This study explores the dual challenges of ageism and professional recognition faced by senior nurses in healthcare settings. Utilizing a phenomenological approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 registered nurses aged 50 and older in Abha City, Saudi Arabia. The analysis revealed four key themes: experiences of ageism, its impact on professional roles, discrimination and stigmatization, and the need for organizational support. Findings indicate that age-related biases lead to significant professional marginalization, reduced job satisfaction, and emotional distress among senior nurses. The study highlights the critical need for comprehensive policies, organizational support, and cultural changes to address ageism and recognize the valuable contributions of senior nurses. Promoting an inclusive work environment and equitable professional development opportunities can enhance the overall quality of care and job satisfaction for older nurses.

UNASSIGNED: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is commonly encountered in older adults; yet, there is limited information on the occurrence of PIP among older adults with hypertension. This study aims to determine and compare the prevalence of PIP and its association with comorbidities in older adult outpatients with hypertension across hospitals and community health centers (CHCs).
UNASSIGNED: This 3-year (2015-2017) repeated cross-sectional study used electronic medical records from Shenzhen, China, involving 62 hospitals and 678 primary medical institutions. PIP was defined using the 2019 Beers Criteria. Older adults (≥65 years) with hypertension and at least one outpatient prescription were included. Modified Poisson regression analysis was used to assess the association between chronic comorbidities, healthcare settings, and PIP.
UNASSIGNED: The prevalence of PIP in old adult outpatients with hypertension in 2015, 2016, and 2017 was 46.32%, 46.98%, and 46.58% in hospitals, with a sample size of 38,411, 46,235, and 50,495, respectively, and 29.14%, 26.66%, and 29.84% in CHCs, with a sample size of 26,876, 29,434, and 34,775 respectively. The top four most popular PIP in hospitals and CHCs was proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs), diuretics, benzodiazepines, and non-cyclooxygenase-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), respectively. PIP was most associated with chronic gastrointestinal disease (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.50-1.59) and mental and behavioral disorders (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.49, 95% CI = 1.46-1.53) in hospitals and with mental and behavioral disorders (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.99; 95% CI = 1.95-2.03) and musculoskeletal system and connective tissue disorders (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.33; 95% CI = 1.31-1.36) in CHCs. The prevalence of PIP was significantly higher in hospital settings than in CHCs (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.63-1.66).
UNASSIGNED: Among older adult outpatients with hypertension in Shenzhen, PIP was more prevalent in hospitals than in CHCs. The comorbidities most strongly associated with PIP were chronic gastrointestinal disease and mental and behavioral disorders in hospitals and mental and behavioral disorders in CHCs. Clinical pharmacy integration needs to be considered to reduce inappropriate prescribing in this vulnerable population.

The 5S methodology, rooted in lean manufacturing principles, has been adopted in healthcare settings to improve organization, efficiency, and quality. This systematic review aimed to synthesize the literature on the implementation of the 5S methodology in healthcare, its impact, and factors influencing successful implementation. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases for original studies on the implementation of the 5S methodology in healthcare settings. Studies were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data were extracted on study characteristics, implementation details, outcomes, and key findings. Six studies met the inclusion criteria, spanning various healthcare settings, including hospitals, clinics, and laboratories. The studies reported positive outcomes associated with implementing the 5S methodology, such as improved workplace organization and cleanliness, increased utilization of healthcare services, enhanced staff satisfaction and motivation, and reduced waste and non-conformities. Critical success factors included commitment from top management, staff involvement, continuous monitoring, and adequate training. However, challenges were noted, including limited resources, small sample sizes, and difficulty assessing long-term sustainability. The implementation of the 5S methodology in healthcare settings can lead to improved organization, efficiency, and quality. However, successful implementation requires addressing critical factors such as leadership commitment, staff engagement, continuous monitoring, and training. Future research should focus on larger-scale implementation studies, long-term assessments, quantitative and qualitative evaluations, and cost-effectiveness analyses to strengthen the evidence base and inform best practices.

UNASSIGNED: This study utilized the evidence-gap map method and critically examined the scope, methodologies, and focus of the studies that investigated the influence of the built environment on inpatient healthcare settings over a decade (2010-2021).
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a systematic review per the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines and surveyed 406 articles, primarily from North America and Europe.
UNASSIGNED: Our findings revealed a dominant focus on architectural features (73%), such as room design and ward layout. Comparatively, there was less emphasis on interior-, ambient-, social-, and nature-related features. Most previous studies explored multiple environmental features, which indicated the intricacy of this field. Research outcomes were diverse, with person-centered care (PCC) being the most frequently investigated, followed by safe care, emotional well-being, activity, and behavior. Furthermore, research methods varied considerably based on the study\'s outcomes and features. Clinical outcomes and safe care favored quantitative methods, activity and behavior favored mixed methods, and PCC favored qualitative research.
UNASSIGNED: This review provides an in-depth overview of the existing studies on healthcare design research and sheds light on the current trends and methodological choices. The insights garnered can guide future research, policy-making, and the development of healthcare facilities.

