indeterminate biliary strictures

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    对于临床医生来说,探索不确定的胆道狭窄(IBS)的性质仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。经过彻底的术前评估,约有20%的胆道狭窄仍未确定。
    这里,我们介绍了2例不确定的胆道狭窄患者,其横断面成像和内镜检查无诊断性。患者最终行剖腹探查术,确诊为恶性肿瘤。我们还回顾了最近有关IBS评估的文献报道。
    鉴于大多数胆道狭窄都是恶性肿瘤,术前区分良恶性是选择最佳治疗方案的关键。因此,密切跟进,多学科讨论,对于一些困难的诊断病例,需要及时的手术探查。
    UNASSIGNED: It is still a challenging problem for clinicians to explore the nature of the indeterminate biliary strictures (IBSs). Approximately 20% of biliary strictures remain undetermined after a thorough preoperative assessment.
    UNASSIGNED: Here, we present two cases of indeterminate biliary strictures patients, whose cross- sectional imaging and endoscopic examination were nondiagnostic. The patients underwent exploratory laparotomy finally and were confirmed as malignancy. We also reviewed the recent reports in literatures regarding the evaluation of IBSs.
    UNASSIGNED: Given the majority of the biliary strictures are malignancy, preoperative differentiation between benign and malignant is critical for choosing the best therapeutic regimen. Thus, close follow-up, multiple multidisciplinary discussion, and prompt surgical exploration are necessary for some difficult diagnostic cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在某些解剖结构改变或胆道梗阻的患者中,常规经口观察胆道狭窄的方法不可行。经皮肝穿刺胆道镜检查可以作为一种替代手术。这项研究旨在回顾性地回顾在丹麦三级转诊中心进行的5年期间,使用SpyGlassDS技术(S-PTCS)对经皮肝穿胆道造影的使用。
    对2016年至2021年在丹麦三级转诊中心接受S-PTCS的所有患者进行回顾性分析。视觉,技术,并对S-PTCS的总体成功率进行了分析,以及并发症发生率。灵敏度,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV),负预测值(NPV),并计算了S-PTCS的准确度。
    22名患者被纳入研究。视觉,技术,在17/22、22/22和21/22患者中,S-PTCS取得了总体成功,分别。S-PTCS的灵敏度为83.3%,100%的特异性,PPV为100%,净现值为94.1%,准确率为95.4%。1/22例患者出现并发症。
    S-PTCS是一种安全的方式,成功率很高,高预测值,并发症发生率低。这项研究表明,对于不确定的胆道狭窄患者,S-PTCS是常规方法的替代方法,而常规方法不可行。
    UNASSIGNED: Conventional peroral methods to visualize biliary strictures are not feasible in some patients with altered anatomy or biliary obstruction, and percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy can be used as an alternative procedure. This study aimed to retrospectively review the use of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography using the SpyGlass DS technology (S-PTCS) during a 5-year period at a Danish tertiary referral centre.
    UNASSIGNED: All patients who underwent S-PTCS at a single Danish tertiary referral centre between 2016 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The visual, technical, and overall success rates of S-PTCS were analyzed, as well as the complication rate. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of S-PTCS were calculated.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-two patients were included in the study. Visual, technical, and overall success of S-PTCS was achieved in 17/22, 22/22, and 21/22 patients, respectively. S-PTCS yielded a sensitivity of 83.3%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100%, a NPV of 94.1%, and an accuracy of 95.4%. Complications occurred in 1/22 patients.
