BACKGROUND: Ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) circumferential pouch advancement (CPA) involves full-thickness transanal 180-360° dissection of the distal pouch, allowing the advancement of healthy bowel to cover the internal opening of a vaginal fistula. We aimed to describe the long-term outcomes of this rare procedure.
METHODS: Patients with IPAA who underwent transanal pouch advancement for any indication between 2009 and 2021 were included. Demographics, operative details, and outcomes were reviewed. An early fistula was defined as occurring within 1 year of IPAA construction. Clinical success was defined as resolution of symptoms necessitating CPA, pouch retention, and no stoma at the time of follow-up. Figures represent the median (interquartile range) or frequency (%).
RESULTS: Over a 12-year period, nine patients were identified; the median age at CPA was 41 (36-44) years. Four patients developed early fistula after index IPAA, and five developed late fistulae. The median number of fistula repair procedures prior to CPA was 2 (1-2). All patients were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis at the time of IPAA and all late patients were re-diagnosed with Crohn\'s disease. Four (44.4%) patients had ileostomies present at the time of surgery, three (33.3%) had one constructed during surgery, and two (22.2%) never had a stoma. The median follow-up time was 11 (6-24) months. Clinical success was achieved in four of the nine (44.4%) patients at the time of the last follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Transanal circumferential pouch advancement was an effective treatment for refractory pouch vaginal fistulas and may be offered to patients who have had previous attempts at repair.

BACKGROUND: We recently described a cluster of symptoms known as twisted pouch syndrome that rarely affects patients with ileoanal pouches. Herein, we present a narrative review in which we describe the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of twisted pouch syndrome, with a focus on a simple classification schema.
METHODS: Diagnostic signs from endoscopic and radiological examinations, treatment, and prevention strategies are presented.
RESULTS: Patients with twisted pouch syndrome suffer from a triad of obstructive symptoms, erratic bowel habits, and pain which may be severe, debilitating visceral pain, all in the setting of a mechanical pouch abnormality. Diagnostic modalities include imaging, careful pouchoscopy, functional testing, diagnostic laparoscopy or laparotomy, and recently 3-dimensional pouchography. Classification of twisted pouch syndrome is based on the location and degree of rotation of the pouch and its mesentery. Outlet twists may result when the distal pouch rotates >90° to 360° clockwise inadvertently during anastomosis; when only the distal most pouch is twisted, it results in an iris-like deformity of the pouch outlet, or when the distal half of the pouch is twisted, a mid-pouch stenosis and an hourglass-shaped pouch may result. Inlet twists are either a full 360° (mesentery posterior), unintentional 180° (mesentery anterior), or 90° counterclockwise twists. Both inlet and outlet twists are fixed deformities and may only be reduced by disconnecting the entire pouch from the anus. If they result in twisted pouch syndrome, a redo pouch procedure or pouch excision is required to reduce the twist; 90° counterclockwise twists may undergo pouch inlet transposition. Adhesive twists result when the pouch becomes fixed in the pelvis in an abnormal configuration, such as when the efferent limb becomes twisted underneath the afferent limb secondary to an occult tip of the J leak, and may be reduced by pelvic adhesiolysis with or without pouch revision.
CONCLUSIONS: Pouches may rarely be inadvertently twisted during construction or twisted owing to adhesive disease or leaks. A high index of suspicion is needed to establish the diagnosis. We present a simple classification of twisted pouch syndrome that may aid in the prevention and recognition of these often difficult to diagnose postoperative complications.
In this article, we report a simple classification system for the mechanical pouch complication known as twisted pouch syndrome, including diagnostic signs from endoscopic and radiological examinations, treatment, and prevention strategies.

The diagnosis of long rectal cuff syndrome may be considered in patients with persistent rectal bleeding after ileal pouch–anal anastomosis. Pouch salvage with excision of residual rectum and conversion to an ileoanal anastomosis offers patients the chance to achieve stoma-free survival.

