indwelling pleural catheter

留置胸膜导管
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估滑石粉胸膜固定术作为日常医疗胸腔镜检查的一部分进行的可行性和安全性。
    通过5.5mm端口的RichardWolf®5mm微型胸腔镜用于具有滑石粉袋的合格病例,然后插入留置胸膜导管(IPC)。地区护士在前5天每天排空IPC。一旦排出量<150毫升,频率逐渐减少到每周一次。在间隔1周的两个连续的干燥龙头之后,去除排水管。
    总的来说,51例患者接受日间胸腔镜检查。对于我们的日间方案,移除IPC的中位时间为14天。在日间病例队列中,41例恶性胸腔积液患者在70天内有7例死亡,相比之下,33例传统胸腔镜检查对照组中有8例死亡。总的来说,与常规队列相比,日间病例队列观察到180日全因死亡率在统计学上显著降低(logrankp=0.024).日间病例和住院队列的每位患者的平均费用为1,328.0±106.0英镑和1,835.0±295.0英镑(p=0.961)。
    这项研究表明,胸腔镜检查和滑石粉袋可以作为日常手术安全地进行。需要进一步的数据来确定长期结果。
    UNASSIGNED: To assess the feasibility and safety of talc pleurodesis performed as part of day-case medical thoracoscopy.
    UNASSIGNED: A Richard Wolf® 5 mm mini thoracoscope through a 5.5 mm port was used with eligible cases having talc poudrage followed by insertion of indwelling pleural catheter (IPC). District nurses drain the IPC daily for the first 5 days. Once the drain output is <150 mL, the frequency is progressively reduced to once weekly. The drain is removed after two consecutive dry taps 1 week apart.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 51 patients underwent day-case thoracoscopy. Median time to removal of IPC for our day-case protocol was 14 days. There were seven deaths within 70 days among 41 patients with malignant pleural effusion in the day-case cohort, compared to eight deaths in the 33 conventional thoracoscopy controls. Overall, the day-case cohort observed a statistically significant reduction in all-cause mortality at 180 days compared to the conventional cohort (log rank p = 0.024). The average cost per patient of the day-case and inpatient cohort was £1,328.0 ± 106.0 and £1,835.0 ± 295.0 (p = 0.961).
    UNASSIGNED: This study suggests that thoracoscopy and talc poudrage can be performed safely as a day-case procedure. Further data are needed to ascertain long-term outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:恶性胸腔积液(MPE)是肿瘤性疾病中常见的主要转折点,通常会导致预期寿命延长。改善生活质量和缓解呼吸困难是这种姑息治疗的主要目标。这可以通过放置留置导管(IPC)或滑石粉胸膜固定术来实现,理想情况下是通过胸腔镜检查(滑石粉袋)进行。除了错误识别被困的肺,后者需要延长住院时间,而IPC放置不允许较高的胸膜固定术率.为了克服这些缺点,这两种技术的结合可用于治疗复发性恶性胸腔积液。报告了这种务实方法的安全性和有效性。
    方法:连续接受MPE治疗的患者,通过胸腔镜检查路径对胸膜联合进行滑石粉袋治疗,最后使用相同的胸廓入口点插入IPC。人口统计数据,住院时间(LOS),手术相关并发症,收集患者的生活质量(QoL)和胸膜固定术的成功率。随访6个月。
    结果:分析了连续25例患者的数据。1个月后14/25例患者(66%)成功胸膜固定术,3个月时分别为17/20例(85%)和6个月时分别为13/15例(86%)。平均而言,术后医院LOS为3.24天(IQR1-4),中位数为1天.除了一名患者(气胸)外,该手术从未导致住院时间延长(>1天)。未发现IPC相关感染或手术相关死亡。
    结论:在复发性MPE患者中,通过胸腔镜路径和IPC同时放置的滑石粉袋联合联合导致医院LOS缩短和胸膜固定率提高。需要进一步的随机临床试验来证实这些结果。
    OBJECTIVE: Malignant pleural effusions (MPE) are a frequent and major turning point in neoplastic disease usually leading to poor life expectancy. Improve quality of life and relieve the dyspnea are the main objectives in this palliative care setting. This can be achieved by the placement of an indwelling catheter (IPC) or talc pleurodesis ideally performed by thoracoscopy route (talc poudrage). Beside to misidentify a trapped-lung, the latter requires a prolonged hospital stay and the IPC placement does not allow a high pleurodesis rate. To overcome these drawbacks, a combination of both technique could be proposed for the management of recurrent malignant pleural effusions. Safety and efficacy of this pragmatic approach are reported.
