背景:可以通过视觉比较未增强计算机断层扫描(CT)上的肝和血管衰减来全面评估肝脂肪变性(HS)。我们旨在评估基于CT的视觉分级系统(VGS)的可靠性和可重复性,以全面评估HS。
方法:在这项回顾性研究中,6名具有不同临床经验的评审员使用717名潜在肝脏供体的未增强CT图像验证了基于肝脏和肝血管视觉比较的四点VGS.使用多阅读器多病例受试者工作特征(ROC)分析(参考:病理学)评估VGS的诊断性能和定量指标(肝脾衰减的差异和比率)诊断HS。使用Fleissκ统计量评估了观察者之间的协议。
结果:使用VGS,所有6名评审人员均显示诊断总脂肪变性(TS)≥30%的ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)高于0.9,大泡性脂肪变性(MaS)≥30%,MAS≥10%。VGS的AUROC和定量指标之间没有差异(p≥0.1)。审稿人表现出了实质性的同意(Fleissκ,0.61)。大多数差异发生在VGS的两个最低等级之间(81.5%;233/283),其中大多数受试者(97.0%;226/233)的MaS<10%。VGS的平均读数灵敏度和特异性分别为检测TS≥30%的0.80和0.94,以及检测MaS≥10%的0.93和0.81。
结论:VGS在评估HS方面是可靠和可重复的。它可以作为一种非侵入性和简单的工具来进行全面的HS评估。
BACKGROUND: Hepatic steatosis (HS) can be comprehensively assessed by visually comparing the hepatic and vessel attenuation on unenhanced computed tomography (CT). We aimed to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of a CT-based visual grading system (VGS) for comprehensive assessment of HS.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, a four-point VGS based on the visual comparison of liver and hepatic vessels was validated by six reviewers with diverse clinical experience using the unenhanced CT images of 717 potential liver donors. The diagnostic performance of VGS and quantitative indices (difference and ratio of the hepatic and splenic attenuation) to diagnose HS were evaluated using multi-reader multi-case receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis (reference: pathology). The interobserver agreement was assessed using Fleiss κ statistics.
RESULTS: Using the VGS, all six reviewers showed areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) higher than 0.9 for diagnosing total steatosis (TS) ≥ 30%, macrovesicular steatosis (MaS) ≥ 30%, and MaS ≥ 10%. No difference was noted between the AUROCs of the VGS and quantitative indices (p ≥ 0.1). The reviewers showed substantial agreement (Fleiss κ, 0.61). Most discrepancies occurred between the two lowest grades of VGS (81.5%; 233/283), in which most subjects (97.0%; 226/233) had a MaS < 10%. The average-reader sensitivity and specificity of the VGS were 0.80 and 0.94 to detect TS ≥ 30% and 0.93 and 0.81 to detect MaS ≥ 10%.
CONCLUSIONS: VGS was reliable and reproducible in assessing HS. It may be useful as a non-invasive and simple tool for comprehensive HS assessment.