BACKGROUND: Trofinetide is the first drug to be approved for the treatment of Rett syndrome. Hepatic impairment is not expected to affect the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of trofinetide because of predominant renal excretion. This study was conducted to help understand the potential impact of any hepatic impairment on trofinetide PK.
METHODS: This study used physiologically based PK modeling to estimate trofinetide exposure (maximum drug concentration and area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) in virtual patients with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (per Child-Pugh classification) compared with virtual healthy subjects following a 12 g oral trofinetide dose.
RESULTS: In individual deterministic simulations for matched individuals and stochastic simulations at the population level (100 virtual individuals simulated per population), as anticipated, predicted plasma exposures were similar for healthy subjects and for patients with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment. However, predicted blood concentration exposures slightly increased with increasing severity of hepatic impairment because of change in hematocrit levels.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that hepatic impairment is not expected to have a clinically relevant effect on exposure to trofinetide.
Trofinetide is the first approved treatment for Rett syndrome, a rare genetic condition that affects brain development. When a person takes trofinetide, most is removed from the body via the urine in its unchanged form (no chemical alteration). Regulatory requirements mean researchers must confirm the safety of any pharmaceutical drug and evaluate whether changes in liver function lead to harmful levels of drug exposure. Researchers used a computer model to predict how much trofinetide would be present in the blood and plasma (the liquid portion of blood) over time in virtual healthy subjects and virtual patients with varying degrees of liver disease (mild, moderate, or severe). Computer simulations showed that predicted trofinetide levels in plasma were similar in virtual healthy subjects and each virtual patient group with liver disease. Predicted levels of trofinetide in blood were slightly elevated with increasing severity of liver disease. This is because people with liver disease have fewer red blood cells, so the cell portion of blood becomes smaller relative to the liquid portion (plasma), which leads to higher trofinetide concentrations in whole blood (trofinetide minimally enters the red blood cell). The small increase in trofinetide levels in blood and the absence of any change in trofinetide levels in plasma means that people with Rett syndrome and liver disease are unlikely to be exposed to harmful levels of trofinetide after a 12 g oral dose.

Dose selection for investigations of intrinsic and extrinsic factors of pharmacokinetic variability as well as safety is a challenging question in the early clinical stage of drug development. The dose of an investigational product is chosen considering the compound information available to date, feasibility of the assessments, regulatory requirements, and the intent to maximize information for later regulatory submission. This review selected 37 programs as case examples of recently approved drugs to explore the doses selected with focus on studies of drug interaction, renal and hepatic impairment, food effect and concentration-QTc assessment.The review found that regulatory agencies may consider alternative approaches if justified and safe as illustrated in these examples. It is thus recommendable to use the first in human trial as an opportunity to assess QT-prolongation and drug interactions using probes or endogenous markers while maximizing the DDI potential, increasing sensitivity and ensuring safety. Early understanding of dose proportionality assists dose finding and simple and fast to conduct DDI study designs are advantageous. Single dose impairment studies despite non-proportional/time-dependent PK are often acceptability.Overall, the early understanding of the drug\'s safety profile is essential to ensure the safety of doses selected while preventing clinical trials with unnecessary exposure when using high doses or multiple doses. The information collected in this retrospective survey is a good reminder to tailor the early clinical program to the profile and needs of the molecule and consider regulatory opportunities to streamline the development path.

BACKGROUND: Rezafungin is a second-generation, once-weekly echinocandin antifungal approved for the treatment of invasive candidiasis, including candidemia. In phase II/III studies of rezafungin versus caspofungin, patients with severe hepatic impairment were excluded due to lack of caspofungin data in this population. This open-label, single-dose, phase I study evaluated the pharmacokinetics (primary objective) and safety of rezafungin in subjects with moderate or severe hepatic impairment versus matched, healthy subjects with normal hepatic function.
METHODS: Eight subjects each with moderate (Child-Pugh B) or severe (Child-Pugh C) hepatic impairment were matched 1:1 with healthy subjects for age, sex, and body mass index. Each subject received a single 400-mg, intravenous, 1-h infusion of rezafungin. Plasma pharmacokinetic sampling was performed at various time points through 336 h postdose. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived by non-compartmental analysis. Safety was assessed throughout.
RESULTS: All 32 subjects received study treatment and were included in all analyses. Despite overlapping distributions of total plasma concentrations, based on geometric least-squares (LS) mean ratios, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero (prior to the start of infusion) to infinity (AUC0-∞) was 32% lower in subjects with moderate (LS mean ratio, 67.55; 90% confidence interval [CI]: 53.91, 84.65) and severe (LS mean ratio, 67.84; 90% CI: 57.49, 80.05) hepatic impairment versus matched healthy subjects. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was 12% lower in moderate hepatic impairment and 28% lower in severe hepatic impairment groups. Linear regression showed no significant trend in the degree of hepatic impairment (based on Child-Pugh score) on AUC0-∞ or Cmax (p > 0.05). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in seven subjects (21.9%; three subjects in each of the hepatic impairment groups, and one healthy subject), none of which were severe, serious, or resulted in withdrawal.
CONCLUSIONS: Rezafungin is well tolerated and can be administered to patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment without the need for dose adjustment. The modest reduction in exposures in subjects with hepatic impairment is not clinically meaningful and is unlikely to impact efficacy.

