hearing loss, sudden

听力损失,
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在建立基于深度学习的特发性突发性感音神经性耳聋(SSNHL)预后预测模型。回顾性分析2015年1月至2023年5月1108例SSNHL患者的数据。患者接受标准化治疗方案,包括大剂量类固醇治疗,三个月后使用Siegel标准和美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(AAO-HNS)分类评估听力结果。为了预测患者康复,实施了两层分类过程。最初,一组22个多层感知器(MLP)网络被用于对患者进行分类.该初始分类的结果随后被传递到第二层元分类器以用于最终预后确定。该方法的有效性是通过以10个不同的分裂执行的K-fold交叉验证程序来确定的。完全恢复的预测模型,根据西格尔的标准,准确度为0.892,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.922。对于A类预测,根据AAO-HNS分类,模型的准确度为0.847,AUC为0.918.这些结果表明,该模型可能通过预测SSNHL患者的听力恢复来为建立量身定制的患者管理策略做出贡献。
    This study aimed to establish a deep learning-based predictive model for the prognosis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). Data from 1108 patients with SSNHL between January 2015 and May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients underwent standardized treatment protocols including high-dose steroid therapy and hearing outcomes were assessed after three months using Siegel\'s criteria and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) classification. For predicting patient recovery, a two-layered classification process was implemented. Initially, a set of 22 Multilayer Perceptrons (MLP) networks was employed to categorize the patients. The outcomes from this initial categorization were subsequently relayed to a second-layer meta-classifier for final prognosis determination. The validity of this methodology was ascertained through a K-fold cross-validation procedure executed with 10 distinct splits. The prediction model for complete recovery, based on Siegel\'s criteria, demonstrated an accuracy of 0.892 and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.922. For the class A prediction, according to AAO-HNS classification, the model showed an accuracy of 0.847 and AUC of 0.918. These results suggest that the model may have the potential to contribute to the establishment of tailored patient management strategies by predicting hearing recovery in patients with SSNHL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics, curative effect related factors and follow-up situation of bilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss (BSSHL). Methods: The clinical data of 169 patients(338 ears) with BSSHL were retrospectively summarized, and the demographic characteristics, predisposing factors, concomitant symptoms and diseases, and audiological characteristics were statistically described. Additionally, influencing factors of curative effect and prognosis were statistically analyzed. Results: Among the 169 patients, 50.9% (86/169) of patients had at least one incentive, with cold and fatigue being the most common incentives(both 23/169). There were high rates of accompanying symptoms including tinnitus (150/169, 88.8%) and dizziness (100/169, 59.2%). Hypertension(49/169, 29.0%)and diabetes(23/169, 13.6%)were the most common concomitant diseases observed. Most cases exhibited all frequencies involvement, with flat type and total deafness type accounting for 83.1%(281/338 ears). The most common degree of hearing loss was total deafness(86/338 ears), with approximately 60.1%(203/338 ears) of the cases being severe or worse. The total effective rate of treatment was only 29.0%, but it increased to 39.5% for patients with course of disease≤14 days, however, when course of disease>30 days, the effective rate decreased sharply to 3.6%, showing a significant difference between these two groups(χ2=13.776,<0.01). Different types of hearing curves showed statistically significant difference in efficiency(χ2=14.782, P<0.01). Comparing the hearing improvements of 28 BSSHL patients from admission to discharge and from discharge to follow-up, it was found that the hearing improvement of the two groups showed statistically significant difference at the frequencies of L-250 Hz, L-500 Hz, R-125 Hz, R-250 Hz and R-500 Hz(Z value was -2.495, -3.083, -3.970, -3.388 and -3.264 respectively, all P<0.05). The proportion of patients with elevated serum IgE was much higher than that of the normal population. Conclusion: BSSHL patients suffer from serious hearing loss, and many also experience tinnitus and vertigo symptoms. Due to the poor efficiency of treatment, it is better for patients to be treated within 30 days of onset. For patients of hearing loss in the low frequency range, hearing improvement is more significant during hospitalization. And the occurrence of BSSHL may involve an immune mechanism.