    METHODS: Consecutive patients who have been managed for recurrent MPE by a combination of talc poudrage for pleural symphysis by thoracoscopy route ending with the insertion of IPC using the same thoracic point of entry. Demographic data, hospital length of stay (LOS), procedural-related complications, patients\' quality of life (QoL) and success of pleurodesis were collected. Patients were followed-up for 6 months.
    RESULTS: The data of twenty-five consecutive patients undergoing the procedure were analyzed. Successful pleurodesis was obtained for 14/25 patients (66 %) at one month, 17/20 patients (85 %) at 3 months and 13/15 patients (86 %) at 6 months respectively. On average, the hospital LOS after the procedure was 3.24 days (IQR 1-4) with a median of 1 day. A prolonged hospitalization (>1 day) was never due to the procedure except for one patient (pneumothorax). No IPC related infection or procedure related deaths were noted.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with recurrent MPE, the combination of talc poudrage symphysis by thoracoscopy route and IPC placement on the same time results in a shortened hospital LOS and higher rate of pleurodesis. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    单侧渗出性胸腔积液被描述为多囊肝病的罕见并发症。主要囊肿的手术清创术可减少胸腔积液的复发。我们描述了一位亚洲老年妇女的情况,该妇女反复出现大量右侧胸腔积液,并且在她的右半the下还出现了巨大的肝囊肿。她被认为是不良的手术候选人,并接受了留置胸膜导管(IPC)的治疗。她从圣康总医院出院,症状有所改善。一名88岁的亚洲妇女两次出现在Sengkang总医院,并反复出现右侧渗出性胸腔积液。她有高血压病史,2型糖尿病,高脂血症,缺血性心脏病(左心室射血分数55%),心房颤动,和慢性肾病3期(估计肾小球滤过率53)。她否认任何多囊肾或肝脏疾病的家族史。她胸部的计算机断层扫描,腹部,骨盆显示右侧胸腔积液和肝囊肿。插入胸膜导管,液体分析与渗出性积液一致。胸膜液无菌培养细菌和分枝杆菌。细胞学检查为恶性细胞阴性。尽管反复从胸膜导管进行大量引流,但胸腔积液仍迅速复发。我们的患者不适合进行肝囊肿的手术清创术,最终接受了IPC并出院。随着IPC的出现,在非恶性胸腔积液的治疗中使用IPC的兴趣日益增加.虽然肝囊肿的手术清创术是多囊肝病相关的复发性胸腔积液的首选治疗选择。IPC现在为临床医生和患者提供了另一种可行的微创选择。
    Unilateral exudative pleural effusions have been described as a rare complication of polycystic liver disease. Surgical debridement of the main cyst reduces recurrence of the pleural effusion. We describe the case of an elderly Asian woman with recurrent large right-sided pleural effusion and also a large hepatic cyst under her right hemidiaphragm. She was deemed a poor surgical candidate and was treated with an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC). She was discharged from Sengkang General Hospital with improvement in symptoms. An 88-year-old Asian woman presented twice to Sengkang General Hospital with recurrent right-sided exudative pleural effusion. She had a past medical history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, ischemic heart disease (left ventricle ejection fraction 55%), atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease stage 3 (estimated glomerular filtration rate 53). She denied any family history of polycystic kidney or liver disease. Computer tomography of her chest, abdomen, and pelvis revealed a large right pleural effusion and also a large hepatic cyst. A pleural catheter was inserted and the fluid analysis was consistent with an exudative effusion. The pleural fluid was sterile to culture for bacteria and mycobacterium. The cytology was negative for malignant cells. The pleural effusion recurred quickly despite repeated large-volume drainage from the pleural catheter. Our patient was not suitable for surgical debridement of the hepatic cyst and eventually received an IPC and was discharged. With the advent of IPC, there has been increasing interest in using IPC in the management of non-malignant pleural effusions. While surgical debridement of hepatic cysts is the preferred treatment option in recurrent pleural effusion associated with polycystic liver disease, IPCs now provide another viable and minimally invasive option for clinicians and patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:恶性胸腔积液(MPE)是一种常见的癌症并发症。不同复发性MPE治疗途径的临床和经济意义尚未得到充分评估。
    目的:什么临床结果,并发症,医疗保健资源使用,和费用与各种快速复发的MPE治疗途径相关?
