The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of hoof trimming on overall limb movements by comparing the changes in 8 limb joint angles before and after one week of hoof trimming. Seventeen Holstein-Friesian dairy cows that were able to move freely and had no history of hoof diseases were included in the study. The cows were walked on a rubber mat with a high friction coefficient (HFM) and a low friction coefficient by the spraying of sodium polyacrylate (LFM). A high-speed camera was set to 200 fps on the image analysis software, and the images of the cows that were given 15 reflective markers on their right side were captured while walking on the test mat. The tests were conducted before and after one week of hoof trimming, and the cows were trimmed by the functional hoof trimming method. With image analysis software, video clips of walking cows were confirmed visually and tracked during one gait cycle by each reflective marker attached to the hoof of the forelimb and hindlimb, after which the stance phase and swing phase were identified. The durations of the stance phase and swing phase of the forelimb and hindlimb, respectively, and the maximum, minimum, and range of motion (ROM) values of the 8 joint angles, shoulder joint, elbow joint, carpus joint, forelimb fetlock joint, hip joint, stifle joint, hock joint and hindlimb fetlock joint during one gait cycle were included in the analysis. The maximum and minimum angles of the hip and stifle joints were narrower after hoof trimming than before, although the ROM did not change and was clearer for HFM than for LFM. It was thought that the flexion of the proximal hindlimb would progress smoothly during walking after trimming.

The control of digital dermatitis (DD) among cattle is crucial; however, effective and environmentally-sound control measures have yet to be identified. From the monitoring data of DD which were recorded during regular hoof trimmings in a farm in Hokkaido, Japan, we detected a decrease in the DD prevalence in a herd where an anaerobic bacterial fermentation enhancer (ABFE) was distributed. The possible effect of ABFE was analyzed using a retrospective repeated cross-sectional design. The prevalence of DD decreased over time in the ABFE-distributed group. Furthermore, a selected regression model indicated the time-dependent enhancement of the decreasing trend. While potential coincidental factors may influence, this study provides a basis for further research on the preventive effect of ABFE against DD.

Lameness in bulls is a common problem seen by many veterinarians, and the cause can be difficult to determine. Understanding cattle lameness requires experience and complete knowledge of their structural anatomy and handling. This article reviews the common body regions that cause lameness in bulls and discusses their treatment. It also details hoof trimming as a way to manage lameness.

UNASSIGNED: To evaluate, in a pasture-based dairy herd, the response to a three-time point hoof trimming regime on lameness incidence and time from calving to observation of an elevated locomotion score (LS).
UNASSIGNED: This study was conducted on a 940-cow spring-calving herd in New Zealand\'s North Island between May 2018 and May 2019. Cows (n = 250) were randomly allocated to the hoof trimming group, with the remainder assigned to the non-trim cohort. One trained professional hoof trimmer used the five-step Dutch method to trim the hind feet of the trimming group. Throughout the subsequent production season, the whole herd was locomotion-scored fortnightly using the 4-point (0-3) Dairy NZ lameness score. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess the univariable effect of trimming on the interval between calving and first LS of ≥ 2 and first LS ≥ 1. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to further evaluate the effect of trimming on time to elevated LS.
UNASSIGNED: Mean lameness (LS ≥ 2) prevalence was 2.6%, with 30% of cows having ≥ 4 observations during the study period when at least one LS was ≥ 2. For LS ≥ 1, mean prevalence was 40%, with 98.6% of cows having ≥ 4 observations during the study period when at least one LS was ≥ 1 during lactation. Hoof trimming had no apparent effect on the incidence of clinical lameness (LS ≥ 2) (trimmed vs. non-trimmed: 33.2% vs. 28.8%, respectively), but for LS ≥ 1, there was a small decrease in the incidence of LS ≥ 1 (trimmed vs. non-trimmed: 96.9% vs. 99.3%, respectively). The hazard of a cow having a first observed LS ≥ 2 in the control group was 0.87 (95% CI = 0.66-1.14) times that of the trimmed group; however, the hazard of a cow having a first LS ≥ 1 was 1.60 (95% CI = 1.37-1.88) times higher in the control than in the trimmed group.
UNASSIGNED: On this farm, prophylactic hoof trimming had no clinically relevant impact on the incidence of clinical lameness and was not associated with clinically beneficial reductions in time to first observed LS ≥ 2. This may be because claw horn imbalance was not pronounced on this farm, with 53% of cows needing no trim on either hind limb on the first trimming occasion. Further research on the response to prophylactic trimming in pasture-based dairy cattle is required.

