OBJECTIVE: More women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) are living with oncology treatment-induced hot flushes (HFs). This Australian-based survey explores why some women experience more severe or ongoing HF and whether specific population characteristics are predictive of HF occurrence, frequency, and/or severity.
METHODS: A non-probabilistic anonymous survey distributed online (Register4) and two Australian hospitals collected demographic and clinical information. Eligibility was consenting Australian-based women, 18 years and over, with a primary BC diagnosis. Analysis included linear and logistic regression models.
RESULTS: A total of 324 survey responses were analyzed. Chemotherapy and hormone therapy were each associated with HF occurrence (aOR = 2.92, 95% CI [1.27, 6.70], p = 0.01; and aOR = 7.50, 95% CI [3.02, 18.62], p < 0.001) and in combination (aOR = 5.98, 95% CI [2.61, 13.69], p < 0.001). Increased self-reported anxiety at BC diagnosis was significantly associated with HF frequency and severity scores (aCO = 0.71, 95% CI [0.31, 1.12], p = 0.001; and aCO = 0.44, 95% CI [0.33, 0.55], p < 0.001). Postmenopausal women had significantly lower HF severity and frequency scores than premenopausal women (aCO = -0.93, 95% CI [-1.62, -0.25], p = 0.008; and aCO = -2.62, 95% CI [-5.14, -0.11], p = 0.041).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with BC receiving chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy and premenopausal or experiencing elevated anxiety and/or stress will likely experience more severe oncology treatment-related HFs.
CONCLUSIONS: HFs continue across the BC treatment trajectory with women >5-year survivorship still reporting life impacts, with premenopausal women at the time of BC diagnosis at higher risk of experiencing severe and more frequent oncology treatment-induced HFs than postmenopausal women. Women at high risk require information on methods to moderate HF potential life impacts and maintain treatment compliance.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this meta-analysis is to study the effect of different strengths of resistance training programs on the severity and frequency of hot flushes in postmenopausal women with vasomotor symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Menopause is defined as the state in which the menstrual cycle of a biological female spontaneously comes to a halt for a period of about 1 year. Through a detailed analysis of much of the research, it is found that the resistance training program is beneficial not only for reducing the severity as well as the frequency of hot flushes in postmenopausal women.
METHODS: Online research was conducted through databases such as PubMed, Cochrane Trial Register, and Google Scholar till the 20th of March 2023. The Review Manager (version 5.4.1) was used to statistically analyze the data from the studies. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria, comparing the vasomotor symptoms in resistance training groups as compared to control were used for this meta-analysis. The primary outcome of interest was the alleviation of hot flushes in the resistance training group. Random-effect model was used to pool the studies and the result was reported in SMD with 95% Confidence Interval (CI).
RESULTS: 5 studies were selected for this review. Statistical analysis shows that vasomotor symptoms were more common in the control group and decreased significantly in the resistance training group after the intervention (SMD = -1.31, 95% CI: -1.85 to -0.77, p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Resistance Training significantly affects vasomotor symptoms and can be considered for such symptoms in postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are the most common symptoms during menopause including hot flushes and night sweats. They are highly disruptive to the quality of life. Fezolinetant is an FDA-approved non-hormonal selective neurokinin3 receptor antagonist for the treatment of VMS. In this study, we aim to assess the efficacy and safety of fezolinetant for VMS associated with menopause.
METHODS: Databases were searched until September 2023 for relevant studies comparing fezolinetant against placebo. Data was extracted into an online form and analyzed using RevMan (Version 5.4.1). The GRADE approach was conducted to evaluate the quality of evidence regarding efficacy outcomes. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fezolinetant to placebo in postmenopausal women experiencing VMS. Exclusion criteria comprised studies involving participants with contraindications to fezolinetant or those evaluating its efficacy for indications other than VMS associated with menopause.
RESULTS: Six studies were included in this study involving 3301 patients. Compared to placebo, fezolinetant reduced the frequency of VMS episodes from baseline (SMD = -0.64, 95 % CI [-0.77, -0.5]) and (SMD = -0.63, 95 % CI [-0.72, -0.53] at weeks 4 and 12 respectively. Additionally, fezolinetant reduced VMS severity score (SMD = -0.59, 95 %CI [-0.77, -0.42]) and (SMD = -0.4, 95 % CI [-0.54, -0.27]) at weeks 4 at 12 respectively. These reductions were positively reflected on Menopause specific quality of life score (SMD = -0.46, 95 %CI [-57, -0.34]), (SMD = -0.37, 95 %CI [-0.48, -0.25]) at weeks 4 and 12 respectively. Regarding safety analysis, fezolinetant showed increased risk for drug-related TEAEs (RR = 1.47, 95 %CI [1.06,2.04]), serious TEAEs (RR = 1.67, 95 %CI [1.09,2.55]), fatigue (RR = 4.05, 95 %CI [1.27,12.88]), arthralgia (RR = 2.83, 95 %CI [1.02,7.8]) and ALT or AST > 3 times (RR = 2, 95 %CI [1.12,3.57]), with no other statistically significant difference regarding other safety terms.
CONCLUSIONS: Fezolinetant has demonstrated efficacy in reducing the frequency and severity of VMS in postmenopausal women, leading to an improvement in their quality of life. These findings suggest that Fezolinetant may serve as a viable alternative to hormonal therapy for managing VMS.

