herniorrhaphy

疝修补术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:腹股沟疝在世界范围内非常普遍,其手术修复是普外科最常见的手术之一。网片的广泛使用将腹股沟疝的复发率降低到可接受的水平,因此,将注意力集中在生活质量上,这是术后的关键结果。CarolinasComfort量表是经过充分研究的问卷,旨在识别使用网状技术进行疝修补后的生活质量变化。这项研究的目的是验证巴西葡萄牙语中的CCS用于腹股沟疝。
    方法:根据跨文化适应指南,原始CCS被翻译成巴西葡萄牙语。我们在18岁及以上的个体中进行了一项横断面研究,这些个体接受了至少6个月的腹股沟腹腔镜内镜疝修补术,2019年1月至2022年8月,在巴西一家三级医院。参与者回答了一项在线调查,其中包含巴西CCS和通用患者报告的结果测量(PROM)短期健康36(SF-36)。参与者在至少三周后的随访中回答了相同的问卷,还有一个关于手术结果满意度的问题。
    结果:调查由115名患者完成,其中78人(67%)在3~10周后回复了随访问卷.CCS表现出优异的内部一致性,克朗巴赫的α为0.94。在测试重测分析中,组内相关系数在0.60至0.82之间。与SF-36相比,在物理功能维度上观察到了很强的相关性,在角色-身体和身体疼痛中发现了中等相关性(皮尔逊系数相关性分别为0.502、0.338和0.332),用于结构分析。与不满意的患者相比,满意的患者的平均CCS评分显着降低(p<0.001)。
    结论:巴西版CCS是评估腹股沟腹腔镜疝修补术后长期生活质量的有效和可靠的方法。
    OBJECTIVE: Inguinal hernias are highly prevalent worldwide and its surgical repair is one of the most common procedures in general surgery. The broad use of mesh has decreased the recurrence rates of inguinal hernia to acceptable levels, thus centering the attention on Quality of Life as a pivotal postoperative outcome. Carolinas Comfort Scale is a well-studied questionnaire designed to identify Quality of Life changes following hernia repair with mesh techniques. The aim of this study is to validate the CCS in Brazilian Portuguese for inguinal hernias.
    METHODS: The original CCS was translated into Brazilian Portuguese according to cross-cultural adaptation guidelines. We conducted a cross-sectional study in individuals aged 18 and above who had undergone inguinal laparo-endoscopic hernia repair for at least 6 months prior, between January 2019 and August 2022, at a Brazilian tertiary hospital. Participants answered an online survey containing the Brazilian CCS and the generic Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) Short-Form Health 36 (SF-36). Participants answered the same questionnaires in the follow-up after at least three weeks, with an additional question about satisfaction with surgery results.
    RESULTS: The survey was completed by 115 patients, of whom 78 (67%) responded to the follow-up questionnaire after 3 to 10 weeks. CCS showed excellent internal consistency, with Cronbach\'s α of 0.94. Intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.60 to 0.82 in the test-retest analysis. Compared to SF-36, a strong correlation was observed in the physical functioning dimension, and a moderate correlation was found in role-physical and bodily pain (Pearson\'s Coefficient Correlation = 0.502, 0.338 and 0.332 respectively), for construct analysis. The mean CCS score was significantly lower (p < 0.001) among satisfied patients compared to the unsatisfied ones.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Brazilian version of CCS is a valid and reliable method to assess long-term quality of life after inguinal laparo-endoscopic hernia repair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们报告了一名32岁男子的病例,该男子在4年前由于改善了心脏功能而移除左心室辅助装置后,出现了巨大的膈疝。胸部X线检查显示胃肠道胸内脱垂。患者被诊断为膈疝,并进行了腹腔镜辅助修复。术中发现左膈疝12×8厘米,大部分胃肠道脱垂到胸腔。我们尝试使用网状物修复腹内侧缺损;然而,它被发现是不够的。因此,我们使用左腹直肌肌皮瓣填充缺损并缝合到网孔上。在难以用网状物完全闭合的情况下,肌皮瓣可能是有用的策略。
    We report the case of a 32-year-old man who developed a giant diaphragmatic hernia following the removal of a left ventricular assist device 4 years prior due to improved cardiac function. Chest radiography revealed an intrathoracic prolapse of the gastrointestinal tract. The patient was diagnosed with a diaphragmatic hernia and a laparoscopy-assisted repair was performed. A 12 × 8 cm hernia was found intraoperatively on the left diaphragm, and a large portion of the gastrointestinal tract had prolapsed into the thoracic cavity. We attempted to repair the ventromedial defect using mesh; however, it was found to be insufficient. Therefore, we used a left rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap to fill the defect and sutured it to the mesh. A myocutaneous flap could be a useful strategy in cases where complete closure with mesh is difficult.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Internal hernias, in particular, hernia of the foramen of Winslow, are rare and occur in typical sites. Laparotomy is common in these cases while laparoscopic surgery is rarely used in such urgent cases. However, modern diagnosis and treatment including computed tomography and laparoscopy allowing minimally invasive interventions are not an exception for patients with hernia of the foramen of Winslow. This approach is effective for this problem and prevents adverse outcomes of disease.
