high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

高频重复经颅磁刺激
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中风是全球成人残疾的主要原因,通常涉及血脑屏障(BBB)的破坏。修复血脑屏障对中风恢复至关重要,和周细胞,BBB的基本组成部分,是潜在的干预目标。重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)已被提议作为中风后功能障碍的治疗方法。对血脑屏障完整性有潜在影响。然而,潜在机制尚不清楚.本研究采用短暂性大脑中动脉闭塞(tMCAO)大鼠模型,我们研究了rTMS对卒中后BBB的影响。通过单细胞测序(ScRNA),我们观察到周细胞之间的发育关系,内皮细胞,血管平滑肌细胞,表明周细胞的分化潜力。不同的周细胞亚簇成为中风的潜在治疗靶点。此外,我们的结果显示这些细胞类型之间的细胞通讯增强,丰富的信号通路,如IGF,TNF,NOTCH,和ICAM。差异表达基因的分析突出与应激相关的过程,分化,和发展。值得注意的是,rTMS干预上调血管平滑肌细胞中的Reck,提示其在经典Wnt信号通路中的作用。总的来说,我们的生物信息学研究结果表明,rTMS可能调节BBB通透性,促进卒中后血管再生.这可能是通过20HzrTMS促进周细胞分化为血管平滑肌细胞,上调Reck,然后激活经典的Wnt信号通路,并促进血管再生和BBB稳定性。
    Stroke is a major cause of adult disability worldwide, often involving disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Repairing the BBB is crucial for stroke recovery, and pericytes, essential components of the BBB, are potential intervention targets. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been proposed as a treatment for functional impairments after stroke, with potential effects on BBB integrity. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In this study using a transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) rat model, we investigated the impact of rTMS on post-stroke BBB. Through single-cell sequencing (ScRNAs), we observed developmental relationships among pericytes, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells, suggesting the differentiation potential of pericytes. A distinct subcluster of pericytes emerged as a potential therapeutic target for stroke. Additionally, our results revealed enhanced cellular communication among these cell types, enriching signaling pathways such as IGF, TNF, NOTCH, and ICAM. Analysis of differentially expressed genes highlighted processes related to stress, differentiation, and development. Notably, rTMS intervention upregulated Reck in vascular smooth muscle cells, implicating its role in the classical Wnt signaling pathway. Overall, our bioinformatics findings suggest that rTMS may modulate BBB permeability and promote vascular regeneration following stroke. This might happen through 20 Hz rTMS promoting pericyte differentiation into vascular smooth muscle cells, upregulating Reck, then activating the classical Wnt signaling pathway, and facilitating vascular regeneration and BBB stability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的/背景高频重复经颅磁刺激(HF-rTMS)和间歇性theta脉冲串刺激(iTBS)是针对重度抑郁症(MDD)的新兴神经调节技术。然而,直接比较其疗效的临床试验是有限的。这项荟萃分析旨在评估iTBS与HF-rTMS对MDD的抗抑郁作用和安全性。方法在主要数据库中进行系统的文献检索,以确定比较iTBS和HF-rTMS治疗MDD的随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果指标是反应率,缓解率,和常见的副作用。采用固定效应和随机效应模型进行Meta分析。评估了发表偏倚。结果7项RCT纳入Meta分析。iTBS和HF-rTMS之间的缓解率(比值比(OR)0.97,95%置信区间(95%CI)0.81至1.16,p=0.75)或缓解率(OR1.06,95%CI0.85至1.31,p=0.62)没有显着差异。两种主动刺激均显示出比假治疗显著更高的应答率。iTBS与假手术的反应几率是假手术的4-5倍(OR4.84,95%CI2.66至8.80,p<0.001),HF-rTMS与假手术的反应几率是假手术的3-4倍(OR3.85,95%CI2.08至7.13,p<0.001)。在iTBS和HF-rTMS之间没有观察到常见副作用如头痛的差异。结论根据目前的证据,iTBS和HF-rTMS在治疗MDD方面具有相当的疗效和安全性。两种神经调节技术都优于假刺激。iTBS可以被认为是HF-rTMS的替代品,具有每日治疗持续时间短的优点。需要进一步的大型随机对照试验和长期随访以证实这些发现。
