Antineoplastic agents are often associated with a wide range of side effects, caused by either direct toxicity or indirect through their metabolism. Ifosfamide is a cytotoxic, antineoplastic medication that is known to cause a direct tubular injury with an associated normal anion gap metabolic acidosis due to type 1 or type 2 renal tubular acidosis (RTA). The manifestations and approach to its diagnosis have been well established. However, we present a case in which a patient presented with acute symptomatic hypokalemia in the setting of ongoing ifosfamide use for metastatic osteosarcoma but without the typical laboratory findings. The clinical- and laboratory-driven diagnosis of suspected type 3 renal tubular acidosis involving proximal and distal segments is suggested by this case report.

UNASSIGNED: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) represent a heterogenous group of rare tumors, primarily treated with surgery. Preoperative radiotherapy is often recommended for extremity high-risk STS. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, typically based on doxorubicin with ifosfamide, has shown efficacy in limbs and trunk wall STS. Second-line chemotherapy, commonly utilized in the metastatic setting, is mostly histology-driven. Molecular targeted agents are used across various histologies, and although the use of immunotherapy in STS is still in its early stages, there is increasing interest in exploring its potential.
UNASSIGNED: This article involved an extensive recent search on PubMed. It explored the current treatment landscape for localized and metastatic STS, focusing on the combined use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy for both extremity and retroperitoneal tumors, and with a particular emphasis on the most innovative histopathology driven therapeutic approaches. Additionally, ongoing clinical trials identified via clinicaltrials.gov are included.
UNASSIGNED: Recently there have been advancements in the treatment of STS, largely driven by the outcomes of clinical trials. However further research is imperative to comprehend the effect of chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy in various STS, as well as to identify biomarkers able to predict which patients are most likely to benefit from these treatments.

BACKGROUND: Ewing sarcoma (ES), is a rare cancer affecting children, adolescents and adults. After VIDE (vincristine-ifosfamide-doxorobucin-etoposide) induction chemotherapy, Busulfan-Melphalan (BuMel) high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation improved outcomes in unfavourable localized ES, but with more toxicities than conventional chemotherapy (VAI: Vincristine-dactinomycin-Ifosfamide). We evaluated whether the risk of acute toxicity associated with BuMel compared to VAI varied according to age in patients recruited in the R2Loc and R2Pulm randomised trials of the Euro-E.W.I.N.G.99 and Ewing-2008 trials.
METHODS: We included patients with a localized high-risk disease, or pulmonary or pleural metastasis. We analysed the risk of severe toxicity according to randomised treatment group (VAI versus BuMel) and age group (<12 years, 12-17 years, 18-24 years, ≥25 years). We evaluated the heterogeneity of treatment effects by age group using interaction terms in logistic multivariable models.
RESULTS: The analysis included 243 patients treated with VAI and 205 with BuMel. Overall, BuMel was associated with a higher risk of severe acute toxicity than VAI particularly haematological, gastrointestinal, liver, sinusoidal occlusive syndrome, and infections. Severe haematological toxicity and lower general condition were significantly more frequent in younger patients, whatever treatment. We did not observe any significant heterogeneity in terms of the excess risk of severe toxicities associated with BuMel compared to VAI according to age group.
CONCLUSIONS: The excess of acute toxicity associated with BuMel compared to VAI does not vary significantly with age, suggesting the feasibility of BuMel across all age groups.