    方法:这项使用监测的回顾性队列研究,流行病学和最终结果医疗保险数据(2011-2015)包括66-90岁的快速复发MPE患者。快速复发定义为在第一次胸腔穿刺术后14天内接受第二次胸膜手术,包括非确定性重复胸腔穿刺术。或确定的治疗选择,包括胸管,留置胸膜导管(IPC),或胸腔镜检查。
    结果:在8,378例MPE患者中,3,090(36.9%)患有快速复发的MPE(平均[SD]年龄75.9[6.6],45.6%男性,原发性肺癌占62.9%,其他占37.1%)。第二次胸膜手术是非确定性胸腔穿刺术(62.3%),胸管(17.1%),IPC(13.2%),或胸腔镜(7.4%)。如果第二次胸膜手术是非确定性胸腔穿刺术与胸管,IPC,或胸腔镜(70.3%vs.44.1%vs.17.9%与14.4%,分别)。在患者的一生中,随后的胸膜手术的平均次数在手术中差异很大(对于接受胸腔穿刺术的患者,为1.74、0.82、0.31和0.22,胸管,IPC,和胸腔镜检查,分别;P<0.05)。第二次胸膜手术后死亡的平均总费用根据原发性癌症诊断时的年龄进行调整,种族,第二次胸膜手术的年份,Charlson合并症指数,初诊时的癌症阶段,IPC($37,443;P<.0001)或胸管($40,627;P=.004)与从原发性癌症诊断到诊断性胸腔穿刺术的时间更低。胸腔穿刺术($47,711)。接受胸腔镜检查的患者($45,386;P=5)的费用与接受胸腔穿刺术的患者相似。
    结论:在快速复发的MPE中,早期确定性治疗与较少的后续手术和较低的成本相关。
    BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is a common cancer complication. Clinical and economic implications of different recurrent MPE treatment pathways have not been evaluated fully.
    OBJECTIVE: What clinical outcomes, complications, health care resource use, and costs are associated with various rapidly recurrent MPE treatment pathways?
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Medicare data (2011-2015) included patients 66 to 90 years of age with rapidly recurrent MPE. Rapid recurrence was defined as receipt of a second pleural procedure within 14 days of the first thoracentesis, including nondefinitive repeated thoracentesis or a definitive treatment option including chest tube, indwelling pleural catheter (IPC), or thoracoscopy.
    RESULTS: Among 8,378 patients with MPE, 3,090 patients (36.9%) had rapidly recurrent MPE (mean ± SD age, 75.9 ± 6.6 years; 45.6% male; primary cancer, 62.9% lung and 37.1% other). Second pleural procedures were nondefinitive thoracentesis (62.3%), chest tube (17.1%), IPC (13.2%), or thoracoscopy (7.4%). A third pleural procedure was required more frequently if the second pleural procedure was nondefinitive thoracentesis vs chest tube placement, IPC placement, or thoracoscopy (70.3% vs 44.1% vs 17.9% vs 14.4%, respectively). The mean number of subsequent pleural procedures over the patient\'s lifetime varied significantly among the procedures (1.74, 0.82, 0.31, and 0.22 procedures for patients receiving thoracentesis, chest tube, IPC, and thoracoscopy, respectively; P < .05). Average total costs after the second pleural procedure to death adjusted for age at primary cancer diagnosis, race, year of second pleural procedure, Charlson comorbidity index, cancer stage at primary diagnosis, and time from primary cancer diagnosis to diagnostic thoracentesis were lower with IPC ($37,443; P < .0001) or chest tube placement ($40,627; P = .004) vs thoracentesis ($47,711). Patients receiving thoracoscopy ($45,386; P = .5) incurred similar costs as patients receiving thoracentesis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Early definitive treatment was associated with fewer subsequent procedures and lower costs in patients with rapidly recurrent MPE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:当胸部X线肺部再扩张不完全时,没有明确的标准来决定移除无功能的留置胸膜导管(IPC)。通常使用胸部计算机断层扫描(胸部CT)。这项工作的目的是验证与胸部CT相比,由肺科医师和放射科医师进行的胸部超声检查的有用性。