    Aims/Background High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) are emerging neuromodulation techniques for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, clinical trials directly comparing their efficacy are limited. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the antidepressant effects and safety profiles of iTBS versus HF-rTMS for MDD. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in major databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing iTBS and HF-rTMS for MDD. The primary outcome measures were response rate, remission rate, and common side effects. Meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effects and random-effects models. Publication bias was assessed. Results Seven RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. No significant differences were found in response rate (odds ratio (OR) 0.97, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.81 to 1.16, p = 0.75) or remission rate (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.31, p = 0.62) between iTBS and HF-rTMS. Both active stimulations showed significantly higher response rates than sham treatment. The odds of response were 4-5 times greater for iTBS versus sham (OR 4.84, 95% CI 2.66 to 8.80, p < 0.001) and 3-4 times greater for HF-rTMS versus sham (OR 3.85, 95% CI 2.08 to 7.13, p < 0.001). No differences in common side effects such as headache were observed between iTBS and HF-rTMS. Conclusion iTBS and HF-rTMS have comparable efficacy and safety profiles in treating MDD based on current evidence. Both neuromodulation techniques are superior to sham stimulation. iTBS could be considered an alternative to HF-rTMS, with the advantage of shorter daily treatment duration. Further large RCTs with long-term follow-up are warranted to confirm these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:通过对相关随机对照试验进行汇总分析,评估高频重复经颅磁刺激预防或治疗偏头痛的有效性和安全性。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,科克伦,OVID,Scopus,WebofScience,和clinicaltrials.gov数据库被系统地搜索随机对照试验(RCT)比较高频rTMS和假刺激预防或治疗偏头痛.使用RevMan5.3软件对相关结局指标进行荟萃分析。
    结果:共384例患者共纳入8个RCTs。共有23名患者退出,因此,最终纳入361例患者进行分析。高频rTMS组的发作频率低于假手术组(MD=-5.10;95%CI:-8.10,-2.09;P=0.0009)。rTMS组比假手术组有较少的剧烈头痛(SMD=-0.74;95%CI-1.04,-0.44;P<0.00001)。高频rTMS改善了患者的残疾(SMD=-0.45;95%CI=0.75,-0.16;P=0.003)。高频rTMS在减少流产药物数量方面没有优势(MD=-1.10;95%CI-3.28,1.08;P=0.32),但增加了不良事件的发生率(RR=1.69;95%CI1.09,2.64;P=0.02)。
    结论:高频rTMS降低偏头痛患者的发作频率和头痛强度,改善患者的残疾,但它也会增加不良事件。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the prevention or treatment of migraine by conducting a pooled analysis of relevant randomized controlled trials.
    METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, OVID, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and clinicaltrials.gov databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing high-frequency rTMS and sham stimulation for the prevention or treatment of migraine. A meta-analysis of relevant outcome measures was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.
    RESULTS: Eight RCTs with a total of 384 patients were included. A total of 23 patients dropped out, and thus, 361 patients were ultimately included for analysis. The high-frequency rTMS group had a lower frequency of attacks than the sham group (MD = - 5.10; 95% CI: - 8.10, - 2.09; P = 0.0009). The rTMS group has less intense headaches than the sham group (SMD = - 0.74; 95% CI - 1.04, - 0.44; P < 0.00001). High-frequency rTMS improved patient disability (SMD = - 0.45; 95% CI - 0.75, - 0.16; P = 0.003). High-frequency rTMS led to no advantage in reducing the number of abortive medications (MD = - 1.10; 95% CI - 3.28, 1.08; P = 0.32), but it increased the occurrence of adverse events (RR = 1.69; 95% CI 1.09, 2.64; P = 0.02).
