history taking

历史记录
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    很大一部分诊断是根据历史记录进行的,通常与物理评估和实验室调查并驾齐驱。全面了解患者病史是准确诊断和有效管理健康状况的基础。本文概述了全面病史的逐步过程,并讨论了该过程的证据。•历史采集是一个结构化但灵活的过程,从患者那里收集相关信息以告知诊断和治疗。•护士的重要沟通技巧时,历史包括积极倾听,移情沟通和文化敏感性。•通过积极让患者参与有关其健康问题的对话,护士促进他们的参与和自主权。反思活动:“如何\”文章可以帮助更新您的实践,并确保它仍然是基于证据。将本文应用于您的实践。反思并撰写简短的说明:•这篇文章在记录患者病史时如何改善您的实践。•您如何使用此信息来教育护理学生或同事服用患者病史。
    UNASSIGNED: A significant proportion of diagnoses are made based on history taking, often alongside physical assessments and laboratory investigations. Taking a thorough patient history is fundamental for the accurate diagnosis and effective management of health conditions. This article outlines a step-by-step process for taking a comprehensive patient history and discusses the evidence for this procedure. • History taking is a structured but flexible process of gathering relevant information from patients to inform diagnosis and treatment. • Important communication skills for nurses when history taking include active listening, empathetic communication and cultural sensitivity. • By actively engaging the patient in a conversation about their health issues, the nurse facilitates their participation and autonomy. REFLECTIVE ACTIVITY: \'How to\' articles can help to update your practice and ensure it remains evidence based. Apply this article to your practice. Reflect on and write a short account of: • How this article might improve your practice when taking a patient history. • How you could use this information to educate nursing students or colleagues on taking a patient history.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文旨在概述与可能指示呼吸系统病理的症状的患者进行咨询和临床评估的基本原理。本文探讨了如何进行以呼吸系统为重点的患者病史和体格检查。还考虑对临床“危险信号”进行评估,以降低遗漏严重疾病的风险,探索呼吸道病理学特征和可用于支持临床诊断的循证临床决策工具。
    This article aims to outline the fundamental principles of consultations with and clinical assessments of patients with symptoms that may be indicative of respiratory system pathology. The article explores how to perform a respiratory system-focused patient history and physical examination. An evaluation of clinical \'red flags\' to reduce the risk of omitting serious illness is also considered, alongside the exploration of features of respiratory pathology and evidence-based clinical decision-making tools that may be used to support clinical diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与高收入国家相比,中低收入国家面临的性健康问题影响不成比例。为了解决这种情况,适当的人际沟通技巧对于临床医生在获取与性健康有关的病史期间收集必要的信息至关重要。这项研究旨在评估SP与训练有素的HCP教师之间针对医疗保健专业学生的性健康相关人际沟通和病史记录的评分之间的可靠性。
    方法:我们进行了一项横断面比较研究,以评估与性健康相关的人际交往和病史记录评分的评分者间可靠性。数据是从Muhimbili卫生与联合科学大学的医学和护理专业学生那里收集的,他采访了12名出现性健康问题的标准化患者(SP)。由SP评分的视频录制的采访,与5名训练有素的医疗保健专业人员(HCP)教职员工的评分进行了比较。使用百分比一致性(PA)和kappa统计(κ)评估了评估者间的可靠性。
    结果:共有412名学生(平均年龄24岁)参加了这项研究,对两名有性健康问题的SP进行访谈。对于人际沟通(IC),评估者之间的总体中位一致性为轻微的(κ20.0095;PA48.9%),而医疗性生活史记录的总体中位一致性被认为是公平的(κ20.139;PA75.02%).
    结论:只有经过适当的培训并有足够的时间进行练习,才能在坦桑尼亚使用SP进行培训和评估医学和护理专业的学生,同时向学生提供反馈。
    BACKGROUND: Low- and middle-income countries face a disproportionate impact of sexual health problems compared to high-income countries. To address this situation proper interpersonal communication skills are essential for clinician to gather necessary information during medical history-taking related to sexual health. This study aimed to evaluate the interrater reliability of ratings on sexual health-related interpersonal communication and medical history-taking between SPs and trained HCP faculty for health care professional students.
    METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional comparative study to evaluate the interrater reliability of ratings for sexual health-related interpersonal communication and medical history-taking. The data were collected from medical and nursing students at Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, who interviewed 12 Standardized Patients (SPs) presenting with sexual health issues. The video-recorded interviews rated by SPs, were compared to the one rated by 5 trained Health Care Professional (HCP) faculty members. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using percent agreement (PA) and kappa statistics (κ).
