hormonal IUD

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2002年,在公共卫生护士和助产士获得处方激素避孕药的授权的同时,挪威政府向青少年推出了激素避孕药的报销计划。这项研究考察了增加可及性和公共资金对青少年使用激素避孕药具的影响。
    方法:挪威处方数据库,挪威统计局,和挪威公共卫生研究所作为本队列研究的数据来源。研究人群包括1989-1990年,1994-1995年和1999-2000年出生的174653名挪威妇女。我们通过从12岁到19岁的处方来检查激素避孕药的使用情况,并将首次连续使用的持续时间作为主要结果。统计分析采用SPSS卡方检验,生存分析,和Joinpoint回归分析,p值<0.05。
    结果:到19岁时,约75%的队列至少使用了一种激素方法。第一个处方的主要提供者是全科医生和公共卫生护士。仅含孕激素的药丸(POPs)的开始在整个队列中增加,而联合口服避孕药(COCs)的起子有所减少。长效可逆避孕药(LARCs)的使用自纳入报销计划(2015年)以来一直在增加。在LARC成为报销计划的一部分之后,大多数转换者从COC或POP作为开始方法转移到植入物。在整个队列中,从日历年开始到结束时连续使用激素避孕药的妇女人数显着增加,她们以相同的方法和切换方法后成为19岁。我们无法将少女分娩或人工流产(Joinpoint分析)下降趋势的变化与实施时间或从2002年开始激素避孕药报销的变化相关联。
    结论:主要是公共卫生护士和较小程度的助产士在获得处方COCs的授权后不久就成为重要的提供者。扩大偿还计划,以涵盖持久性有机污染物,补丁,阴道环,2006年的醋酸甲羟孕酮对增加长期首次使用者的比例影响较小。然而,2015年纳入LARCs显著增加了长期首次使用激素避孕药的比例.
    BACKGROUND: The Norwegian Government introduced in 2002 a reimbursement scheme for hormonal contraceptives to adolescents at the same time as public health nurses and midwives received authorization to prescribe hormonal contraceptives. This study examines the impact of increased accessibility and public funding on hormonal contraceptive use among adolescents.
    METHODS: The Norwegian Prescription Database, Statistics Norway, and Norwegian Institute of Public Health served as data sources for this cohort study. The study population comprised 174 653 Norwegian women born 1989-1990, 1994-1995, and 1999-2000. We examined use of hormonal contraceptives through dispensed prescriptions from age 12 through age 19 with duration of first continuous use as primary outcome. The statistical analyses were done in SPSS using chi-squared test, survival analysis, and Joinpoint regression analysis with p-values < 0.05.
    RESULTS: By age 19, ~75% of the cohorts had used at least one hormonal method. The main providers of the first prescription were general practitioners and public health nurses. Starters of progestogen-only pills (POPs) have increased across the cohorts, while starters of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) have decreased. The use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) has increased since its inclusion in the reimbursement scheme (2015). Most switchers shifted from COCs or POPs as a start method to implants after LARCs became part of the reimbursement scheme. There has been a significant increase across the cohorts in the number of women who continuously used hormonal contraceptives from start to the end of the calendar year they became 19 years with the same method and after switching methods. We could not correlate changes in decreasing trends for teenage births or induced abortions (Joinpoint analysis) to time for implementation or changes in the reimbursement of hormonal contraceptives from 2002.
