hybrid application

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    合成药物制造的最新进展为欧洲监管体系带来了新的动力,以生物起源产品为参考药物的化学合成多肽产品。尽管生物仿制药在欧盟受到专门的监管框架的约束,合成生产的后续产品不符合通过该途径进行评估的条件,需要通过第10(1)条规定的传统通用途径获得批准,或通过第10(3)条规定的杂交途径。这篇综述概述了参考欧盟生物起源的合成肽领域的最新进展。使用不同的监管程序可能会对监管评估产生潜在影响,临床实践和药物警戒。随着未来几年预计将出现更复杂的合成产品,这些产品将参考重组鼻祖产品,这项研究促进了化学合成产品引用生物起源产品的监管程序的透明度和全球一致性,以确保安全和高质量的仿制药的批准。
    Recent advances in synthetic drug manufacturing have introduced a new dynamic to the European regulatory system, with chemically synthesized polypeptide products using biological originator products as their reference medicine. Whereas biosimilars are subject to a dedicated regulatory framework in the EU, synthetically produced follow-on products are not eligible for assessment through this pathway, requiring approval via the traditional generic pathway under Article 10 (1), or via the hybrid pathway under Article 10 (3). This review presents an overview of recent developments in the field of synthetic peptides referencing biological originators in the EU. The use of different regulatory procedures can have potential implications for regulatory assessments, clinical practice and pharmacovigilance. As more complex synthetic products referencing recombinant originator products are expected in the coming years, this study promotes more transparency as well as global alignment about regulatory procedures for chemically synthesised products referencing biological originator products to ensure approval of safe and high-quality generics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:切口疝是腹部手术的常见并发症。
    目的:评价腹腔镜和开腹混合应用巨大腹侧疝修补术的效果和并发症。
    方法:接受开放的患者的医疗记录,腹腔镜,回顾性分析了2006年至2013年治疗巨大腹侧疝的杂交手术.计算并记录疝复发率及术后并发症。
    结果:打开,腹腔镜,在82、94和132名患者中进行了混合方法,分别。平均疝直径为13.11±3.4cm。混合手术组疝复发率为1.3%,平均随访41个月。这一发现明显低于腹腔镜组(12.3%)或开腹组(8.5%;P<0.05)。术中肠损伤发生率为6.1%,4.1%,和1.5%的开放,腹腔镜,和混合程序,分别为(混合与开放和腹腔镜手术;P<0.05)。开腹术后肠瘘形成的比例,腹腔镜,混合方法组为2.4%,6.8%,和3.3%,分别为(P>0.05)。
    结论:对于巨大腹侧疝的修复,开放和腹腔镜的混合应用比单一的开放或腹腔镜手术更有效和更安全。
    BACKGROUND: An incisional hernia is a common complication of abdominal surgery.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes and complications of hybrid application of open and laparoscopic approaches in giant ventral hernia repair.
    METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent open, laparoscopic, or hybrid surgery for a giant ventral hernia from 2006 to 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The hernia recurrence rate and intra- and postoperative complications were calculated and recorded.
    RESULTS: Open, laparoscopic, and hybrid approaches were performed in 82, 94, and 132 patients, respectively. The mean hernia diameter was 13.11 ± 3.4 cm. The incidence of hernia recurrence in the hybrid procedure group was 1.3%, with a mean follow-up of 41 mo. This finding was significantly lower than that in the laparoscopic (12.3%) or open procedure groups (8.5%; P < 0.05). The incidence of intraoperative intestinal injury was 6.1%, 4.1%, and 1.5% in the open, laparoscopic, and hybrid procedures, respectively (hybrid vs open and laparoscopic procedures; P < 0.05). The proportion of postoperative intestinal fistula formation in the open, laparoscopic, and hybrid approach groups was 2.4%, 6.8%, and 3.3%, respectively (P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: A hybrid application of open and laparoscopic approaches was more effective and safer for repairing a giant ventral hernia than a single open or laparoscopic procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号