hedgehog pathway inhibitor

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    基底细胞癌(BCC)采用局部手术或非侵入性治疗方式进行治疗。如果BCC未得到治疗,它可以发展成局部晚期BCC或转移性BCC。
    在这里,我们详细报告了使用vismodegib治疗失败后三种复杂的高级BCC(aBCC)的管理。在所有肿瘤上,在个性化癌症治疗中心-02(CPCT-02)研究中进行了下一代DNA测序;随后,患者被纳入药物重新发现方案(DRUP)试验,其中基于分子肿瘤谱,使用市售靶向抗癌药物开始治疗。所有患者在用二线PD-1抑制剂治疗后表现出部分反应或疾病稳定,平均反应持续时间为12.3个月。
    免疫治疗可以成为抗hedgehog途径抑制剂治疗的aBCC的治疗选择。然而,尽管aBCC的肿瘤突变负担很高,免疫疗法并不总是导致长时间的反应。通过平行或交替循环再激发或组合治疗hedgehog抑制剂和PD-1抑制剂可能是延长治疗反应的策略。
    UNASSIGNED: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is treated with local surgery or noninvasive treatment modalities. If a BCC remains untreated, it can develop into a locally advanced BCC or a metastatic BCC.
    UNASSIGNED: Here we report in detail the management of three complex advanced BCC (aBCC) after treatment failure with vismodegib. On all tumors, next generation DNA sequencing in the Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment-02 (CPCT-02) study was performed; subsequently, patients were included in the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP) trial, in which treatment was started with commercially available targeted anticancer drugs based on the molecular tumor profile. All patients showed partial response or stable disease following treatment with second line PD-1 inhibitors with an average duration of response of 12.3 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Immunotherapy can be a treatment option for aBCC resistant to hedgehog pathway inhibitor treatment. However, despite the high tumor mutational burden of aBCCs, immunotherapy does not always lead to a long response. Rechallenge or combining treatment of hedgehog inhibitors and PD-1 inhibitors by parallel or alternating cycles may be a strategy to lengthen the treatment response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    用Hedgehog抑制剂治疗Gorlin-Goltz综合征(GGS)可产生良好的客观临床反应,然而,继发性耐药性和类别相关毒性限制了治疗持续时间.本研究旨在回顾GGS患者接受vismodegib治疗的当前数据,专注于治疗持续时间,临床结果和时间表修改。对PubMed数据库进行了系统搜索,以查找1993年至2023年的英文文章,确定了31篇适合纳入的论文。共351名患者,平均年龄为52岁,进行了分析。中断治疗的患者平均治疗时间为9.3个月,对于在本研究发表时继续使用vismodegib的人,则为25.1个月。Vismodegib的完全缓解率为44%。治疗中断主要是由于副作用(69.1%)和继发耐药性(9.1%)。使用替代方案,虽然不影响疗效,可以提高治疗依从性。需要进一步研究以确定GGS患者的最佳治疗方案和时间表。时间表的修改为改善副作用和促进长期治疗提供了希望。
    Treatment with Hedgehog Inhibitors in Gorlin-Goltz syndrome (GGS) yields favourable objective clinical responses, yet secondary resistance and class-related toxicity restrict treatment duration. This study aims to review current data on GGS patients undergoing vismodegib therapy, focusing on treatment duration, clinical outcomes and schedule modifications. A systematic search of the PubMed database was conducted for English articles from 1993 to 2023, identifying 31 papers suitable for inclusion. A total of 351 patients, with a mean age of 52 years, were analysed. The average treatment duration was 9.3 months for patients who discontinued treatment, and 25.1 months for those who continued vismodegib at the time this study was published. Vismodegib achieved a complete response rate of 44%. Treatment interruption predominantly occurred due to side effects (69.1%) and secondary resistance (9.1%). The use of alternative regimens, although not compromising efficacy, may enhance treatment compliance. Further investigations are warranted to ascertain the optimal treatment regimen and timeline for GGS patients. Schedule modifications offer promise in ameliorating side effects and facilitating long-term treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    眼周基底细胞癌(BCC)的治疗由于其靠近眼球而具有挑战性。Vismodegib,一种Hedgehog通路抑制剂,已成为局部晚期和转移性BCC的治疗选择。批判性地评估相关证据,我们对观察性和实验性研究进行了系统评价,评估了维莫德吉治疗眼周BCC的疗效和安全性.37项审判,包括435名患者,有资格。没有检索到随机试验。完全和总体临床反应率为20-88%和68-100%,分别。以14%的最大比率观察到疾病进展。复发率在0%和31%之间变化。最常见的副作用是肌肉痉挛,熟食症,体重减轻和脱发。使用vismodegib治疗可改善与健康相关的生活质量。总之,vismodegib代表了晚期眼周BCC的重要新治疗方法,具有良好的反应率和可接受的耐受性。然而,其全部潜力需要通过随机对照试验予以澄清.