    目的: 分析双侧突发性聋(bilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss,BSSHL)患者的临床特征及疗效。 方法: 回顾性总结解放军总医院第一医学中心169例(338耳)BSSHL患者临床资料,对其人口学特征、发病诱因、伴随症状及伴发疾病、听力学特征、实验室检查结果进行统计描述,并对其疗效及影响因素、预后情况进行统计分析。 结果: 50.9%(86/169)患者至少存在一种诱因,其中上呼吸道感染(23/169)、劳累(23/169)最为多见;伴随症状中耳鸣(150/169,88.8%)、眩晕(100/169,59.2%)较高,伴发疾病中高血压(49/169,29.0%)、糖尿病(23/169,13.6%)较为常见。听力损失类型多为全频受累,平坦型和全聋型占83.1%(281/338耳);听力损失程度以全聋型最多见(86/338耳),重度及以上占60.1%(203/338耳)。治疗总有效率仅29.0%,病程≤14 d、14 d<病程≤30 d患者有效率分别为39.5%和25.5%,病程>30 d者有效率为3.6%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=13.776,P<0.01);不同类型的听力曲线治疗有效率差异有统计学意义(χ2=14.782,P<0.01);比较28例BSSHL患者入院至出院和出院至随访的听力提高值,发现左-250 Hz、左-500 Hz、右-125 Hz、右-250 Hz、右-500 Hz处,两组听力提高值差异有统计学上意义(Z值分别为-2.495、-3.083、-3.970、-3.388、-3.264,P值均<0.05)。患者血清IgE升高比例远高于健康人群。 结论: BSSHL患者听力损失严重,更多患者伴耳鸣、眩晕,疗效欠佳,发病30 d内就诊疗效优于30 d后就诊;对低频范围内听力损失,住院治疗听力提高更显著;且BSSHL的发生可能存在免疫机制。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:军事人员的听力损失是一个众所周知的挑战,报告为第二常见的VA服务相关残疾。虽然大多数听力损失是逐渐发生的,一个子集突然发生,显著影响生活质量和军事准备,被认为是医疗紧急情况.这项研究旨在评估军事系统内不同亚群之间突发性听力损失的发生率,以更好地识别高危人群。
    方法:本研究是一项基于人群的回顾性研究,回顾了2016年1月1日至2021年12月31日在美国国防部现役军人中所有被诊断为突发性听力损失的病例。对多个亚群进行统计分析。
    结果:在研究期间,现役服务人员诊断出2,650例突发性听力损失,平均每年每10万人中32.9例,相比之下,平民人口中每年每10万人报告5至27例。高级官员表现出突发性听力损失的比率显着增加,每年每10万人中有103.9例,可能是年龄增长的结果,空军人员也是如此,每年每10万人有45.1例。基于军事职业专业的发病率没有差异,尽管与驻扎在美国境内的人员相比,位于海外的服务人员的发病率有所下降。在冠状病毒-19大流行之前的几年(2016-2019年)与大流行开始后的几年(2020-2021年)相比,没有显着差异。
    结论:突发性听力损失在军事人员中似乎比在平民人群中更常见。高级官员发病率的增加可能是由于年龄的增加,尽管有必要对所报告的入伍军人和军官之间的听力损失发生率之间的差异进行进一步评估。虽然军事职业专业在发病率上没有显着差异,由于迄今为止未知的原因,空军中的那些人表现出突发性听力损失的发生率增加。尽管确定了其他潜在的危险人群,集中精力更好地了解导致高级军官和空军人员发病率升高的因素,将有助于更好地减轻突发性听力损失的发病率和影响。
    BACKGROUND: Hearing loss among military personnel is a well-known challenge, reported as the second most common VA service-connected disability. Although most hearing loss occurs gradually, a subset occurs suddenly and significantly impacts quality of life and military readiness and is considered as a medical emergency. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of sudden hearing loss among different subpopulations within the military system to better identify at-risk groups.
    METHODS: This study was a retrospective population-based study reviewing all cases of diagnosed sudden hearing loss between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021 within active duty service members in the U.S. DoD. Statistical analysis of multiple subpopulations was performed.
    RESULTS: There were 2,650 cases of sudden hearing loss diagnosed in active duty service members during the study period, with an average incidence of 32.9 cases per 100,000 people per year, compared with 5 to 27 cases per 100,000 people per year reported in civilian populations. Senior officers demonstrated significantly increased rates of sudden hearing loss with 103.9 cases per 100,000 people per year, likely as a result of increased age, as did Air Force personnel with 45.1 cases per 100,000 people per year. There was no difference in incidence based on military occupational specialty, though service members located overseas were noted to have decreased incidence compared with those stationed within the USA. There was no significant difference during the years before coronavirus-19 pandemic (2016-2019) compared to the years following the start of the pandemic (2020-2021).
