OBJECTIVE: The upgrade of major equipment can be disruptive to clinical operations and introduce risk as policy and procedures need to adapt to new technical possibilities and constraints. We describe here the transition from GammaMedPlus-iX to Bravos in a busy brachytherapy clinic, involving four afterloaders across two sites.
METHODS: Our clinic employs three high-dose-rate remote afterloaders in four dedicated treatment vaults at the main site and a fourth afterloader at a regional location. Of more than 600 new HDR treatment plans performed annually, most are planned and treated intraoperatively. Most treatments are for prostate cancer, followed by GYN, intraoperative brachytherapy, GI, and other sites. Applicators used include vendor-provided applicators as well as third party applicators and in-house 3D-printed devices to provide interstitial, intracavitary, intraluminal, and surface treatments. All applicators were commissioned according to recommended guidelines. The choice of tolerances and the design of new procedures were informed by current guidelines and leveraged new HDR afterloader functionalities. A review of clinical operations in the 4 months postupgrade was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of new tolerances and the effectiveness of new procedures.
RESULTS: The procedures outlined improved and standardized afterloader QA and treatment protocols with clear actionable steps for staff to follow to ensure treatments are delivered as planned. Re-commissioning of applicators yielded results similar to those previously reported by other investigators. A review of initial treatment data revealed that in one case, due to the implementation of tight tolerances, obstruction near the tip of the channel was detected and corrected prior to treatment. It confirms that the implementation of the tolerances adopted is feasible and effective in flagging treatment deviations.
CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced procedures and QA processes were implemented successfully. We established clear actionable steps to follow by staff to ensure that treatments are delivered accurately.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to investigate perioperative and subacute postoperative complications in patients undergoing LDR or HDR monotherapy for prostate cancer. We hypothesize a low rate of complications, and a favorable toxicity profile in patients treated with HDR compared to LDR.
METHODS: A prospectively collected institutional database was queried for patients treated with HDR or LDR prostate monotherapy between 1998 and 2021. Toxicities were determined per CTCAE. Claims based billing codes were obtained to identify additional events. Events occurring within 4 months of treatment were defined as perioperative or subacute postoperative complications.
RESULTS: 759 patients were identified, 446 received LDR with 125I, and 313 received HDR with 192Ir. HDR patients had higher risk features: 75.7% with Gleason score 7+ versus 2.4% of LDR, and 16% with initial PSA 10+ ng/mL versus 2.7% of LDR. Toxicities were mild with the most common being grade 1 GU frequency and nocturia at ∼50%. HDR patients had significantly less grade 2 dysuria (2.6% vs. 9.0%), frequency (4.8% vs. 9.4%), hematuria (1.0% vs. 5.2%), nocturia (3.8% vs. 9.4%), and urinary obstructive symptoms (7.3% vs. 11.2%), all statistically significant. 11 (1.4%) patients had infection requiring antibiotics: 8 (1.8%) from the LDR group and 3 (1%) from the HDR group. Cardiopulmonary events were low at <2% overall, without difference between HDR and LDR.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall toxicity rates support the safety of prostate brachytherapy. HDR monotherapy is associated with significantly less perioperative and subacute postoperative GU events when compared to LDR monotherapy. Cardiopulmonary events were equally rare in both groups.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can facilitate accurate organ delineation and optimal dose distributions in high-dose-rate (HDR) MRI-Assisted Radiosurgery (MARS). Its use for this purpose has been limited by the lack of positive-contrast MRI markers that can clearly delineate the lumen of the HDR applicator and precisely show the path of the HDR source on T1- and T2-weighted MRI sequences. We investigated a novel MRI positive-contrast HDR brachytherapy or interventional radiotherapy line marker, C4:S, consisting of C4 (visible on T1-weighted images) complexed with saline. Longitudinal relaxation time (T1) and transverse relaxation time (T2) for C4:S were measured on a 1.5 T MRI scanner. High-density polyethylene (HDPE) tubing filled with C4:S as an HDR brachytherapy line marker was tested for visibility on T1- and T2-weighted MRI sequences in a tissue-equivalent female ultrasound training pelvis phantom. Relaxivity measurements indicated that C4:S solution had good T1-weighted contrast (relative to oil [fat] signal intensity) and good T2-weighted contrast (relative to water signal intensity) at both room temperature (relaxivity ratio > 1; r2/r1 = 1.43) and body temperature (relaxivity ratio > 1; r2/r1 = 1.38). These measurements were verified by the positive visualization of the C4:S (C4/saline 50:50) HDPE tube HDR brachytherapy line marker on both T1- and T2-weighted MRI sequences. Orientation did not affect the relaxivity of the C4:S contrast solution. C4:S encapsulated in HDPE tubing can be visualized as a positive line marker on both T1- and T2-weighted MRI sequences. MRI-guided HDR planning may be possible with these novel line markers for HDR MARS for several types of cancer.