    The management of periocular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is challenging due to its proximity to the eyeball. Vismodegib, a Hedgehog pathway inhibitor, has emerged as a therapeutic option for locally advanced and metastatic BCC. To critically appraise the relevant evidence, we conducted a systematic review of observational and experimental studies assessing the efficacy and safety of vismodegib for periocular BCC. Thirty-seven trials, including 435 patients, were eligible. No randomized trials were retrieved. Complete and overall clinical response rates were 20-88 % and 68-100 %, respectively. Disease progression was observed at a maximum rate of 14 %. Recurrence rates varied between 0 % and 31 %. The most common side effects were muscle cramps, dysgeusia, weight loss and alopecia. Treatment with vismodegib improved health-related quality of life. In conclusion, vismodegib represents an important novel treatment for advanced periocular BCC, with good response rates and acceptable tolerability profile. Nevertheless, its full potential needs clarification through randomized controlled trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    晚期基底细胞癌(BCC)的管理可能具有挑战性,并且通常涉及皮肤科医生的多学科方法,整形外科医生,和肿瘤学家。晚期BCC的标准疗法历来涉及及时切除和放疗;然而,近年来,利用Hedgehog途径抑制剂作为新辅助治疗的管理策略已经越来越流行。虽然关于管理建议的争议仍然存在,我们介绍了一例晚期BCC,在免疫功能低下的患者中,使用新辅助vismodegib导致了良好的结果,令人惊讶的是,完成肿瘤的病理清除。
    The management of advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) can be challenging and often involves a multi-disciplinary approach with dermatologists, plastic surgeons, and oncologists. Standard therapy for advanced BCCs has historically involved prompt excision and radiation; however, in recent years, management strategies utilizing hedgehog pathway inhibitors as neoadjuvant therapy have gained popularity. While controversy regarding management recommendations still exists, we present a case of advanced BCC with cranial involvement in an immunocompromised patient where the use of neoadjuvant vismodegib led to a favorable outcome and, surprisingly, complete the pathologic clearance of the tumor.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Vismodegib适用于治疗晚期或转移性基底细胞癌(BCC)。迄今为止,对vismodegib反应的预测因素描述不佳。
    主要目的是确定对vismodegib有反应的患者的概况和反应持续时间。次要目标是评估治疗持续时间与复发风险之间是否存在相关性。并定义与复发相关的因素。
    我们纳入了61例局部晚期BCC(laBCC)或多发性BCC患者,用vismodegib治疗(每天150毫克),2011年7月至2015年11月,在法国南特大学医院肿瘤科。使用实体瘤版本1.1中的反应评估标准评估肿瘤反应。
    39例患者患有晚期BCC(64%),22例患者患有多发性BCC(36%)。包括10例Gorlin综合征患者。无因子预测对vismodegib的反应。总人口的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为69.5个月。在多变量分析中,多发性BCC是与复发风险增加相关的唯一因素(HR:13.80[CI95%,1.93-98.64,p<0.01])。治疗持续时间降低了复发的风险(HR0.95[CI95%,0.90-0.99,p=0.0467])。在随访期间复发的20例患者中,15人(75%)用vismodegib重新治疗,反应率为66%。
    虽然我们无法确定对vismodegib反应的预测因素,我们首次证明治疗持续时间延长与复发风险降低相关.
    Vismodegib is indicated for the treatment of advanced or metastatic basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The predictive factors of response to vismodegib have so far been poorly described.
    The primary objective was to determine the profile of patients responding to vismodegib and the duration of response. Secondary objectives were to assess whether there is a correlation between the duration of treatment and the risk of relapse, and to define factors associated with relapse.
    We included 61 patients with locally advanced BCC (laBCC) or multiple BCC, treated with vismodegib (150 mg per day), from July 2011 to November 2015, in the Oncodermatology Department of Nantes University Hospital in France. Tumour response was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1.