    Внутренние грыжи, одной из которых является грыжа Винслова отверстия, считаются редкими хирургическими заболеваниями, которые имеют типичные места формирования. В большинстве случаев проблему разрешают с помощью лапаротомии, в свою очередь, лапароскопическая хирургия в подобных ургентных случаях используется редко. Однако стоит учесть, что современные методы диагностики и лечения, такие как компьютерная томография и лапароскопия, дающие возможность проводить малоинвазивные вмешательства, не являются исключением и для пациентов с грыжей Винслова отверстия с целью радикального лечения и предотвращения неблагоприятных исходов заболевания.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of recommendations provided by ChatGPT regarding inguinal hernia repair.
    METHODS: ChatGPT was asked 5 questions about surgical management of inguinal hernias. The chat-bot was assigned the role of expert in herniology and requested to search only specialized medical databases and provide information about references and evidence. Herniology experts and surgeons (non-experts) rated the quality of recommendations generated by ChatGPT using 4-point scale (from 0 to 3 points). Statistical correlations were explored between participants\' ratings and their stance regarding artificial intelligence.
    RESULTS: Experts scored the quality of ChatGPT responses lower than non-experts (2 (1-2) vs. 2 (2-3), p<0.001). The chat-bot failed to provide valid references and actual evidence, as well as falsified half of references. Respondents were optimistic about the future of neural networks for clinical decision-making support. Most of them were against restricting their use in healthcare.
    CONCLUSIONS: We would not recommend non-specialized large language models as a single or primary source of information for clinical decision making or virtual searching assistant.
    UNASSIGNED: Оценить качество рекомендаций языковой модели (ЯМ) ChatGPT по лечению паховой грыжи.
    UNASSIGNED: ChatGPT было задано 5 вопросов о хирургическом лечении паховых грыж. Чат-боту отведена роль эксперта в области герниологии и предложено провести поиск только в специализированных медицинских базах данных, предоставив информацию об источниках и уровне их доказательности. Эксперты в области герниологии и общие хирурги (не эксперты) оценили качество рекомендаций, полученных с помощью ChatGPT, по 4-балльной шкале (от 0 до 3 баллов). Изучены статистические закономерности между оценками респондентов и их мнением относительно перспектив использования искусственного интеллекта.
    UNASSIGNED: Качество ответов ChatGPT экспертами оценено ниже (2 [1—2] балла), чем не экспертами (2 [2—3]), (p<0,001). Чат-бот не справился с предоставлением достоверных ссылок на источники и указанием уровня доказательности, а также сфальсифицировал половину приведенных ссылок. Респонденты с оптимизмом смотрят на будущее нейросетей как инструмента принятия клинических решений; большинство из них выступают против ограничения их использования в здравоохранении.
