联不是双向的;孤立的儿童后来没有ADHD症状恶化的风险。多动症表现的儿童更有可能变得孤立,与不专心的演讲相比。这在学校环境中很明显,正如老师们观察到的那样,但不是在家里的母亲。
    研究结果强调了增强同伴社会支持和包容多动症儿童的重要性,特别是在学校环境中。这项研究增加了超越传统纵向方法的解释价值,因为结果代表了单个孩子随着时间的推移如何变化,相对于他们自己先前存在的特征。
    我们致力于确保招募人类参与者时的性别和性别平衡。我们努力确保以包容性的方式准备研究问卷。本文的一位或多位作者自我认同为科学中一个或多个历史上代表性不足的性和/或性别群体的成员。我们积极努力促进作者群体的性别和性别平衡。本文的作者名单包括参与数据收集的研究地点和/或社区的贡献者,设计,分析,和/或作品的解释。
    UNASSIGNED: This study examined longitudinal associations between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms and social isolation across childhood. The study tested the direction of this association across time, while accounting for preexisting characteristics, and assessed whether this association varied by ADHD presentation, informant, sex, and socioeconomic status.
    UNASSIGNED: Participants included 2,232 children from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study. ADHD symptoms and social isolation were measured at ages 5, 7, 10, and 12. Random-intercept cross-lagged panel models were used to assess the directionality of the association across childhood.
    UNASSIGNED: Children with increased ADHD symptoms were consistently at increased risk of becoming socially isolated later in childhood, over and above stable characteristics (β = .05-.08). These longitudinal associations were not bidirectional; isolated children were not at risk of worsening ADHD symptoms later on. Children with hyperactive ADHD presentation were more likely to become isolated, compared with inattentive presentation. This was evident in the school setting, as observed by teachers, but not by mothers at home.
    UNASSIGNED: The study findings highlight the importance of enhancing peer social support and inclusion for children with ADHD, particularly in school settings. This study adds explanatory value beyond traditional longitudinal methods, as the results represent how individual children change over time, relative to their own preexisting characteristics.
    UNASSIGNED: We worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure that the study questionnaires were prepared in an inclusive way. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location and/or community where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:评估智障学生(ID)的自决权是促进进度监控的主要步骤。研究人员已经开发了自我和代理评估,以更深入地评估自决表达。然而,到目前为止,有限的研究探索了两种评估之间的一致性。
    方法:为了满足这一需求,本研究分析了219名具有ID的青少年之间的差异;63%是年龄在13至21岁之间的男性(M=16.8;SD=1.72);以及他们的教师在评估自决时的差异,并探讨了哪些因素(学生的年龄,性别,学校的身份和机会水平)可能解释了这些差异。参与者是故意招募的。拥有身份证的学生完成了两份问卷:AIR自我决定量表和西班牙语版本的自我决定清单,这也是他们的老师完成的。
    结果:在自决评估中发现了显着差异,老师对它的评价较低。Further,发现学生的性别和他们在学校提供的参与自决行动的机会可以解释自决评估的差异。
    结论:评估有身份证的年轻人的自决权的研究和实践活动必须考虑到,举报人的观点可能受到学生的性别和参与自主行动的背景机会的影响。讨论了对进一步研究和实践的启示。
    BACKGROUND: Assessing self-determination in students with intellectual disabilities (IDs) is a primary step in facilitating progress monitoring. Researchers have developed both self and proxy assessments to favor a more in-depth evaluation of self-determination expression. However, to date, limited research has explored the congruence between both assessments.
    METHODS: To address this need, the present study analyzes the differences between 219 adolescents with ID; 63% being males with an age range from 13 to 21 years (M = 16.8; SD = 1.72); and their teachers in their assessment of self-determination and explores which factors (students\' age, sex, level of ID and opportunities at school) might explain those differences. The participants were recruited intentionally. Students with IDs completed two questionnaires: the AIR Self-Determination Scale and the Spanish version of the Self-Determination Inventory, which was also completed by their teachers.
