high need high cost

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:没有广泛接受的管理高需求的护理模式,高成本(HNHC)患者。我们假设家庭心脏医院(H3),它提供了纵向,医院一级的家庭护理,将提高HNHC心血管疾病(CVD)患者的护理质量并降低成本。
    目的:为了评估H3注册之间的关联,医院一级的家庭护理,护理质量,和HNHC患者CVD的费用。
    方法:这项回顾性研究使用保险索赔和电子健康记录数据来评估未经调整和调整的年度住院率,护理总费用,A部分费用,和之前的死亡率,during,跟随H3。
    结果:在2019年2月至2021年10月期间,94名患者在H3中入选。患者平均年龄为75岁,50%为女性。常见的合并症包括充血性心力衰竭(50%),心房颤动(37%),冠状动脉疾病(44%)。相对于预注册,H3的入组与年住院率显着降低相关(绝对减少(AR):2.4住院/年,95%置信区间[95%CI]:-0.8,-4.0;p<0.001;护理总费用(AR:-$56990,95%CI:-$105170,-$8810;p<0.05;A部分费用(AR:-$78210,95%CI:-$114770,-$41640;p<0.001)。H3后的年度总成本和A部分成本显着低于入学前成本(护理总成本:-113510美元,95%CI:-151340美元,-65320美元;p<0.001;A部分成本:-84480美元,95%CI:-121040美元,-47920美元;p<0.001)。
    结论:纵向家庭护理模式有望改善HNHC伴CVD患者的质量并减少医疗支出。
    BACKGROUND: There is no widely accepted care model for managing high-need, high-cost (HNHC) patients. We hypothesized that a Home Heart Hospital (H3), which provides longitudinal, hospital-level at-home care, would improve care quality and reduce costs for HNHC patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD).
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate associations between enrollment in H3, which provides longitudinal, hospital-level at-home care, care quality, and costs for HNHC patients with CVD.
    METHODS: This retrospective within-subject cohort study used insurance claims and electronic health records data to evaluate unadjusted and adjusted annualized hospitalization rates, total costs of care, part A costs, and mortality rates before, during, and following H3.
    RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were enrolled in H3 between February 2019 and October 2021. Patients\' mean age was 75 years and 50% were female. Common comorbidities included congestive heart failure (50%), atrial fibrillation (37%), coronary artery disease (44%). Relative to pre-enrollment, enrollment in H3 was associated with significant reductions in annualized hospitalization rates (absolute reduction (AR): 2.4 hospitalizations/year, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: -0.8, -4.0; p < 0.001; total costs of care (AR: -$56 990, 95% CI: -$105 170, -$8810; p < 0.05; and part A costs (AR: -$78 210, 95% CI: -$114 770, -$41 640; p < 0.001). Annualized post-H3 total costs and part A costs were significantly lower than pre-enrollment costs (total costs of care: -$113 510, 95% CI: -$151 340, -$65 320; p < 0.001; part A costs: -$84 480, 95% CI: -$121 040, -$47 920; p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal home-based care models hold promise for improving quality and reducing healthcare spending for HNHC patients with CVD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在过去十年中,与酒精有关的住院人数翻了一番,在英格兰,每年>1.2m。高需求,高成本(HNHC)酒精相关的频繁出席者(ARFA)是一个相对较小的患者亚组,在短时间内多次因饮酒而入院或就诊。该试验旨在测试积极外展治疗(AOT)方法在改善ARFA临床结果方面的有效性。并在急性环境中减少资源使用。
    方法:将招募一百六十名ARFA患者,并在基线评估后,随机分配到AOT加照常照护(CAU)或相等数量的单独CAU。基线评估包括饮酒和相关问题,在过去6个月中使用标准的经过验证的工具,身心健康合并症以及健康和社会护理服务的使用,加上资源使用的衡量标准。随机化后6个月和12个月的随访评估包括与基线相同的工具以及患者满意度的标准测量。将比较6个月和12个月时CAU+AOT和CAU的结果,控制预先指定的基线措施。主要结果将是12个月时戒除天数的百分比。次要结果包括急诊科(ED)出勤,住院人数和住院时间,酒精消费,与酒精有关的问题,其他卫生服务使用,心理和身体合并症干预后6个月和12个月。卫生经济分析将估计AOT从健康的经济影响,社会护理和社会观点,并在12个月的随访中探索质量调整生命年和饮酒方面的成本效益。
    结论:对酒精依赖患者进行试验的AOT模型显示,酒精消耗和计划外国民健康服务(NHS)护理的使用显着减少,随着与酒精治疗服务的增加,与接受CAU的患者相比。虽然AOT干预比英国目前的标准护理更昂贵,将HNHCARFA作为目标的理由是因为它们对NHS的整体酒精负担的贡献不成比例.以前没有研究评估AOT对HNHCARFA的临床和成本效益:这项针对伦敦南部五个NHS信托的ARFA的随机对照试验(RCT)是第一个。
    背景:国际标准随机对照试验编号(ISRCTN)注册:ISRCTN67000214,回顾性注册26/11/2016。
    BACKGROUND: Alcohol-related hospital admissions have doubled in the last ten years to > 1.2 m per year in England. High-need, high-cost (HNHC) alcohol-related frequent attenders (ARFA) are a relatively small subgroup of patients, having multiple admissions or attendances from alcohol during a short time period. This trial aims to test the effectiveness of an assertive outreach treatment (AOT) approach in improving clinical outcomes for ARFA, and reducing resource use in the acute setting.
    METHODS: One hundred and sixty ARFA patients will be recruited and following baseline assessment, randomly assigned to AOT plus care as usual (CAU) or CAU alone in equal numbers. Baseline assessment includes alcohol consumption and related problems, physical and mental health comorbidity and health and social care service use in the previous 6 months using standard validated tools, plus a measure of resource use. Follow-up assessments at 6 and 12 months after randomization includes the same tools as baseline plus standard measure of patient satisfaction. Outcomes for CAU + AOT and CAU at 6 and 12 months will be compared, controlling for pre-specified baseline measures. Primary outcome will be percentage of days abstinent at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include emergency department (ED) attendance, number and length of hospital admissions, alcohol consumption, alcohol-related problems, other health service use, mental and physical comorbidity 6 and 12 months post intervention. Health economic analysis will estimate the economic impact of AOT from health, social care and societal perspectives and explore cost-effectiveness in terms of quality adjusted life years and alcohol consumption at 12-month follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: AOT models piloted with alcohol dependent patients have demonstrated significant reductions in alcohol consumption and use of unplanned National Health Service (NHS) care, with increased engagement with alcohol treatment services, compared with patients receiving CAU. While AOT interventions are costlier per case than current standard care in the UK, the rationale for targeting HNHC ARFAs is because of their disproportionate contribution to overall alcohol burden on the NHS. No previous studies have evaluated the clinical and cost-effectiveness of AOT for HNHC ARFAs: this randomized controlled trial (RCT) targeting ARFAs across five South London NHS Trusts is the first.
    BACKGROUND: International standard randomized controlled trial number (ISRCTN) registry: ISRCTN67000214, retrospectively registered 26/11/2016.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号