BACKGROUND: A bidirectional relationship has been observed between type 2 diabetes mellitus and sarcopenia, especially among older adults. While previous studies have reported that imeglimin improves mitochondrial function, they have not assessed its effects on muscle strength in patients with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of imeglimin on muscle strength in patients with type 2 diabetes.
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we recruited consenting patients with type 2 diabetes (20-75 years). Changes in lean body mass (LBM), fat mass, quadriceps muscle strength, and grip strength from baseline (week 0) to week 24 were evaluated and compared between patients treated with imeglimin therapy (group I) and those who did not take imeglimin (controls, group C).
RESULTS: We recruited 27 patients treated with imeglimin (group I) and 29 controls (group C), and 50 of them completed the study (group I: n = 23; group C: n = 27). The change in LBM, total body fat mass, or skeletal muscle index from baseline to week 24 did not differ significantly between the two groups. However, group I exhibited a significantly higher percent change in quadriceps knee extension strength from baseline to week 24 than group C (13 ± 19% and 2.1 ± 14%, p = 0.022). Conversely, the difference in percent change in grip strength was not significant. Multivariable analysis showed that imeglimin use was significantly associated with a percent change in quadriceps knee extension strength, independent of age, sex, body mass index, and skeletal mass index (β = 0.325, p = 0.0014).
CONCLUSIONS: Imeglimin positively affected muscle strength in patients with type 2 diabetes without altering LBM. Therefore, imeglimin exerts a unique effect on skeletal muscles in humans. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.
BACKGROUND: This research was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN, UMIN000054715).

Introduction Imeglimin is a novel oral antihyperglycaemic drug used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In 2022, its clinical use was approved in Japan; however, there is limited data on its practical efficacy. Thus, we retrospectively investigated the clinical efficacy of imeglimin for six months at the National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan. Material and methods We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis to elucidate the efficacy of imeglimin in the treatment of T2DM. Ten patients were enrolled, and their biomarkers and geographic data were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c level at six months after imeglimin treatment compared to the baseline values. Other demographic and laboratory parameters, including sex, age, BMI, renal function, liver function, lipid profile, and transient elastography data, were also analyzed. Results A significant improvement in the HbA1c levels (8.1 % at baseline to 6.9 % at six months after treatment, P value = 0.01) was observed in this study, suggesting that imeglimin is a promising option for treating T2DM. In addition, no negative effects on renal function were observed, and albumin levels tended to decrease from baseline values. Among the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) cases, liver conditions, especially fat content, tended to improve in this short-term period. Conclusions Imeglimin is suggested to have a beneficial effect not only on glycemic control but also on renal and liver function. However, further studies are required to better understand the long-term efficacy of this drug.

BACKGROUND: Imeglimin is a novel antidiabetic drug with insulinotropic and insulin-sensitizing effects that targets mitochondrial bioenergetics. We investigated acute effects of add-on therapy with imeglimin to preceding metformin on the 24-h glucose profile and glycemic variability assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in patients with type 2 diabetes.
METHODS: We studied 30 outpatients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin. CGM was used for 14 days straight during the research period. Imeglimin 2,000 mg/day was started on day 7 after initiating CGM. Several CGM parameters were compared between days 4-6 (prior to imeglimin treatment) and 11-13 (following the initiation of imeglimin treatment).
RESULTS: After treatment with imeglimin, 24-h mean glucose was acutely decreased from 161.6 ± 48.0 mg/dL to 138.9 ± 32.2 mg/dL (p < 0.0001), while time in range (i.e., at a glucose level of 70-180 mg/dL) was significantly increased from 69.9 ± 23.9% to 80.6 ± 21.0% (p < 0.0001). Addition of imeglimin to metformin significantly decreased the standard deviation (SD) of 24-h glucose and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, 2 indexes of glycemic variability. Baseline serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was negatively correlated with changes in mean 24-h glucose (r = -0.3859, p = 0.0352) and those in SD (r = -0.4015, p = 0.0309).
CONCLUSIONS: Imeglimin add-on therapy to metformin acutely lowered 24-h glucose levels and improved glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin. A higher serum HDL cholesterol at baseline was associated with a better response to acute effects of imeglimin on 24-h glucose levels and glycemic variability.