    方法:前瞻性,描述性,描述性多学科和多中心研究,包括恶性胸腔积液和无功能IPC而无肺复张的患者。根据肺科医师进行的胸部超声检查做出的决定,由放射科医生执行,以胸部CT为金标准。
    结果:分析了18例患者,所有这些人都接受了肺科医生的超声检查和胸部CT检查,其中11人还接受了放射科医生的超声检查。肺科医生进行的超声检查灵敏度为60%,100%的特异性,PPV100%和NPV66%决定正确删除IPC。两种超声(肺科医生和放射科医生)的一致性为100%,kappa指数为1。4例不一致病例是IPC未位于超声上的病例。
    结论:由肺科专家进行的胸部超声检查是确定自发性胸膜固定术和去除无功能IPC的有效且简单的工具,在超声检查观察到肺再扩张的情况下,可以避免胸部CT。
    BACKGROUND: There are no defined criteria for deciding to remove a non-functioning indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) when lung re-expansion on chest X-ray is incomplete. Chest computed tomography (chest CT) is usually used. The objective of this work is to validate the usefulness of chest ultrasound performed by a pulmonologist and by a radiologist compared to chest CT.
    METHODS: Prospective, descriptive, multidisciplinary and multicenter study including patients with malignant pleural effusion and non-functioning IPC without lung reexpansion. Decisions made on the basis of chest ultrasound performed by a pulmonologist, and performed by a radiologist, were compared with chest CT as the gold standard.
    RESULTS: 18 patients were analyzed, all of them underwent ultrasound by a pulmonologist and chest CT and in 11 of them also ultrasound by a radiologist. The ultrasound performed by the pulmonologist presents a sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 100%, PPV 100% and NPV 66% in the decision of the correct removal of the IPC. The concordance of both ultrasounds (pulmonologist and radiologist) was 100%, with a kappa index of 1. The 4 discordant cases were those in which the IPC was not located on the ultrasound.
    CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic ultrasound performed by an expert pulmonologist is a valid and simple tool to determine spontaneous pleurodesis and remove a non-functioning IPC, which would make it possible to avoid chest CT in those cases in which lung reexpansion is observed with ultrasonography.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多项研究表明,贝伐单抗胸腔内输注是治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)伴恶性胸腔积液(MPE)的有效方法。然而,通过留置胸膜导管(IPC)给药贝伐单抗对这些患者预后的影响尚不清楚.
    方法:在三甲医院确定了连续的晚期NSCLC患者,有症状的MPE单独接受IPC或通过IPC接受贝伐单抗。收集患者特征和临床结果。
    结果:共纳入149例患者,中位年龄为60.3岁.男性和不吸烟者分别占48.3%和65.8%,分别。共有69.8%(104/149)的患者存在可操作的突变,包括92个EGFR激活突变,11ALK融合,和1个ROS1融合。共有81.9%(122/149)的患者单独接受IPC,18.1%(27/149)通过IPC接受贝伐单抗治疗。在具有可操作突变的亚组中,贝伐单抗治疗组的前6个月自发性胸膜固定术的发生率高于IPC治疗组(64.3%vs.46.9%,P=0.28)。通过IPC接受贝伐单抗治疗的可行突变患者的中位总生存期(OS)为42.2个月,明显长于单独接受IPC的患者的26.7个月(P=0.045)。然而,在没有可操作突变的亚组中,两组之间的中位OS没有差异(10.8vs.41.0个月,P=0.24)。通过IPC组和IPC组的贝伐单抗在发生不良事件的参与者人数中没有发现显着差异,在具有可操作突变的患者中(14.3%vs.8.4%;P=0.42)或无可操作突变的患者(16.7%vs.12.8%;P=1.00)。
    结论:贝伐单抗通过IPC导致MPE和可行突变的NSCLC患者的预后显著改善。然而,没有可操作突变的患者不能通过IPC从贝伐单抗获益.
    BACKGROUND: Several studies have indicated that intrapleural infusion of bevacizumab is an effective treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with malignant pleural effusion (MPE). However, the impact of bevacizumab administered through an indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) on the prognosis of these patients is unknown.