    CONCLUSIONS: High-frequency rTMS reduces the frequency of attacks and headache intensity in migraine patients and improves the patient\'s disability, but it also increases adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨高频重复经颅磁刺激(HF-rTMS)联合加兰他敏治疗脑卒中后认知障碍患者的疗效及对血清同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)水平的影响。
    共纳入90例首次缺血性卒中后认知障碍患者。随机分为rTMS+认知康复组,加兰他敏+认知康复组,rTMS+加兰他敏+认知康复组。两组均接受常规内科治疗及肢体康复治疗。rTMS刺激部位为左背外侧前额叶皮质(左DLPFC),磁刺激频率为5Hz,磁刺激强度为运动阈值水平的80%,每天给予3000次脉冲。迷你精神状态检查(MMSE),蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)Fugl-Meyer量表,修改了Barthel指数,治疗前后(治疗4周后)进行康复评分及血清NSE、Hcy测定。
    治疗4周后,MMSE的分数,MoCa量表,Fugl-Meyer量表,3组患者的Barthel指数和改良后的Barthel指数均显著高于治疗前(均P<0.05),3组血清NSE和Hcy水平均下降。rTMS+加兰他敏+认知康复组评分较高,三组与其他两组比较差异均有统计学意义(均p<0.05)。
    认知康复联合HF-rTMS和加兰他敏可以最大程度地改善患者的认知功能,促进身体活动的恢复,提高日常生活自理能力,有效降低脑卒中后认知功能障碍患者血清HCY和NSE水平。尚未报道类似联合治疗的随机对照试验。更好的治疗效果可能与加兰他敏联合重复经颅磁可以更广泛地激活脑胆碱能系统有关,通过长期增强促进脑神经重塑,并抑制脑损伤中的局部神经炎症反应。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the efficacy of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) combined with galantamine in patients with cognitive impairment after stroke and its effect on serum homocysteine (Hcy) and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 90 patients with cognitive impairment after the first ischemic stroke were enrolled. They were randomly divided into rTMS+ cognitive rehabilitation group, Galantamine + cognitive rehabilitation group, and rTMS+ Galantamine + cognitive rehabilitation group. All groups received routine medical treatment and limb rehabilitation treatment. The rTMS stimulation site was the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (left DLPFC), the magnetic stimulation frequency was 5 Hz, the magnetic stimulation intensity was 80% of the motor threshold level, and 3,000 pulses were given every day. The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Fugl-Meyer scale, and modified Barthel index, as well as rehabilitation scale and serum NSE and Hcy were evaluated before and after treatment (after 4 weeks).
    UNASSIGNED: After 4 weeks of treatment, the scores of MMSE, MoCa scale, Fugl-Meyer scale, and modified Barthel index in the three groups were significantly higher than those before treatment (all p < 0.05), while the serum NSE and Hcy levels of the three groups were decreased. rTMS+ Galantamine + cognitive rehabilitation group had higher scale scores, and the difference between the three groups was statistically significant compared with the other two groups (all p < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Cognitive rehabilitation combined with HF-rTMS and galantamine could improve the cognitive function of patients to the greatest extent, promote the recovery of physical activity, improve the self-care ability of daily life, and effectively reduce the serum HCY and NSE levels in patients with cognitive impairment after stroke. No randomized controlled trials of similar combination treatments have been reported. The better therapeutic effect may be related to the fact that galantamine combined with repetitive transcranial magnetism can activate the brain cholinergic system more extensively, promote brain neural remodeling through long-term potentiation and inhibit local neuroinflammatory responses in brain injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中风后吞咽困难(PSD)是中风的常见症状。PSD的临床并发症包括营养不良和肺炎。临床研究表明,高频重复经颅磁刺激(HF-rTMS)可以改善中风患者的吞咽功能。然而,很少有研究阐明潜在的分子机制。
    方法:采用短暂性大脑中动脉闭塞(tMCAO)建立PSD大鼠模型。将大鼠随机分为假手术组,PSD组,PSD+假rTMS组,PSD+5Hz-rTMS组,PSD+10Hz-rTMS组和PSD+20Hz-rTMS组。将大鼠称重并进行视频透视吞咽研究。肺部炎症,血清P物质(SP)和降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)水平,肺,和孤束核(NTS),评估NTS中的脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)和5-羟色胺(5HT)。
    结果:PSD组大鼠体重下降,减少推注面积和咽部推注速度,术后第7天和第14天,咽部传输时间(PTT)和吞咽间隔(ISI)增加。此外,PSD大鼠出现肺部炎症,降低肺和血清中的SP水平,肺和NTS中CGRP水平升高,降低NTS中BDNF和5HT的水平。PSD组与PSD+sham-rTMS组的体重和VFSS成果无明显差别。与PSD组相比,丸剂面积显著增加,5HzrTMS干预后大鼠PTT降低。10Hz的HF-rTMS显着增加了重量,bolus面积,咽推注速度和降低大鼠PTT和ISI。推注面积(p<0.01)和咽部推注速度也显着增加,20HzrTMS干预后大鼠PTT和ISI降低。此外,与PSD+5Hz-rTMS组相比,推注面积和咽部推注速度显着增加,PSD+10Hz-rTMS组大鼠吞咽功能ISI降低。此外,与PSD+5Hz-rTMS组相比,PSD+20Hz-rTMS组大鼠吞咽功能ISI显著下降。10Hz的HF-rTMS减轻了肺部炎症,增加了肺中SP的水平,血清,和NTS,血清和NTS中的CGRP,5HT在PSD年夜鼠NTS中的表达。
    结论:与5Hz和20HzrTMS相比,10HzrTMS能更有效地改善PSD大鼠的吞咽功能。10Hz的HF-rTMS改善了PSD大鼠的吞咽功能并减轻了肺炎。其机制可能与肺中SP水平升高有关,血清和NTS,血清和NTS中CGRP的水平,5HT在HF-rTMS处置后的NTS。
    BACKGROUND: Post-stroke dysphagia (PSD) is a common symptom of stroke. Clinical complications of PSD include malnutrition and pneumonia. Clinical studies have shown that high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) can improve the swallowing function in stroke patients. However, few studies have elucidated the underlying molecular mechanisms.