Biosecurity in livestock farming includes all measures preventing pathogen introduction onto a farm (external biosecurity) and pathogen transmission on the farm itself (internal biosecurity). An important risk factor for the dissemination of infectious diseases are specialised external persons working on numerous farms, such as professional hoof trimmers in Switzerland. In the present study, 49 hoof trimmers, participating in the Swiss claw health programme and working as professionals, were questioned regarding their biosecurity measures and observed by two veterinarians during hoof trimming in order to assess the implementation of biosecurity measures by hoof trimmers. Data were processed using a scoring system, in which points were allocated to the different working methods taking into account their assumed transmission potential for infectious diseases such as digital dermatitis (DD) and Salmonellosis. The working method, which complied with the ideal biosecurity measure, was always given a whole point, whereas less optimal working methods were only given an intermediate value or no point. The scoring system helped identify precisely the strengths and weaknesses of the hoof trimmers in terms of biosecurity. The level of implementation of biosecurity measures by hoof trimmers was overall quite low (53 %=average of the overall biosecurity scores of the 49 hoof trimmers). Hoof trimmers which attended specialised training courses tended to have a higher level of implementation of biosecurity measures. The answers given by the hoof trimmers and the observations made by the veterinarians were compared, whereby it was found that hoof trimmers generally evaluated themselves better in regard to biosecurity than veterinarians assessed them. In summary and based on the results of this study, the dissemination of pathogens, such as DD associated treponemes and salmonella is possible during hoof trimming performed by external persons working on numerous farms. Thus, future training and continuing education courses should place emphasis on biosecurity.
Biosicherheit umfasst im Zusammenhang mit Tierhaltung alle Massnahmen zur Verhinderung der Einschleppung von Krankheitserregern in einen Betrieb (externe Biosicherheit) und der Krankheitserregerverbreitung innerhalb eines Betriebs (interne Biosicherheit). Als wichtiger Risikofaktor für die Ausbreitung von Infektionskrankheiten gilt überbetrieblich arbeitendes Fachpersonal, zu dem auf Schweizer Rindviehbetrieben professionelle Klauenpfleger gehören. Um einen Überblick über die Umsetzung von Biosicherheitsmassnahmen durch Klauenpfleger zu geben, wurden in der vorliegenden Studie 49 Klauenpfleger, die am Schweizer Klauengesundheitsprogramm teilnahmen, zu diesem Thema von zwei Tierärzten befragt und während der Klauenpflege beobachtet. Die Datenbearbeitung erfolgte mit Hilfe eines Scoringsystems, wobei den verschiedenen Arbeitsweisen unter Berücksichtigung des angenommenen Übertragungspotenzials der Infektionskrankheiten Dermatitis digitalis (DD) und Salmonellose Punkte zugeteilt wurden. Die Arbeitsweise, die die ideale Biosicherheitsmassnahme darstellt, erhielt immer einen ganzen Punkt, weniger optimale Arbeitsweisen dagegen einen Zwischenwert oder keinen Punkt. Mithilfe des Scoringsystems konnten die Stärken und Defizite der Klauenpfleger bezüglich Biosicherheit genau benannt werden. Insgesamt ist der Implementierungsgrad von Biosicherheitsmassnahmen durch Klauenpfleger recht niedrig (53 %=Mittelwert des allgemeinen Gesamtbiosicherheitsscores der 49 Klauenpfleger). Klauenpfleger, die häufiger fachbezogene Fortbildungen besuchten, wiesen tendenziell einen höheren Umsetzungsgrad von Biosicherheitsmassnahmen auf. Die Antworten der Klauenpfleger und die Beobachtungen der Tierärzte wurden zudem miteinander verglichen, wobei festgestellt wurde, dass sich die Klauenpfleger meist selbst besser bezüglich Biosicherheit einschätzten als die Tierärzte sie beurteilten. Zusammenfassend ist unter Berücksichtigung der Ergebnisse dieser Studie die Verschleppung von Krankheitserregern wie DD-assoziierten Treponemen und Salmonellen im Rahmen der überbetrieblichen Klauenpflege möglich. In zukünftigen Aus- und Fortbildungen sollte daher ein Schwerpunkt auf Biosicherheit gelegt werden.
