OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of genicular block and interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule (IPACK) block in the reduction of postoperative pain, the need for rescue analgesics, and the effects on a range of motion (ROM) in patients with TKA.
METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled study was carried out between February and May 2023. Based on the block method, 60 participants were divided into three equal groups. These groups included the IPACK block group (n=20), the genicular block group (n=20), and control group (n=20). Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society score (KSS) and Oxford Knee score (OKS) were used for clinical evaluation in the postoperative period.
RESULTS: The KSS and OKS scores of the IPACK and GNB were significantly lower than the control group (p<0.001, p<0.001). The timed up and go (TUG) values of the IPACK and GNB groups at 12th and 24th hour were significantly lower than the control group (p<0.001, p<0.001). The Tramadol rescue values of the IPACK block and control groups were significantly higher than the GNB group (p=0.028, p=0.001, respectively). The ROM values of the IPACK and GNB groups were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.001, p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Both GNB and IPACK blocks had a significant positive impact on postoperative pain scores within the initial 24 hours following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In comparison with IPACK, GNB had lower opioid consumption in the early postoperative period while also promoting better mobilization.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate if combined single-shot adductor canal blockade (ACB) and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) provide better postoperative pain management compared to ACB alone for patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent primary, unilateral TKA. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts: single-shot ACB alone (performed with bupivacaine 0.25%) and combined single-shot ACB + IPACK (performed with bupivacaine 0.25%, dexmedetomidine 1 mg/kg, and dexamethasone 4 mg). Patients were propensity-matched 1:1. The primary study outcome was total opioid consumption converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per eight-hour interval and postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, length of stay, ambulation distance, return to emergency department, hospital readmission, and 30-day adverse events.
UNASSIGNED: One hundred eighty patients were identified, of which propensity matching used 71% to yield 64 patients receiving ACB alone and 64 receiving combined ACB + IPACK. Combined ACB + IPACK had significantly lower total summative MME throughout the entire postoperative stay (P = .002) and cumulatively after the first 24 hours (P < .001). Combined ACB + IPACK also had lower mean pain scores for 0-8 hours (P = .005) and 8-16 hours (P = .009) postoperatively. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Combined single-shot ACB + IPACK block was associated with lower total narcotic intake and mean pain scores during most of the immediate postoperative period following primary, unilateral TKA compared to ACB alone. Implementing longer-acting, single-shot ACB + IPACK for TKA can balance effective and more selective pain management with early rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate pain management, functional recovery, and stress response expressed by the neutrophile-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) after the popliteal artery and posterior knee capsule infiltration (iPACK) block combined with adductor canal block (ACB) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: This was a prospective, double-blinded, randomised, controlled trial in a tertiary referral hospital. Three hundred and sixty-six patients were randomly allocated into the sham block group and iPACK combined with the ACB group. The primary outcome was postoperative pain scores. The secondary outcomes were opioid consumption, functional recovery expressed by a range of motion, and quadriceps strength. Also, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were calculated.
RESULTS: There were significant differences between the sham block and iPACK + ACB group in pain scores p < 0.0001 at all time points. Therefore, there was a significant difference in opioid consumption (p < 0.0001) and functional recovery (p < 0.0001). Also, NLR and PLR levels 12 h (p < 0.0001) and 24 h (24 h) after surgery (p < 0.0001) were much lower in the iPACK + ACB group.
CONCLUSIONS: After total knee arthroplasty, the iPACK combined with ACB block group improved pain management, functional recovery, and stress response. Therefore, we strongly recommend this technique as a part of a multimodal analgesia protocol in knee surgery.

Our previous study reported that when a respective 20 mL of ropivacaine was used for adductor canal block (ACB) combined with infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the minimum concentration of 0.275% could provide successful block in almost all patients. Based on the results, the primary objective of this study was to investigate the minimum effective volume (MEV90, defined as the volume which can provide successful block in 90% of patients) of ACB + IPACK block.
This double-blind, randomized dose-finding trial was based on a biased coin up-and-down sequential design, where the volume of ropivacaine administered to a given patient depended on the previous patient\'s response. The first patient received 15 mL of 0.275% ropivacaine for ACB and again for IPACK. If the block failed, the next subject received a 1 mL higher volume for ACB and IPACK, respectively; otherwise, the next subject received either a 1 mL lower volume (probability of 0.11) or the same volume (probability of 0.89). The primary outcome was whether the block was successful. Block success was defined as the patient did not suffer significant pain and did not receive rescue analgesia within 6 h after surgery. Then the MEV90 was estimated by isotonic regression.
Based on analysis of 53 patients, the MEV90 was 17.99 mL (95% CI 17.47-18.61 mL), MEV95 was 18.48 mL (95% CI 17.45-18.98 mL) and MEV99 was 18.90 mL (95% CI 17.38-19.07 mL). Patients whose blocks succeeded had significantly lower NRS pain scores, lower morphine consumption, and shorter hospitalization.
0.275% ropivacaine in 17.99 mL respectively can provide successful ACB + IPACK block in 90% of patients undergoing TKA. The minimum effective volume (MEV90) of ACB + IPACK block was 17.99 mL.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

The infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK) has been described to provide analgesia without loss of muscle strength and is effective in functional recovery. This study compared iPACK + ACB (adductor canal block) with PAI (periarticular infiltration) + ACB and ACB alone in terms of postoperative analgesia and functional improvement.
This double-blinded randomized controlled trial included 105 patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Patients received ACB, iPACK + ACB, and PAI + ACB along with spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) numeric rating scale (NRS) at 48 h. Secondary outcomes were cumulative postoperative analgesic consumption within 48 h, timed up-and-go test, range of motion, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, and adverse events.
The 48-h AUC movement NRS score in the iPACK + ACB group was significantly lower than in the PAI + ACB and ACB groups (p < 0.05). At the postoperative 48th h, the opioid consumption of the iPACK + ACB group was lower than those of the ACB and PAI + ACB groups (p < 0.001). The patients in the iPACK + ACB group had significantly shorter discharge and mobilization days than the ACB and PAI + ACB groups (p < 0.001).
The adding of an iPACK block to the ACB improves postoperative analgesia and reduces opioid consumption. In addition, this approach improves functional performance and reduces hospital stay.

Regional anesthesia is an integral component of successful orthopedic surgery. Neuraxial anesthesia is commonly used for surgical anesthesia while peripheral nerve blocks are often used for postoperative analgesia. Patient evaluation for regional anesthesia should include neurological, pulmonary, cardiovascular, and hematological assessments. Neuraxial blocks include spinal, epidural, and combined spinal epidural. Upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks include interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary. Lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks include femoral nerve block, saphenous nerve block, sciatic nerve block, iPACK block, ankle block and lumbar plexus block. The choice of regional anesthesia is a unanimous decision made by the surgeon, the anesthesiologist, and the patient based on a risk-benefit assessment. The choice of the regional block depends on patient cooperation, patient positing, operative structures, operative manipulation, tourniquet use and the impact of post-operative motor blockade on initiation of physical therapy. Regional anesthesia is safe but has an inherent risk of failure and a relatively low incidence of complications such as local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST), nerve injury, falls, hematoma, infection and allergic reactions. Ultrasound should be used for regional anesthesia procedures to improve the efficacy and minimize complications. LAST treatment guidelines and rescue medications (intralipid) should be readily available during the regional anesthesia administration.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (iPACK) block with periarticular local infiltration analgesia (LIA) to assess postoperative pain control and enhanced recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: This research was carried out at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from September 2020 to March 2021. Eighty Patients scheduled for elective unilateral TKA were randomized to receive either iPACK or periarticular LIA along with adductor canal block under spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome was postoperative pain score, and secondary outcomes included physical rehabilitation, duration of surgery, length of post-anesthesia care unit stay, hemodynamics, and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: The pain score during activity in iPACK group was significantly lower compared to LIA group at 4 hours postoperatively, but no significant difference was observed at 24 or 48 hours. The timed up and go test took significantly longer for patients in LIA group at 4, 24, and 48 hours compared to those in iPACK group. No significant differences in knee range of motion were observed between the 2 groups at any point.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, iPACK block is an effective technique in reducing pain in the immediate postoperative period without affecting motor function, resulting in enhanced recovery following primary TKA.

This article describes the use of an infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee joint (IPACK) to diagnose an entrapment neuropathy of the tibial nerve (TN) in a patient presenting with chronic neuropathic pain in the medial posterior compartment of the left knee, with a previous electromyography showing no evidence of tibial or common peroneal nerve neuropathy. After a positive sciatic nerve block, the patient was evaluated for a TN block, cancelled due to the presence of an abnormal leash of vessels wrapping around the nerve. For this reason, the patient was submitted to a diagnostic IPACK. A negative IPACK suggested that a compression of the TN at the popliteal fossa was the most likely source of the symptoms. After surgical decompression of the TN nerve at the popliteal fossa, the patient\'s symptoms decreased substantially.
Lay abstract This case report describes the use of an infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee joint (IPACK), a technique in which local anesthetic is injected between the popliteal artery and the back side of the knee joint, to diagnose a compression of the tibial nerve (TN) in a patient with chronic knee pain. A female adult patient presented for further evaluation of chronic pain in the inner side of the back of her left knee. A previous electromyography showed no evidence of tibial or common peroneal nerve disease. After a positive diagnostic block of the left sciatic nerve, the patient was evaluated for a left TN block, so as to ascertain whether a compression of this nerve at the back side of the knee could be the origin of the patient’s symptoms. During the ultrasound scanning of the TN, a group of abnormal vessels was found wrapping around the nerve, which made it impossible to inject the TN in a safe manner, even with the guidance of ultrasound. For this reason, the patient was instead submitted to a diagnostic left IPACK. A negative IPACK suggested that a compression of the TN at the popliteal fossa, the region behind the knee joint, was the most likely source of the patient’s symptoms. After surgical decompression of the TN at the popliteal fossa, the patient’s symptoms decreased substantially.