    METHODS: A PSD rat model was established using transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO). Rats were randomly divided into sham-operated groups, PSD groups, PSD + sham-rTMS groups, PSD + 5 Hz-rTMS groups, PSD + 10 Hz-rTMS groups and PSD + 20 Hz-rTMS groups. Rats were weighed and videofluoroscopic swallowing studies were conducted. Pulmonary inflammation, levels of substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in the serum, lung, and nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT) in NTS were evaluated.
    RESULTS: Rats in the PSD group experienced weight loss, reduced bolus area and pharyngeal bolus speed, and increased pharyngeal transit time (PTT) and inter-swallow interval (ISI) on day 7 and day 14 after operation. Moreover, PSD rats showed pulmonary inflammation, reduced levels of SP in the lung and serum, increased levels of CGRP in the lung and NTS, reduced levels of BDNF and 5HT in the NTS. There was no significant difference between the PSD group and the PSD + sham-rTMS group in the results of weight and VFSS. Comparing with the PSD group, there significant increases in the bolus area, decreases in PTT of rats following 5 Hz rTMS intervention. HF-rTMS at 10 Hz significantly increased the weight, bolus area, pharyngeal bolus speed and decreased the PTT and ISI of rats. There were also significant increases in the bolus area (p < 0.01) and pharyngeal bolus speed, decreases in PTT and ISI of rats following 20 Hz rTMS intervention. Furthermore, compared with the PSD + 5 Hz-rTMS group, there were significant increases in the bolus area and pharyngeal bolus speed, decreases in ISI in the swallowing function of rats in the PSD + 10 Hz-rTMS group. Besides, compared with the PSD + 5 Hz-rTMS group, there were significant decreases in ISI in the swallowing function of rats in the PSD + 20 Hz-rTMS group. HF-rTMS at 10 Hz alleviated pulmonary inflammation, increased the levels of SP in the lung, serum, and NTS, CGRP in the serum and NTS, 5HT in the NTS of PSD rats.
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 5 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS, 10 Hz rTMS more effectively improved the swallowing function of rats with PSD. HF-rTMS at 10 Hz improved the swallowing function and alleviated pneumonia in PSD rats. The mechanism may be related to increased levels of SP in the lung, serum and NTS, levels of CGRP in the serum and NTS, 5HT in the NTS after HF-rTMS treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:本研究旨在研究在左背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)接受重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗的难治性抑郁症(TRD)患者中,总脉冲对改善抑郁症状的剂量效应。
    方法:MEDLINE,Cochrane中央对照试验登记册(中央),EMBASE,PsycINFO,系统检索了ClinicalTrial.gov数据库。我们包括随机,双盲,在TRD患者中使用rTMS优于左侧DLPFC的安慰剂对照试验(RCT)。排除的研究是非TRD,非RCT,或结合其他大脑刺激干预措施。感兴趣的结果是rTMS组和假对照在以剂量反应方式改善抑郁症状方面的差异。随机效应荟萃分析和剂量反应荟萃分析(DRMA)用于检查rTMS的抗抑郁功效及其与总脉冲的相关性。
    结果:我们发现左侧DLPFC的rTMS优于假手术对照组(报告为标准化平均差[SMD],95%置信区间:0.77;0.56-0.98)。DRMA的最佳拟合模型为钟形(使用受限三次样条模型进行估计;R2=0.42),表明较高剂量(>26,660总脉冲)与抑郁症状改善增加无关。刺激频率(R2=0.53)和年龄(R2=0.51)是剂量反应曲线的显着调节作用。此外,当组合所有剂量时,15-20HzrTMS优于10HzrTMS(0.61,0.15-1.10)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,高剂量(总脉冲)的rTMS并不总是与TRD患者抑郁症状改善的增加有关,剂量-反应关系受刺激频率和年龄调节。这些关联强调了确定给药参数以实现最大功效的重要性。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine dose-effects of total pulses on improvement of depressive symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) receiving repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC).