Le concept de biosécurité englobe, en lien avec la production animale, toutes les mesures empêchant l’introduction de germes dans une exploitation (biosécurité externe) et la propagation de germes à l’intérieur de l’exploitation (biosécurité interne). Un facteur de risque important pour la propagation de maladies infectieuses est le personnel spécialisé externe travaillant sur plusieurs exploitations, dont font partie les pareurs d’onglons professionnels intervenant sur les exploitations bovines suisses. Dans la présente étude, afin de donner un aperçu de la situation actuelle concernant la mise en oeuvre de mesures de biosécurité par les pareurs d’onglons, 49 pareurs d’onglons participant au programme suisse de santé des onglons, ont été questionnés à ce sujet et observés lors du parage des onglons par des vétérinaires. Le traitement des données a été effectué à l’aide d’un système de notation, attribuant des points aux différentes pratiques de travail selon leur potentiel supposé de transmission des maladies infectieuses que sont la Dermatite digitale (DD) et la Salmonellose. La pratique de travail, qui correspondait à la mesure de biosécurité idéale, obtenait toujours un point entier, alors que les pratiques de travail moins optimales ne recevaient qu’une valeur intermédiaire ou aucun point. Le système de notation a permis de désigner précisément les forces et les faiblesses des pareurs d’onglons en terme de biosécurité. Le niveau de mise en œuvre de mesures de biosécurité par les pareurs d’onglons est de manière générale relativement faible (53 % = moyenne du score de biosécurité générale des 49 pareurs). Les pareurs d’onglons ayant suivi plus fréquemment des formations spécifiques présentaient tendanciellement un niveau de mise en oeuvre de mesures de biosécurité plus élevé. De plus, les réponses des pareurs d’onglons et les observations des vétérinaires ont été comparées. Il a été constaté, que les pareurs d’onglons s’évaluaient généralement meilleurs en matière de biosécurité que les vétérinaires ne les jugeaient. En résumé et en tenant compte des résultats de cette étude, la propagation de germes pathogènes par les pareurs d’onglons dans le cadre de leur activité professionnelle, tels que les tréponèmes associés à la DD et les salmonelles, est possible. Par conséquent, la biosécurité devrait être thématisée en priorité lors des formations et formations continues futures.
La biosicurezza negli allevamenti di animali ingloba tutte le misure che impediscono l’introduzione di agenti patogeni nell’azienda (biosicurezza esterna) e la trasmissione di agenti patogeni nell’azienda stessa (biosicurezza interna). Un importante fattore di rischio per la diffusione di malattie infettive è rappresentato dal personale specializzato esterno che lavora in numerosi allevamenti in Svizzera, come gli addetti alla cura professionale degli unghioni. Nel presente studio, alfine di avere una panoramica sulla situazione attuale delle misure di biosicurezza implementate dagli addetti alla cura degli unghioni, 49 di questi professionisti che hanno partecipato al programma svizzero di salute degli unghioni, sono stati intervistati sulle misure di biosicurezza da loro implementate e osservati durante la cura degli unghioni da due veterinari. I dati sono stati elaborati utilizzando un sistema di punteggio, in cui i punti sono stati assegnati ai diversi metodi di lavoro considerando il loro presunto potenziale di trasmissione di malattie infettive come la dermatite digitale (DD) e la salmonellosi. Al metodo di lavoro che rispettava la misura di biosicurezza ideale veniva sempre attribuito un punto intero, mentre al metodo di lavoro meno ottimale veniva attribuito solo un punteggio intermedio o nessun punto. Il sistema di punteggio ha permesso di identificare con precisione i punti di forza e di debolezza degli addetti alla cura degli unghioni in termini di biosicurezza. Il livello di attuazione delle misure di biosicurezza da parte degli addetti alla cura degli unghioni è risultato complessivamente piuttosto basso (53 %=media dei punteggi complessivi di biosicurezza dei 49 addetti). Gli addetti alla cura degli unghioni che avevano frequentato corsi di formazione specializzati tendevano ad avere un livello più alto di attuazione delle misure di biosicurezza. Inoltre sono state comparate le risposte fornite dagli addetti alla cura degli unghioni e le osservazioni dei veterinari e si è riscontrato che gli addetti alla cura degli unghioni generalmente si valutavano meglio in termini di biosicurezza rispetto al giudizio dei veterinari. In sintesi, e sulla base dei risultati di questo studio, la diffusione da parte degli addetti alla cura degli unghioni nell’ambito della loro attività professionale di agenti patogeni, come i treponemi associati alla DD e la salmonella, è possibile. Pertanto, i corsi di formazione e di aggiornamento a venire dovrebbero porre l’accento sulla biosicurezza.