    CONCLUSIONS: Primarily public health nurses and to a lesser extent midwives became soon after they received authorization to prescribe COCs important providers. The expansion of the reimbursement scheme to cover POPs, patches, vaginal ring, and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in 2006 had minor impact on increasing the proportion of long-term first-time users. However, the inclusion of LARCs in 2015 significantly increased the proportion of long-term first-time hormonal contraceptive users.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在尼日利亚,新的计划生育(FP)方法的在职培训通常是使用基于课堂的学习的组合进行的,技能实验室,和监督实习。这项混合方法研究评估了可行性,可接受性,提供者能力,以及与激素宫内节育器(IUD)的混合数字和亲自训练模型相关的成本。
    方法:这项研究是在埃努古进行的,卡诺,奥约说,尼日利亚,以及以前接受过非激素宫内节育器培训的FP提供者。参与者完成了数字教学培训,具有客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的基于模型的实习,其次是向客户提供监督服务。对提供者的知识增益和临床能力进行了描述性评估和描述。关于可行性的数据,可接受性,该方法的可扩展性是从参与的提供商那里收集的,临床主管,和关键利益相关者。使用基于活动的方法捕获培训成本,并用于计算每个培训提供者的成本。所有分析都是描述性的。
    结果:62家供应商接受了混合数字化培训,其中60人(91%)被纳入研究(n=36人来自公共部门,n=15来自私营部门,n=9,两者都是公共/私人)。培训前后的平均知识分数从62%增加到86%。临床能力整体非常高(平均:94%),所有提供商都获得了认证。提供商喜欢数字培训可以在他们选择的时间/地点完成(84%),自我调整(79%),并降低COVID-19暴露风险(75%)。临床主管和卫生部利益相关者对培训及其可扩展性也有积极的印象。混合培训包的费用为每个受训的提供者316美元。
    结论:我们发现,在尼日利亚提供激素IUD服务的混合数字培训方法是可以接受且可行的。提供者在培训后证明了知识的增加,并实现了高水平的临床能力。提供者和临床主管都认为数字培训内容是高质量的,并且是基于课堂的可接受(有时更可取)替代方案,亲自培训。这项研究为长效避孕药的混合数字训练模型提供了见解,与尼日利亚和类似环境的扩大相关。
    BACKGROUND: In Nigeria, in-service trainings for new family planning (FP) methods have typically been conducted using a combination of classroom-based learning, skills labs, and supervised practicums. This mixed-methods study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, provider competency, and costs associated with a hybrid digital and in-person training model for the hormonal intrauterine device (IUD).
    METHODS: The study was conducted in Enugu, Kano, and Oyo states, Nigeria, and enrolled FP providers previously trained on non-hormonal IUDs. Participants completed a digital didactic training, an in-person model-based practicum with an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), followed by supervised provision of service to clients. Provider knowledge gains and clinical competency were assessed and described descriptively. Data on the feasibility, acceptability, and scalability of the approach were gathered from participating providers, clinical supervisors, and key stakeholders. Training costs were captured using an activity-based approach and used to calculate a cost per provider trained. All analyses were descriptive.
    RESULTS: Sixty-two providers took the hybrid digital training, of whom 60 (91%) were included in the study (n = 36 from public sector, n = 15 from private sector, and n = 9 both public/private). The average knowledge score increased from 62 to 86% pre- and post-training. Clinical competency was overall very high (mean: 94%), and all providers achieved certification. Providers liked that the digital training could be done at the time/place of their choosing (84%), was self-paced (79%), and reduced risk of COVID-19 exposure (75%). Clinical supervisors and Ministry of Health stakeholders also had positive impressions of the training and its scalability. The hybrid training package cost $316 per provider trained.