    RESULTS: A total of 412 students (mean age 24) were enrolled in the study to conduct interviews with two SPs presenting with sexual health concerns. For interpersonal communication (IC), the overall median agreement between raters was slight (κ2 0.0095; PA 48.9%) while the overall median agreement for medical sexual history-taking was deemed fair (κ2 0.139; PA 75.02%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of SPs for training and evaluating medical and nursing students in Tanzania is feasible only if they undergo proper training and have sufficient time for practice sessions, along with providing feedback to the students.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肾上腺功能不全通常表现为非特异性症状,物理发现,和实验室结果,导致诊断挑战。然而,报告表明,也可能出现特定症状,例如高味觉症(对味觉过敏)和高嗅觉症(对嗅觉过敏)。我们报道了一个60岁男性食欲不振的病例,疲劳,和多关节痛,详细的病史显示厌食症的原因是肥大症和高睡眠症。这些特定的症状导致肾上腺功能不全的诊断。口服类固醇治疗继发性肾上腺功能不全可改善其各种症状。这个案例说明,在出现慢性非特异性症状的患者中,询问味觉和嗅觉敏感性的升高会提示怀疑肾上腺功能不全。此外,这一病例提醒我们,对有非特异性症状的患者进行仔细的病史检查可以发现可能是诊断线索的特定发现.
    Adrenal insufficiency often presents with nonspecific symptoms, physical findings, and laboratory results, leading to diagnostic challenges. However, reports have indicated that specific symptoms such as hypergeusia (hypersensitivity to taste) and hyperosmia (hypersensitivity to smell) can also occur. We report the case of a 60-year-old male with loss of appetite, fatigue, and polyarthralgia, where a detailed medical history revealed the cause of anorexia to be hypergeusia and hyperosmia. These specific symptoms led to the diagnosis of adrenal insufficiency. Treatment with oral steroids for secondary adrenal insufficiency resulted in the improvement of his diverse symptoms. This case illustrates that in patients presenting with chronic nonspecific symptoms, inquiring about heightened taste and smell sensitivity can prompt suspicion of adrenal insufficiency. Moreover, this case serves as a reminder that careful medical history taking in patients with nonspecific symptoms can uncover specific findings that may be diagnostic clues.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文提供了功能性胃肠病(FGID)病史的框架。临床医生依靠历史记录和对最新的“罗马IV标准”的了解,而不是生物标志物来做出FGID的阳性诊断。提高一个人的历史记录技能势在必行,早期诊断可以通过避免过度调查和/或慢性来改善患者的预后。我们建议的历史记录结构采用疾病的生物-心理-社会模型。我们用开放式和封闭式问题描述胃肠道症状的评估,排除“警报”迹象或症状的重要性,使用多系统方法来识别共存的功能障碍并引发患者的营养史。我们探讨了FGID中存在的心理合并症的增加以及社会历史在识别易感方面的意义,沉淀,延续和保护因素,这将最终指导治疗建议。我们认为历史应该被用来与病人建立融洽的关系,同时,验证他们的问题并减少污名。然后通过对肠-脑轴的教育来实现症状的重新归因,并可用于在第一次遇到时给患者提供保证。治疗的成功取决于对此类解释的参与和接受。
    This article offers a framework in history taking for functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). Clinicians rely on history taking and knowledge of the latest \'Rome IV criteria\' rather than biomarkers to make a positive diagnosis of FGIDs. Improving one\'s history-taking skills is imperative, as early diagnosis can improve patient outcomes by avoiding over investigation and/or chronicity. Our suggested structure for history taking adopts the bio-psycho-social model of disease. We describe the assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms with open and closed questions, the importance of ruling out \'alarm\' signs or symptoms, the use of a multi-system approach to identify coexisting functional disorders and eliciting patients\' nutritional history. We explore the increased psychological comorbidity present in FGIDs and the significance of the social history in identify predisposing, precipitating, perpetuating and protective factors, which will ultimately guide treatment recommendations. We believe history taking should be used to build rapport with patients while, at the same time, validating their problems and reducing stigma. Reattribution of symptoms is then achieved through education of the gut-brain axis and can be used to provide reassurance to patients at the first encounter. Success of treatment depends on engagement and acceptance of such explanations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    认识到性健康的整体定义,医疗保健提供者必须敏感地处理性健康史,包容性,和创伤知情的观点。有很多版本的性史应该是什么样子存在,但某些原则是常见的。对医疗保健提供者进行性史研究的教育可能涉及审查性史的组成部分,但也应包括使用非污名化语言的重要性,以病人为中心的方法,并实行创伤知情和文化敏感的护理。