    Thirty-nine patients had advanced BCC (64%) and 22 patients multiple BCC (36%), including 10 patients with Gorlin syndrome. No factor predicted response to vismodegib. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 69.5 months for the total population. In multivariate analysis, multiple BCC was the only factor associated with an increased risk of relapse (HR: 13.80 [CI95%, 1.93-98.64, p < 0.01]). Treatment duration decreased the risk of relapse (HR 0.95 [CI95%, 0.90-0.99, p = 0.0467]). Among the 20 patients who experienced relapse during follow-up, 15 (75%) were re-treated with vismodegib, with a response rate of 66%.
    Although we were unable to establish predictive factors for the response to vismodegib, we demonstrate for the first time that increased treatment duration correlates with a decreased risk of relapse.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,基底细胞癌(BCC)已经发展成为全球负担,发病率逐年上升,尤其是老年人口。即使这种情况主要是局部的,该疾病的性质是破坏性的,可以发展为局部晚期BCC(laBCC),甚至很少发展为转移性BCC(mBCC)。这些病例有完善的常规治疗方案,包括手术和放疗。然而,并非所有病例都适合常规治疗。最近,生物治疗已经获得了大量的关注和研究。这导致了涉及Hedgehog途径抑制剂(HPI)的靶向治疗的发展,laBCC和mBCC的关键发病机制。目前有两个批准的HPI,vismodegib和sonidegib治疗不能手术的laBCC和mBCC。本文旨在探讨BCC发展背后的Hedgehog途径的病理生理学。以及目前HPIs的疗效和药代动力学特性的更新,导致laBCC或mBCC的理想治疗,作为单一疗法或与其他常规疗法组合。
    As one of the most common malignancies, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has evolved as a global burden with incidence annually rising, especially in the older population. Even though the condition is mostly localized, the nature of the disease is destructive and can evolve as either locally advanced BCC (laBCC) or even more rarely as metastatic BCC (mBCC). There are well-established conventional treatment options for these cases, including surgeries and radiotherapy. However, not all cases are eligible for conventional treatments. Recently, biologic treatment has gained a lot of attention and research. This has led to the development of targeted treatment involving the hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HPI), a key pathogenesis in laBCC and mBCC. There are currently two approved HPIs, vismodegib and sonidegib to treat inoperable laBCC and mBCC. This review seeks to explore the pathophysiology of hedgehog pathway behind the development of BCC, and the current update of the efficacy as well as pharmacokinetics properties of HPIs that led to the ideal treatment for laBCC or mBCC, either as monotherapy or in combination with other conventional therapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    作为最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,基底细胞癌(BCC)已经发展成为全球负担,发病率逐年上升,尤其是老年人口。即使这种情况主要是局部的,该疾病的性质是破坏性的,可以发展为局部晚期BCC(laBCC),甚至很少发展为转移性BCC(mBCC)。这些病例有完善的常规治疗方案,包括手术和放疗。然而,并非所有病例都适合常规治疗。最近,生物治疗已经获得了大量的关注和研究。这导致了涉及Hedgehog途径抑制剂(HPI)的靶向治疗的发展,laBCC和mBCC的关键发病机制。目前有两个批准的HPI,vismodegib和sonidegib治疗不能手术的laBCC和mBCC。本文旨在探讨BCC发展背后的Hedgehog途径的病理生理学。以及目前HPIs的疗效和药代动力学特性的更新,导致laBCC或mBCC的理想治疗,作为单一疗法或与其他常规疗法组合。
    As one of the most common malignancies, basal cell carcinoma (BCC) has evolved as a global burden with incidence annually rising, especially in the older population. Even though the condition is mostly localized, the nature of the disease is destructive and can evolve as either locally advanced BCC (laBCC) or even more rarely as metastatic BCC (mBCC). There are well-established conventional treatment options for these cases, including surgeries and radiotherapy. However, not all cases are eligible for conventional treatments. Recently, biologic treatment has gained a lot of attention and research. This has led to the development of targeted treatment involving the hedgehog pathway inhibitor (HPI), a key pathogenesis in laBCC and mBCC. There are currently two approved HPIs, vismodegib and sonidegib to treat inoperable laBCC and mBCC. This review seeks to explore the pathophysiology of hedgehog pathway behind the development of BCC, and the current update of the efficacy as well as pharmacokinetics properties of HPIs that led to the ideal treatment for laBCC or mBCC, either as monotherapy or in combination with other conventional therapies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号