    CONCLUSIONS: We found that a hybrid digital training approach to hormonal IUD service provision in Nigeria was acceptable and feasible. Providers demonstrated increases in knowledge following the training and achieved high levels of clinical competency. Both providers and clinical supervisors felt that the digital training content was of high quality and an acceptable (sometimes preferable) alternative to classroom-based, in-person training. This study provided insights into a hybrid digital training model for a long-acting contraceptive, relevant to scale-up in Nigeria and similar settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:荷尔蒙宫内节育器,长效可逆避孕方法,自2019年以来,尼日利亚联邦卫生部正在将其引入尼日利亚私营和公共部门的试点地点。为卫生保健提供者的培训提供信息,我们对一项混合数字和面对面培训进行了研究,该研究利用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)评估提供者受训人员的能力.这项研究代表了使用OSCE评估数字培训有效性的少数记录在案的经验之一。方法:从2021年9月至10月,在埃努古,尼日利亚的卡诺和奥约州,使用混合数字/面对面培训方法,对来自公共和私营部门医疗机构的62名卫生保健提供者进行了激素宫内节育器服务提供培训。供应商,熟练提供铜宫内节育器,接受了使用数字模块的说教组件,接下来是面对面的实习,最后监督提供者培训生工作场所的服务提供。在为期一天的实习期间,使用OSCE评估了技能。结果:使用OSCE评估技能为研究团队提供了有价值的信息。提供者受训人员的表现很高(平均94%正确完成了欧安组织的步骤)。结论:OSCE被用作这项试点研究的研究方法;迄今为止,欧安组织尚未纳入FMOH扩大的培训方法。OSCE上的提供者受训人员表现一致,毫不奇怪,因为提供者学员在提供铜宫内节育器方面经验丰富。如果并且当培训向没有铜宫内节育器经验的提供者推出时,OSCE可能在提供服务之前评估技能方面发挥更重要的作用。在推出激素宫内节育器和其他避孕技术方面,应进一步探索OSCE在设计混合数字/面对面培训方法中的作用。
    Background: The hormonal intrauterine device, a long-acting reversible contraceptive method, is being introduced to pilot sites in the private and public sector in Nigeria by the Nigerian Federal Ministry of Health since 2019. To inform training of health care providers, a study was conducted on a hybrid digital and in-person training which utilized Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) to assess competency of provider trainees. This study represents one of few documented experiences using OSCE to assess the effectiveness of a digital training. Methods: From September - October 2021, in Enugu, Kano and Oyo states of Nigeria, 62 health care providers from public and private sector health facilities were trained in hormonal IUD service provision using a hybrid digital / in-person training approach. Providers, who were skilled in provision of copper IUD, underwent a didactic component using digital modules, followed by an in-person practicum, and finally supervised service provision in the provider trainee\'s workplace. Skills were assessed using OSCE during the one-day practicum. Results: Use of the OSCE to assess skills provided valuable information to study team. The performance of provider trainees was high (average 94% correct completion of steps in the OSCE). Conclusions: OSCE was used as a research methodology as part of this pilot study; to date, OSCE has not been integrated into the training approach to be scaled up by FMOH. Uniformly high performance of provider trainees was seen on the OSCE, unsurprising since provider trainees were experienced in providing copper IUD. If and when training is rolled out to providers inexperienced with copper IUD, OSCE may have a more important role to assess skills before service provision. The role of OSCE in design of hybrid digital / in-person training approaches should be further explored in rollout of hormonal IUD and other contraceptive technologies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定生育年龄队列中不同年龄和百分位数的避孕特异性血清抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平的比较。
    方法:前瞻性招募队列的横断面分析。
    方法:美国育龄妇女购买了生育激素测试,并同意在2018年5月至2021年11月期间参加研究。在荷尔蒙测试的时候,参与者是各种避孕药的使用者(联合口服避孕药(n=6,850),仅含孕激素的药丸(n=465),激素(n=4,867)或铜(n=1,268)宫内节育器,植入物(n=834),阴道环(n=886))或月经周期正常的女性(n=27,514)。
    方法:使用避孕药。
    方法:AMH的年龄和避孕特异性估计。
    结果:抗苗勒管激素具有避孕特异性作用,联合口服避孕药的效果估计范围为0.83,95%CI0.82,0.85(降低17%),激素宫内节育器无效果(1.00,95%CI0.98,1.03)。我们没有观察到抑制的年龄特异性差异。然而,在抗苗勒管激素百分位数之间,避孕方法的抑制作用不同,在百分位数时效果最大,在百分位数时效果最小。例如,对于服用联合口服避孕药的女性,第10个百分位的AMH降低了32%(系数0.68,95%CI0.65,0.71),在第50个百分位时降低19%(系数0.81,95%CI0.79,0.84),在第90个百分位时降低5%(系数0.95,95%CI0.92,0.98),与其他形式的避孕显示类似的不一致。
    结论:这些发现加强了大量文献,这些文献表明激素避孕药在人群水平上对抗苗勒管激素水平有不同的影响。这些结果增加了这一文献,即这些效果并不一致;相反,最大的影响发生在较低的抗苗勒管激素百分位数。然而,与已知的任何年龄卵巢储备的生物学变异性相比,这些避孕依赖性差异很小.这些参考值能够可靠地评估个体相对于同龄人的卵巢储备,而不需要停止或潜在的侵入性避孕。
    To determine how the contraceptive-specific serum antimüllerian hormone (AMH) levels compare across ages and percentiles in a reproductive-age cohort.