    Recognizing the holistic definitions of sexual health, health-care providers must approach sexual health history taking with sensitivity, inclusivity, and a trauma-informed perspective. Many versions of what a sexual history should look like exist but certain principles are commonly found. Education of health-care providers on sexual history taking can involve reviewing the components of the sexual history but should also include the importance of using nonstigmatizing language, having a patient-centered approach, and practicing trauma-informed and culturally sensitive care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:沟通是医疗专业人员的核心能力,对患者安全至关重要。虽然医学课程强调沟通训练,传统格式,例如真实或模拟的患者互动,可以表现出心理压力,并且在重复中受到限制。最近出现的大型语言模型(LLM),如生成式预训练变压器(GPT),提供了克服这些限制的机会。
    目的:本研究的目的是探索GPT驱动的聊天机器人实践历史获取的可行性,沟通的核心能力之一。
    方法:我们开发了一个交互式聊天机器人界面,使用GPT-3.5和一个特定的提示,包括聊天机器人优化的疾病脚本和行为组件。遵循混合方法方法,我们邀请医学生自愿练习历史。为了确定GPT是否作为模拟患者提供合适的答案,使用定量和定性方法记录和分析对话.我们分析了问题和答案与提供的脚本一致的程度,以及医学合理性的答案。最后,学生填写了Chatbot可用性问卷(CUQ)。
    结果:共有28名学生与我们的聊天机器人一起练习(平均年龄23.4,SD2.9岁)。我们总共记录了826个问答对(QAP),每次对话的QAP中位数为27.5,与历史记录有关的QAP中位数为94.7%(n=782)。当脚本明确涵盖问题时(n=502,60.3%),GPT提供的答案主要基于明确的脚本信息(n=471,94.4%).对于脚本未涵盖的问题(n=195,23.4%),GPT答案使用了56.4%(n=110)的虚构信息。关于合理性,860个QAP中有842个(97.9%)被评为合理。在14个(2.1%)令人难以置信的答案中,GPT提供了被评为社会理想的答案,离开角色身份,忽略脚本信息,不合逻辑的推理,和计算错误。尽管有这些结果,CUQ显示出整体积极的用户体验(77/100分)。
    结论:我们的数据显示,如GPT,可以提供模拟的患者体验,并产生良好的用户体验和大多数合理的答案。我们的分析显示,GPT提供的答案使用明确的脚本信息或基于可用信息,可以理解为归纳推理。虽然罕见,基于GPT的聊天机器人在某些情况下提供了不合理的信息,主要趋势是社会期望的,而不是医学上合理的信息。
    BACKGROUND: Communication is a core competency of medical professionals and of utmost importance for patient safety. Although medical curricula emphasize communication training, traditional formats, such as real or simulated patient interactions, can present psychological stress and are limited in repetition. The recent emergence of large language models (LLMs), such as generative pretrained transformer (GPT), offers an opportunity to overcome these restrictions.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of a GPT-driven chatbot to practice history taking, one of the core competencies of communication.
    METHODS: We developed an interactive chatbot interface using GPT-3.5 and a specific prompt including a chatbot-optimized illness script and a behavioral component. Following a mixed methods approach, we invited medical students to voluntarily practice history taking. To determine whether GPT provides suitable answers as a simulated patient, the conversations were recorded and analyzed using quantitative and qualitative approaches. We analyzed the extent to which the questions and answers aligned with the provided script, as well as the medical plausibility of the answers. Finally, the students filled out the Chatbot Usability Questionnaire (CUQ).
    RESULTS: A total of 28 students practiced with our chatbot (mean age 23.4, SD 2.9 years). We recorded a total of 826 question-answer pairs (QAPs), with a median of 27.5 QAPs per conversation and 94.7% (n=782) pertaining to history taking. When questions were explicitly covered by the script (n=502, 60.3%), the GPT-provided answers were mostly based on explicit script information (n=471, 94.4%). For questions not covered by the script (n=195, 23.4%), the GPT answers used 56.4% (n=110) fictitious information. Regarding plausibility, 842 (97.9%) of 860 QAPs were rated as plausible. Of the 14 (2.1%) implausible answers, GPT provided answers rated as socially desirable, leaving role identity, ignoring script information, illogical reasoning, and calculation error. Despite these results, the CUQ revealed an overall positive user experience (77/100 points).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed that LLMs, such as GPT, can provide a simulated patient experience and yield a good user experience and a majority of plausible answers. Our analysis revealed that GPT-provided answers use either explicit script information or are based on available information, which can be understood as abductive reasoning. Although rare, the GPT-based chatbot provides implausible information in some instances, with the major tendency being socially desirable instead of medically plausible information.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术尽管有几种快速流感诊断测试(RIDTs),他们在快速检测之前预测患者是否患有流感很重要。这里,我们通过结合访谈和体格检查评估了RIDTs流感检测阳性的预测因素.方法我们使用多变量逻辑回归分析访谈与体检结果和RIDT结果之间的关系。结果在2018-2019年流感季节期间,共有76名儿童入学。因此,115例(41.7%)流感A阳性。我们的逻辑回归模型确定了年龄,体温,上呼吸道症状的存在是预测RIDTs阳性的重要因素,比值比(OR)为1.17[95%CI(置信区间):1.08-1.25]/+Δ1岁,1.70(95%CI:1.27-2.27)/+Δ1℃,和5.08(95%CI:2.57-10.00)的呼吸道症状。此外,患病接触的OR为7.67(95%CI:3.96-14.90)。我们的逻辑回归模型显示曲线下面积(AUC)为0.84。疫苗接种史没有被确定为RIDT阳性的重要因素。结论患病接触的存在与通过RIDTs进行的流感检测阳性有关。尽管RIDT是检测流感病毒的一种简单快捷的方法,我们应该结合访谈和体格检查结果对RIDT的病例进行适当的识别.