    METHODS: The MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), EMBASE, PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrial.gov databases were systematically searched. We included randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (RCT) that used rTMS over left DLPFC in patients with TRD. Excluded studies were non-TRD, non-RCTs, or combined other brain stimulation interventions. The outcome of interest was the difference between rTMS arms and sham controls in improvement of depressive symptoms in a dose-response manner. A random-effects meta-analysis and dose-response meta-analysis(DRMA) was used to examine antidepressant efficacy of rTMS and association with total pulses.
    RESULTS: We found that rTMS over left DLPFC is superior to sham controls (reported as standardized mean difference[SMD] with 95% confidence interval: 0.77; 0.56-0.98). The best-fitting model of DRMA was bell-shaped (estimated using restricted cubic spline model; R2 =0.42), indicating that higher doses (>26,660 total pulses) were not associated with increased improvement of depressive symptoms. Stimulation frequency(R2 =0.53) and age(R2 =0.51) were significant moderators for the dose-response curve. Furthermore, 15-20 Hz rTMS was superior to 10 Hz rTMS (0.61, 0.15-1.10) when combining all doses.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest higher doses(total pulses) of rTMS were not always associated with increased improvement of depressive symptoms in patients with TRD, and that the dose-response relationship was moderated by stimulation frequency and age. These associations emphasize the importance of determining dosing parameters to achieve maximum efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    尽管有可用的干预措施,但难治性抑郁症(TRD)仍存在重大的治疗挑战。艾司西酞普兰(ESC)是一种高度选择性的抗抑郁药。这项研究旨在比较TRD患者中单独使用ESC和ESC联合改良电惊厥治疗(MECT)或高频重复经颅磁刺激(HF-rTMS)。90名参与者被随机分配到ESC中,ESC+MECT,和ESC+HF-rTMS组。在12周时,ESC(14.37)之间的汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS-17)评分观察到显著差异,ESC+MECT(10.27),ESC+HF-rTMS(10.77)组(P=0.006)。在12周时使用世界卫生组织生活质量问卷(WHOQOL-BREF)评估总体生活质量(QoL),ESC,ESC+MECT,和ESC+HF-rTMS组分别得2分、3分和3.5分。与ESC组相比,ESC+MECT/HF-rTMS组抑郁症状减轻,伴随着更高的总体QoL评分和健康满意度的提高。接受ESC+MECT的患者在短期记忆和定向方面无明显改变,根据蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的测量,治疗前后。此外,与基线相比,观察到语言下降(12周:中位数2,IQR2-3;基线:中位数1,IQR1-3;P=0.022).ESC与HF-rTMS对认知功能的积极影响由所有dominesMoCA的改善证明。与ESC单一疗法相比,ESC与MECT或HF-rTMS的组合在缓解抑郁症状和增强QoL方面表现出增强的有效性。具体来说,ESC+HF-rTMS组合显示出作为TRD综合治疗策略的潜力,解决情感和认知方面的问题。
    Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) poses significant therapeutic challenges despite available interventions. Escitalopram (ESC) is a highly selective antidepressant. This study aimed to compare ESC alone and ESC combined with modified electroconvulsive therapy (MECT) or high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) in TRD patients. Ninety participants were randomized into ESC alone, ESC + MECT, and ESC + HF-rTMS groups. Notable differences were observed in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) scores at 12 weeks among ESC (14.37), ESC + MECT (10.27), and ESC + HF-rTMS (10.77) groups (P = 0.006). In terms of overall quality of life (QoL) evaluated using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF) at 12 weeks, the ESC, ESC + MECT, and ESC + HF-rTMS groups scored 2, 3, and 3.5, respectively. ESC + MECT/HF-rTMS groups showed reduced depressive symptoms compared to the ESC group, accompanied by higher overall QoL scores and increased satisfaction with health. Patients receiving ESC + MECT demonstrated no significant alterations in short-term memory and orientation, as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), before