背景:切口疝是腹部手术的常见并发症。
目的:评价腹腔镜和开腹混合应用巨大腹侧疝修补术的效果和并发症。
方法:接受开放的患者的医疗记录,腹腔镜,回顾性分析了2006年至2013年治疗巨大腹侧疝的杂交手术.计算并记录疝复发率及术后并发症。
结果:打开,腹腔镜,在82、94和132名患者中进行了混合方法,分别。平均疝直径为13.11±3.4cm。混合手术组疝复发率为1.3%,平均随访41个月。这一发现明显低于腹腔镜组(12.3%)或开腹组(8.5%;P<0.05)。术中肠损伤发生率为6.1%,4.1%,和1.5%的开放,腹腔镜,和混合程序,分别为(混合与开放和腹腔镜手术;P<0.05)。开腹术后肠瘘形成的比例,腹腔镜,混合方法组为2.4%,6.8%,和3.3%,分别为(P>0.05)。
结论:对于巨大腹侧疝的修复,开放和腹腔镜的混合应用比单一的开放或腹腔镜手术更有效和更安全。
BACKGROUND: An incisional hernia is a common complication of abdominal surgery.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes and complications of hybrid application of open and laparoscopic approaches in giant ventral hernia repair.
METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent open, laparoscopic, or hybrid surgery for a giant ventral hernia from 2006 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The hernia recurrence rate and intra- and postoperative complications were calculated and recorded.
RESULTS: Open, laparoscopic, and hybrid approaches were performed in 82, 94, and 132 patients, respectively. The mean hernia diameter was 13.11 ± 3.4 cm. The incidence of hernia recurrence in the hybrid procedure group was 1.3%, with a mean follow-up of 41 mo. This finding was significantly lower than that in the laparoscopic (12.3%) or open procedure groups (8.5%; P < 0.05). The incidence of intraoperative intestinal injury was 6.1%, 4.1%, and 1.5% in the open, laparoscopic, and hybrid procedures, respectively (hybrid vs open and laparoscopic procedures; P < 0.05). The proportion of postoperative intestinal fistula formation in the open, laparoscopic, and hybrid approach groups was 2.4%, 6.8%, and 3.3%, respectively (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid application of open and laparoscopic approaches was more effective and safer for repairing a giant ventral hernia than a single open or laparoscopic procedure.