Dersimelagon is an orally administered selective melanocortin-1 receptor agonist being investigated for treatment of erythropoietic protoporphyria, X-linked protoporphyria, and diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis. Dersimelagon is extensively metabolized in the liver, and potential recipients may have liver dysfunction. Further, effects of renal impairment on pharmacokinetic properties should be established in drugs intended for chronic use. Two separate studies (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04116476; NCT04656795) evaluated the effects of hepatic and renal impairment on dersimelagon pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability. Participants with mild (n = 7) or moderate (n = 8) hepatic impairment or normal hepatic function (n = 8) received a single oral 100-mg dersimelagon dose. Participants with mild (n = 8), moderate (n = 8), or severe (n = 8) renal impairment or normal renal function (n = 8) received a single 300-mg dose. Systemic exposure to dersimelagon was comparable with mild hepatic impairment but higher with moderate hepatic impairment (maximum observed plasma concentration, 1.56-fold higher; area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity, 1.70-fold higher) compared with normal hepatic function. Maximum observed plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were similar with moderate renal impairment but higher with mild (1.86- and 1.87-fold higher, respectively) and severe (1.17- and 1.45-fold higher, respectively) renal impairment versus normal renal function. Dersimelagon was generally well tolerated.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetic changes of linezolid in patients with hepatic impairment and to explore a method to predict linezolid exposure.
METHODS: Patients with hepatic impairment who received linezolid were recruited. A population pharmacokinetic model (PPK) was then built using NONMEM software. And based on the final model, virtual patients with rich concentration values was constructed through Monte Carlo simulations (MCS), which were used to build machine learning (ML) models to predict linezolid exposure levels. Finally, we investigated the risk factors for thrombocytopenia in patients included.
RESULTS: A PPK model with population typical values of 3.83 L/h and 34.1 L for clearance and volume of distribution was established, and the severe hepatic impairment was identified as a significant covariate of clearance. Then, we built a series of ML models to predict the area under 0 -24 h concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) of linezolid based on virtual patients from MCS. The results showed that the Xgboost models showed the best predictive performance and were superior to the methods for estimating linezolid AUC0-24 based on though concentration or daily dose. Finally, we found that baseline platelet count, linezolid AUC0-24, and combination with fluoroquinolones were independent risk factors for thrombocytopenia, and based on this, we proposed a method for calculating the toxicity threshold of linezolid.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we successfully constructed a PPK model for patients with hepatic impairment and used ML algorithm to estimate linezolid AUC0-24 based on limited data. Finally, we provided a method to determine the toxicity threshold of linezolid.

Pralsetinib is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of metastatic rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Pralsetinib is primarily eliminated by the liver and hence hepatic impairment (HI) is likely alter its pharmacokinetics (PK). Mild HI has been shown to have minimal impact on the PK of pralsetinib. This hepatic impairment study aimed to determine the pralsetinib PK, safety and tolerability in subjects with moderate and severe HI, as defined by the Child-Pugh and National Cancer Institute Organ Dysfunction Working Group (NCI-ODWG) classification systems, in comparison to subjects with normal hepatic function. Based on the Child-Pugh classification, subjects with moderate and severe HI had similar systemic exposure (area under the plasma concentration time curve from time 0 to infinity [AUC0-∞]) to pralsetinib, with AUC0-∞ geometric mean ratios (GMR) of 1.12 and 0.858, respectively, compared to subjects with normal hepatic function. Results based on the NCI-ODWG classification criteria were comparable; the AUC0-∞ GMR were 1.22 and 0.858, respectively, for subjects with moderate and severe HI per NCI-ODWG versus those with normal hepatic function. These results suggested that moderate and severe hepatic impairment did not have a meaningful impact on the exposure to pralsetinib, thus not warranting a dose adjustment in this population.