    CONCLUSIONS: Sudden hearing loss appears to occur more frequently in military personnel than in the civilian population. The increased incidence in senior officers is likely driven by increased age, though further evaluation into the discrepancies between reported incidence of hearing loss among enlisted service members and officers is warranted. Although military occupational specialty did not demonstrate any significant difference in incidence, for thus far unknown reasons those in the Air Force demonstrated increased rates of sudden hearing loss. Although other potentially at-risk groups were identified, focused efforts to better understand contributing factors to elevated incidence in senior officers and Air Force personnel will help to better mitigate the incidence and effects of sudden hearing loss.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据报道,突发性感觉神经性耳聋(SSNHL)与糖尿病密切相关,高血压,和高脂血症。虽然代谢综合征(MetS)是一种多因素疾病,包括糖尿病,高血压,血脂异常,肥胖,已知与SSNHL有关。众所周知,天气条件会影响SSNHL。这项研究旨在明确MetS之间的联系,或天气状况,以及SSNHL的严重程度和预后。127例SSNHL患者被分为MetS组和非MetS组,并对两组的人口统计学和临床特征进行了回顾性分析。MetS组中有52例(40.9%)患者,而非MetS组中有75例(59.1%)患者。眩晕的发生率,高血压,糖尿病,降低高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)水平,高甘油三酯(TG),体重指数(BMI)≥25(kg/m2)在MetS组明显高于非MetS组。眩晕,高血压,大都会队与听力损失的严重程度有关.MetS组的完全恢复率和部分恢复率明显低于非MetS组。根据多变量分析,MetS与SSNHL的预后较差显着相关;发作时高环境温度差异和高血压与不良预后相关。这些结果表明,SSNHL的严重程度和预后可能受到MetS的影响。发病时高环境温度差异和高血压是SSNHL预后不良的指标。
    It is reported that sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is closely related to diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. While the metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a multifactorial disease that includes diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and obesity, which are known to be associated with SSNHL. Weather conditions have long been known to affect the SSNHL. This study aimed to make a clear connection between MetS, or weather conditions, and the severity and prognosis of SSNHL. 127 SSNHL patients have been divided into the MetS group and the non-MetS group, and the demographic and clinical characteristics of the 2 groups have been analyzed retrospectively. There were 52 (40.9%) patients in the MetS group, while there were 75 (59.1%) patients in the non-MetS group. The rate of vertigo, hypertension, diabetes, lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, high triglyceride (TG), and body mass index (BMI) ≥25 (kg/m2 ) were significantly higher in the MetS group than those in non-MetS group. Vertigo, hypertension, and Mets were linked to the severity of hearing loss. The rate of complete recovery and partial recovery in the MetS group was clearly lower than that in non-MetS group. According to the multivariate analysis, MetS was significantly associated with a poorer prognosis of SSNHL; a high ambient temperature difference at onset and hypertension were correlated with a poor prognosis. These results demonstrate that the severity and prognosis of SSNHL can be influenced by the MetS. High ambient temperature differences at onset and hypertension were indicators of a poor prognosis for SSNHL.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    Objective: To explore the incidence of sudden deafness accompanied with tinnitus, the selection of examination protocols and treatment, and to provide reference for the establishment of new guidelines for sudden deafness. Methods: CiteSpace software was used for analysis and data mining to analyze and summarize the computer-retrieved articles on diagnostic examination and treatment of sudden deafness accompanied with tinnitus collected from CNIC, Wanfang and Web of Science databases from 2011 to 2021. Results: A total of 207 randomized controlled studies were retrieved in this study, including 121 in Chinese and 86 in English. Finally, 74 Chinese literatures and 16 English literatures were included. Among the 74 valid Chinese literatures, 64 (86.5%) were accompanied with tinnitus, 58 (78.4%) with dizziness/vertigo, 25 (33.8%) with aural fullness, 10 (13.5%) with headache, 4 (5.4%) with insomnia, 4 (5.4%) with a mixture of dizziness and tinnitus, and 2 (2.7%) with vomiting. Among the 16 English literatures, 15 (93.8%) were accompanied with tinnitus, 12 (75.0%) with vertigo, 1 (6.3%) with aural fullness, and 1 (6.3%) with a mixture of various symptoms. Among the 64 Chinese articles mentioning tinnitus, only 9 mentioned tinnitus matching tests, and 1 mentioned that the treatment for tinnitus accompanying symptoms was sound therapy and psychological counseling. The incidence rates of tinnitus accompanying four different types of sudden deafness, from low to high, are as follows: low-to-mid frequency, 82.4%; mid-to-high frequency, 90.7%; complete deafness, 92.4%; and flat type, 92.8%. Conclusion: Tinnitus is the most common accompanying symptom of sudden deafness, and tinnitus matching test is an effective evaluation method. When establishing a scientific, comprehensive, and systematic diagnosis and treatment system or guidelines for sudden deafness, attention should be paid to the diagnosis and treatment of tinnitus symptoms and their adverse psychological reactions, in order to reduce the incidence of tinnitus patients in the later stage of recovery from sudden deafness.