    RESULTS: Significant differences were found in the self-determination assessment, with teachers rating it lower. Further, students\' sex and the opportunities they were provided at school to engage in self-determined actions were found to explain the differences in self-determination assessment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Research and practice initiatives to assess self-determination in young people with IDs must consider that informants\' points of view might be influenced by students\' sex and by contextual opportunities to engage in self-determined actions. Implications for further research and practice are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在幼儿园进行普遍的心理健康筛查为早期识别和早期干预提供了机会。但是需要关于使用哪些告密者的指导。对两种筛查表格中的学龄前儿童(N=535)家长和教师报告进行了分析,以确定分类结果和筛查得分的相似性和差异。分析还检查了是否有额外的评估者为纵向幼儿园结局的预测提供了逐步有效的信息。父母和老师的筛选分数在评估者和评估者之间的表格之间显着相关。然而,分类结果表明,教师比父母更有可能在各种表格的风险范围内对学龄前儿童进行评分。最后,分层回归分析显示,教师评分是幼儿园社会情绪的预测因素,认知,和学术成果,并且添加父母评分并没有显着改善对结局的预测。在多重门控筛选程序中,在多个评估者的背景下讨论了含义。
    Universal screening for mental health in preschools provides the opportunity for early identification and early intervention, but guidance regarding which informants to use is needed. Preschoolers\' (N = 535) parent and teacher reports across two screening forms were analyzed to determine similarities and discrepancies for classification results and screener scores. The analyses also examined if an additional rater provided incrementally valid information to the prediction of longitudinal kindergarten outcomes. Parents\' and teachers\' screening scores were significantly correlated across forms by rater and across raters. However, categorical classification results indicated that teachers were more likely than parents to rate preschoolers in at-risk ranges across forms. Finally, hierarchical regression analyses revealed teacher ratings were predictive of kindergarten social-emotional, cognitive, and academic outcomes, and that the addition of parent ratings did not significantly improve prediction of outcomes. Implications are discussed in the context of multiple raters within multiple-gating screening procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:阿尔茨海默病和阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆(AD/ADRD)研究通常要求参与者加入“研究伙伴”(SP)。对于预测谁进入SP角色或SP与参与者的关系是否会影响其疾病严重程度的报告,知之甚少。方法:健康与退休研究数据(HRS),在衰老之前收集,人口统计学和记忆研究(ADAMS)用于确定预测谁在ADAMS中担任SP的社会文化因素。SP报告的结果在三种类型的参与者-SP关系之间进行了比较:配偶,成年子女,和其他。结果:配偶(35%)和成年子女(39%)同样可能担任SP。预测谁服务的因素有所不同。在多变量分析中,成年子女对参与者的记忆力评价比配偶受损程度低,判断,和组织能力(p<0.05)。结论:参与者-SP关系对SP报告的认知障碍严重程度具有独立影响。
    Background: Alzheimer\'s disease and Alzheimer\'s disease related dementias (AD/ADRD) research typically requires participants to enroll with a \"study partner\" (SP). Little is known about what predicts who steps into the SP role or whether the SP\'s relationship to the participant affects their reports of disease severity.Methods: Health and Retirement Study data (HRS), collected prior to the Aging, Demographics and Memory Study (ADAMS), was used to identify sociocultural factors that predict who serves as a SP in ADAMS. SP-reported outcomes were compared between three types of participant-SP relationships: spousal, adult child, and other.Results: Spouses (35%) and adult children (39%) were similarly likely to serve as SPs. Factors predicting who served differed. In multivariable analyses, adult children rated participants less impaired than spouses on measures of memory, judgment, and organizational abilities (p < .05). Conclusions: The participant-SP relationship has independent effects on the SP\'s reports of the severity of cognitive impairments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    了解土地利用/覆盖(LULC)变化及其对集水区的影响对于适当的土地管理至关重要。因此,有关LULC变化响应的有用信息对于最大程度地减少对未来土地利用的负面影响变得很重要。该研究的目的是评估1986年至2018年Bilate流域的LULC变化和变化的后果。LULC变化评估是通过使用1986年、2002年和2018年的Landsat图像进行的。采用有监督的图像分类来绘制土地覆盖类别。线人访谈和实地观察的小组讨论被用来确定变化的后果。在过去的一段时间里,建成区,水体,耕种,贫瘠的土地增加了0.97,0.13,9.27和1.36%,分别。然而,森林和牧场分别减少了8.56和3.18%。在没有适当管理的情况下进行穷尽的土地耕种,并耕种草皮土地增加了水土流失和水体的沉积物产量。农作物产量下降,畜产品和数量,和阿巴亚湖的鱼类种群是流域LULC变化的主要影响。因此,为了确保土地的可持续利用,负责的机构承诺并通过参与性方法与社区密切合作。