    UNASSIGNED: S-PTCS is a safe modality, with high success rates, high predictive values, and a low rate of complications. This study suggests that S-PTCS is an alternative to conventional methods in patients with indeterminate biliary strictures where conventional methods were unfeasible.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:不确定的胆道狭窄(IDBS)的特征仍然是一个重大挑战。数字单操作员胆道镜检查(DSOC)可能会克服常规活检和刷检的局限性。这项研究的目的是将视觉评估和DSOC引导的活检的诊断准确性与常规的经乳头采样技术进行比较,并评估观察者之间的视觉诊断协议(IOA)。
    方法:对所有连续接受DSOC引导活检的患者进行了为期6年的常规IDBS采样技术的回顾性评估。最终诊断基于手术标本的组织学评估(如果可用)或至少6个月的临床随访。对于IOA,由6名专家和6名学员对20秒DSOC剪辑进行了回顾性审查,并根据摩纳哥分类进行了分类。
    结果:在研究期间,35例患者接受了IDBS的DSOC治疗;14例患者(F=9),中位年龄为64岁(范围53-76)达到了研究目标。在DSOC之后,3例患者的狭窄位置发生了改变(额外产量为21.4%).在所有病例中,导管内DSOC引导活检技术上都是成功的,充足性为92.8%。没有记录到不良事件。最终诊断为良性疾病5例,其他为胆管癌。对于IOA,对29个视频进行了评估,最终诊断几乎完全一致(kappa0.871;协议93.1,p<0.001),尽管专家和受训者的DSOC视觉发现的总体准确率为73.6%和64.4%,分别。
    结论:DSOC可以提高IDBS的诊断准确性,因为它显示了对视觉发现的高灵敏度和对DSOC引导活检的高特异性。视觉诊断对于使用摩纳哥分类进行诊断似乎是可靠的。
    OBJECTIVE: Characterization of indeterminate biliary strictures (IDBS) still represents a major challenge. Digital single-operator cholangioscopy (DSOC) could potentially overcome limits of conventional biopsy and brush sampling. The aim of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of visual evaluation and DSOC-guided biopsies to conventional trans-papillary sampling techniques and to evaluate the inter-observer agreement (IOA) on visual diagnosis.
    METHODS: All consecutive patients undergoing DSOC-guided biopsy after conventional sampling techniques for IDBS during a six-year period were retrospectively evaluated. Final diagnosis was based on histological evaluation of the surgical specimen if available or a clinical follow-up of at least 6 months. For IOA, 20-second DSOC clips were retrospectively reviewed by 6 experts and 6 trainees and classified according to the Monaco Classification.
    RESULTS: Thirty-five patients underwent DSOC for IDBS in the study period; 14 patients (F = 9) with a median age of 64 years (range 53-76) met the study aim. After DSOC, strictures location was changed in three patients (additional yield of 21.4 %). Intraductal DSOC-guided biopsy were technically successful in all cases, with an adequacy of 92.8 %. No adverse events were recorded. Final diagnosis was benign disease in five cases and cholangiocarcinoma in the others. For IOA, 29 videos were evaluated with almost perfect agreement for final diagnosis (kappa 0.871; agreement 93.1, p <0.001), although overall accuracy of DSOC visual finding was 73.6 % and 64.4 % for experts and trainees, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: DSOC could improve diagnostic accuracy for IDBS, since it showed high sensitivity for visual finding and high specificity for DSOC guided-biopsy. Visual diagnosis seems reliable for diagnosis using the Monaco Classification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管横截面成像和内窥镜技术取得了进展,胆管狭窄仍然是一个具有挑战性的临床实体。早期确定胆道狭窄的良性或恶性至关重要。早期诊断不仅有助于进一步治疗,而且还可以最大程度地减少与延迟诊断相关的死亡率和发病率。常规成像和内窥镜技术,尤其是内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)和组织取样技术是建立诊断的关键.不确定的胆道狭窄(IDBS)在影像学或绝对组织病理学诊断上没有明确的质量,并且通常需要使用多种诊断方法来确定病因。在这次审查中,我们讨论可能的病因,临床表现,诊断,以及IDBS的管理。根据现有数据和专家意见,我们描述了一种用于管理IDBS的基于证据的诊断算法.重点领域包括使用传统的组织采样技术,例如ERCP与刷细胞学,导管内活检,荧光原位杂交和流式细胞术。我们还描述了内窥镜超声(EUS)引导的细针穿刺和活检的作用,胆道镜检查,共聚焦激光显微内镜,和导管内EUS在IDBS管理中的应用。
    Despite advances in cross-sectional imaging and endoscopic technology, bile duct strictures remain a challenging clinical entity. It is crucial to make an early determination of benign or malignant nature of biliary strictures. Early diagnosis not only helps with further management but also minimizes mortality and morbidity associated with delayed diagnosis. Conventional imaging and endoscopic techniques, particularly endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and tissue sampling techniques play a key in establishing a diagnosis. Indeterminate biliary strictures (IDBSs) have no definite mass on imaging or absolute histopathological diagnosis and often warrant utilization of multiple diagnostics to ascertain an etiology. In this review, we discuss possible etiologies, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management of IDBSs. Based on available data and expert opinion, we depict an evidence based diagnostic algorithm for management of IDBSs. Areas of focus include use of traditional tissue sampling techniques such as ERCP with brush cytology, intraductal biopsies, fluorescence in situ hybridization and flow cytometry. We also describe the role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsies, cholangioscopy, confocal laser endomicroscopy, and intraductal EUS in management of IDBSs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    经口胆道镜检查(POC)是一种内窥镜检查程序,可直接对胆道进行导管内可视化。POC已成为不确定的胆道狭窄评估和治疗困难的胆道结石的重要工具。在几代设备中,在其他诊断或治疗方式不足的情况下,POC已满足其他临床需求。不良事件发生率与标准内镜逆行胆道镜检查相当,技术属性独特,POC的作用可能会继续扩大。在这篇前沿文章中,我们重点介绍了POC的现有和不断发展的临床应用以及正在进行的研究领域。