    Background Despite several rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs), they are predicting whether a patient has influenza before rapid testing is important. Here, we assessed factors predictive of a positive flu test via RIDTs by combining interviews and physical examination. Methods We analyzed the relationship between interviews and physical findings and results of RIDTs using multivariable logistic regression. Results Two hundred seventy-six children were enrolled throughout the 2018-2019 flu season. Accordingly, 115 patients (41.7%) were positive for flu A. Our logistic regression model identified age, body temperature, and the existence of upper respiratory symptoms as significant factors for predicting positive for RIDTs, with odds ratios (OR) of 1.17 [95% CI (confidence interval): 1.08-1.25]/+Δ1year old, 1.70 (95% CI: 1.27-2.27)/+Δ1 ℃, and 5.08 (95% CI: 2.57-10.00) for respiratory symptoms. In addition, the OR for sick contact was 7.67 (95% CI: 3.96-14.90). Our logistic regression model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84. History of vaccination was not identified as a significant factor in positive RIDTs. Conclusions The existence of sick contact was associated with a positive flu test via RIDTs. Although RIDTs are an easy and quick method for detecting the flu virus, we should perform the appropriate identification of cases for RIDTs by combining interviews and physical findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不确定性影响健康沟通的过程。由于获取和提供复杂的健康信息的挑战日益严峻,在医疗保健讨论期间对不确定性的管理和容忍度获得了新的关注。以及在不同背景下提供卫生服务。产前遗传咨询(GC)提供教育,为怀孕期间面临遗传或先天性诊断或风险的患者和夫妇提供支持和测试选项。收集详细而准确的家族史信息对于确定患者的遗传风险至关重要。在南非,背景因素,如患者识字,语言多样性,有限的书面患者健康记录,对GC服务缺乏熟悉可能会增加GC咨询期间误解的可能性。本研究使用定性社会语言学方法分析了9个视频记录的南非产前GC咨询,以了解不确定性对收集家族史信息过程的影响。研究结果表明,在家族史研究过程中,不确定性以不同的方式引入。这包括当患者不了解他们的家族史时;当他们有一些知识但细节不清楚时;或者当患者有知识但细节令人困惑时。不确定性会导致知识不对称形式的互动麻烦,疑问句,认知权威的逆转,和潜在的不信任。对于遗传专家如何管理GC家族史的不确定性提出了建议。这些包括识别不确定性的上下文来源,了解患者对不确定性的反应,并意识到个人对不适时刻的反应。重点介绍了具体的交流培训建议和基于视频的社会语言学方法,以增强反思和交流实践。这些方法可以提高GC沟通的有效性,并加强患者与专家的关系,尤其是在不同的环境中。
    Uncertainty impacts the process of health communication. The management and tolerance of uncertainty during healthcare discussions have gained renewed focus due to the growing challenge of obtaining and delivering complex health information, and the offer of health services in diverse contexts. Prenatal genetic counseling (GC) provides education, support and testing options for patients and couples facing a genetic or congenital diagnosis or risk during pregnancy. Gathering detailed and accurate family history information is essential to determine a patient\'s genetic risk. In South Africa, contextual factors such as patient literacy, language diversity, limited written patient health records, and a lack of familiarity with GC services may increase the potential for misunderstandings during GC consultations. This study uses a qualitative sociolinguistic approach to analyse 9 video-recorded South African prenatal GC consultations to understand the impact of uncertainty on the process of gathering family history information. The findings reveal uncertainty is introduced in different ways during family history taking. This includes when patients have no knowledge about their family history; when they have some knowledge but the details are unclear; or when patients have knowledge but the details are confusing. Uncertainty can lead to interactional trouble in the form of knowledge asymmetries, interrogative questioning, reversals in epistemic authority, and the potential for mistrust. Suggestions are made for how genetic specialists can manage uncertainty in GC family history taking. These include recognizing contextual sources of uncertainty, understanding how patients may respond to uncertainty and being aware of personal responses to moments of discomfort. Specific communication training recommendations and video-based sociolinguistic methods to enhance reflection and communication practice are highlighted. These approaches may enhance the effectiveness of GC communication and strengthen patient-specialist relationships, especially in diverse settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号