    Cross-sectional analysis of a prospectively recruited cohort.
    Community.
    This study included US-based women of reproductive age who purchased a fertility hormone test and consented to participate in research between May 2018 and November 2021. At the time of hormone testing, participants were users of various contraceptives (combined oral contraceptive [n = 6,850], progestin-only pill [n = 465], hormonal [n = 4,867] or copper [n = 1,268] intrauterine device, implant [n = 834], vaginal ring [n = 886]) or women with regular menstrual cycles (n = 27,514).
    Contraceptive use.
    Age and contraceptive-specific estimates of AMH.
    There were contraceptive-specific effects on AMH with effect estimates ranging from 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.85) (17% lower) for the combined oral contraceptive pill to no effect (1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.03) for the hormonal intrauterine device. We did not observe age-specific differences in suppression. However, there were differential suppressive effects of the contraceptive method across AMH percentiles, with the greatest effect at lower percentiles and least effect at higher percentiles. For example, for women taking the combined oral contraceptive pill, the AMH level was 32% lower at the 10th percentile (coefficient, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.65-0.71), 19% lower at the 50th percentile (coefficient, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.79-0.84), and 5% lower at the 90th percentile (coefficient, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.98), with other forms of contraception showing similar discordances.
    These findings reinforce the body of literature that shows that hormonal contraceptives have different impacts on the AMH levels at a population level. These results add to this literature that these effects are not consistent; instead, the greatest impact occurs at the lower AMH percentiles. However, these contraceptive-dependent differences are small compared with the known biological variability in ovarian reserve at any given age. These reference values enable robust assessment of an individual\'s ovarian reserve relative to their peers without requiring cessation or potentially invasive removal of contraception.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估接受铜宫内节育器(IUD)的妇女的妊娠发生率,一次性使用激素宫内节育器或依托孕酮(ENG)避孕植入物。
    方法:我们的前瞻性研究是在坎皮纳斯大学进行的,坎皮纳斯,SP,巴西。我们从四项正在进行的研究中获得了数据,包括设备放置的日期,末次月经的第一天,以及放置设备后三个月内怀孕的发生。
    结果:我们包括2479个设备放置(413个TCu380A宫内节育器,1,476激素宫内节育器和590ENG植入物。几乎一半的设备放置(1113/2479;44.9%)在月经周期的前五天内进行。我们观察到三次怀孕,1例发生在ENG植入物使用者中,该使用者在月经周期的1-5天内接受了植入物,一位在月经周期第6-10天放置的激素IUD使用者和一位在月经周期第21-25天放置的铜IUD使用者。
    结论:单次就诊LARC是一种良好的策略,总体妊娠率非常低。这一战略有可能减少意外怀孕,降低妇女和卫生系统的成本和障碍。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the occurrence of pregnancy in a cohort of women who received a copper intrauterine device (IUD), hormonal IUDs or an etonogestrel (ENG) contraceptive implant at a single-visit practice.
    METHODS: Prospective study conducted at the University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. We obtained data from four ongoing studies including both the date of the device placement, the first day of the last menstrual period, and the occurrence of pregnancy up to 3 months after device placement.
    RESULTS: We included 2479 device placements (413 TCu380A IUDs, 1476 hormonal IUD and 590 ENG implants). Almost half of the device placements (1113/2479; 44.9%) were performed within the first 5 days of the menstrual cycle. We observed three pregnancies: one in an ENG implant user who received the implant within days 1-5 of the menstrual cycle; one in a woman who received a hormonal IUD during days 6-10 of the menstrual cycle; and one in a copper IUD user with placement during days 21-25 of menstrual cycle.