and after treatment. Moreover, a decline in language was observed compared to baseline (12 weeks: median 2, IQR 2-3; baseline: median 1, IQR 1-3; P = 0.022). The positive impact of ESC with HF-rTMS on cognitive function was evidenced by improvements in all domines MoCA.Combining ESC with MECT or HF-rTMS exhibited enhanced effectiveness in alleviating depressive symptoms and enhancing QoL compared to ESC monotherapy. Specifically, the ESC + HF-rTMS combination displayed potential as a comprehensive treatment strategy for TRD, addressing both emotional and cognitive aspects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    我们的荟萃分析表明,间歇性theta脉冲刺激(iTBS)/双侧TBS(Bi-TBS)和高频重复经颅磁刺激(HF-rTMS)/双侧rTMS(Bi-rTMS)具有相似的疗效。可接受性,抗抑郁治疗耐药的重度抑郁症(AD-TRD)的安全性。在我们的敏感性分析中,排除了一项比较老年人Bi-TBS和Bi-rTMS的研究,iTBS和HF-rTMS的所有疗效结局也具有可比性.因为iTBS不需要比传统HF-rTMS协议更高的刺激强度和更长的刺激时间,我们推测对于患有AD-TRD的人来说,iTBS/Bi-TBS在临床实践中是比HF-rTMS/Bi-rTMS更有用的治疗方式。
    Our meta-analysis demonstrated that intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS)/bilateral-TBS (Bi-TBS) and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS)/bilateral-rTMS (Bi-rTMS) had similar efficacy, acceptability, and safety profiles for antidepressant treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (AD-TRD). In our sensitivity analysis that excluded a study that compared Bi-TBS with Bi-rTMS for older adults, all efficacy outcomes were also comparable between iTBS and HF-rTMS. Because iTBS does not require higher stimulation intensity and a longer stimulus time than conventional HF-rTMS protocols, we speculated that for those with AD-TRD, iTBS/Bi-TBS is a more helpful therapeutic modality in clinical practice than HF-rTMS/Bi-rTMS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已经证明,重复的经颅磁刺激(rTMS)触发了稳态代谢可塑性的调制,这导致rTMS的效果消失甚至逆转,rTMS列车之间一定长度的间隔可能会破坏稳态化可塑性的调制。然而,尚不清楚高频rTMS的影响是否可以通过延长列车持续时间来调节稳态化可塑性,以及是否可以通过延长列车间间隔来破坏稳态化可塑性。
    在这项研究中,15名受试者参加了两个实验,包括靶向运动皮层的不同rTMS方案。在第一个实验中,采用不同列车持续时间(2s和5s)、列车间隔时间为25s的高频rTMS协议。在第二个实验中,采用了列车持续时间为5s和不同列车间间隔(50s和100s)的高频rTMS协议。还包括假方案。从肌电图获得的运动诱发电位幅度的变化,功率谱密度,评估了在每个rTMS方案之前和之后从静息状态下的脑电图获得的区域内和区域间功能连接。
    具有2s训练持续时间和25s训练间隔的高频rTMS增加了α频段的皮层兴奋性和双侧中部区域的功率谱密度,并增强了中部区域与其他大脑区域之间的功能连通性。当列车持续时间延长到5秒时,高频rTMS的后遗症消失了。具有5s列车持续时间和100s列车间间隔的rTMS的后效应与具有2s列车持续时间和25s列车间间隔的rTMS相同。
    我们的结果表明,列车持续时间和列车间隔时间可以诱导稳态代谢,并确定rTMS后效应的强度方向,在研究和临床实践中进行rTMS时,当然应该考虑在内。
    UNASSIGNED: It has been proved that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) triggers the modulation of homeostatic metaplasticity, which causes the effect of rTMS to disappear or even reverse, and a certain length of interval between rTMS trains might break the modulation of homeostatic metaplasticity. However, it remains unknown whether the effects of high-frequency rTMS can be modulated by homeostatic metaplasticity by lengthening the train duration and whether homeostatic metaplasticity can be broken by prolonging the inter-train interval.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, 15 subjects participated in two experiments including different rTMS protocols targeting the motor cortex. In the first experiment, high-frequency rTMS protocols with different train durations (2 s and 5 s) and an inter-train interval of 25 s were adopted. In the second experiment, high-frequency rTMS protocols with a train duration of 5 s and different inter-train intervals (50 s and 100 s) were adopted. A sham protocol was also included. Changes of motor evoked potential amplitude acquired from electromyography, power spectral density, and intra-region and inter-region functional connectivity acquired from electroencephalography in the resting state before and after each rTMS protocol were evaluated.