Objective. Ionization chambers, mostly used for beam calibration and for reference dosimetry, can show high recombination effects in pulsed high dose rate proton beams. The aims of this paper are: first, to characterize the linearity response of newly designed asymmetrical beam monitor chambers (ABMC) in a 100-226 MeV pulsed high dose rate per pulse scanned proton beam; and secondly, to calibrate the ABMC with a PPC05 (IBA Dosimetry) plane parallel ionization chamber and compare to calibration with a home-made Faraday cup (FC).Approach. The ABMC response linearity was evaluated with both the FC and a PTW 60019 microDiamond detector. Regarding ionometry-based ABMC calibration, recombination factors were evaluated theoretically, then numerically, and finally experimentally measured in water for a plane parallel ionization chamber PPC05 (IBA Dosimetry) throughkssaturation curves. Finally, ABMC calibration was also achieved with FC and compared to the ionometry method for 7 energies.Main results. Linearity measurements showed that recombination losses in the new ABMC design were well taken into account for the whole range of the machine dose rates. The two-voltage-method was not suitable for recombination correction, but Jaffé\'s plots analysis was needed, emphasizing the current IAEA TRS-398 reference protocol limitations. Concerning ABMC calibration, FC based absorbed dose estimation and PPC05-based absorbed dose estimation differ by less than 6.3% for the investigated energies.Significance.So far, no update on reference dosimetry protocols is available to estimate the absorbed dose in ionization chambers for clinical high dose rate per pulse pulsed scanned proton beams. This work proposes a validation of the new ABMC design, a method to take into account the recombination effect for ionometry-based ABMC calibration and a comparison with FC dose estimation in this type of proton beams.

OBJECTIVE: High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are effective treatments for prostate cancer but cause genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities. There is no consensus on the timing of HDR-BT in relation to EBRT and the effect of sequencing on patients. The primary objective was to assess differences, if any, in the incidence of grade (G) 3 or higher GU toxicities from treatment. We also aimed to explore the incidence of G1 to G4 GI toxicities, quality of life (QOL), and patient satisfaction. Suppression of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and signals for survival differences were also analyzed.
METHODS: This was a single-center randomized trial in patients with intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer who received HDR-BT before (Arm A) or after (Arm B) EBRT. Toxicities were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was used to assess lower urinary tract symptoms. The International Index of Erectile Function scale (IIEF) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) were used to assess erectile dysfunction and QOL at 0, 3, 9, and 12 months.
RESULTS: Fifty patients were recruited to each arm, with 48 and 46 patients completing treatment and follow-up in each arm, 81.5% of whom had high-risk disease. There were no G3 or G4 GU or GI toxicities. G1 urinary frequency was the most common adverse event experienced in both arms, peaking in incidence 3 months after treatment commenced (45.7% and 42.2% in Arm A and B, respectively). Up to 11% of patients reported G1 urinary frequency at 12 months. Other G1 GU toxicities experienced by >10% of patients were urinary tract obstruction, tract pain, and urgency. These symptoms also peaked in incidence at 3 months. G2 GU toxicities were uncommon and experienced in a maximum of 2 patients within each arm at any time point. Over 30% of patients had G1 flatulence at baseline, and this remained the most frequently occurring G1 GI toxicity throughout the study, peaking at 12 months (21.4% and 25.6% in Arm A and B, respectively). Other GI toxicities experienced by more than 10% of patients were GI pain, proctitis, and rectal mucositis, most of which demonstrated a peak incidence at 3 or 9 months. G2 GI toxicities were uncommon except for G2 flatulence. No significant difference was found in CTCAE, IPSS, IIEF, FACT-P, and QOL scores between the arms. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) follow-up was 5 years. Seven patients had treatment failure in each arm. Disease Free Survival (DFS) was 93.3% and 90.7% at 5 years in Arm A and B, respectively, with median failure time of 60 and 48 months in Arm A and B, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between arms.
CONCLUSIONS: The sequencing of HDR-BT and EBRT did not affect the incidence of G3 or G4 toxicities, and no significant differences were seen in other patient-reported outcomes. Treatment was well tolerated with maintained QOL scores. Treatment failure was low in both arms in a high-risk cohort; however, a larger study with longer follow-up is underway to establish whether the difference in median time to failure between the 2 arms is a signal of superiority.