    CONCLUSIONS: Single-visit long-acting reversible contraception placements are a good strategy with overall very low pregnancy rates. This strategy has a potential to reduce unintended pregnancies and to reduce costs and barriers to both women and the healthcare system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    释放左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器(LNG-IUD)是发达国家公认的避孕药,然而,生活在资源匮乏的妇女在使用和接受方面的经验有限,发展中国家的设置。我们研究了通过初级保健服务提供液化天然气宫内节育器的可行性,以及它在低收入女性中的可接受性,印度的农村部落社区。
    我们在四个医疗机构(三个农村,和一个城市)在拉贾斯坦邦,印度。除了现有的避孕方法外,还向寻求避孕的妇女提供了液化天然气宫内节育器。我们跟踪所有从2015年8月到2019年9月采用LNG-IUD的人(n=1266),直到停药或12个月。无论哪个更早。主要结果是延续率和可接受性,次要结果是血红蛋白水平的变化,我们在插入前和12个月随访时进行了测量,使用Sahli\的方法。
    大多数用户居住在村庄,是文盲,属于边缘化群体,有两个或更多的孩子,并希望在他们采用这种方法时限制生育。12个月的延续率为87.6%。在所有用户中,7.4%的女性因副作用而寻求切除,2%的女性因改变生育意愿而寻求切除,另有2%报告自发驱逐。大多数持续使用者在使用12个月时报告月经过少(54%)或闭经(42%)。用户满意度高达91.6%,92%的女性认为她们的经历等于或超过预期。中度和重度贫血减少,平均血红蛋白水平增加0.7g/dL(p<0.01)。
    初级保健诊所可以可行地提供液化天然气宫内节育器,在资源匮乏的环境中生活的妇女中具有很高的可接受性。鉴于印度和类似国家缺乏长效可逆避孕选择和妇女贫血患病率高,该方法应在公共卫生系统中进行试点。
    避孕作用持续时间长,减少月经出血和减少贫血的能力,可逆性,易于拆卸,结合使液化天然气宫内节育器接受妇女,尤其是在贫血患病率较高的地区。这项研究证明了在低资源条件下引入LNG-IUD的可行性和可接受性。初级保健设置。
    UNASSIGNED: The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) is a well-accepted contraceptive across developed countries, yet there is limited experience in use and acceptance amongst women living in low-resource, developing country settings. We studied the feasibility of providing the LNG-IUD through a primary care service, and its acceptability amongst women living in a low-income, rural-tribal community in India.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted an observational study of feasibility and acceptability at four health facilities (three rural, and one urban) in Rajasthan, India. Women seeking contraception were offered the LNG-IUD in addition to existing contraceptive methods. We followed all those who adopted LNG-IUD from August 2015 to September 2019 (n= 1266) till discontinuation or 12 months, whichever was earlier. The primary outcome was continuation rate and acceptability, and the secondary outcome was change in hemoglobin levels, which we measured before insertion and at 12-month follow-up, using Sahli\'s method.
    UNASSIGNED: Most users lived in villages, were illiterate, belonged to marginalized groups, had 2 or more children, and wished to limit births when they adopted the method. The 12-month continuation rate was 87.6%. Amongst all users, 7.4% of women sought removal for side effects and 2% for change in reproductive intention, while another 2% reported spontaneous expulsion. Most continuing users reported hypomenorrhea (54%) or amenorrhea (42%) by 12 months of use. User satisfaction was high at 91.6%, with 92% of women rating their experience as equaling or exceeding expectations. Moderate and severe anemia reduced, and mean hemoglobin levels increased by 0.7 g/dL (p < 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: Primary care clinics can feasibly deliver LNG-IUD, with high acceptability amongst women living in low resource settings. Given the paucity of long-acting reversible contraceptive options and high prevalence of anemia among women in India and similar countries, the method should be piloted through the public health system.