    METHODS: Consecutive advanced NSCLC patients with symptomatic MPE receiving an IPC alone or bevacizumab through an IPC were identified in a tertiary hospital. The patient characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected.
    RESULTS: A total of 149 patients were included, and the median age was 60.3 years. Males and nonsmokers accounted for 48.3% and 65.8%, respectively. A total of 69.8% (104/149) of patients harbored actionable mutations, including 92 EGFR-activating mutations, 11 ALK fusions, and 1 ROS1 fusion. A total of 81.9% (122/149) of patients received IPC alone, and 18.1% (27/149) received bevacizumab through an IPC. The incidence of spontaneous pleurodesis during the first 6 months was greater in the bevacizumab-treated group than in the IPC-treated group in the subgroup with actionable mutations (64.3% vs. 46.9%, P = 0.28). The median overall survival (OS) in patients with actionable mutations treated with bevacizumab through an IPC was 42.2 months, which was significantly longer than the 26.7 months in patients who received an IPC alone (P = 0.045). However, the median OS did not differ between the two arms in the subgroup without actionable mutations (10.8 vs. 41.0 months, P = 0.24). No significant difference between the bevacizumab through an IPC group and the IPC group was detected in the number of participants who had adverse events, either in patients with actionable mutations (14.3% vs. 8.4%; P = 0.42) or in patients without actionable mutations (16.7% vs. 12.8%; P = 1.00).
    CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab through an IPC resulted in a significantly improved prognosis for NSCLC patients with MPE and actionable mutations. However, patients without actionable mutations do not benefit from bevacizumab through IPC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非扩张肺(NEL)对患者症状和肺功能受损有严重影响,以及对恶性胸腔积液(MPE)的管理至关重要的意义。留置胸膜导管对NEL患者表现出良好的症状缓解;因此,在疾病早期识别患者是至关重要的。由于胸腔穿刺术后肺无法实现胸膜贴壁并形成水气胸,传统上,胸部X线和临床症状已用于胸腔穿刺术后的诊断。我们的目的是研究呼吸期间的肺部运动的超声测量是否可以在胸腔穿刺术前预测NEL,从而帮助临床医生规划受影响的患者的最佳治疗。
    方法:在胸膜诊所进行的单中心试验中连续纳入了49例患者。患者在胸腔穿刺术前接受了超声评估,并在计划的胸腔穿刺术部位测量了肺和膈肌运动,并测量了胸膜和胸腔积液的剪切波弹性成像。
    结果:肺运动的M模式测量提供了最好的诊断ROC曲线结果,AUC为0.81。内部有效性使用校准带测试和Brier测试显示良好的结果。
    结论:M模式测量肺运动在已知或疑似MPE患者胸腔穿刺术前诊断NEL方面显示出希望。需要一个验证队列来确认结果。
    BACKGROUND: Non-expandable lung (NEL) has severe implications for patient symptoms and impaired lung function, as well as crucial implications for the management of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Indwelling pleural catheters have shown good symptom relief for patients with NEL; hence, identifying patients early in their disease is vital. With the inability of the lung to achieve pleural apposition following thoracentesis and the formation of a hydropneumothorax, traditionally, chest X-ray and clinical symptoms have been used to make the diagnosis following thoracentesis. It is our aim to investigate whether ultrasound measurement of lung movement during respiration can predict NEL before thoracentesis, thereby aiding clinicians in their planning for the optimal treatment of affected patients.
    METHODS: A total of 49 patients were consecutively included in a single-centre trial performed at a pleural clinic. Patients underwent protocolled ultrasound assessment pre-thoracentesis with measurements of lung and diaphragm movement and shear wave elastography measurements of the pleura and pleural effusion at the planned site of thoracentesis.
    RESULTS: M-mode measurements of lung movement provided the best diagnostic ROC-curve results, with an AUC of 0.81. Internal validity showed good results utilising the calibration belt test and Brier test.