BACKGROUND: We report a phase II trial (OSAD93) testing CDDP with ifosfamide (IFO), without doxorubicin in neoadjuvant phase, in adult osteosarcoma with a 25 years follow-up.
METHODS: This is a multicentric phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with IFO and CDDP in localized high-grade osteosarcoma of patients. Patients received 4 pre-operative courses of IFO 9 g/m2 and CDDP 100 mg/m2 on day 4 (SHOC regimen), followed by local treatment. Doxorubicin was added post-operatively (HOCA regimen) in patients with > 10 % residual tumor cells. A Good Histological Response (GHR), ie ≤ 10 % residual tumor cells in > 30 % of patients, was the primary objective. Disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were secondary objectives.
RESULTS: From Jan 1994 to Jun 1998, 60 patients were included. Median age was 27 (range: 16-63). Primary tumor sites were limbs (76 %), trunk, head or neck (24 %). After neoadjuvant SHOC, grade 3-4 and febrile neutropenia, thrombopenia, and re-hospitalization occurred in 58 %, 17 %, 17 % and 22 % of SHOC courses and in 76 %, 28 %, 47 %, 47 % of HOCA courses, respectively. GHR was obtained in 16/60 (27.5 %) patients. With a median follow-up of 322 months, the DFS and OS were 51.8 % and 64.4 % at 5 years. At 10 years, DFS and OS were 49.9 % and 64.4 %. At 25 years, DFS and OS were 47.8 % and 55.9 %. No long-term cardiac toxicity was observed. Three patients developed a second malignancy (one fatal) after 300 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Though the primary endpoint of OSAD93 was not met, this pre-operative doxorubicin-free regimen led to excellent long-term survival with limited toxicity in localized osteosarcoma.

Cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide are major alkylating agents but their therapeutics uses are limiting by the toxicity due to several toxicities. Indeed conventional chemotherapies are generally used with the maximum tolerated dose. In contrast, metronomic schedule aims to get a minimum dose for efficacy with a good safety. Depending on the dose, their mechanisms of action are different and offer a dual activity: at high dose, cyclophosphamide is mainly used in graft conditioning for its immunosuppressive properties, while at metronomic dose it is used as an immunoactive agent. Currently, at metronomic dose, cyclophosphamide is studied in clinic against various types of cancer, alone or in combination with others anticancer drugs (anti-angiogenic, immune-modulating agents, immune checkpoints blockers, vaccines, radiotherapy, others conventional anticancer agents), as a nth-line or first-line treatment. More than three quarters of clinical studies show promising results, mostly in breast, ovarian and prostate cancers. Taking advantage of the immune system, use dual antitumor action\'s chemotherapy is clearly a therapeutic strategy that deserves to be confirmed in order to improve the efficacy/toxicity balance of anticancer treatments, and to use CPM or analogues as a standard of care.

Patients with ifosfamide-induced renal damage present with Fanconi syndrome. Karyomegalic nephropathy/interstitial nephritis (KNIN) is a rare form of chronic tubulo-interstitial nephritis that was initially considered a type of familial nephropathy. However, several reports of drug-induced KNIN, i.e., KNIN-like nephropathy, have been reported in recent years. We present the case of an 18-year-old man who presented with Fanconi syndrome and progressive renal dysfunction after receiving chemotherapy including ifosfamide and cisplatin for right femoral osteosarcoma. Renal biopsy revealed numerous atrophied tubular epithelial cells with large, polymorphic nuclei, and the definitive diagnosis was KNIN. Most patients with KNIN-like nephropathy who receive ifosfamide are concomitantly treated with cisplatin, indicating that ifosfamide and cisplatin might act synergistically to increase the risk for KNIN-like nephropathy. Further investigation in case series is warranted to reveal potential treatment approaches and to evaluate prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options are limited, and the prognosis is poor for patients with platinum-resistant recurrent metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a paclitaxel and ifosfamide (TI) regimen in patients with R/M HNSCC whose disease had progressed following platinum-based therapy.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 53 patients with R/M HNSCC who underwent at least one cycle of TI-based therapy, post platinum failure, between February 2020 and August 2023. Some patients received the TI regimen in combination with immunotherapy and/or cetuximab. Key metrics assessed included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate, and progression-free as well as overall survival.
RESULTS: The study observed an ORR of 15.8% and a disease control rate of 36.8%. The median progression-free survival for the entire cohort was 3.3 months, and the median overall survival was 9.6 months. Notably, the combination of TI with immunotherapy yielded a higher ORR of 30.8%, compared to 14.3% with TI alone. The most prevalent grade 1-2 adverse events were anemia (81%), weight loss (68%) and hypernatremia (55%).
CONCLUSIONS: The TI-based regimen demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profile in treating R/M HNSCC. Enhanced outcomes may be attainable when combining it with immunotherapy. This study suggests that TI-based therapy could serve as a potential salvage option for this specific patient group.