    Peroral cholangioscopy (POC) is an endoscopic procedure that allows direct intraductal visualization of the biliary tract. POC has emerged as a vital tool for indeterminate biliary stricture evaluation and treatment of difficult biliary stones. Over several generations of devices, POC has fulfilled additional clinical needs where other diagnostic or therapeutic modalities have been inadequate. With adverse event rates comparable to standard endoscopic retrograde cholangioscopy and unique technical attributes, the role of POC is likely to continue expand. In this frontiers article, we highlight the existing and growing clinical applications of POC as well as areas of ongoing research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胆道镜检查,或者胆道镜检查,是用于诊断或治疗目的的胆道内直接可视化的内窥镜程序。自1879年构思以来,进行了许多变化和改进,以确保诊断和管理一系列肝内和肝外胆道病变的相关性。范围从改善的视觉印象和光学引导活检不确定的胆道狭窄和临床上无法区分的病理到碎石和其他消融疗法的治疗用途。此外,随着对胆道疾病不断发展的理解,有很多创新的想法和技术来填补这个空白,如细微差别的胆道支架置入和取回迁移的导管支架。考虑到这一点,我们对目前在胆道镜检查方面的进展进行了综述,并提供了新的支持证据,进一步描述了胆道镜检查在各种诊断和治疗干预中的作用。并发症,局限性,并提出了进一步研究的领域。
    Choledochoscopy, or cholangioscopy, is an endoscopic procedure for direct visualization within the biliary tract for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes. Since its conception in 1879, many variations and improvements are made to ensure relevance in diagnosing and managing a range of intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary pathologies. This ranges from improved visual impression and optical guided biopsies of indeterminate biliary strictures and clinically indistinguishable pathologies to therapeutic uses in stone fragmentation and other ablative therapies. Furthermore, with the evolving understanding of biliary disorders, there are significant innovative ideas and techniques to fill this void, such as nuanced instances of biliary stenting and retrieving migrated ductal stents. With this in mind, we present a review of the current advancements in choledo-choscopy with new supporting evidence that further delineates the role of choledochoscopy in various diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, complications, limitations and put forth areas for further study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    经口胆道镜(POC)提供微创,用于诊断和治疗目的的胆道导管系统的直接内窥镜可视化。POC自几十年前首次推出以来,已经受益于许多技术进步。这些进步导致了改进的效用和扩展的功能,使POC成为管理各种胆管疾病和病症的一个组成部分。随着时间的推移,POC的临床作用已经扩大。新的应用程序和功能正日益受到赞赏和发展。本文概述了POC的当前状态,特别关注数字单操作员胆道镜检查及其优势,局限性,预付款,新兴的应用。
    Peroral cholangioscopy (POC) provides minimally invasive, direct endoscopic visualization of the biliary ductal system for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. POC has benefited from a number of technologic advances since its first introduction several decades ago. These advances have led to improved utility and expanded functionality, making POC an integral part of managing various bile duct diseases and disorders. Over time, the clinical role of POC has expanded. Novel applications and capabilities are being increasingly appreciated and developed. This article provides an overview of the current state of POC, with a particular focus on digital single-operator cholangioscopy and its strengths, limitations, advances, and emerging applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures remains challenging due to limited sensitivity of endoscopic tissue sampling. Biliary probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) has shown promise to detect and exclude neoplasia. However, knowledge of whether individual inflammatory criteria are more prevalent in neoplasia compared to benign strictures is limited. The objective of this work is to improve diagnosis of neoplastic and inflammatory conditions using pCLE.