    UNASSIGNED: High-frequency rTMS with 2 s train duration and 25 s inter-train interval increased cortex excitability and the power spectral density of bilateral central regions in the alpha frequency band and enhanced the functional connectivity between central regions and other brain regions. When the train duration was prolonged to 5 s, the after-effects of high-frequency rTMS disappeared. The after-effects of rTMS with 5 s train duration and 100 s inter-train interval were the same as those of rTMS with 2 s train duration and 25 s inter-train interval.
    UNASSIGNED: Our results indicated that train duration and inter-train interval could induce the homeostatic metaplasticiy and determine the direction of intensity of rTMS after-effects, and should certainly be taken into account when performing rTMS in both research and clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文对重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)是否可以通过调节肠道菌群和代谢产物来调节持续性植物状态(PVS)患者的营养状况(主要终点)进行了初步研究,它们之间的相关性也进行了调查。选择
    76例PVS患者,采用随机数字分组法分为观察组(n=38)和对照组(n=38)。检查所有受试者的粪便样品的代谢物并分析短链脂肪酸(SCFA)含量。所有受试者的血清白蛋白,前白蛋白,在治疗前后测量血红蛋白水平。在治疗前后以及随访的第30天和第90天对所有受试者进行营养风险筛查2002。
    (1)肠道菌群结构:Chao指数,Ace指数,观察组和对照组的Shannon指数明显高于对照组(p<0.05),而辛普森指数在治疗后显著降低(p<0.05)。(2)肠道菌群代谢产物:观察组的乙酸水平明显高于对照组,丁酸,和戊酸(p<0.05),以及治疗后较低水平的丙酸(p<0.05)。(3)营养状况(主要终点):治疗后,两组血清营养指标均显著高于对照组(p<0.05),观察组各项指标明显高于对照组(p<0.05)。
    rTMS方法可能通过调节肠道菌群的结构并通过微生物群-肠-脑轴影响SCFA的水平来改善PVS患者的营养状况。可能的机制涉及高频rTMS如何引起大脑右侧额叶的兴奋,从而调节5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素的水平。
    UNASSIGNED: This paper presents a preliminary study on whether repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can modulate the nutritional status of persistent vegetative state (PVS) patients (the primary endpoint) by regulating the intestinal flora and the metabolites, with the correlation between them also investigated.
    UNASSIGNED: Seventy-six patients with PVS were selected and divided into the observation group (n = 38) and the control group (n = 38) by random numerical grouping. All subjects\' stool samples were examined for metabolites and analyzed regarding the short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) content. All subjects\' serum albumin, prealbumin, and hemoglobin levels were measured before and after the treatment. Nutrition risk screening 2002 was performed on all the subjects before and after the treatment and on the 30th and 90th days of the follow-up.
    UNASSIGNED: (1) Intestinal flora structure: the Chao index, Ace index, and Shannon index of the observation group and the control group were significantly higher (p < 0.05), while the Simpson index was significantly lower (p < 0.05) following the treatment. (2) Metabolites of the intestinal flora: the observation group had significantly higher levels of acetic acid, butyric acid, and valeric acid (p < 0.05), as well as lower levels of propionic acid (p < 0.05) following the treatment. (3) Nutritional status (the primary endpoint): following the treatment, the above serum nutritional indices were significantly higher in both groups (p < 0.05), while the indices of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (p < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: The rTMS method may improve the nutritional status of patients with PVS by regulating the structure of the intestinal flora and affecting the level of SCFAs through the microbiota-gut-brain axis. The possible mechanism involves how high-frequency rTMS can cause increased excitation in the frontal lobe of the right side of the brain, thus regulating the 5-hydroxytryptamine and norepinephrine levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号