    Understanding land use/cover (LULC) changes and their impacts on the catchment are imperative for proper land management. Hence, useful information concerning responses to LULC changes becomes important to minimize negative impacts on future land uses. The aim of the study was to evaluate the LULC changes and consequences of the change at Bilate catchment from 1986 to 2018. The LULC change evaluations were undertaken by using Landsat images of 1986, 2002 and 2018. Supervised image classification was employed to map the land cover classes. Informant interviews and group discussions with field observations were used to identify the consequences of the changes. Over the past periods, built-up areas, water bodies, cultivation, and barren lands have increased by 0.97, 0.13, 9.27, and 1.36%, respectively. However, the forest and grazing lands have decreased by 8.56 and 3.18% respectively. Exhaustive land cultivation without appropriate management and cultivation of sloppy lands have increased soil erosion and sediment yield to water bodies. A decline in crop yields, livestock products and numbers, and fish population in Lake Abaya are the major implications of LULC change in the catchment. Therefore, to ensure sustainable land use, responsible bodies commit and work closely with communities through participatory approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    情绪和行为问题(EBP)经常发生在年轻的自闭症儿童中。父母和其他线人之间的差异是常见的,但可能导致制定的不确定性,诊断和护理计划。这项研究旨在探索儿童和线人特征与不同环境中报告的儿童EBP相关。参与者是自闭症谱系治疗和弹性(ASTAR)研究中的83名4-8岁自闭症儿童及其父母和老师。儿童EBP问卷由家长和老师完成,并获得了自我报告的育儿压力和幸福感指标。还完成了对父母-子女/研究人员-子女互动的观察。家长报告的EBP比教师多,家长与教师的协议也很低,特别是情感问题。更大的育儿压力和口头表达与更多的父母报告的EBP有关,但与老师报告的EBP无关。最低限度的言语儿童表现出了更多观察到的挑战行为。更多的育儿压力可能与家庭中更多EBP的存在有关;或者,育儿压力可能会混淆报告。对于自闭症儿童的EBP评估,采取多信息方法至关重要。需要更好地了解线人特征与EBPs的线人差异之间的关联。
    Emotional and behavioral problems (EBPs) frequently occur in young autistic children. Discrepancies between parents and other informants are common but can lead to uncertainty in formulation, diagnosis and care planning. This study aimed to explore child and informant characteristics are associated with reported child EBPs across settings. Participants were 83 4-8-year-old autistic children and their parents and teachers in the Autism Spectrum Treatment and Resilience (ASTAR) study. Questionnaires of child EBPs were completed by parents and teachers, and self-reported parenting stress and wellbeing measures were obtained. An observation of parent-child/researcher-child interaction was also completed. Parents reported more EBPs than teachers and parent-teacher agreement was low, particularly for emotional problems. Greater parenting stress and being verbal was associated with more parent- but not teacher-reported EBPs. More observed behaviors that challenge were displayed by minimally verbal children. More parenting stress could be associated with the presence of more EBPs in the home; alternatively, parenting stress may confound reports. It is essential for assessments of EBPs in autistic children to take a multi-informant approach. Better understanding of the associations between informant characteristics and informant discrepancies of EBPs is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究比较了自我的效度,parent-,和教师报告版本的冷酷无情的特质清单(ICU),一种广泛使用的冷酷无情(CU)特征的衡量标准,在几个不同的年龄。参与者(N=236,60.6%的女孩)是来自美国南部公立学校系统的3、6和8年级(Mage=11.55,SD=2.23)的儿童。我们测试了所有三个ICU版本与几个验证者的关联:父母和老师报告的行为问题,与CU特征相关的特征的同行提名,和社会偏好的社会计量同行提名。结果显示,在报告的CU性状的总体水平中,ICU版本和等级之间存在相互作用,教师报告导致六年级的最高评级,高于三年级的家长报告。此外,不同版本的ICU的有效性在年级之间有所不同.具体来说,研究结果支持三年级教师和自我报告的有效性,但自我报告是唯一在八年级表现出强烈有效性的版本。
    The current study compared the validity of self-, parent-, and teacher-report versions of the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits (ICU), a widely used measure of callous-unemotional (CU) traits, at several different ages. Participants (N = 236, 60.6% girls) were children in Grades 3, 6, and 8 (Mage = 11.55, SD = 2.23) from a public school system in the southern United States. We tested the association of all three ICU versions with several validators: parent- and teacher-reported conduct problems, peer nominations of characteristics associated with CU traits, and sociometric peer nominations of social preference. Results revealed an interaction between the ICU version and grade in the overall level of CU traits reported, with teacher-report leading to the highest ratings in sixth grade and being higher than parent-report in third grade. Furthermore, the validity of the different versions of the ICU varied somewhat across grades. Specifically, findings support the validity of both teacher- and self-report in third grade, but self-report was the only version to show strong validity in the eighth grade.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号