This study aims to investigate the effects of routine treatment protocols for claw horn disruptive lesions (CHDL) on lameness recovery rates, pain sensitivity, and lesion severity in moderately lame primiparous cows. A cohort of first parity cows was recruited from a single commercial dairy herd and randomly allocated to five treatments, comprising four lame groups (LTNB, LTN, LTB, and LT) and a single group non-lame group. Eligibility criteria for the lame cows included a first lameness score (score 3/5), presence of CHDL on a single foot, good body condition score of 3.0 to 3.5, and no history of previous lameness. LTNB received a combination of therapeutic trim, administration of a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID; Ketoprofen) for 3 days, and hoof block on the healthy claw. Both LTN and LTB received the same treatment as LTNB without hoof block and NSAID, respectively. LT received only a therapeutic trim, whereas non-LT (negative control) received either a therapeutic or preventive trim. Pain sensitivity was assessed using the limb withdrawal reflex while lesion severity was recorded using the International Committee Animal Records (ICAR) Atlas guide. The enrolled cows were observed at weekly intervals, and the primary outcomes were assessed 28 days after treatment. The number (%) of recovered cows was 15 of 20 (75%), 13 of 21 (61.9%), 6 of 14 (42.9%), and 6 of 15 (40%) for LTNB, LTN, LTB, and LT, respectively. LTNB had significantly higher odds of successful treatment (OR = 4.5; 95% 1.1-19.1) compared to LT. Pain sensitivity based on limb withdrawal reflex was absent in a significantly higher number of cows (15/20; 75.0%) in LTNB compared to LTB and LT. LTB had a significantly lower lesion severity score in comparison to LTN. Overall, cows with limb withdrawal at day 28 after treatment were less likely (OR = 0.06; 95% CI 0.01-0.24) to develop a non-lame score. In conclusion, the treatment with therapeutic trim, hoof block, and NSAID led to better recovery and reduced pain sensitivity in moderately lame primiparous cows with good BCS compared to those that received only therapeutic trim. Further research on the changes within the hoof capsule following various treatment protocols is needed to elucidate the clinical benefits observed in this study.