BACKGROUND: Ileoanal pouch is a demanding procedure with many potential technical complications including bladder or ureteral injury, while inflammation or stricture of the anastomosis or anal transition zone may lead to the formation of strictures and fistulae, including to the adjacent urethra. Pouch urinary tract fistulae are rare. We aimed to describe the presentation, diagnostic workup, and management of patients with pouch urinary at our center.
METHODS: Our prospectively maintained pouch registry was queried using diagnostic codes and natural language processing free-text searches to identify ileoanal pouch patients diagnosed with any pouch-urinary tract fistula from 1997 to 2022. Descriptive statistics and pouch survival using Kaplan-Meier curves are presented. Numbers represent frequency (proportion) or median (range).
RESULTS: Over 25 years, urinary fistulae were observed 27 pouch patients; of these, 16 of the index pouches were performed at our institution [rate 0.3% (16/5236)]. Overall median age was 42 (27-62) years, and 92.3% of the patients were male. Fistula locations included pouch-urethra in 13 patients (48.1%), pouch-bladder in 12 patients (44.4%), and anal-urethra in 2 (7.4%). The median time from pouch to fistula was 7.0 (0.3-38) years. Pouch excision and end ileostomy were performed in 12 patients (bladder fistula, n = 3; urethral fistula, n = 9), while redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) was performed in 5 patients (bladder fistula, n = 3; urethral fistula, n = 2). The 5-year overall pouch survival after fistula to the bladder was 58.3% vs. 33.3% with urethral fistulae (p = 0.25).
CONCLUSIONS: Pouch-urinary tract fistulae are a rare, morbid, and difficult to treat complication of ileoanal pouch that requires a multidisciplinary, often staged, surgical approach. In the long term, pouches with bladder fistulae were more likely to be salvaged than pouches with urethral fistulae.

UNASSIGNED: Total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the most established restorative operative approach for patients with ulcerative colitis. It has associated morbidity and the potential for major repercussions on quality of life. As such, patient selection is crucial to its success. The main aim of this paper is to present an institutional preoperative checklist to support clinical risk assessment and patient selection in those considering IPAA.
UNASSIGNED: A literature review was performed to identify the risk factors associated with surgical complications, decreased functional outcomes/quality of life, and pouch failure after IPAA. Based on this, a preliminary checklist was devised and modified through an iterative process. This was then evaluated by a consensus group comprising the pouch multidisciplinary team (MDT) core members.
UNASSIGNED: The final preoperative checklist includes assessment for risk factors such as gender, advanced age, obesity, comorbidities, sphincteric impairment, Crohn\'s disease and pelvic radiation therapy. In addition, essential steps in the decision-making process, such as pouch nurse counselling and discussion regarding surgical alternatives, are also included. The last step of the checklist is discussion at a dedicated pouch-MDT.
UNASSIGNED: A preoperative checklist may support clinicians with the selection of patients that are suitable for pouch surgery. It also serves as a useful tool to inform the discussion of cases at the MDT meeting.

BACKGROUND: Herein, we present a proof-of-concept study of three-dimensional [3D] pouchography using virtual and printed 3D models of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA] in patients with normal pouches and in cases of mechanical pouch complications.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective, descriptive case series of a convenience sample of 10 pouch patients with or without pouch dysfunction, who had CT scans appropriate for segmentation who were identified from our pouch registry. The steps involved in clinician-driven automated 3D reconstruction are presented.
RESULTS: We included three normal patients who underwent CT imaging and were found to have no primary pouch pathology, and seven patients with known pouch pathology identifiable with 3D reconstruction [including pouch strictures, megapouch, pouch volvulus, and twisted pouches], underwent 3D virtual modelling; one normal and one twisted pouch were 3D-printed. We discovered that 3D pouchography reliably identified staple lines [pouch body, anorectal circular and transverse, and tip of J], the relationship between staple lines, and variations in pouch morphology and pouch pathology.
CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional reconstruction of IPAA morphology is highly feasible using readily available technology. In our practice, we have found 3D pouchography to be an extremely useful adjunct to diagnose various mechanical pouch complications and improve planning for pouch salvage strategies. Given its ease of use and helpfulness in understanding the pouch structure and function, we have started to routinely integrate 3D pouchography into our clinical pouch referral practice. Further study is needed to formally assess the value of this technique to aid in the diagnosis of pouch pathology.

The restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch–anal anastomosis is the preferred surgery for patients with medically refractory ulcerative colitis. Although the ileal pouch–anal anastomosis provides gastrointestinal continuity and is an excellent alternative to a permanent end ileostomy, it is not without its complications including acute pouchitis, which occurs in up to 80% of patients. Diet may have a significant impact on pouch function and the development of pouchitis by virtue of its impact on motility and the microbiome. Multiple studies have evaluated the ability of different diets and supplements to improve pouch function and manage pouchitis, yet results are conflicting; thus, evidence-based dietary recommendations are lacking. Patients with an ileoanal pouch routinely ask about dietary interventions to maintain pouch health, and it is crucial that concrete evidence-based recommendations are identified to provide guidance. The goal of this systematic review is to summarize the available data on dietary patterns in patients with an ileoanal pouch, dietary interventions in this cohort, and the impact of supplements on pouch function and pouchitis.

Complications of ileoanal pouch surgery affecting function and quality of life may require surgical correction or pouch excision. The management of patients with pouch dysfunction requires a multidisciplinary approach and demand for service provision include multiple healthcare professionals and resources. The aim of this study is to present the service requirements, and surgical outcomes for redo pouch surgery and pouch excision, with cost analysis of the required resources. All patients undergoing surgery for revision or excision of the ileoanal pouch from June 2021 to May 2023 were prospectively included. Patient undergoing only diagnostic procedures, or perineal procedures were excluded. Outcomes within 30 days of surgery were collected, including readmissions and re-operations. Cost analysis of all investigations, outpatient appointments and procedures prior to pouch revision or pouch excision was conducted. Twenty patients were included during the 24 months study period: 13 underwent abdominal revisional pouch surgery, 7 had ileoanal pouch excision. 15 patients (75%) were tertiary referrals from other hospitals in the UK. The median interval between index IPAA surgery and revision was 113 months. Three multidisciplinary clinical appointments, two imaging modalities, and at least one invasive day-surgery procedure were required for each patient prior to surgery. Expertise and infrastructure are needed for indication and peri-operative management of patients with pouch dysfunction requiring pouch revision or pouch excision. We estimated a starting cost of £22.605 ($29.589) for provision of pouch revision or excision surgery for investigations and treatments from referral to the pouch unit to surgery. This likely represents an underestimate as only accounts for procedures performed since referral with pouch dysfunction.

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis remains the gold standard treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis who desire restoration of intestinal continuity. Despite a significant cancer risk reduction after surgical removal of the colon and rectum, dysplasia and cancers of the ileal pouch or anal transition zone still occur and are a risk even if an anal canal mucosectomy is performed. Surgical care and maintenance after ileoanal anastomosis must include consideration of malignant potential along with other commonly monitored variables such as bowel function and quality of life. Cancers and dysplasia of the ileal pouch are rare but sometimes difficult-to-manage sequelae of pouch surgery.

BACKGROUND: Many pouch complications following ileoanal pouch surgery have an inflammatory or mechanical nature, and specialist colorectal surgeons are required to assess the anatomy of the ileoanal pouch in multiple settings. In this study, we report our stepwise clinical and endoscopic assessment of the patient with an ileoanal pouch.
METHODS: The most common configuration of the ileoanal pouch is a J-pouch, and the stapled anastomosis is more frequently performed than a handsewn post-mucosectomy. A structured clinical and endoscopic assessment of the ileoanal pouch must provide information on 7 critical areas: anus and perineum, rectal cuff, pouch anal anastomosis, pouch body, blind end of the pouch, pouch inlet and pre-pouch ileum.
RESULTS: We have developed a structured pro forma for step-wise assessment of the ileoanal pouch, according to 7 essential areas to be evaluated, biopsied and reported. The structured assessment of the ileoanal pouch in 102 patients allowed reporting of abnormal findings in 63 (61.7%). Strictures were diagnosed in 27 patients (26.4%), 3 pouch inlet strictures, 21 pouch anal anastomosis strictures, and 3 pre-pouch ileum strictures. Chronic, recurrent pouchitis was diagnosed in 9 patients, whilst 1 patient had Crohn\'s disease of the pouch.
CONCLUSIONS: Detailed clinical history, assessment of symptoms and multidisciplinary input are all essential for the care of patients with an ileoanal pouch. We present a comprehensive reporting pro forma for initial clinical assessment of the patient with an ileoanal pouch, with the aim to guide further investigations and inform multidisciplinary decision-making.