OBJECTIVE: We conducted a study on women with sensitive skin of various skin tones to analyse their skin characteristics and preferences for foundation shades.
METHODS: Volunteers were categorized based on their individual typological angle, and their preferences were assessed using self-perception and software-based mass aesthetic assessment. The Baumann Questionnaire is a valuable tool for identifying patients with sensitive skin and gaining a comprehensive understanding of their skin sensitivity. The skin characteristics of two groups were compared using a more suitable classification method.
RESULTS: Individuals diagnosed with sensitive skin typically have skin tones classified as Types I, II and III, with Type I being the most common in sensitive skin cases. The sensitive group exhibited higher levels of transepidermal water loss, lighter skin tone, lower yellowness, increased glossiness, higher haemoglobin content, more acne, fewer blackheads, and fewer pores. Among them, Type I skin is characterized by lower elasticity, increased oiliness, higher hydration levels and fewer visible pores. Type II skin is characterized by lower hydration levels, higher oiliness and increased redness. Type III exhibits more pores, decreased oiliness and enhanced elasticity. Foundations No. 2 and No. 3 are fairer than foundations No. 1 and No. 4. In the self-assessment, Type I and Type II subjects preferred No. 3, while Type III subjects preferred No. 1 and No. 4 because they matched their skin tone. The results of the software evaluation showed that popular aesthetics preferred Type I and Type II to use No. 2, and Type III to use No. 2 and No. 3, as they resulted in a fairer complexion.
CONCLUSIONS: Sensitive skin of different skin tone types confronts different skin problems. The findings also highlight the public\'s inclination towards lighter foundation shades, despite the common practice of selecting shades that harmonize with one\'s inherent skin tone.
OBJECTIVE: Nous avons mené une étude sur des femmes à la peau sensible de différentes carnations afin d\'analyser les caractéristiques de leur peau et leurs préférences en matière de teintes de fond de teint. MÉTHODES: Les volontaires ont été classées en fonction de leur angle typologique individuel et leurs préférences ont été évaluées à l\'aide d\'une auto‐perception et d\'une évaluation esthétique de masse basée sur un logiciel. Le questionnaire de Baumann est un outil précieux pour identifier les patients à la peau sensible et obtenir une compréhension globale de leur sensibilité cutanée. Les caractéristiques cutanées de deux groupes ont été comparées à l\'aide d\'une méthode de classification plus appropriée. RÉSULTATS: Les personnes chez qui l\'on a diagnostiqué une peau sensible ont généralement des teintes de peau classées en types I, II et III, le type I étant le plus courant dans les cas de peau sensible. Le groupe sensible présente des niveaux plus élevés de perte d\'eau transépidermique, un teint plus clair, une couleur moins jaune, une brillance accrue, une teneur en hémoglobine plus élevée, plus d\'acné, moins de points noirs et moins de pores. Parmi eux, la peau de type I se caractérise par une élasticité plus faible, un taux de sébum plus élevé, des niveaux d\'hydratation plus élevés et moins de pores visibles. La peau de type II se caractérise par des niveaux d\'hydratation plus faibles, un taux de sébum plus élevé et des rougeurs plus importantes. Le type III présente plus de pores, une diminution de l\'aspect gras et une meilleure élasticité. Les fonds de teint n° 2 et n° 3 sont plus clairs que les fonds de teint n° 1 et n° 4. Lors de l\'auto‐évaluation, les sujets des types I et II ont préféré le fond de teint n° 3, tandis que les sujets du type III ont préféré le fond de teint n° 1 et le fond de teint n° 4 parce qu\'ils correspondaient à leur carnation. Les résultats de l\'évaluation du logiciel ont montré que l\'esthétique populaire préférait que les sujets de type I et de type II utilisent le n° 2, et que les sujets de type III utilisent le n° 2 et le n° 3, car ils donnaient un teint plus clair.
CONCLUSIONS: Les peaux sensibles de différents types de carnation sont confrontées à des problèmes cutanés différents. Les résultats mettent également en évidence le penchant du public pour les teintes de fond de teint plus claires, malgré la pratique courante consistant à choisir des teintes qui s\'harmonisent avec le teint inhérent à la peau.

OBJECTIVE: Carotenoids, especially lutein and zeaxanthin isomers (L/Zi), filter blue light and protect skin from environmental factors including high-energy sources. These carotenoids may be able to block the formation of melanin pathways, decrease cytokines, and increase antioxidants.
METHODS: This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial over a 12-week supplementation period. Fifty healthy people (50 healthy subjects were recruited and 46 subjects completed the study) (males and females, age: 18-45 years) with mild-to-moderate dry skin were included in this study. Skin type of the subjects was classified as Fitzpatrick skin type II-IV scale. Subjects were administered with either an oral dietary supplement containing 10 mg lutein (L) and 2 mg zeaxanthin isomers (Zi) (L/Zi: RR-zeaxanthin and RS (meso)-zeaxanthin) or a placebo daily for 12 weeks. The minimal erythemal dose and skin lightening (L*) were measured via the Chromameter®. The individual typological angle was calculated. Subjective assessments were also recorded.
RESULTS: Overall skin tone was significantly improved in the L/Zi group compared to placebo (P<0.0237), and luminance (L*) values were significantly increased in the L/Zi group. Mean minimal erythemal dose was increased with L/Zi supplementation after 12 weeks of supplementation. L/Zi supplementation significantly increased the individual typological angle.
CONCLUSIONS: L/Zi supplementation lightens and improves skin conditions.

BACKGROUND: Skin color varies among ethnic groups on accounts of genetic background. Within an ethnic group, skin color may also vary according to geographical environments and sun exposure habits. While many reports address skin color differences between ethnic groups, few have compared skin color within as ethnic group.
OBJECTIVE: To compare skin color characteristics according to differences in latitude including UV exposure between two Asian populations (Korean and Cantonese [Chinese]).
METHODS: We included 461 healthy female subjects: 317 Korean (age 42.3 ± 7.16) and 144 Cantonese (age 41.5 ± 11.2). Skin phototypes were classified according to the Fitzpatrick classification, and back skin color measured using the Minolta colorimeter. We evaluated the lightness (L*), yellowish (b*) value, individual typology angle (ITA°), and minimal erythema dose (MED).
RESULTS: Fitzpatrick phototype ratios were similar in Korean (II: 19.9%, III: 78.9%) and Cantonese (II: 27.1%, III: 72.9%). However, the L* (68.47 ± 2.66 vs. 66.44 ± 2.47), ITA° (41.80 ± 5.51 vs. 40.20 ± 5.79), and b* (20.56 ± 1.71 vs. 19.28 ± 1.97) were significantly higher in Korean than in Cantonese. Korean had a significant lower MED than Cantonese (22.33 ± 2.89 vs. 23.38 ± 6.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Subjective phototype self-assessment showed similar results in Korean and Cantonese. However, objective skin color parameters differed between the two populations. Koreans, who live at a higher latitude and get relatively little sun exposure, have lighter skin color than the Cantonese and burn easily upon UV exposure.