■每年,美国手外科学会(ASSH)在“最佳论文”会议期间选择了几篇摘要进行讲台演讲。我们检查了这些论文,以更好地了解它们的特征和对手外科领域的影响。
■\“最佳论文\”从2010年到2020年ASSH年会进行了审查。搜索在线数据库以找到匹配的出版物。描述性数据从出版物中收集。记录每个相应作者的Hirsch指数值和每个出版物的引用次数。使用描述性统计来分析数据。
■在研究期间颁发了59篇“最佳论文”。49(83%)是临床研究,10是基础科学研究。共有39项观察性研究,11项人体试验,8个实验研究,和1个病例系列。在我们进行审查时,发表了54篇(91.5%)。其中26项(48%)是多中心研究,其余28人来自一个机构。从发表到发表的平均时间为16个月。发表的前三名期刊是《手外科杂志》(33%),骨与关节外科杂志(9%),和手外科杂志,欧洲(7%)。所有“最佳论文”的证据中位数水平为3,在研究期间有更高水平的证据趋势。所有通讯作者的平均h指数值为27.3。每篇出版物的平均引用次数为37次。
■ASSH“最佳论文”主要是临床研究,证据水平越来越强,可能是由具有研究生产力历史的作者领导的。在ASSH年会上被选为“最佳论文”是对未来出版物和影响的有力预测。
■本研究评估了ASSH年会上最佳论文指定的“价值”。
UNASSIGNED: Each year, the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH) selects several abstracts for podium presentations during a \"Best Papers\" session. We examined these papers to better understand their characteristics and impact on the field of hand surgery.
UNASSIGNED: \"Best Papers\" from the 2010 to 2020 ASSH Annual Meetings were reviewed. Online databases were searched to find matching publications. Descriptive data were collected from the publications. The Hirsch index value for each corresponding author and the number of citations for each publication were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data.
UNASSIGNED: Fifty-nine \"Best Papers\" were awarded during the study period. Forty-nine (83%) were clinical and 10 were basic science studies. A total of 39 observational studies, 11 human trials, 8 experimental studies, and 1 case series were present. Fifty-four (91.5%) were published at the time of our review. Twenty-six of those (48%) were multicenter studies, and the remaining 28 were from a single institution. The average time from presentation to publication was 16 months. The top three journals of publication were the Journal of Hand Surgery (33%), the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (9%), and the Journal of Hand Surgery, European (7%). The median level of evidence for all \"Best Papers\" was 3, with a trend toward a higher level of evidence during the study period. The average h-index value of all corresponding authors was 27.3. The average number of citations per publication was 37.
UNASSIGNED: The ASSH \"Best Papers\" were primarily clinical studies with an increasingly strong level of evidence and were likely led by an author with a history of research productivity. Selection as a \"Best Paper\" at ASSH Annual Meetings is a strong predictor of future publication and impact.
UNASSIGNED: This study evaluates the \"value\" of the best paper designation at the ASSH annual meeting.