BACKGROUND: The extent to which preventive hoof trimming is implemented on Great Britain\'s (GB) dairy farms is unknown. The aims of this study were to determine common practices and capture producers\' input on key areas that require further research.
METHODS: An online survey was conducted over a 4-week period from March to April 2017.
RESULTS: A total of 338 valid survey responses were received. The majority of farmers undertook preventive hoof trimming (82.4%), and this was significantly positively associated with increased herd yield (p < 0.001). Drying off was the most common time trimming was undertaken, with 72.2% of farmers who implemented preventive trimming doing so at this point in the management cycle. Of those undertaking preventive trimming, 46.4% solely used an external hoof trimmer, 31.7% solely used farm staff and the remainder (21.9%) used a combination of operators. Four over-arching themes were identified within the key research questions; when to trim, why we should trim, how to trim and who to trim. The most frequent questions related to optimal trimming timing, frequency and method.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted that preventive hoof trimming is a widespread practice on GB dairy farms, undertaken by both external hoof trimmers and farm staff. Despite this, farmers still want to know when they should undertake preventive hoof trimming and which technique they should use.

The objective of this study was to compare the impact of the functional hoof trimming (HT) method to an adaptation that results in increased modelling of the weight bearing claw on time to lameness and lesion prevalence in housed dairy cows. A total of 418 non-lame cows at early and late lactation were enrolled in the study and randomly allocated into 3 groups: functional HT (TRIM1), adaptation method (TRIM2), and an untrimmed group (CON). Locomotion scores (LS; 5-point scale) and animal-based welfare measures were assessed monthly from enrolment until the following 270 days in milk. Cows were considered lame when 2 consecutive LS = 3, or any assessment with a score of 4 or 5. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the difference in time to lameness between the groups. Multivariable CC Cox regression models were fitted to assess associations between covariates and time to lameness event, while associated factors for lesion prevalence were estimated using logistic regression models. The incidence rate of lameness was 29.3 cases/100/month, with corresponding rates of 28.7, 15.8 and 42.8 cases/100/months, in TRIM1, TRIM2 and CON, respectively. Time to first lameness event was higher in TRIM2 (mean ± S.E; 8.26 ± 0.16, P = 0.03) than CON (7.32 ± 0.2) and tended to be higher than TRIM1 (7.83 ± 0.19; P = 0.07). The risk of new lameness event was higher in cows with low BCS (≤2.5) (Hazard ratio; HR = 1.5; 95 % CI 1.1-2.1), while trimming all feet was a protective factor (HR = 0.58; 95 % CI 0.38-0.90). The prevalence of hoof lesions in the study population was 36.3 %, with the highest prevalence in CON (45.6 %), followed by TRIM1 (34.6 %) and TRIM2 (28.1 %). Seventy-eight per cent of hoof lesions were non-infectious and the majority of cows with hoof lesion in TRIM1 (72.3 %), CON (74.6 %) and TRIM2 (55.6 %) were lame. The odds of having a non-infectious hoof lesion were higher in CON (OR = 2.1; 95 % CI 1.2-3.7) compared to TRIM2, and in cows with hock injury (OR = 3.1; 95 % 1.1-9.7) relative to healthy hock, and tended to be higher in cows with low BCS (P = 0.09) relative to those with moderate BCS. Our results suggest that the adaptation to the functional method reduced the risk of lameness during lactation, however, proper management of under-conditioned cows is equally important.

Background: The objectives of this study were to, (1) investigate the impact of the Dutch five-step hoof trimming (HT) technique on time to lameness and hoof lesion prevalence in grazing (GR) and non-grazing (NGR) dairy cows, and (2) determine the association between potential benefits of HT and animal-based welfare measures during lactation. A total of 520 non-lame cows without hoof lesions from 5 dairy farms (GR = 2, NGR = 3) were enrolled at early (within 30 days in milk; DIM) and late lactation (above 200 DIM), and randomly allocated to either trimmed (HGR or HNGR) or control groups (CON-GR and CON-NGR). Locomotion scores, body condition, hock condition, leg hygiene, and hoof health were assessed at monthly intervals until the following 270 days in milk. The data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, multivariable Cox, and logistic regression models. The overall incidence rate of lameness was 36.2 cases/100 cows/month, with corresponding rates of 27.4, 31.9, 48.4, and 45.8 cases/100 cows/month in HGR, HNGR, CON-GR, and CON-NGR, respectively. Time to first lameness event was significantly higher in HGR (mean ± S.E; 8.12 ± 0.15) compared to CON-GR (7.36 ± 0.26), and in HNGR (8.05 ± 0.16) compared to CON-NGR (7.39 ± 0.23). The prevalence of hoof lesions in the enrolled cows was 36.9%, with a higher occurrence in CON-GR (48.8%) than HGR (23.2%), and in CON-NGR (52.6%) compared to HNGR (32.2%). The majority of hoof lesions were non-infectious in grazing (HGR vs. CON-GR; 21.3 vs. 33.3%) and non-grazing herds (HNGR vs. CON-NGR; 25.0 vs. 40.4%). The risk of lameness was higher in underconditioned cows (Hazard ratio; HR = 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-7.4), presence of hoof lesion (HR = 33.1, 95% CI 17.6-62.5), and there was variation between farms. Aside HT, lower parity (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.8), normal hock condition (OR = 0.06; 95% 0.01-0.29), and absence of overgrown hoof (OR = 0.4; 95% 0.2-0.7) were protective against non-infectious hoof lesions. Functional HT is beneficial as a lameness preventive strategy during lactation; however, ensuring older cows are in good body condition and free from hock injuries are equally important.

Until now, it is unknown whether hoof trimming late in gestation is associated with increased risk of abortion in dairy cows. Using data from 1,476,013 pregnancies in Danish dairy cows, the objective of the present study was to evaluate risk factors for abortion in cows hoof trimmed during pregnancy. Odds of abortion was lower in first parity cows, lower in Jersey cows compared to other breeds, and higher in cows pregnant with twins. Odds of abortion was 2.4 times higher in cows hoof trimmed within the last four weeks before end of pregnancy. Hoof trimming of cows in late gestation should be done with caution.