OBJECTIVE: Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) adversely affect postmenopausal quality of life. However, their association with bone health has not been elucidated. This study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the evidence regarding the association of VMS with fracture risk and bone mineral density (BMD) in peri- and postmenopausal women.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases until 31 August 2023. Fracture, low BMD (osteoporosis/osteopenia) and mean change in lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD were assessed. The results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD), respectively, with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The I2 index quantified heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Twenty studies were included in the qualitative and 12 in the quantitative analysis (n=49,659). No difference in fractures between women with and without VMS was found (n=5, OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.93-1.16, I2 16%). However, VMS were associated with low BMD (n=5, OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.42-1.67, I2 0%). This difference was evident for LS (MD -0.019 g/cm2, 95% CI -0.03 to -0.008, I2 85.2%), but not for FN BMD (MD -0.010 g/cm2, 95% CI -0.021 to 0.001, I2 78.2%). These results were independent of VMS severity, age and study design. When the analysis was confined to studies that excluded menopausal hormone therapy use, the association with BMD remained significant.
CONCLUSIONS: The presence of VMS is associated with low BMD in postmenopausal women, although it does not seem to increase fracture risk.

Insomnia is one of the major complaints of menopausal women with advancing age and may be complexly related to a variety of causes. However, there is still a lack of standards on the general approach and treatment for insomnia in menopausal women. The aim of this review is to summarize recent pathogenic theories of sleep disturbance in the menopausal period and discuss the approach and management of insomnia in postmenopausal women. Sleep disturbances in menopausal women may be associated with physical and psychiatric factors and other comorbid diseases. Careful history taking and multidisciplinary physical and psychosocial evaluation are necessary and, in particular, comorbidities related to sleep disorders, such as obstructive sleep apnea, must be taken into consideration. A unique aspect of insomnia in postmenopausal women is that menopausal symptoms due to hormonal decline can be closely related to sleep disturbances. Therefore, menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) should be considered as the treatment of choice among pharmacological treatments following cognitive behavioral therapy, which is suggested as the first-line treatment in the general population insomnia treatment guidelines. Additionally, melatonin and 5HT-based drugs, which have fewer side effects, along with MHT should be preferentially recommended in menopausal women.

UNASSIGNED: Menopausal vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are experienced by most women and are often debilitating and can last for years. While hormone replacement therapy is effective, it carries risks that have impacted its wider use, and it can be contraindicated. There is a large unmet need for a safe, effective non-hormonal therapy.
UNASSIGNED: The importance of the neurokinin (NK) system in the hypothalamic regulation of the vasomotor center has become clear. NK antagonists, previously developed for other indications, have therefore been investigated for the treatment of VMS. Elinzanetant is a potent antagonist at both NK1 (endogenous ligand Substance P) and NK3 (neurokinin B) receptors, whereas other related drugs in development are selective NK3 antagonists. Elinzanetant has been investigated in 2 Phase II trials for menopausal VMS, demonstrating rapid onset and dose-dependant efficacy for the relief of VMS and improvement in quality of life for up to 12 weeks. Phase III trials are underway in women both with physiological menopause and after treatment for breast cancer.
UNASSIGNED: Elinzanetant is a very promising non-hormonal approach to a highly prevalent symptom constellation, with rapid onset and high efficacy. Wider indications are being explored in current Phase III trials.

