UNASSIGNED: Real-life experience with imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (IMI/REL) for the treatment of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae complex (KPC-Kp) and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (DTR-PA) infections is herein described.
UNASSIGNED: Adult patients with KPC-Kp or DTR-PA infections who received ≥48 h of IMI/REL were included. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were retrieved through the medical records. Primary outcome was clinical cure. Secondary outcomes included mortality from infection onset and adverse effects attributable to IMI/REL.
UNASSIGNED: We included 10 patients with different infections caused by DTR-PA (n = 4), KPC-Kp [n = 5, of which 3 ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant (CTV-R KPC-Kp), 2 CTV susceptible (CTV-S KPC-Kp)] or both DTR-PA/KPC-Kp (n = 1) successfully treated with IMI/REL: 3 hospital-acquired pneumonia, 1 ventilator-associated pneumonia, 2 skin and soft tissue infections, 1 osteomyelitis, 2 bloodstream infections, 1 complicated urinary tract infection. Clinical cure was achieved in all cases. No patients died and no side effect were reported.
UNASSIGNED: We reported the preliminary real-life experience on the successful and safe use of IMI/REL for the treatment of KPC-Kp or DTR-PA complicated infections, including pneumonia and bone infections.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales represent a major health threat and have few approved therapeutic options. Enterobacterales isolates were collected from hospitalized inpatients from 49 sites in six European countries (1 January-31 December 2020) and underwent susceptibility testing to cefiderocol and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Meropenem-resistant (MIC >8 mg/L) and cefiderocol-susceptible isolates were analyzed by PCR, and cefiderocol-‍resistant isolates by whole-genome sequencing, to identify resistance mechanisms. Overall, 1,909 isolates (including 970 Klebsiella spp., 382 Escherichia coli, and 244 Enterobacter spp.) were collected, commonly from bloodstream infections (43.6%). Cefiderocol susceptibility was higher than approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations and largely comparable to cefepime-taniborbactam and aztreonam-avibactam against all Enterobacterales (98.1% vs 78.1%-‍97.4% and 98.7%-99.1%, respectively) and Enterobacterales resistant to meropenem (n = 148, including 125 Klebsiella spp.; 87.8% vs 0%-71.6% and 93.2%-98.6%, respectively), β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (66.7%-‍92.1% vs 0%-‍88.1% and 66.7%-97.9%, respectively), and to both meropenem and β-‌lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (61.9%-65.9% vs 0%-‍20.5% and 76.2%-97.7%, respectively). Susceptibilities to approved and developmental β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales (n = 37) were 10.8%-‍56.8% and 78.4%-94.6%, respectively. Most meropenem-resistant Enterobacterales harbored Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (110/148) genes, although metallo-β-lactamase (35/148) and oxacillinase (OXA) carbapenemase (6/148) genes were less common; cefiderocol susceptibility was retained in β-lactamase producers, other than NDM, AmpC, and non-carbapenemase OXA producers. Most cefiderocol-resistant Enterobacterales had multiple resistance mechanisms, including ≥1 iron uptake-related mutation (37/37), carbapenemase gene (33/37), and ftsI mutation (24/37). The susceptibility to cefiderocol was higher than approved β-lac‌tam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against European Enterobacterales, including meropenem- and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates.
OBJECTIVE: This study collected a notably large number of Enterobacterales isolates from Europe, including meropenem- and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates against which the in vitro activities of cefiderocol and developmental β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations were directly compared for the first time. The MIC breakpoint for high-dose meropenem was used to define meropenem resistance, so isolates that would remain meropenem resistant with doses clinically available to patients were included in the data. Susceptibility to cefiderocol, as a single active compound, was high against Enterobacterales and was higher than or comparable to available β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. These results provide insights into the treatment options for infections due to Enterobacterales with resistant phenotypes. Early susceptibility testing of cefiderocol in parallel with β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations will allow patients to receive the most appropriate treatment option(s) available in a timely manner. This is particularly important when options are more limited, such as against metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has contributed to the spread of antimicrobial resistance, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.
METHODS: This study utilized data from the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) surveillance program in Taiwan. Enterobacterales from patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs) were collected and subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing and β-lactamase gene detection using a multiplex PCR assay. Statistical analysis was conducted to compare susceptibility rates and resistance genes between time periods before (2018-2019) and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021).
RESULTS: A total of 1231 Enterobacterales isolates were collected, predominantly Escherichia coli (55.6%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (29.2%). The proportion of nosocomial BSIs increased during the COVID-19 pandemic (55.5% vs. 61.7%, p < 0.05). Overall, susceptibility rates for most antimicrobial agents decreased, with Enterobacterales from nosocomial BSIs showing significantly lower susceptibility rates than those from community-acquired BSIs. Among 123 Enterobacterales isolates that underwent molecular resistance mechanism detection, ESBL, AmpC β-lactamase, and carbapenemase genes were detected in 43.1%, 48.8% and 16.3% of the tested isolates, respectively. The prevalence of carbapenemase genes among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales increased during the pandemic, although the difference was not statistically significant. Two novel β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam, preserved good efficacy against Enterobacterales. However, imipenem-relebactam showed lower in vitro activity against imipenem-non-susceptible Enterobacterales than that of meropenem-vaborbactam.
CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic appears to be associated with a general decrease in antimicrobial susceptibility rates among Enterobacterales causing BSIs in Taiwan. Continuous surveillance is crucial to monitor antimicrobial resistance during the pandemic and in the future.