    目的: 探讨突发性聋(突聋)伴耳鸣的发生率、检查方案选择及治疗,为临床建立完善的突聋新指南提供参考。 方法: 运用CiteSpace软件分析及数据挖掘,对计算机检索出的2011—2021年中国知网、万方以及Web of Science数据库收录的有关突聋伴耳鸣相关辅助检查和治疗的文章进行分析总结。 结果: 本研究共检索随机对照研究207篇,其中中文121篇,英文86篇;最终纳入中文文献74篇,英文文献16篇。74篇中文文献中,伴随症状为耳鸣的64篇(86.5%),头晕/眩晕58篇(78.4%),耳闷25篇(33.8%),头痛10篇(13.5%),失眠4篇(5.4%),头晕耳鸣混杂4篇(5.4%),呕吐2篇(2.7%);16篇英文文献中伴随症状为耳鸣的15篇(93.8%),眩晕12篇(75.0%),耳闷1篇(6.3%),各种症状混杂1篇(6.3%)。64篇提及耳鸣的中文文献中,仅9篇提到了耳鸣匹配检查;1篇提到耳鸣伴随症状的治疗为声治疗及心理辅导。4种不同类型突聋伴耳鸣发生率由低到高依次为:低中频82.4%,中高频90.7%,全聋型92.4%,平坦型92.8%。 结论: 耳鸣是突聋最常见的伴随症状,耳鸣匹配检查是有效评估手段。在建立科学、完善、全面、系统的突聋诊疗体系或指南的同时应重视耳鸣症状及其不良心理反应的诊疗,减少突聋康复后期耳鸣的发生率。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    特发性突发性感觉神经性听力损失是一种无法解释的突然感觉神经性听力损失,没有具体的发病机制,而且很难治疗。特发性突发性感觉神经性耳聋最常见的治疗策略是使用类固醇联合神经营养药物,因为其他治疗方法显示出有限的疗效。然而,近年来,高压氧治疗已成为一种有希望的治疗选择.研究表明,高压氧治疗,结合常规治疗,能有效缓解内耳水肿,改善血液循环,抑制炎症。因此,高压氧治疗在特发性突发性耳聋的治疗中起着重要作用。在这次审查中,我们旨在评估现有研究,总结高压氧治疗特发性突发性耳聋的临床效果和机制,为进一步研究本病的临床治疗提供依据。
    Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss is an unexplained sudden loss of sensorineural hearing, with no specific pathogenesis, and is difficult to treat. The most common therapeutic strategy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss is the use of steroids combined with neurotrophic drugs, as other treatments have shown limited efficacy. However, in recent years, hyperbaric oxygen therapy has emerged as a promising treatment option. Studies have shown that hyperbaric oxygen therapy, in combination with conventional treatments, can effectively alleviate inner ear edema, improve blood circulation, and suppress inflammation. Therefore, hyperbaric oxygen therapy plays an important role in the treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. In this review, we aim to assess existing studies and summarize the clinical effects and mechanisms of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, providing a basis for further research on the clinical treatment of this disorder.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目标:尽管随着时间的推移提出了不同的假设,缺乏能够预测特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失(ISSNHL)治疗反应和听力恢复的因素的信息.这项研究的目的是在我们的三级学术听力学中心接受ISSNHL治疗的患者的回顾性临床环境中应用单变量和多变量统计模型,以调查临床体征的预后价值。症状,以及与听力恢复有关的合并症。材料和方法:纳入标准为:在Padova或Modena三级学术听力学中心诊断和治疗的ISSNHL病史;年龄≥18岁;临床和听力学结果数据的可用性。排除标准为:听觉神经鞘瘤的听力损失,内淋巴积液,脑膜炎,创伤(头部创伤,颞骨骨折,声学创伤),气压伤,淋巴瘘;在工作环境中暴露于≥80dB的噪声水平;ISSNHL诊断前任何单侧或双侧听力损失(老年性耳聋除外);任何影响外耳或中耳的疾病;任何先前的耳手术;拒绝提供医疗数据用于研究目的。86名连续患者(38名女性,48名男性;平均年龄:58岁;四分位距:47.00-69.00岁)。对所有患者进行全身性类固醇治疗,口服泼尼松或静脉注射甲基泼尼松龙。二线治疗包括鼓室类固醇注射和/或高压氧治疗。结果:采用多因素logistic回归模型,包括非多重共线临床和听力学变量,在单变量分析中显示p值<0.10(即诊断时的年龄,诊断时间到了,口服类固醇剂量,和受影响一侧的PTA)。仅患侧PTA保留其统计学意义(OR:1.0615,95%CI:1.0185-1.1063,p=0.005)。结论:对我们数据的分析表明,治疗前的听力阈值与ISSNHL的恢复之间存在关联。需要对更大的队列(尤其是在前瞻性环境中)进行进一步的研究,以进一步阐明临床参数在ISSNHL患者中的预后作用。在正确的咨询环境中,关于患者对无法恢复听力的担忧,重要的是提供适当的听力康复方法的观点。