    UNASSIGNED: Long duration of contraceptive action, ability to reduce menstrual bleeding and reduce anemia, reversibility, and easy removal, combine to make LNG-IUD acceptable to women, especially in regions with high prevalence of anemia. This study demonstrates the feasibility and acceptability of introducing LNG-IUD in a low resource, primary care setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    释放左炔诺孕酮的宫内节育器(IUD)-也称为激素宫内节育器-是一种高效的避孕方法,在赞比亚的公共部门尚未广泛使用。早期引入工作可以提供对用户特征的关键见解,方法选择的原因,并体验他们的方法。
    我们对710名接受荷尔蒙宫内节育器的公共部门客户进行了调查,铜宫内节育器,在赞比亚的两个省植入或注射,以及对29名女性的深入采访。我们对调查数据进行了描述性分析,并拟合了多变量逻辑回归模型,以评估与激素宫内节育器使用相关的因素。定性访谈进行了主题分析。
    与激素宫内节育器使用相关的因素包括全职或自雇(相对于植入物和铜宫内节育器使用),除了年纪大了,更富有,和合作伙伴不知道方法的使用(相对于植入物的使用)。选择长效方法的常见原因是持续时间,认为这种方法“适合我的身体”,“和方便。此外,一部分激素宫内节育器受体提到了有效性,谨慎使用的潜力,很少或可控制的副作用,和治疗沉重或痛苦的时期。83%至95%的女性表示,她们接受了月经变化和/或非出血副作用的咨询;然而,与闭经(43%)相比,更多的激素宫内节育器受体被告知出血减少的可能性(88%).定性访谈表明,女性寻求副作用最小或可容忍的方法。虽然大多数女性报告说她们的伴侣知道方法的使用,男性可能更一致地参与使用避孕药的决定,而不是选择特定的方法。定性结果表明,减少出血(尤其是出血较轻)的生活方式的好处,尽管闭经可能令人担忧。
    引入荷尔蒙宫内节育器的初步努力可以提供有价值的学习,可以为更广泛的方法介绍提供信息,以扩大选择范围,更好地满足赞比亚和其他地方的女性需求。扩大计划应包括强调高质量的咨询和需求生成。赞比亚政府致力于增加获得高质量避孕方法的机会,并为用户提供更多选择。迄今为止,荷尔蒙宫内节育器,一个非常有效的,长效避孕药在该国尚未广泛使用。在试点介绍环境中进行的一项研究提供了有关女性选择这些方法的原因的见解,他们的特点,以及他们获得方法的经验。研究中的710名妇女在赞比亚两个省的公共部门获得了计划生育服务。研究中接受荷尔蒙宫内节育器的女性,铜宫内节育器,植入物,或注射完成了定量调查;还对29名女性进行了深入访谈。结果显示了选择长效方法的常见原因(荷尔蒙宫内节育器,铜宫内节育器或植入物)是它们的持续时间,认为这种方法“适合我的身体”,“和方便。此外,一些荷尔蒙宫内节育器受体表明他们被该方法的有效性所吸引,谨慎使用的潜力,很少或可控制的副作用,和治疗沉重或痛苦的时期。对妇女的定性访谈还表明,妇女希望采用避孕方法,以产生最小或可耐受的副作用。男性伴侣通常知道避孕药具的使用;然而,男性较少参与女性选择的特定方法的决定.使用荷尔蒙宫内节育器可以减少月经出血,在采访中,女性表示他们喜欢减少出血(尤其是较轻的出血),虽然闭经(暂停出血)可能引起关注。结果可以帮助提供更广泛的方法介绍。
    The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (IUD)-also known as the hormonal IUD-is a highly effective contraceptive method that has not been widely available in the public sector in Zambia. Early introduction efforts can provide critical insights into the characteristics of users, reasons for method choice, and experiences getting their method.
    We conducted a survey with 710 public sector clients who received a hormonal IUD, copper IUD, implant or injectable in two provinces of Zambia, and additional in-depth interviews with 29 women. We performed descriptive analyses of survey data and fitted multivariable logistic regression models to assess factors associated with hormonal IUD use. Qualitative interviews were analyzed thematically.
    Factors associated with hormonal IUD use included full-time or self-employment (relative to both implant and copper IUD use), as well as being older, wealthier, and partner not being aware of method use (relative to implant use only). Common reasons for choosing long-acting methods were duration, perception that the method was \"right for my body,\" and convenience. In addition, a portion of hormonal IUD acceptors mentioned effectiveness, potential for discreet use, few or manageable side effects, and treatment for heavy or painful periods. Between 83 and 95% of women said that they were counseled about menstrual changes and/or non-bleeding side effects; however, more hormonal IUD acceptors recalled being counseled on the possibility of experiencing reduced bleeding (88%) than amenorrhea (43%). Qualitative interviews indicate that women seek methods with minimal or tolerable side effects. While most women reported their partner was aware of method use, men may be more consistently involved in the decision to use contraception rather than in the choice of a particular method. Qualitative results show an appreciation of the lifestyle benefits of reduced bleeding (especially lighter bleeding), although amenorrhea can be cause for concern.