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. represent major threats and have few approved therapeutic options. Non-‍fermenting Gram-negative isolates were collected from hospitalized inpatients from 49 sites in 6 European countries between 01 January 2020 and 31 December 2020 and underwent susceptibility testing against cefiderocol and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Meropenem-resistant (MIC >8 mg/L), cefiderocol-susceptible isolates were analyzed by PCR, and cefiderocol-resistant isolates were analyzed by whole-genome sequencing to identify resistance mechanisms. Overall, 1,451 (950 P. aeruginosa; 501 Acinetobacter spp.) isolates were collected, commonly from the respiratory tract (42.0% and 39.3%, respectively). Cefiderocol susceptibility was higher than ‍β‍-‍l‍a‍c‍t‍a‍m‍/‍β‍-‍l‍a‍c‍t‍a‍mase‍ inhibitor combinations against P. aeruginosa (98.9% vs 83.3%-91.4%), and P. ‍aeruginosa resistant to meropenem (n = 139; 97.8% vs 12.2%-59.7%), β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (93.6%-98.1% vs 10.7%-71.8%), and both meropenem and ceftazidime-avibactam (96.7% vs 5.0%-‍‍45.0%) or ‍ceftolozane-tazobactam (98.4% vs 8.1%-54.8%), respectively. Cefiderocol and sulbactam-durlobactam susceptibilities were high against Acinetobacter spp. (92.4% and 97.0%) and meropenem-resistant Acineto‍bacter ‍spp. (n = 227; 85.0% and 93.8%) but lower against sulbactam-durlobactam- (n ‍= 15; 13.3%) and cefiderocol- (n = 38; 65.8%) resistant isolates, respectively. Among meropenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., the most common β-‍‍lactamase genes were metallo-β-lactamases [30/139; blaVIM-2 (15/139)] and oxacillinases [215/227; blaOXA-23 (194/227)], respectively. Acquired β-lactamase genes were identified in 1/10 and 32/38 of cefiderocol-resistant P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., and pirA-like or piuA mutations in 10/10 and 37/38, respectively. Conclusion: cefiderocol susceptibility was high against P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., including meropenem-resistant isolates and those resistant to recent β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations common in first-line treatment of European non-fermenters.
OBJECTIVE: This was the first study in which the in vitro activity of cefiderocol and non-licensed β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations were directly compared against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp., including meropenem- and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination-resistant isolates. A notably large number of European isolates were collected. Meropenem resistance was defined according to the MIC breakpoint for high-dose meropenem, ensuring that data reflect antibiotic activity against isolates that would remain meropenem resistant in the clinic. Cefiderocol susceptibility was high against non-fermenters, and there was no apparent cross resistance between cefiderocol and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, with the exception of sulbactam-durlobactam. These results provide insights into therapeutic options for infections due to resistant P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. and indicate how early susceptibility testing of cefiderocol in parallel with β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations will allow clinicians to choose the effective treatment(s) from all available options. This is particularly important as current treatment options against non-fermenters are limited.

OBJECTIVE: Imipenem-relebactam (IMR), a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, is recommended for infections caused by difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This study aimed to investigate the evolution trajectory of IMR resistance under the selection of levofloxacin in P. aeruginosa.
METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, complete genome sequencing and gene manipulation experiments were performed. Quantitative reverse transcription PCR for specific genes and porin levels were detected. Evolution trajectory was simulated in vitro by induction assay.
RESULTS: P. aeruginosa HS347 and HS355 were isolated from abdominal drainage of two neighbouring patients (S and Z) undergoing surgery of colon carcinoma in Shanghai, China, with the latter patient having received levofloxacin. They were closely related ST16 strains, and both carried blaKPC-2 plasmids highly similar to those of P. aeruginosa endemic clones from Zhejiang province, where patient Z had received enteroscopy before this admission. Acquisition of resistance was observed for both IMR and fluoroquinolones in HS355, likely prompted by treatment with levofloxacin. The T274I substitution in MexS (putative oxidoreductase), upregulated efflux pump operon mexEF-oprN and decreased production of porin OprD leading to cross-resistance to fluoroquinolones and IMR, which was also verified by in vitro mutant selection under levofloxacin selection.
CONCLUSIONS: The emergence of a rare blaKPC-2-plasmid-bearing ST16 clone implies the horizonal spread and inter-regional dissemination of a high-risk plasmid-clone combination, representing a public health challenge. Levofloxacin exposure can select for mexS inactivating mutation, which in turn leads to IMR resistance phenotype, implicating the role of an unrelated, widely used antimicrobial agent in insidiously triggering the development of cross resistance to a latest β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination.