Background: Action research (AR) starts with an existing practical situation with which there is a concern or potential for improvement. It seeks transformative change through the simultaneous process of doing research and undertaking actions, both of which are linked together by a critical reflective process. It simultaneously allows one to systematically investigate a given social situation while promoting democratic change and collaborative participation. AR approaches have been used for many years in business management and education. More recently, AR has become an increasingly popular method of inquiry in healthcare, particularly in nursing, to investigate professional practice while simultaneously; introducing innovations; planning and undertaking action; and evaluating new ideas. The overall goal is to augment collaboration whilst improving the patient experience and outcomes. Methods: The Arksey and O\'Malley methodology framework will be used to guide this scoping review process: stage 1 will identify the research questions; the eligibility criteria and search strategy will be defined in stage 2; studies will then be selected in stage 3; data will be extracted and charted from these included studies in stage 4; stage 5 involves aggregating and summarising these results along with criteria relevant for health professionals and policy-makers. An optional consultation (stage 6) exercise may potentially be included. Conclusion: This scoping review will comprehensively map the evidence on the use of AR methodology by healthcare professionals and in healthcare team settings. It is predicted that the findings will inform researchers in carrying out future AR and highlight gaps in the literature. An article reporting the results of the completed scoping review will be submitted for publication to a scientific journal and presented at relevant national and international conferences.

OBJECTIVE: Existing systematic reviews related to advance care planning (ACP) largely focus on specific groups and intervention efficacy or are limited to contextual factors. This research aims to identify the modifiable factors perceived by different users of ACP in healthcare settings and inform healthcare professionals about the factors affecting ACP practice.
METHODS: Five English-language databases (ProQuest, PubMed, CINAHL Plus, Scopus, and Medline) and two Chinese-language databases (CNKI and NCL) were searched up to November 2022. Empirical research identifying factors related to ACP in healthcare settings was included. ACP is defined as a discussion process on future end-of-life care. Thematic synthesis was performed on all included studies.
RESULTS: A total of 1871 unique articles were screened; the full texts of 193 were assessed by 4 reviewers, and 45 articles were included for analysis. Twenty-two (54%) studies were qualitative, 15 (33%) were quantitative, and 6 (13%) used mixed methods. Foci varied from 28 (62%) studies on a single subject group (either patient, family, or physician), 11 (25%) on 2 subject groups (either patient and family or patient and healthcare professional), and 6 (13%) covered 3 subject groups (patient, family, and healthcare professional). Among the 17 studies involving more than 1 subject group, only 2 adopted a dyadic lens in analysis. Complex interwoven factors were categorized into (1) intrapersonal factors, (2) interpersonal factors, and (3) socio-environmental factors, with a total of 11 themes: personal belief, emotions, the burden on others, timing, responsiveness, relationship, family dynamics, experience, person taking the lead, culture, and support.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients, families, and healthcare professionals are the essential stakeholders of ACP in healthcare settings. Factors are interweaved among the intrapersonal, interpersonal, and socio-environmental dimensions. Research is warranted to examine the dynamic interactions of the 3 essential stakeholders from a multidimensional perspective, and the mechanism of the interweaving of factors.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia choice is critical in ensuring optimal surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction. We aimed to investigate anesthesia preferences, trends, and outcomes in elective surgeries within Saudi Arabian healthcare settings.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted among anesthesia residents and attending anesthesiologists across Saudi Arabia. Participants provided demographic information and responded to questions regarding anesthesia preferences, trends, and outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, and logistic regression analysis was employed to identify factors associated with anesthesia preference.
RESULTS: The survey was completed by 572 healthcare professionals in Saudi Arabia. Among participants, 51.7% (n=296) preferred general anesthesia, while 48.3% (n=276) favored regional anesthesia for elective surgeries. Factors influencing anesthesia choice included patient preference, surgical complexity, and resource availability. Over half of the respondents reported an increase in regional anesthesia preference over the past five years, although some perceived inadequate training in this area. Common barriers to regional anesthesia adoption included equipment availability, patient reluctance, and limited training opportunities. Postoperative recovery was perceived as quicker with regional anesthesia by 52.3% (n=299) of participants, with postoperative nausea and vomiting being the most common complication associated with general anesthesia. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that participants above 50 years had lower odds of preferring regional anesthesia, while those perceiving training adequacy in regional anesthesia as adequate had higher odds of preferring it (OR=0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-0.98, p=0.041; OR=1.58, 95% CI: 1.21-2.05, p=0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into anesthesia practice patterns in Saudi Arabian healthcare settings. Individualized anesthesia care, ongoing training in regional anesthesia, and evidence-based decision-making are essential to optimize perioperative outcomes and patient satisfaction.