    UNASSIGNED: Основываясь на результатах данного исследования, в настоящее время нельзя рекомендовать применение неспециализированных ЯМ в качестве единственного или основного источника информации для принятия решения или виртуального помощника по поиску медицинской информации.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    腹股沟疝是常见的,主要由外科医生管理;然而,对于腹膜后结构来说是不寻常的,比如输尿管,突出它。更重要的是,包含输尿管的疝通常不会在术前发现,除非事先订购了特定的影像学检查,因为它们通常是无症状的。这对患者造成风险,因为未识别的结构可能在手术期间被错误地损伤。我们描述了一个60多岁的男人的案例,他出现了一个巨大的左侧间接腹股沟腹疝。术中,除了绳状结构外,还遇到了大量不可还原的腹膜后脂肪,术中复查影像学后发现是左输尿管。最初,疝气修复是用机器人完成的,但由于其不可还原性和对输尿管的潜在风险,它被转换为开放式修复。此外,我们讨论了这种疝气的病因和常见表现。
    Inguinal hernias are commonly encountered and are primarily managed by surgeons; however, it is unusual for retroperitoneal structures, such as the ureter, to herniate into it. More importantly, hernias containing ureters are not usually identified preoperatively unless specific imaging was ordered prior, as they are generally asymptomatic. This poses a risk to the patient as unidentified structures can be mistakenly injured during the surgery. We describe a case of a man in his 60s, who presented with a large left-sided indirect inguinoscrotal hernia. Intraoperatively, a large amount of irreducible retroperitoneal fat was encountered in addition to a cord-like structure, which was discovered to be the left ureter after reviewing imaging intraoperatively. Initially, the hernia repair was done robotically, but it was converted to open repair due to its irreducibility and the potential risk imposed on the ureter. Additionally, we discuss the aetiology and common presentations of this kind of hernia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:报告膀胱切除术患者行回肠导管(IC)尿流改道行造口旁疝(PSH)修补术的围手术期和术后长期结果。
    方法:我们回顾了2003年至2022年在我们中心接受膀胱切除术和IC改道的患者。基线变量,包括PSH修复的手术方法和修复技术,被捕获。进行多变量Cox回归分析以检验不同变量与PSH复发之间的关联。
    结果:纳入36例中位年龄(IQR)为79(73-82)岁的患者。膀胱切除术至PSH修复的中位时间为30(14-49)个月。大多数PSH维修(32/36,89%)是选择性进行的,而4则是由于小肠梗阻。疝修补术通过开放进行(n=25),机器人(10),和腹腔镜方法(1)。手术技术包括用网状物直接修复(20),无网格直接修复(4),带网孔的造口重新定位(5),和没有网格的气孔定位(7)。90天并发症发生率为28%。在24(7-47)个月的中位随访中,17例(47%)患者复发。中位复发时间为9(7-24)个月。在多变量分析中,PSH修复后90天的并发症与复发风险增加相关。
    结论:在这篇关于泌尿外科文献中最大的PSH修复系列之一的报告中,47%的患者在疝修补术后复发,中位随访时间为2年。比较修复技术或使用开放或微创方法时,复发率没有显着差异。
    OBJECTIVE: To report perioperative and long-term postoperative outcomes of cystectomy patients with ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion undergoing parastomal hernia (PSH) repair.
    METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent cystectomy and IC diversion between 2003 and 2022 in our center. Baseline variables, including surgical approach of PSH repair and repair technique, were captured. Multivariable Cox regressionanalysis was performed to test for the associations between different variables and PSH recurrence.
    RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with a median (IQR) age of 79 (73-82) years were included. The median time between cystectomy and PSH repair was 30 (14-49) months. Most PSH repairs (32/36, 89%) were performed electively, while 4 were due to small bowel obstruction. Hernia repairs were performed through open (n=25), robotic (10), and laparoscopic approaches (1). Surgical techniques included direct repair with mesh (20), direct repair without mesh (4), stoma relocation with mesh (5), and stomarelocation without mesh (7). The 90-day complication rate was 28%. In a median follow-up of 24 (7-47) months, 17 patients (47%) had a recurrence. The median time to recurrence was 9 (7-24) months. On multivariable analysis, 90-day complication following PSH repair was associated with an increased risk of recurrence.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this report of one of the largest series of PSH repair in the Urology literature, 47% of patients had a recurrence following hernia repair with a median follow-up time of 2 years. There was no significant difference in recurrence rates when comparing repair technique or the use of open or minimally invasive approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    造口旁疝(PSH)的治疗是疝手术的主要挑战。据报道,各种技术在并发症和复发率方面具有不同的结果。这项研究的目的是分享我们植入DynaMesh-IPST-R和-IPST的初步经验,由聚偏氟乙烯(PVDF)制成的腹膜内漏斗网。这是一项回顾性观察性队列研究,对2019年3月至2023年4月期间使用烟囱技术与腹膜内漏斗网眼IPST-R或IPST进行PSH治疗的患者进行了研究。主要结果是复发,次要结果是术中和术后并发症,后者使用Clavien-Dindo分类进行评估。共21例连续患者接受腹膜内PVDF漏斗网片治疗,17与IPST-R和4与IPST。术中无并发症。总的来说,61.9%(n=12)的患者无并发症发生.4例(19.0%)出现严重的术后并发症(定义为Clavien-Dindo≥3b)。在平均21.6(范围4.8-37.5)个月的随访期间,1例(4.8%)复发.总之,用于治疗造口旁疝,IPST-R或IPST网状物的植入已被证明是有效的,易于处理,而且非常安全.特别是,低复发率4.8%,这与当前的文献一致,是令人信服的。然而,更多的患者将提高结果的有效性.