Trilaciclib is a first-in-class, intravenous cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor approved for reducing the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in adult patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving a platinum/etoposide-containing or topotecan-containing regimen. No dose adjustment is recommended for participants with mild hepatic impairment (HI) based on previous population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. This open-label, parallel-group study examined the impact of moderate and severe HI on the PK of trilaciclib. The study employed a reduced study design. Participants with moderate (Child-Pugh B, n = 8) and severe (Child-Pugh C, n = 5) HI and matched healthy controls (n = 11) received a single intravenous dose of trilaciclib 100 mg/m2. The unbound fraction of trilaciclib was comparable between the HI groups and the matched healthy control group. The unbound trilaciclib extent of exposure (i.e., area under the concentration-time curve) in participants with moderate and severe HI was ∼40% and ∼60% higher, respectively, compared with healthy matched controls based on Child-Pugh classification. Ad hoc analysis using National Cancer Institute classification showed similar results. The US Food and Drug Administration-approved trilaciclib dose of 240 mg/m2 should be reduced by ∼30%, to 170 mg/m2, for patients with moderate or severe HI.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequently encountered across various specialties. The management of VTE has become more nuanced, requiring consideration of several factors when deciding on the choice and duration of anticoagulation. This evidence-based review article summarises the current practice and evidence behind anticoagulation in VTE, incorporating national and international guidelines. Factors influencing decision-making around the choice and duration of anticoagulation, along with special circumstances such as cancer and antiphospholipid syndrome, are discussed. The clinical utility of thrombophilia screening is also addressed.

Fenfluramine (Fintepla®) is approved for the treatment of seizures associated with the rare epileptic encephalopathies Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Fenfluramine is extensively metabolized; thus, patients with hepatic impairment (HI) might experience changes in exposure to fenfluramine or its metabolites. In this phase 1 study, we investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of a single oral dose of 0.35 mg/kg fenfluramine in subjects with mild (n = 8), moderate (n = 8), or severe (n = 7) HI (Child-Pugh A/B/C, respectively) and healthy control subjects (n = 22) matched for sex, age, and BMI. All subjects underwent serial sampling to determine total plasma concentrations of fenfluramine and its active metabolite, norfenfluramine. Hepatic impairment was associated with increases in fenfluramine exposures, mainly area-under-the-curve (AUC). Geometric least squares mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for fenfluramine AUC0-∞ in mild, moderate, and severe HI versus healthy controls were 1.98 (1.36-2.90), 2.13 (1.43-3.17), and 2.77 (1.82-4.24), respectively. Changes in exposure to norfenfluramine in mild, moderate, and severe HI were minimal compared with normal hepatic function. Exposures to fenfluramine and norfenfluramine in all HI groups were within the ranges that have been characterized in the overall development program, including ranges examined in exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety in patients, and determined to have an acceptable safety profile. Mild and moderate HI had a modest effect on fenfluramine exposure that was not clinically meaningful, whereas the higher fenfluramine exposure in severe HI may require dose reduction based on general caution in this population. The modest decrease in norfenfluramine exposure is not considered clinically relevant.

Firsocostat is an oral, liver-targeted inhibitor of acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase in development for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis. Hepatic organic anion transporting polypeptides play a significant role in the disposition of firsocostat with minimal contributions from uridine diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase and cytochrome P450 3A enzymes. This phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of firsocostat in participants with mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment. Participants with stable mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A, B, or C, respectively [n = 10 per cohort]) and healthy matched controls with normal hepatic function (n = 10 per cohort) received a single oral dose of firsocostat (20 mg for mild and moderate hepatic impairment; 5 mg for severe hepatic impairment) with intensive pharmacokinetic sampling over 96 h. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Firsocostat plasma exposure (AUCinf) was 83%, 8.7-fold, and 30-fold higher in participants with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment, respectively, relative to matched controls. Firsocostat was generally well tolerated, and all reported adverse events were mild in nature. Dose adjustment is not necessary for the administration of firsocostat in patients with mild hepatic impairment. However, based on the observed increases in firsocostat exposure, dose adjustment should be considered for patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment, and additional safety and efficacy data from future clinical trials will further inform dose adjustment.