The \"Food as Medicine\" (FAM) movement encourages public health and medical professionals to recognize the importance of dietary patterns and food access. The purpose of this work was to describe patient and physician engagement with a produce prescription (PRx) program to improve access to fresh vegetables in a healthcare setting. A Federally Qualified Health Center, regenerative farm, and academic institution partnered for the PRx program (2017-21). During harvest seasons, patients redeemed \"prescriptions\" for initial and \"refill\" produce boxes. Baseline food insecurity surveys were embedded in electronic medical records. Refill surveys assessed satisfaction and confidence. Electronic surveys to prescribing physicians assessed program knowledge, expectations, and motivations. Across 8 biannual harvests generating 9986 produce boxes, 8046 patients received prescriptions, 6227 redeemed prescriptions for ≥1 box, and 720 redeemed for ≥2 boxes. Seasonally, initial redemption rates ranged from 64.5% to 82.7%; refill rates ranged from 6.8% to 16.7%. Among participants, 70.8% sometimes/often worried food would run out and 66.7% sometimes/often ran out of food. Among those with refills, there was high satisfaction with food quality (95.8%) and variety (97.2%), and 94.2% were confident preparing meals from produce. Among physicians (n = 22), 100% self-reported adequate knowledge about PRx for patient recommendations, and 100% believed PRx had benefit for patients. Chronic conditions (77%), low socioeconomic status (64%), and food insecurity (59%) were common motivating factors for prescriptions. We demonstrated the feasibility of implementing a cross-sector, seasonal PRx program within a multisite healthcare system. More research is needed to refine implementation toward greater patient refill rates.
Food is an important aspect of health, and people with limited access to food face more barriers to health. Healthcare settings are places where patients can get encouragement about nutrition goals and obtain food. In this study, patients at a large healthcare center received “prescriptions” for boxes of fresh vegetables, which were stored on-site and given to patients free of charge. Patients and doctors were asked to complete surveys to give their feedback on the program. The program lasted for 5 years, and during that time nearly 10 000 produce prescription boxes were given to over 6000 patients. Many of these patients did not have consistent access to food before this program. Overall, patients who received more than two boxes of fresh vegetables were satisfied with the vegetables they received, and doctors who completed the program survey believed that this program was important for patients. Food programs in healthcare settings may help patients access food, but more work is needed to refine the program.

BACKGROUND: Champions play a critical role in implementing technology within healthcare services. While prior studies have explored the presence and characteristics of champions, this review delves into the experiences of healthcare personnel holding champion roles, as well as the experiences of healthcare personnel interacting with them. By synthesizing existing knowledge, this review aims to inform decisions regarding the inclusion of champions as a strategy in technology implementation and guide healthcare personnel in these roles.
METHODS: A systematic mixed studies review, covering qualitative, quantitative, or mixed designs, was conducted from September 2022 to March 2023. The search spanned Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus, focusing on studies published from 2012 onwards. The review centered on health personnel serving as champions in technology implementation within healthcare services. Quality assessments utilized the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).
RESULTS: From 1629 screened studies, 23 were included. The champion role was often examined within the broader context of technology implementation. Limited studies explicitly explored experiences related to the champion role from both champions\' and health personnel\'s perspectives. Champions emerged as promoters of technology, supporting its adoption. Success factors included anchoring and selection processes, champions\' expertise, and effective role performance.
CONCLUSIONS: The specific tasks and responsibilities assigned to champions differed across reviewed studies, highlighting that the role of champion is a broad one, dependent on the technology being implemented and the site implementing it. Findings indicated a correlation between champion experiences and organizational characteristics. The role\'s firm anchoring within the organization is crucial. Limited evidence suggests that volunteering, hiring newly graduated health personnel, and having multiple champions can facilitate technology implementation. Existing studies predominantly focused on client health records and hospitals, emphasizing the need for broader research across healthcare services.
CONCLUSIONS: With a clear mandate, dedicated time, and proper training, health personnel in champion roles can significantly contribute professional, technological, and personal competencies to facilitate technology adoption within healthcare services. The review finds that the concept of champions is a broad one and finds varied definitions of the champion role concept. This underscores the importance of describing organizational characteristics, and highlights areas for future research to enhance technology implementation strategies in different healthcare settings with support of a champion.