OBJECTIVE: To explore differences in imeglimin response among type 2 diabetes (T2D) patient clusters using data-driven cluster analysis.
METHODS: Data-driven cluster analysis (non-hierarchical k-means clustering) was performed on randomized, double-blind, imeglimin monotherapy and adjunctive (to insulin) therapy trials based on four baseline variables: (1) disease duration; (2) body mass index (BMI); (3) HbA1c; and (4a) homeostatic model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-β) (monotherapy trials) or (4b) insulin total daily dose (adjunctive trial).
RESULTS: Four clusters were identified with distinct clinical characteristics in both monotherapy (1-4) and adjunctive therapy (I-IV) trials; clusters 1 and I had lower values across all four indices versus the overall population, clusters 2 and II had a longer diabetes duration, cluster 3 had higher baseline BMI and HOMA-β, and cluster III had higher baseline BMI and insulin total daily dose, while clusters 4 and IV had higher baseline HbA1c. Between-group differences in HbA1c change (95% confidence interval) and effect size (ES) at week 24 varied considerably by cluster (cluster 1: -0.82 [-1.00, -0.63], ES = 1.47; cluster 2: -0.64 [-0.89, -0.39], ES = 1.18; cluster 3: -0.86 [-1.38, -0.33], ES = 0.84; cluster 4: -1.27 [-1.73, -0.82], ES = 1.44). For imeglimin adjunctive therapy, HbA1c improvements were significant versus placebo at week 16, excluding cluster III (cluster I: -0.63 [-0.95, -0.31], ES = 0.88; cluster II: -0.66 [-1.02, -0.30], ES = 1.13; cluster III: -0.31 [-0.73, 0.11], ES = 0.46; cluster IV: -0.82 [-1.29, -0.35], ES = 0.99).
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in imeglimin response were observed among T2D patient clusters. Patient stratification may help with selection of those most probable to respond to imeglimin.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the real-world effects of imeglimin on glycemic control and other metabolic factors in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).
METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted based on a chart review. We recruited patients with T2DM who took imeglimin continuously for at least 3 months. Data on various metabolic parameters were collected at the first prescription of imeglimin and at 3, 6 and 12 months after the initiation of imeglimin. Statistical comparisons were performed using paired t-tests.
RESULTS: 68 patients were eligible for this study. HbA1c decreased by 0.7 % at 3 months, 1.1 % at 6 months and 1.0 % by 12 months after the initiation of imeglimin. The decreases in HbA1c were observed regardless of age, gender, body mass index, duration of diabetes, renal function and concomitant use of hypoglycemic agents. There were also significant decreases in body weight, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and non-HDL-C during imeglimin treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report showing the long-term effects of imeglimin in a real-world setting. We confirmed the glucose-lowering effects of imeglimin. Furthermore, favorable effects of imeglimin on body weight and serum lipids were also suggested.

OBJECTIVE: Imeglimin is a recently approved oral antidiabetic agent that improves insulin resistance, and promotes insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells. Here, we investigated the effects of imeglimin on glucagon secretion from pancreatic α-cells.
METHODS: Experiments were carried out in high-fat, high-sucrose diet-fed mice. The effects of imeglimin were examined using insulin and glucose tolerance tests, glucose clamp studies, and measurements of glucagon secretion from isolated islets. Glucagon was measured using both the standard and the sequential protocol of Mercodia sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; the latter eliminates cross-reactivities with other proglucagon-derived peptides.
RESULTS: Plasma glucagon, insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 levels were increased by imeglimin administration in high-fat, high-sucrose diet-fed mice. Glucose clamp experiments showed that the glucagon increase was not caused by reduced blood glucose levels. After both single and long-term administration of imeglimin, glucagon secretions were significantly enhanced during glucose tolerance tests. Milder enhancement was observed when using the sequential protocol. Long-term administration of imeglimin did not alter α-cell mass. Intraperitoneal imeglimin administration did not affect glucagon secretion, despite significantly decreased blood glucose levels. Imeglimin did not enhance glucagon secretion from isolated islets. Imeglimin administration improved fatty liver by suppressing de novo lipogenesis through decreasing sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c and carbohydrate response element binding protein and their target genes, while enhancing fatty acid oxidation through increasing carnitine palmitoyltransferase I.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the present results showed that imeglimin enhances glucagon secretion through an indirect mechanism. Our findings also showed that glucagon secretion promoted by imeglimin could contribute to improvement of fatty liver through suppressing de novo lipogenesis and enhancing fatty acid oxidation.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of patient characteristics on imeglimin effectiveness in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
METHODS: Data were pooled from two randomized, placebo-controlled, 24-week, double-blind studies of imeglimin monotherapy in Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with the proportion of responders (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] < 7.0%) and sustained responders (i.e., achieved and maintained response) in the imeglimin 1,000 mg twice daily group calculated at each visit. Patient factors significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with response were explored through multivariate logistic regression. Subgroup analyses compared the efficacy of imeglimin in patients with a HbA1c improvement less than or equal to -0.3% (early responders) versus greater than -0.3% (early non-responders) at week 4.
RESULTS: A total of 38.0% of imeglimin-treated patients and 7.2% of placebo-treated patients were responders (P < 0.001, number needed to treat = 4). The proportion of sustained responders at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16 and 20 was 10.6, 19.0, 24.0, 25.7 and 29.1%, respectively (>70% of responders at each visit). Improvements in HbA1c and fasting glucose were significantly greater in early responders versus early non-responders from week 4; between-group differences remained significant to week 24. Older age (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.14; P < 0.001); treatment-naïve status vs previous treatment (odds ratio 3.70, 95% confidence interval 1.55-8.82; P = 0.003), and lower baseline HbA1c (odds ratio 0.06, 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.16; P < 0.001) predicted response.
CONCLUSIONS: A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving imeglimin 1,000 mg twice daily monotherapy were responders versus placebo. Most (>70%) were sustained responders, suggesting that response is fairly predictable. Older age, treatment-naïve status and early treatment response significantly predicted imeglimin effectiveness.

