hysteroscopy failure

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估有经验的外科医师使用微型宫腔镜进行门诊宫腔镜检查时宫颈管特征对疼痛的影响。
    方法:对303例接受诊断性宫腔镜检查的妇女进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究。通过宫颈管时,使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度。根据VAS评分将患者分为两组:无痛或轻度疼痛(VAS<4)和中度或重度疼痛(VAS≥4)。宫颈管特征之间的关系(长度,版本,和屈曲姿势,宫颈干预史,狭窄,synehiae),妇产科史,术前焦虑水平,程序持续时间,并检查疼痛强度。
    结果:38%的患者(n=117)出现中度疼痛(4≤VAS<7),14例患者(5%)出现重度疼痛(VAS≥7)。在多变量分析中,无效性(p=0.01;OR,4.6;95%CI,1.7-13.2),绝经后状态(p=0.02;OR,2.2;95%CI,1.2-4.3),子宫颈过度屈曲和子宫后倾(p<0.001;OR,4.1;95%CI,2.0-8.5)被确定为疼痛手术的危险因素。98%的患者诊断性宫腔镜检查成功。疼痛是宫腔镜检查失败的主要原因。
    结论:除了无胎和绝经后状态,宫颈管的不利特征,如子宫颈过度屈曲和子宫逆行是门诊宫腔镜检查时疼痛的重要原因。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of cervical canal features on pain during outpatient hysteroscopy performed by experienced surgeons using mini-hysteroscope.
    METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted on 303 women undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy without anesthesia. Pain intensity was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) when the cervical canal was passed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the VAS score: painless or mild pain (VAS <4) and moderate or severe pain (VAS ≥ 4). The relationship between cervical canal characteristics (length, version, and flexion positions, history of cervical intervention, stenosis, synechiae), obstetric and gynecological history, preoperative anxiety level, procedure duration, and pain intensity was examined.
    RESULTS: Moderate pain (4 ≤ VAS < 7) was observed in 38% of patients (n = 117) and 14 patients (5%) experienced severe pain (VAS ≥ 7). In multivariate analysis, nulliparity (p = 0.01; OR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.7-13.2), postmenopausal state (p = 0.02; OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.3), excessive flexion of the cervix and retroverted uterus (p <0.001; OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 2.0-8.5) were identified as risk factors for a painful procedure. Diagnostic hysteroscopy was successful in 98% of the patients. The pain was the primary cause of the failed hysteroscopy.
    CONCLUSIONS: In addition to nulliparity and postmenopausal status, unfavorable features of the cervical canal, such as the excessive flexion position of the cervix and uterine retroversion are significant causes of pain during outpatient hysteroscopy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a clinical tool, the HFI (Hysteroscopy Failure Index), which gives criteria to predict hysteroscopic examination failure.
    METHODS: This was a retrospective diagnostic test study, aimed to validate the HFI, set at the Department of Gynaecology, Obstetric and Reproductive Science of the Second University of Naples, Italy. The HFI was applied to our database of 995 consecutive women, who underwent office based to assess abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), infertility, cervical polyps, and abnormal sonographic patterns (postmenopausal endometrial thickness of more than 5mm, endometrial hyperechogenic spots, irregular endometrial line, suspect of uterine septa). Demographic characteristics, previous surgery, recurrent infections, sonographic data, Estro-Progestins, IUD and menopausal status were collected. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the ability of the model to identify patients who were correctly identified (true positives) divided by the total number of failed hysteroscopies (true positives+false negatives). Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratios with 95%CI were calculated.
    RESULTS: The HFI score is able to predict office hysteroscopy failure in 76% of cases. Moreover, the Positive likelihood ratio was 11.37 (95% CI: 8.49-15.21), and the Negative likelihood ratio was 0.33 (95% CI: 0.27-0.41).
    CONCLUSIONS: Hysteroscopy failure index was able to retrospectively predict office hysteroscopy failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号