    METHODS: The charts of all patients who underwent pCLE at a single referral center between 2009 and 2015 were reviewed. ERCP reports were reviewed for eleven Miami and Paris criteria. Primary outcome was the identification of neoplasia by histopathology (defined as high-grade dysplasia and/or adenocarcinoma). To model predictors of neoplasia, we fit a binary regression model incorporating data from pCLE operating criteria, pCLE impression, and PSC status.
    RESULTS: 97 patients were identified. In the 27 patients with neoplasia, there was increasing number of Miami malignant criteria (Pearson r = 0.512, p < .001) while inflammatory criteria were less prevalent. 10% (5/51, p < .001) of patients with benign pCLE impression developed neoplasia, while 48% (22/46, p < .001) with suspicious pCLE impressions developed neoplasia. The binary regression model to predict neoplasia had a sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 92.5%, and overall accuracy 89.7%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Presence of malignant criteria and absence of certain inflammatory criteria are more prevalent in patients with neoplasia. Our model, which weights individual imaging components, shows impressive sensitivity and specificity over prior prognostic efforts. Prospective studies will be required to evaluate this model.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Digital single-operator cholangioscopes (digital SOCs), equipped with an improved image quality, have been recently introduced.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of digital SOCs (Spyglass™ DS).
    METHODS: Sixty-seven digital SOC procedures performed between 2015 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.
    RESULTS: The most frequent indications for examination were indeterminate biliary strictures (61.2%) and biliary stone disease (23.9%). In 25 patients (37.3), visual findings predicted malignancy with a sensitivity of 88.9%, a specificity of 97.6%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 96.0% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.9%. For histological analysis, forceps biopsies were performed in 29 patients (43.2%). Compared with visual findings, forceps biopsies yield a lower diagnostic efficacy in diagnosing malignancy (sensitivity 62.5%, specificity 90.0%, PPV 90.9%, NPV 60.0%). Therapeutic interventions were performed in 19 patients with a technical success rate of 89.4%. Adverse events were observed in 17 patients (25.4%). Of these, 11 patients (16.4%) suffered from severe adverse events (pancreatitis, cholangitis or major bleeding), which led to a prolonged hospital stay.
    CONCLUSIONS: Digital SOCs have excellent diagnostic and therapeutic efficacies, but are accompanied by high rates of adverse events; therefore, physicians should use digital SOCs in carefully selected cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Pre-operative evaluation of biliary strictures remains challenging. The dilemma that exists is how to balance the risk of failing to detect malignancy and the potential morbidity caused by unnecessary surgery in patients with benign etiologies. With emerging novel diagnostic modalities, this study aims to assess the efficacy of diagnostic techniques and facilitate a clinical approach to indeterminate biliary strictures. Areas covered: Conventional imaging modalities are crucial in identifying the location of a stricture and are helpful for choosing further diagnostic modalities. Utilization of endoscopic techniques, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), is key in establishing a diagnosis. The emergence of novel diagnostic modalities, such as fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), peroral cholangioscopy (POC), intraductal endoscopic ultrasound (IDUS) and confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE), enhance the diagnostic yield in the evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures. Expert commentary: More reliable and validated visual criteria for differentiating malignancy from benign biliary conditions, utilizing advanced imaging modalities such as POC and CLE, need to be established. It is of significance to further evaluate these novel diagnostic modalities through ongoing trials and to develop a diagnostic algorithm that reconciles cost-effectiveness with diagnostic accuracy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号