    Background and Objectives: Although different hypotheses have been proposed over time, there is a dearth of information on factors able to predict the response to treatment for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) and hearing recovery. The aim of this study was to apply univariate and multivariate statistical models in a retrospective clinical setting of patients given therapy for ISSNHL at our tertiary academic audiological centers to investigate the prognostic value of clinical signs, symptoms, and comorbidities in relation to hearing recovery. Materials and Methods: The inclusion criteria were: history of ISSNHL diagnosed and treated at the Padova or Modena tertiary academic audiological centers; age ≥ 18 years; availability of clinical and audiological outcome data. The exclusion criteria were: hearing loss in acoustic schwannoma, endolymphatic hydrops, meningitis, trauma (head trauma, temporal bone fracture, acoustic trauma), barotrauma, perilymphatic fistula; exposure to noise levels ≥ 80 dB in the work environment; any unilateral or bilateral hearing loss (except for presbycusis) prior to ISSNHL diagnosis; any disorders affecting the external or middle ear; any previous ear surgery; refusal to make medical data available for research purposes. Eighty-six consecutive patients (38 females, 48 males; median age: 58 years; interquartile range: 47.00-69.00 years) were included. A systemic steroid therapy was administered to all patients, either orally with prednisone or intravenously with methylprednisolone. Second-line therapy included intratympanic steroid injections and/or hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Results: A multivariate logistic regression model was used, including the non-multicollinear clinical and audiological variables, which showed a p-value < 0.10 at the univariate analyses (namely age at diagnosis, time to diagnosis, oral steroid dose, and PTA on the affected side). Only PTA on the affected side retained its statistical significance (OR: 1.0615, 95% CI: 1.0185-1.1063, p = 0.005). Conclusions: The analysis of our data showed an association between the hearing threshold before treatment and the recovery from ISSNHL. Further studies on larger cohorts (especially in a prospective setting) are needed to shed more light on the prognostic role of clinical parameters in patients with ISSNHL. In a correct counseling setting, with regard to the patient\'s concern about not being able to recover hearing, it is important to offer perspectives of appropriate hearing rehabilitation approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定发病前阿司匹林是否会影响特发性突发性感觉神经性听力损失(SSNHL)的严重程度和结果。
    方法:回顾性回顾。
    方法:三级护理中心。
    方法:确定特发性SSNHL患者,并将其分为阿司匹林组和非阿司匹林组。变量,包括人口统计,合并症条件,确定了听力学结果,并在组间进行了比较.
    结果:纳入了符合纳入标准的148例患者。有38例患者在发病前接受阿司匹林治疗,110例患者在SSNHL发作前没有服用阿司匹林。阿司匹林组治疗前后听力学状况恶化。其他合并症,包括高脂血症,冠状动脉疾病(CAD),脑血管意外(CVA),眩晕症状也有影响。通过多变量分析,CAD,CVA,眩晕症状似乎比阿司匹林更有效果。
    结论:服用阿司匹林的患者治疗前后听力学状况恶化。这似乎更多是由于潜在的CAD或CVA病史,而不是阿司匹林本身。
    OBJECTIVE: Identify if pre-incident aspirin influences severity and outcome of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).