    Initial efforts to introduce the hormonal IUD can provide valuable learnings that can inform broader method introduction to expand choice and better suit women\'s needs in Zambia and elsewhere. Scale-up plans should include emphasis on high quality counseling and demand generation. The government of Zambia is committed to increasing access to high-quality contraception and making more choices available to users. To date, the hormonal IUD, a highly effective, long-lasting contraceptive has not been widely available in the country. A study in pilot introduction settings provided insights into why women chose the methods, their characteristics, and their experiences getting their methods. The 710 women in the study received family planning services in public sector settings in two provinces in Zambia. Women in the study who received a hormonal IUD, copper IUD, implant, or injectable completed a quantitative survey; in-depth interviews were also conducted with 29 women. Results showed common reasons for choosing the long-acting methods (hormonal IUD, copper IUD or implants) were their duration, perception that the method was \"right for my body,\" and convenience. In addition, some hormonal IUD acceptors indicated that they were attracted to the method\'s effectiveness, potential for discreet use, few or manageable side effects, and treatment for heavy or painful periods. Qualitative interviews with women also showed that women want contraceptive methods that lead to minimal or tolerable side effects. Male partners were typically aware of contraceptive use; however, men were less involved with decisions about the particular method women selected. Use of the hormonal IUD can lead to reduced menstrual bleeding, and in the interviews, women indicated that they liked reduced bleeding (especially lighter bleeding), although amenorrhea (paused bleeding) can be cause for concern. The results can help inform broader method introduction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: The hormonal Intrauterine Device (IUD) is a highly effective contraceptive option growing in popularity and availability in many countries. The hormonal IUD has been shown to have high rates of satisfaction and continuation among users in high-income countries. The study aims to understand the profiles of clients who choose the hormonal IUD in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and describe their continuation and satisfaction with the method after 12 months of use.
    METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study of hormonal IUD acceptors was conducted across three countries-Madagascar, Nigeria, and Zambia-where the hormonal IUD had been introduced in a pilot setting within the of a broad mix of available methods. Women were interviewed at baseline immediately following their voluntary hormonal IUD insertion, and again 3 and 12 months following provision of the method. A descriptive analysis of user characteristics and satisfaction with the method was conducted on an analytic sample of women who completed baseline, 3-month, and 12-month follow-up questionnaires. Kaplan-Meier time-to-event models were used to estimate the cumulative probability of method continuation rates up to 12 months post-insertion.
    RESULTS: Each country had a unique demographic profile of hormonal IUD users with different method-use histories. Across all three countries, women reported high rates of satisfaction with the hormonal IUD (67-100%) and high rates of continuation at the 12-month mark (82-90%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Rates of satisfaction and continuation among hormonal IUD users in the study suggest that expanding method choice with the hormonal IUD would provide a highly effective, long-acting method desirable to many different population segments, including those with high unmet need.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗苗勒管激素已成为评估卵巢储备的临床生物标志物标准。随着抗苗勒管激素测试变得越来越普遍,越来越多的人正在寻求解释使用避孕药时获得的价值。适当地为妇女提供咨询,需要更好地了解使用不同避孕药的女性的抗苗勒管激素水平.