Estrogen is a key regulatory hormone in the functioning of a female reproductive system. Estrogen hormone regulates many complex physiological processes, which has its role in reproduction and skeletal and cardiovascular systems by acting on estrogen receptors alpha (ERα) and beta (ERβ), which are nuclear transcription factors. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) are now being used to treat bone loss, breast carcinoma, and menopausal symptoms, metabolic neurodegenerative because of their characteristics that allow them to function as both estrogen agonists and antagonists, depending on the target tissue. First-generation SERMs, such as Tamoxifen, are used in the management protocol for breast cancer, which is estrogen receptor (ER-positive). Raloxifene is a second-generation SERM that is a valuable adjunct used to treat and prevent osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and prevent compression fractures of the vertebral column. Novel SERM molecules are on the horizon, proven more potent and efficacious in preventing and treating osteoporosis. These include Ospemifene, lasofoxifene, bazedoxifene and arzoxifene. The benefits of Raloxifene versus that of Bazedoxifene are under trial. Despite their therapeutic benefits and actions, these medications are not without adverse effects, such as thromboembolic disorders. Increased risk of uterine cancer has been linked to Tamoxifen. This article delves into the world of SERMs, including their development and discovery. The newer SERMs in late development, ospemifene, lasofoxifene, bazedoxifene, and arzoxifene, are described in detail.

The huge impact of climate change on humankind is multidimensional, and includes direct and indirect challenges to the physical, psychological and socio-cultural wellbeing. Women may be more vulnerable to climate-sensitive diseases, but little attention has been paid to specific needs and challenges associated with the menopause transition. The increase in average and extreme temperatures may modulate the manifestation of vasomotor symptoms; in particular, environmental temperature and seasonality may affect hot flushes and night sweats. However, more research is needed to define the impact of climate-related factors among the determinants influencing the individual experience of menopause. In addition, increased exposure to environmental pollution and toxins may also have a role in the modulation of ovarian aging mechanisms, possibly influencing timing of menopause. Finally, both air pollution and menopause transition are associated with unfavorable modifications of cardio-metabolic, bone and cognitive health, and account should be taken of these in the evaluation of the individual woman\'s health vulnerabilities. Overall, the evidence reported in this narrative review supports the need for specific strategies aimed at reducing the burden of climate and environmental change on menopausal women. Healthcare providers should promote behavioral measures that reduce anthropogenic climate change and at the same time have a beneficial role on several domains of physical and psychological wellbeing. From this perspective, menopause represents a golden moment to implement virtuous behaviors that will benefit at the same time women\'s longevity and the planet.

Vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are often considered the classic menopausal symptom and are experienced by most women during the menopause transition. VMS are well established to be associated with decrements in quality of life during the menopause. More recent research also links VMS to poorer cardiovascular health. This review summarizes key insights about links between VMS and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk that come from the Study of Women\'s Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a longitudinal epidemiologic cohort study of the menopause transition, as well as from the MsHeart/MsBrain studies, clinical studies that leverage vascular imaging and brain imaging as well as wearable technologies that provide objective indicators of VMS. Using a range of methodologies and extensive consideration of confounders, these studies have shown that frequent and/or persistent VMS are associated with adverse CVD risk factor profiles, poorer underlying peripheral vascular and cerebrovascular health, and elevated risk for clinical CVD events. Collectively, the SWAN and MsHeart/MsBrain studies form complementary epidemiologic and clinical studies that point to the importance of VMS to women\'s cardiovascular health during the menopause transition and beyond.

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is advised before 40-45 years of age for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. This study describes the effect of RRSO on lipid determinants, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and C-reactive protein (CRP).
A total of 142 women with increased risk of ovarian cancer were included, 92 premenopausal and 50 postmenopausal. Serum levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and total cholesterol, triglycerides, HbA1c and CRP were determined at three points in time: before (T0) and 6 weeks (T1) and 7 months (T2) following RRSO. The Hot Flush Rating Scale was administered at the same time points.
In premenopausal women, levels of HDL-cholesterol, the cholesterol ratio and HBA1c increased significantly over time, although still staying within the reference range. In this group, hot flushes increased over time (p < 0.001). In postmenopausal women, no significant changes were observed following RRSO. At T2, serum LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, HbA1c and CRP were significantly lower in premenopausal women compared to postmenopausal women, whereas HDL was increased.
Seven months after RRSO, the lipid profile in premenopausal women had changed, although still staying within the reference range. For postmenopausal women, we did not observe any significant changes. Our results do not suggest a worsening of cardiovascular risk within 7 months of RRSO.