    METHODS: Retrospective review.
    METHODS: Tertiary care center.
    METHODS: Patients with idiopathic SSNHL were identified and separated into aspirin and non-aspirin groups. Variables, including demographics, comorbid conditions, audiologic outcomes were identified and compared between groups.
    RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight patients were included that met inclusion criteria. There were 38 patients who were on pre-incident aspirin therapy and 110 patients not on aspirin prior to the onset of SSNHL. Pre- and post-treatment audiologic status was worsened in the aspirin group. Other comorbid conditions, including hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and vertigo symptoms had an effect as well. With multivariate analysis, CAD, CVA, and vertigo symptoms appeared to have an effect more than aspirin.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients on aspirin have a worsened pre- and post-treatment audiologic status. This appears to be more due to the underlying CAD or history of CVA rather than aspirin use itself.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究评估了鼓室内利多卡因对突发性耳聋(SSNHL)患者耳鸣缓解的疗效和安全性。
    方法:在一项双盲随机对照试验中,100例单侧耳鸣的SSNHL患者接受了鼓室内利多卡因或生理盐水以及常规护理。使用耳鸣障碍量表在1个月和3个月评估治疗效果,主观视觉模拟量表,纯音测听.
    结果:根据耳鸣障碍量表和视觉模拟量表,利多卡因组表现出明显的耳鸣缓解,在整个研究期间,没有纯音测听改善或严重不良事件。
    结论:鼓室内利多卡因提供了一种安全的,SSNHL耳鸣的有效治疗选择。由于SSNHL的异质性,进一步的研究应完善剂量和递送参数。
    OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates intratympanic lidocaine\'s efficacy and safety for tinnitus relief in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) patients.
    METHODS: In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, 100 SSNHL patients with unilateral tinnitus received either intratympanic lidocaine or saline plus usual care. Treatment impact was assessed at 1 and 3 months using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, subjective visual analog scale, pure-tone audiometry.
    RESULTS: The lidocaine group demonstrated significant tinnitus relief according to the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and visual analog scale, without pure-tone audiometry improvement or serious adverse events throughout the study period.
    CONCLUSIONS: Intratympanic lidocaine provides a safe, efficacious treatment option for SSNHL tinnitus. Further studies should refine the dosage and delivery parameters because of SSNHL\'s heterogenous nature.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    听力损失是整个美国和世界的显著发病率的原因。由于多种因素,例如持续的噪声暴露,慢性疾病控制不佳,人口老龄化,听力损失的负担预计将继续增加。听力损失通常被归类为传导性的,感觉神经性,或混合。听力损失的类型可以通过结合患者病史和体格检查来确定,然后通过测听和鼓室检查确认。高级成像通常不是必需的,但在特定情况下可能会有所帮助。突然的感觉神经性听力损失的出现应促使紧急转诊给耳鼻喉科医师和听力学家。这种情况的治疗是选择性的,但最初可能包括口服皮质类固醇。慢性听力损失的管理涉及使用助听器,这可以为用户提供很大的好处,但历史上一直很昂贵,许多保险计划都不包括在内。最近的美国立法通过允许直接面向消费者的营销和提供未经临床评估的非处方助听器,使助听器更容易获得和负担得起。
    Hearing loss is the cause of significant morbidity throughout the United States and the world. Because of numerous factors, such as ongoing noise exposure, poorly controlled chronic disease, and an aging population, the burden of hearing loss is expected to continue to increase. Hearing loss commonly is categorized as conductive, sensorineural, or mixed. The type of hearing loss can be determined through a combination of patient history and physical examination, and then confirmed with audiometry and tympanometry. Advanced imaging is not typically necessary, but it may be helpful in specific instances. The presentation of sudden sensorineural hearing loss should prompt urgent referral to an otolaryngologist and audiologist. Management of this condition is selective but may initially include oral corticosteroids. Management for chronic hearing loss involves the use of hearing aids, which can offer a large benefit to users but historically have been expensive and not covered by many insurance plans. Recent US legislation has made hearing aids more accessible and affordable by allowing direct-to-consumer marketing and offering over-the-counter hearing aids without a clinical evaluation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号