    CONCLUSIONS: M-mode measurement of lung movement shows promise in diagnosing NEL before thoracentesis in patients with known or suspected MPE. A validation cohort is needed to confirm the results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝性胸腔积液是与门脉高压相关的胸腔积液;其诊断和治疗可能很困难。本文的目的如下:收集肝胃肠病学家或肺科医师关于肝胸水的诊断和管理的实践。
    方法:邀请来自13个法语国家的从业人员回答关于肝性胸水诊断及其管理的在线问卷。
    结果:五百二十八名从业者(80%来自法国)回答了这项调查。75%是肝胃肠病学家,20%的肺科医师,其余5%属于其他专业。对于64%的响应者,肝性胸水可以位于左肺上(66%的肝胃肠病学家对57%的肺科医师;p=0.25);91%的响应者在没有临床腹水的情况下可以存在肝性胸水(93%的肝胃肠病学家对88%的肺科医师;p=0.27)。43%的应答者在穿刺前系统地进行了超声胸膜扫描(36%的肝胃肠病学家对70%的肺科医师;p<0.001)。73%的应答者在穿刺前进行了胸部X射线检查(79%的肝胃肠病学家对54%的肺科医师;p<0.001)。在自发性细菌性脓胸的情况下,73%的肝胃肠病学家和20%的肺科医师使用了白蛋白输注(p<0.001).37%的响应者使用了引流管(37%的肝肠病学家对31%的肺科医生;p=0.26)。50%的肺科医师和22%的肝胃肠病医师使用留置胸膜导管(p<0.01)。78%的应答者推荐TIPS(85%的肝胃肠病学家对52%的肺科医师;p<0.001)和肝移植,76%的应答者(86%的肝胃肠病学家对44%的肺科医师;p<0.001)。
    结论:这项大型研究的结果为讲法语的肝肠病学家和肺科医师的实践提供了重要数据;看来建议是有必要的。
    BACKGROUND: The Hepatic hydrothorax is a pleural effusion related to portal hypertension; its diagnosis and therapeutic management may be difficult. The aims of this article are which follows: To gather the practices of hepatogastroenterologists or pulmonologists practitioners regarding the diagnosis and management of the hepatic hydrothorax.
    METHODS: Practitioners from 13 French- speaking countries were invited to answer an online questionnaire on the hepatic hydrothorax diagnosis and its management.
    RESULTS: Five hundred twenty-eight practitioners (80% from France) responded to this survey. 75% were hepatogastroenterologists, 20% pulmonologists and the remaining 5% belonged to other specialities. The Hepatic hydrothorax can be located on the left lung for 64% of the responders (66% hepatogastroenterologists vs 57% pulmonologists; p = 0.25); The Hepatic hydrothorax can exist in the absence of clinical ascites for 91% of the responders (93% hepatogastroenterologists vs 88% pulmonologists; p = 0.27). An Ultrasound pleural scanning was systematically performed before a puncture for 43% of the responders (36% hepatogastroenterologists vs 70% pulmonologists; p < 0.001). A chest X-ray was performed before a puncture for 73% of the respondeurs (79% hepatogastroenterologists vs 54% pulmonologists; p < 0.001). In case of a spontaneous bacterial empyema, an albumin infusion was used by 73% hepatogastroenterologists and 20% pulmonologists (p < 0.001). A drain was used by 37% of the responders (37% hepatogastroenterologists vs 31% pulmonologists; p = 0.26).An Indwelling pleural catheter was used by 50% pulmonologists and 22% hepatogastroenterologists (p < 0.01). TIPS was recommended by 78% of the responders (85% hepatogastroenterologists vs 52% pulmonologists; p < 0.001) and a liver transplantation, by 76% of the responders (86% hepatogastroenterologists vs 44% pulmonologists; p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this large study provide important data on practices of French speaking hepatogastroenterologists and pulmonologists; it appears that recommendations are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Video-Audio Media
    本视频教程是对因多发性转移而被诊断为恶性胸腔积液的患者的留置胸膜导管插入技术的逐步演示。放置留置胸膜导管是治疗慢性胸腔积液的一种新方法,尤其是继发于恶性肿瘤.该方法特别适用于肺部受困或预期寿命减少的患者,这些患者禁止使用更多的侵入性手术。留置胸膜导管耐受性良好。
    This video tutorial is a step-by-step demonstration of the indwelling pleural catheter insertion technique in a patient who was diagnosed with malignant pleural effusions due to multiple metastases. Placing an indwelling pleural catheter is a novel method to treat chronic pleural effusions, especially secondary to malignancies. This method is particularly useful in patients with a trapped lung or with reduced life expectancy in whom more-invasive procedures are contraindicated. Indwelling pleural catheters are well tolerated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号