With the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), it has become critical to identify effective treatment strategies. In recent years, the novel oral hypoglycaemic drug Imeglimin has attracted much attention in the field of diabetes treatment. The mechanisms of its therapeutic action are complex and are not yet fully understood by current research. Current evidence suggests that pancreatic β-cells, liver, and skeletal muscle are the main organs in which Imeglimin lowers blood glucose levels and that it acts mainly by targeting mitochondrial function, thereby inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis, enhancing insulin sensitivity, promoting pancreatic β-cell function, and regulating energy metabolism. There is growing evidence that the drug also has a potentially volatile role in the treatment of diabetic complications, including metabolic cardiomyopathy, diabetic vasculopathy, and diabetic neuroinflammation. According to available clinical studies, its efficacy and safety profile are more evident than other hypoglycaemic agents, and it has synergistic effects when combined with other antidiabetic drugs, and also has potential in the treatment of T2DM-related complications. This review aims to shed light on the latest research progress in the treatment of T2DM with Imeglimin, thereby providing clinicians and researchers with the latest insights into Imeglimin as a viable option for the treatment of T2DM.

OBJECTIVE: Imeglimin, a novel antidiabetic drug, has recently been reported to affect pancreatic β-cells and hepatocytes. Adipose tissue plays a crucial role in systemic metabolism. However, its effect on adipocytes remains unexplored. Herein, we investigated the effects of imeglimin on adipocytes, particularly in the mitochondria.
METHODS: The 3T3-L1 adipocytes were treated with imeglimin. Mitochondrial respiratory complex I activity and NAD+, NADH, and AMP levels were measured. Protein expression levels were determined by western blotting, mitochondrial DNA and mRNA expression levels were determined using quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and secreted adipocytokine and mitokine levels were determined using adipokine array and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS: Imeglimin inhibited complex I activity, decreased the NAD+/NADH ratio, and increased AMP levels, which were associated with the enhanced phosphorylation of AMP-activated protein kinase. In addition, imeglimin increased the mitochondrial DNA content and levels of mitochondrial transcription factor A and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator 1-α mRNA, which were abolished by Ly294002, a phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor. Furthermore, imeglimin facilitated the expression levels of markers of the mitochondrial unfolded protein response, and the gene expression and secretion of two mitokines, fibroblast growth factor 21 and growth differentiation factor 15. The production of both mitokines was transcriptionally regulated and abolished by phosphoinositide 3-kinase and Akt inhibitors.
CONCLUSIONS: Imeglimin modulates mitochondrial biology in adipocytes and may exert a mitohormetic effect through mitokine secretion.

Imeglimin is a novel oral antidiabetic drug for treating type 2 diabetes. However, the effect of imeglimin on NLRP3 inflammasome activation has not been investigated yet. Here, we aimed to investigate whether imeglimin reduces LPS-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation in THP-1 macrophages and examine the associated underlying mechanisms. We analyzed the mRNA and protein expression levels of NLRP3 inflammasome components and IL-1β secretion. Additionally, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, mitochondrial membrane potential, and mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) opening were measured by flow cytometry. Imeglimin inhibited NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated IL-1β production in LPS-stimulated THP-1-derived macrophages. In addition, imeglimin reduced LPS-induced mitochondrial ROS production and mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphorylation. Furthermore, imeglimin restored the mitochondrial function by modulating mitochondrial membrane depolarization and mPTP opening. We demonstrated for the first time that imeglimin reduces LPS-induced NLRP3 inflammasome activation by inhibiting mPTP opening in THP-1 macrophages. These results suggest that imeglimin could be a promising new anti-inflammatory agent for treating diabetic complications.