hospital stay period

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:许多研究表明,改善口腔卫生有助于降低头颈部癌症患者术后并发症的风险,心脏病,还有食道癌.然而,围手术期口腔管理程序的有益标准尚未建立.因此,我们的目的是确定他们的创新口腔管理干预措施是否有助于减少肺癌术后并发症.
    UNASSIGNED:我们对在京林大学医院接受肺叶切除术和全肺切除术的肺癌患者的病历进行了回顾性分析。将患者分为两组:2016年4月至2018年3月接受肺癌手术的围手术期口腔管理干预组(n=164),和2014年4月至2016年3月接受手术的未口服治疗的对照组(n=199).特别是,我们的口腔管理程序强调口腔粘膜刺激,以诱导唾液排出,如口香糖咀嚼,而不是简单地使用刷牙来减少口腔微生物组。因此,我们的口腔管理程序不同于传统的口腔护理。
    UNASSIGNED:这项研究表明,我们的口腔管理实践与术后肺炎发生率的下降有关(比值比,0.184;95%CI,0.042-0.571;P=.009),术后住院时间(β系数,-4.272;95%CI,-6.390至-2.155;P<.001)和Clavian-Dindo分类等级II级或以上(赔率比,0.503;95%CI,0.298-0.835;P=.009)。
    UNASSIGNED:我们提出了一种创新的新策略,利用其独特的口腔管理流程来减少肺切除术后的并发症。
    UNASSIGNED: Numerous studies have shown that improving oral hygiene contributes to a reduction in the risk of postoperative complications in patients with head and neck cancer, cardiac disease, and esophageal cancer. However, the beneficial standard for oral management procedures during the perioperative period has not yet been established. Therefore, our aim was to determine whether or not their innovative oral management intervention contributed to a reduction in postoperative complications in lung cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records of patients who underwent lung cancer surgery with lobectomy and pneumonectomy at Kyorin University Hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups: a perioperative oral management intervention group that underwent lung cancer surgery from April 2016 to March 2018 (n = 164), and a control group without oral management that underwent surgery from April 2014 to March 2016 (n = 199). In particular, our oral management procedure emphasized oral mucosa stimulation to induce saliva discharge as in gum chewing, rather than simply using teeth brushing to reduce oral microbiome. Therefore, our oral management procedure is different from traditional oral care.
    UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrated that our oral management practice was associated with a decline in the occurrence of postoperative pneumonia (odds ratio, 0.184; 95% CI, 0.042-0.571; P = .009), postoperative hospital stay duration (β coefficient, -4.272; 95% CI, -6.390 to -2.155; P < .001) and Clavian-Dindo classification grade II or above (odds ratio, 0.503; 95% CI, 0.298-0.835; P = .009).
    UNASSIGNED: We propose an innovative new strategy using their unique oral management procedure to reduce postoperative complications resulting from pulmonary resection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Background There have been very few studies on the association of polypharmacy with clinical course. In this paper, we seek to evaluate the relationship between polypharmacy and hospitalization period. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 322 patients hospitalized from February to September 2017, after excluding short-term and orthopedic cases. Patients with polypharmacy were defined as those who were prescribed more than five drugs at the time of admission. The primary endpoint for all subjects regardless of polypharmacy was the hospitalization period. Using Mann-Whitney U test results, we compared the average number of hospital days between patients with and without polypharmacy. Secondary endpoints were hospitalization period with and without polypharmacy for each disease type. Results The hospitalization period was significantly extended for patients with polypharmacy as compared to those without (31.6 vs. 23.2 days, p: 0.002). Those with an infection had significantly longer hospitalization than those without polypharmacy (27.6 vs. 18.1 days, p: 0.007). Malignancy, heart disease, and cerebrovascular disease did not have a significant effect on hospitalization regardless of polypharmacy. Conclusion Polypharmacy is related to an extended hospitalization period and is found to occur more frequently in patients hospitalized for an infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Vitamin D deficiency is a prevalent condition among critically ill patients. Information about the relationship between vitamin D levels and outcomes in the intensive care unit (ICU) is sparse.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate vitamin D status among critically ill patients and its relevance to severity of illness, ICU stay period, and mortality.
    METHODS: This prospective multicenter study was conducted in the ICUs of Fayoum, Cairo, Alazhar, and Ain Shams university hospitals. All patients were subjected to interview questionnaire, laboratory investigation, vitamin D level assessment, and severity of illness evaluation using the Acute Physiologic Assessment and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score.
    RESULTS: In total, 250 patients were included in the study. The median age was 62 (40-73) years, and most patients were male (52%). The median serum level of vitamin D was 19 (7-40.6). Vitamin D was deficient in 197 patients (78.8%) on admission. While we grouped the ICU patients as vitamin D deficient, insufficient, and sufficient, vitamin D-deficient patients had more severe diseases (mean APACHE II score, 44 ± 15; P = .014). Prolonged ICU stay was observed among the deficient group but with no significant association. The overall mortality rate was 6.8%; of these, 70.5% were vitamin D-deficient patients. However, logistic regression analysis demonstrated that vitamin D deficiency was not an independent risk factor for mortality.
    CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D insufficiency is common in critically ill patients (69%); it is associated with more severity of illness, but it is not an independent risk factor for longer ICU stay or mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号