    The treatment of parastomal hernias (PSH) represents a major challenge in hernia surgery. Various techniques have been reported with different outcomes in terms of complication and recurrence rates. The aim of this study is to share our initial experience with the implantation of the DynaMesh-IPST-R and -IPST, intraperitoneal funnel meshes made of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF). This is a retrospective observational cohort study of patients treated for PSH between March 2019 and April 2023 using the chimney technique with the intraperitoneal funnel meshes IPST-R or IPST. The primary outcome was recurrence and the secondary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications, the latter assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. A total of 21 consecutive patients were treated with intraperitoneal PVDF funnel meshes, 17 with IPST-R and 4 with IPST. There were no intraoperative complications. Overall, no complications occurred in 61.9% (n = 12) of the patients. Major postoperative complications (defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3b) were noted in four cases (19.0%). During the mean follow-up period of 21.6 (range 4.8-37.5) months, one patient (4.8%) had a recurrence. In conclusion, for the treatment of parastomal hernias, the implantation of IPST-R or IPST mesh has proven to be efficient, easy to handle, and very safe. In particular, the low recurrence rate of 4.8%, which is in line with the current literature, is convincing. However, a larger number of patients would improve the validity of the results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腹股沟疝修补术是一种经常进行的外科手术,与开腹修复相比,腹腔镜修复术因其并发症发生率低、恢复快而成为首选方法。基于网格的无张力修复是这两种方法的黄金标准。近年来,机器人疝修补术已被引入作为腹腔镜修补术的替代方案,提供的优势,如减少术后疼痛和改善人体工程学。这项研究旨在比较短期和长期结果,包括手术应激反应,术后并发症,生活质量,和性功能,机器人辅助经腹腹膜前疝修补术(rTAPP)和腹腔镜TAPP腹股沟疝修补术。
    方法:这项随机对照试验将涉及来自南丹麦大学医院外科的150名患者,随机接受rTAPP或腹腔镜TAPP。手术应激将通过测量C反应蛋白(CRP)和细胞因子水平来定量。次要结果包括并发症发生率,生活质量,性功能,和操作时间。数据分析将坚持意向治疗原则,并将在收集所有患者数据后进行,在不同的术后间隔评估结果。
    结论:本研究对评估机器人辅助手术在腹股沟疝修补术中的潜在优势具有重要意义。假设rTAPP与常规腹腔镜TAPP相比将导致较低的手术应激反应并潜在地降低术后并发症的风险。这项研究的意义可能会影响未来的手术实践和指南,专注于患者的康复和医疗费用。这项研究的结果将有助于围绕手术中机器人系统的使用进行的讨论,如果好处得到证实,可能会提倡更广泛的实施。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT05839587。2023年2月28日进行了回顾性注册。
    BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is a frequently performed surgical procedure, with laparoscopic repair emerging as the preferred approach due to its lower complication rate and faster recovery compared to open repair. Mesh-based tension-free repair is the gold standard for both methods. In recent years, robotic hernia repair has been introduced as an alternative to laparoscopic repair, offering advantages such as decreased postoperative pain and improved ergonomics. This study aims to compare the short- and long-term outcomes, including the surgical stress response, postoperative complications, quality of life, and sexual function, between robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP) and laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repairs.
    METHODS: This randomized controlled trial will involve 150 patients from the Surgical Department of the University Hospital of Southern Denmark, randomized to undergo either rTAPP or laparoscopic TAPP. Surgical stress will be quantified by measuring C-reactive protein (CRP) and cytokine levels. Secondary outcomes include complication rates, quality of life, sexual function, and operative times. Data analysis will adhere to the intention-to-treat principle and will be conducted once all patient data are collected, with outcomes assessed at various postoperative intervals.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study holds significance in evaluating the potential advantages of robotic-assisted surgery in the context of inguinal hernia repairs. It is hypothesized that rTAPP will result in a lower surgical stress response and potentially lower the risk of postoperative complications compared to conventional laparoscopic TAPP. The implications of this research could influence future surgical practices and guidelines, with a focus on patient recovery and healthcare costs. The findings of this study will contribute to the ongoing discourse surrounding the utilization of robotic systems in surgery, potentially advocating for their broader implementation if the benefits are substantiated.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05839587. Retrospectively registered on 28 February 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号