OBJECTIVE: There is limited evidence regarding the systemic treatment of retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma, and the current Japanese guidelines fail to make definitive suggestions. Here, we report our experience with combination chemotherapy of mesna, doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and dacarbazine (MAID) in this population.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of eight patients (three male and five female) who received MAID for pathologically diagnosed metastatic unresectable retroperitoneal sarcoma (either leiomyosarcoma or pleomorphic sarcoma) between October 2019 and January 2022. Treatment efficacy, tolerability (need for dose reduction), and safety profiles were evaluated and summarized.
RESULTS: At initiation, the median age was 56.0 years, and the body mass index was 20.0 kg/cm2 Six patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores of 0. The net clinical benefit was a partial response in three (37.5%) patients, stable disease in four (50.0%), and progressive disease in one (12.5%). During the median 90.8 weeks of follow-up, disease in five patients progressed, resulting in a median progression-free survival of 48.4 weeks, and five deaths occurred, resulting in an overall survival of 95.1 weeks. Commonly observed adverse events were neutropenia (eight patients), anemia (eight patients), and decreased platelet count (seven patients), which led to dose reduction (60-80%) in six patients.
CONCLUSIONS: MAID combination therapy may be an acceptable option for advanced retroperitoneal sarcoma; however, its benefits must be carefully assessed owing to its not insignificant toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Multidrug chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma can lead to severe myelosuppression. We proposed two clinical questions (CQ): CQ #1, \"Does primary prophylaxis with G-CSF benefit chemotherapy for Ewing sarcoma?\" and CQ #2, \"Does G-CSF-based intensified chemotherapy improve Ewing sarcoma treatment outcomes?\".
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi web databases, including English and Japanese articles published from 1990 to 2019. Two reviewers assessed the extracted papers and analyzed overall survival (OS), febrile neutropenia (FN) incidence, infection-related mortality, quality of life (QOL), and pain.
RESULTS: Twenty-five English and five Japanese articles were identified for CQ #1. After screening, a cohort study of vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide chemotherapy with 851 patients was selected. Incidence of FN was 60.8% with G-CSF and 65.8% without; statistical tests were not conducted. Data on OS, infection-related mortality, QOL, or pain was unavailable. Consequently, CQ #1 was redefined as a future research question. As for CQ #2, we found two English and five Japanese papers, of which one high-quality randomized controlled trial on G-CSF use in intensified chemotherapy was included. This trial showed trends toward lower mortality and a significant increase in event-free survival for 2-week interval regimen with the G-CSF primary prophylactic use compared with 3-week interval.
CONCLUSIONS: This review indicated that G-CSF\'s efficacy as primary prophylaxis in Ewing sarcoma, except in children, is uncertain despite its common use. This review tentatively endorses intensified chemotherapy with G-CSF primary prophylaxis for Ewing sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with Relapsed/Refractory Osteosarcoma (R/R OS) remains dismal without an agreement on systemic therapy. The use of High-Dose Ifosfamide (14 g/sqm) with an external pump in outpatient setting (14-IFO) in R/R OS patients is limited. This study represents the first retrospective cohort analysis focused on evaluating the activity and toxicity of 14-IFO in this setting.
METHODS: The study investigated 14-IFO activity, in terms of tumour response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, as well as survival rates and toxicity, according to CTCAE v.5.
RESULTS: The trial enrolled 26 patients with R/R OS. The Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) obtained was 23% and 57.5%, respectively. Patients with relapsed OS showed a higher ORR (45%) and DCR (82%) compared to refractory patients, irrespective of the number of prior treatment lines received. The achievement of disease control with 14-IFO administration enabled 27% of patients to undergo new local treatment. Four-month Progression-Free Survival (PFS) was 54% for all patients and 82% for the relapsed OS sub-group. Median Overall Survival (OSurv) was 13.7 months, with 1-year OSurv of 51% for all patients and 71% for relapsed patients. Age over 18 years and the presence of refractory disease were identified as negative prognostic factors for this patient cohort. A total of 101 cycles were evaluated for toxic assessment, demonstrating a tolerable profile without grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities.
CONCLUSIONS: 14-IFO should be considered a viable treatment option for R/R OS, particularly due to its well tolerated toxicity profile and the potential for home-administration, which can improve patient quality of life without compromising efficacy.