    研究不同形式的避孕药与育龄妇女抗苗勒菌水平之间的关系。
    这是一项横断面研究,包括27,125名20至46岁的美国女性,通过现代生育率获取生殖激素结果,并提供知情同意参与研究。通过干血点卡(95.9%)或静脉穿刺(4.1%)采集抗苗勒管激素水平,和以前的工作已经表明这两种方法收集的激素水平之间的高度相关性。进行多重线性回归,以比较使用避孕药的女性与不使用任何避孕药的女性的抗苗勒管激素水平。控制年龄,初潮年龄,身体质量指数,吸烟,样品采集方法,周期日,和自我报告的多囊卵巢综合征诊断。我们还分析了使用避孕药的持续时间是否可以预测使用激素宫内节育器和联合口服避孕药的使用者的抗苗勒管激素水平,考虑到这些避孕组的规模。
    使用联合口服避孕药的女性的平均抗苗勒管激素水平在统计学上显着降低(降低23.68%;系数,0.76;95%置信区间,0.72-0.81;P<.001),阴道环(低22.07%;系数,0.78;95%置信区间,0.71-0.86;P<.001),激素宫内节育器(低6.73%;系数,0.93;95%置信区间,0.88-0.99;P=.014),种植体(降低23.44%;系数,0.77;95%置信区间,0.69-0.85;P<.001),或仅含孕激素的药丸(低14.80%;系数,0.85;95%置信区间,0.76-0.96;P=.007)比控制协变量时不使用任何避孕药的女性。比较不使用任何避孕药具的女性与使用铜宫内节育器的女性时,抗苗勒管激素水平没有显着差异(低1.57%;系数,0.98;95%置信区间,0.92-1.05,P=.600)。根据自我报告的多囊卵巢综合征诊断,避孕药具使用与抗苗勒管激素水平之间的关联没有差异。激素宫内节育器使用的持续时间,但不是联合使用口服避孕药,与抗苗勒管激素水平略有正相关,尽管这种小幅度效应可能没有临床意义(系数,1.002;95%置信区间,1.0005-1.003;P=.007)。
    与未服用避孕药的女性相比,目前使用激素避孕药的平均抗苗勒管激素水平较低。不同避孕方法的百分比差异不同。这些数据为临床医生提供了有关如何解释在使用避孕药时评估的抗苗勒管激素水平的指导,并可能促进更多患者在评估其卵巢储备时继续使用避孕药具。
    Anti-Müllerian hormone has become the clinical biomarker-based standard to assess ovarian reserve. As anti-Müllerian hormone testing becomes more common, more individuals are seeking to interpret the values obtained while using contraceptives. To appropriately counsel women, a better understanding of anti-Müllerian hormone levels in women using different contraceptives is needed.
    To study the association between different forms of contraceptives and anti-Müllerian levels in women of reproductive age.
    This is a cross-sectional study including 27,125 US-based women aged 20 to 46 years, accessing reproductive hormone results through Modern Fertility and who provided informed consent to participate in the research. Anti-Müllerian hormone levels were collected through dried blood spot card (95.9%) or venipuncture (4.1%), and previous work has shown high correlation between hormone levels collected by these 2 methods. Multiple linear regressions were run to compare anti-Müllerian hormone levels in women using contraceptives with women not on any contraceptive, controlling for age, age of menarche, body mass index, smoking, sample collection method, cycle day, and self-reported polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosis. We also analyzed whether duration of contraceptive use predicted anti-Müllerian hormone levels in users of the hormonal intrauterine device and combined oral contraceptive pill, given the size of these contraceptive groups.
    Mean anti-Müllerian hormone levels were statistically significantly lower in women using the combined oral contraceptive pill (23.68% lower; coefficient, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-0.81; P<.001), vaginal ring (22.07% lower; coefficient, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.86; P<.001), hormonal intrauterine device (6.73% lower; coefficient, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-0.99; P=.014), implant (23.44% lower; coefficient, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.85; P<.001), or progestin-only pill (14.80% lower; coefficient, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.96; P=.007) than women not on any contraceptive when controlling for covariates. Anti-Müllerian hormone levels were not significantly different when comparing women not using any contraceptives to those using the copper intrauterine device (1.57% lower; coefficient, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.05, P=.600). Associations between contraceptive use and anti-Müllerian hormone levels did not differ based on self-reported polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosis. Duration of hormonal intrauterine device use, but not of combined oral contraceptive pill use, was slightly positively associated with anti-Müllerian hormone levels, although this small magnitude effect is likely not clinically meaningful (coefficient, 1.002; 95% confidence interval, 1.0005-1.003; P=.007).
    Current hormonal contraceptive use is associated with a lower mean anti-Müllerian hormone level than that of women who are not on contraceptives, with variability in the percent difference across contraceptive methods. These data provide guidance for clinicians on how to interpret anti-Müllerian hormone levels assessed while on contraceptives and may facilitate more patients to continue contraceptive use while being evaluated for their ovarian reserve.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号