UNASSIGNED: Locally advanced cervical cancer is frequently treated using a combination of external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Radiotherapy often leads to vaginal morbidity, which poses a significant problem. This study aims to analyze the impact of reducing ovoid loading on dosimetry.
UNASSIGNED: We analyzed forty-five CT-based intracavitary brachytherapy plans from fifteen patients. Three plan sets were created for the 45 applications: a standard loading plan (A), a plan with reduced ovoid loading (B), and a tandem-only loading plan (C). We generated Dose-Volume Histograms and recorded dose volume parameters for the three plan sets.
UNASSIGNED: The D90 for the Clinical Target Volume (CTV) did not show significant differences among the three plan sets (p = 0.20). The average D90 values for plans A, B, and C were 8.15 Gy, 8.16 Gy, and 7.4 Gy, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in D2cc bladder (p = 0.09) (average values: 6.8 Gy, 6.5 Gy, and 5.9 Gy for plans A, B, and C, respectively) and D2cc sigmoid (p = 0.43) (average values: 2.8 Gy, 2.6 Gy, and 2.4 Gy, respectively) among the three plan sets. However, there was a statistically significant difference in D2cc rectum (p < 0.001) (average values: 4 Gy, 3.3 Gy, and 1.8 Gy, respectively), as well as in vaginal dose points (p < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: Reducing ovoid loading significantly decreased the doses to vaginal dose points and the rectum without compromising the dose to the Clinical Target Volume (CTV). Therefore, in carefully selected cases, the adoption of tandem-only loading or reduced ovoid loading could be considered to minimize vaginal morbidity following high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy.

In this study, the effect of microstructure under various dose rates of plasma immersion ion implantation on 8Cr4Mo4V steel has been investigated for crystallite size, lattice strain and dislocation density. The phase composition and structure parameters including crystallite size, dislocation density and lattice strain have been investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements and determined from Scherrer\'s equation and three different Williamson-Hall (W-H) methods. The obtained results reveal that a refined crystallite size, enlarged microstrain and increased dislocation density can be obtained for the 8Cr4Mo4V steel treated by different dose rates of ion implantation. Compared to the crystallite size (15.95 nm), microstrain (5.69 × 10-3) and dislocation density (8.48 × 1015) of the dose rate of 2.60 × 1017 ions/cm2·h, the finest grain size, the largest microstrain and the highest dislocation density of implanted samples can be achieved when the dose rate rises to 5.18 × 1017 ions/cm2·h, the effect of refining is 26.13%, and the increment of microstrain and dislocation density are 26.3% and 45.6%, respectively. Moreover, the Williamson-Hall plots are fitted linearly by taking βcosθ along the y-axis and 4sinθ or 4sinθ/Yhkl or 4sinθ(2/Yhkl)1/2 along the x-axis. In all of the W-H graphs, it can be observed that some of the implanted samples present a negative and a positive slope; a negative and a positive slope in the plot indicate the presence of compressive and tensile strain in the material.

OBJECTIVE: Brachytherapy (BT) has been used for many years for disease control in tumours of the head and neck area (H&N). It is currently performed with high dose rate (HDR) or pulsed dose rate (PDR), but its use has been reduced due to the implementation of new non-invasive external beam radiotherapy techniques such as intensity modulation (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and the improvement of surgical techniques.
METHODS: The Spanish Brachytherapy Group (GEB) has carried out a survey to find out the number of centres in Spain that continue to use BT in H&N and its indications and expectations for the future.
RESULTS: The results were presented at the XX GEB Consensus Meeting held on October 21, 2022, in Valencia (Spain) and it was confirmed that, although there are fewer and fewer centres that use BT in H&N, there are still units with extensive experience in this technique that should be positioned as referral centres.
CONCLUSIONS: It is necessary to carry out continuous work with other specialities involved, such as H&N surgeons, and other radiation oncologists, to improve the training of residents, both oncologists and medical physicists.

Assess the interfraction dose variations of the organs at risk (OARs) in carcinoma cervix high dose rate (HDR) computed tomography (CT)-guided intra cavitary brachytherapy (ICBT). 120 CT scans of 40 patients who had undergone three fractions of ICBT (7 Gy/fr) were analyzed. Dose to Point A and the minimum doses to the volumes of 2, 1, and 0.1cc of bladder, rectum and sigmoid colon were recorded. Revised plans were generated in 20 patients. Paired t-test was used to compare the difference in the means. Point \"A\" mean dose difference was statistically significant between the treated and revised plans. For bladder, the difference in means of dosage to all volumes, whilst for the rectum and sigmoid colon, the low volume dosage (0.1cc) was statistically significant. Absence of individualized planning would have resulted in underdosage of tumor and increased dosage of up to 30% to OARs. CT-guided ICBT should be implemented for each HDR fraction treatment.

暂无摘要。