OBJECTIVE: To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the in vitro activity of two novel antimicrobial drugs, including imipenem-relebactam (IMR) and aztreonam-avibactam (AZA), toward carbapenem-resistant and hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-hvKP) strains. Our in vitro activity study revealed that only few antibacterial agents (including several novel agents) exhibit high antimicrobial activity toward carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) and CR-hvKP isolates. IMR and AZA may be promising therapeutic agents for the treatment of infections caused by CRKP and CR-hvKP isolates.

As new treatment alternatives for Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) are urgently needed, we determined the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for novel carbapenem combinations, including imipenem-relebactam and tebipenem-avibactam against 98 MABC isolates by broth microdilution. The MIC50 was reduced from 16 to 8 mg/L by adding relebactam to imipenem, while the addition of avibactam to tebipenem showed a more pronounced reduction from 256 to 16 mg/L, representing a promising non-toxic, oral treatment option for further exploration.

OBJECTIVE: Mycobacterium abscessus is an emerging infection in people living with lung diseases, including cystic fibrosis (CF) and bronchiectasis, and it has limited treatment options and low cure rates. The off-label use of novel antibiotics developed for other bacterial pathogens offers potential new therapeutic options. We aimed to describe the in vitro activity of imipenem, imipenem-relebactam and tedizolid against comparator antibiotics in M. abscessus isolates from Australian patients with and without CF.
METHODS: We performed susceptibility testing for imipenem-relebactam, tedizolid and comparator antibiotics by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria against 102 clinical M. abscessus isolates, including 46 from people with CF.
RESULTS: In this study, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs) of imipenem-relebactam was one-fold dilution less than of imipenem alone. The MIC50 and MIC90 of imipenem-relebactam were 8 and 16 mg/L, respectively, whereas for imipenem they were 16 and 32 mg/L. Tedizolid had an MIC50 and MIC90 of 2 and 4 mg/L, respectively. Forty non-CF isolates had linezolid susceptibility performed, with MIC50 and MIC90 values of 16 and 32 mg/L, respectively, measured.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows lower MICs for imipenem-relebactam and tedizolid compared to other more commonly used antibiotics and supports their consideration in clinical trials for M. abscessus treatment.

Medical tourism is becoming increasingly popular. The most popularly sought operations are cosmetic procedures. With the increase in cosmetic tourism, it is unsurprising that there has also been a rise in skin and soft tissue infections caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM); in particular by the rapidly growing mycobacteria species. Here we provide a case of a 35 year-old woman who presented after autologous fat grafting with multiple painful, violaceous, and purulent nodules on her arms, legs, and breasts. Infection was found to be due to Mycobacterium abscessus. She was successfully treated with azithromycin, clofazimine, rifabutin, amikacin, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam (Recarbrio™) and imipenem-cilastatin. This is the first described case of a M. abscessus infection successfully treated using this combination.

The role of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in ceftazidime-nonsusceptible (CAZ-NS) and imipenem-nonsusceptible (IPM-NS) Pseudomonas aeruginosa has not been fully elucidated. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates, determined how avibactam restored ceftazidime activity, and compared the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and imipenem-relebactam (IMR) against KPC-producing P. aeruginosa. Similar high susceptibility rates for CZA, IMR, and ceftolozane-tazobactam (88.9% to 89.8%) were found for 596 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from 11 hospitals in China, and a higher susceptibility rate to ceftazidime than imipenem was observed (73.5% versus 63.1%). For CAZ-NS and IPM-NS isolates, susceptibility rates for CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and IMR were 61.5% (75/122), 54.9% (67/122), and 51.6% (63/122), respectively. For CAZ-NS, IPM-NS but CZA-susceptible isolates, 34.7% (26/75) harbored acquired β-lactamases with KPC-2 predominant (n = 19), and 45.3% (34/75) presented overexpression of chromosomal β-lactamase ampC. Among 22 isolates carrying KPC-2 carbapenemase alone, susceptibility rates to CZA and IMR were 86.4% (19/22) and 9.1% (2/22), respectively. Notably, 95% (19/20) of IMR-nonsusceptible isolates had an inactivating mutation of oprD gene. In conclusion, CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and IMR exhibit high activity against P. aeruginosa, and CZA is more active than IMR against CAZ-NS and IPM-NS isolates as well as KPC-producing P. aeruginosa. Avibactam overcomes ceftazidime resistance engendered by KPC-2 enzyme and overexpressed AmpC. IMPORTANCE The emergence of antimicrobial resistance poses a particular challenge globally, and the concept of P. aeruginosa with \"difficult-to-treat\" resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was proposed. Here, P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were highly susceptible to three β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, CZA, IMR, and ceftolozane-tazobactam. The combination of KPC-2 enzyme and nonfunctional porin OprD contributed to IMR resistance in P. aeruginosa, and CZA was more active than IMR in fighting against KPC-2-producing P. aeruginosa. CZA also showed good activity against CAZ-NS and IPM-NS P. aeruginosa, primarily by inhibiting KPC-2 enzyme and overproduced AmpC, supporting the clinical use of CZA in the treatment of infections caused by DTR-P. aeruginosa.