OBJECTIVE: Healthcare disparities influence multiple dimensions of orthopaedic care including access, burden and incidence of disease, and outcome in varying populations. These disparities impact healthcare at both the micro and macro scale of the healthcare experience from individual patient-physician relationships to reimbursement rates across the United States. This article provides a review of how healthcare disparities contribute to the landscape of orthopaedic care and specifically highlights how disparities affect outpatient visits, discretionary and unplanned surgical care, and postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS: Current research demonstrates the widespread presence of healthcare disparities in the field of orthopaedics and gives both objective and subjective evidence confirming disparities\' measurable influence. The disparities most highlighted by our review include differences in orthopaedic care based on insurance type and race. Currently disparities in orthopaedic care are deeply connected to patient insurance status and race. In the outpatient setting insurance significantly impacts access to care, travel burden, and utilization of services. The emergent setting is similarly influenced with measurable differences in lack of access to acute care, rates of inappropriate triage, and timeliness of care based on insurance status and race. Additionally, the postoperative period is not immune to disparities with likelihood of follow up, experience of catastrophic medical expenses, and postoperative outcomes also being affected. Addressing these disparities is a pressing need and may include solutions like wider expansion and acceptance of publicly funded insurance and the development of readily available and easily measurable metrics for healthcare equity and quality in vulnerable populations.

Mass incarceration in the United States presents major healthcare challenges, and otorhinolaryngology-related needs within carceral settings are underrecognized. Public health crises, as exemplified by the COVID-19 pandemic which led to over 3,000 deaths among incarcerated individuals, can intensify disparities. Both acute otorhinolaryngology conditions, such as craniomaxillofacial trauma, impending airway compromise, and life-threatening infection, as well as more chronic conditions such as cancer, sinusitis, or ear infections can lead to impaired quality of life, disability, or preventable mortality. Incarcerated individuals experience substantial healthcare disparities, which are driven by intrinsic individual and carceral facility factors such as resource scarcity, structural barriers, limited self-advocacy, and social determinants of health, as well as extrinsic factors related to societal misconceptions, inadequate education of healthcare providers on carceral healthcare, and underdeveloped care systems. To address these issues, a comprehensive approach is needed, incorporating experiential learning, bias reduction, and trust building. Early clinical exposure, enhanced public health education, and community outreach efforts are conducive to cultivating structural competence and relevant skills. Carceral health initiatives can thus raise awareness and enhance the healthcare of incarcerated individuals. Healthcare professionals can expand their roles to advocate for equitable care, prioritize rehabilitation over punishment, and support individuals upon reentry into society. Healthcare professionals in otorhinolaryngology, play a pivotal role in addressing the needs of incarcerated individuals, with nurses, physicians, and allied health stakeholders working together. Education, advocacy, and compassionate care provide the basis for a more equitable and humane carceral healthcare system that upholds the dignity and well-being of all individuals.

Child refugees, asylum seekers and undocumented migrants who have been forcibly displaced from their countries of origin have heightened health needs as a consequence of their migration experiences. Host countries have a duty to respond to these needs, yet across Europe we are seeing a rise in potentially harmful discriminative, hostile and restrictive migration policies and practices. Research exploring the role racism, xenophobia and discrimination in European health systems may play in child migrant health inequities is lacking. This Personal View seeks to highlight this knowledge gap and stimulate discourse on how discrimination in health information systems, data sharing practices, national health policy, healthcare entitlements, service access, quality of care, and healthcare workers attitudes and behaviours may infringe upon the rights of, and impact the health of child refugees, asylum-seekers and undocumented migrants. It calls for action to prevent and mitigate against potentially harmful policies and practices.

BACKGROUND: A conceptual, methodological, and theoretical framework is needed in Nursing Education to center racism, in the curriculum, as a root cause of health inequity.
OBJECTIVE: To provide Nursing and health professions\' educators with a comprehensive unifying framework to fundamentally conceptualize and deliver a curriculum which positions racism\'s impact as a root cause of health inequities.
METHODS: Critical race theory is the underpinning for a historical analysis of racism and a critique of scientific racism, whiteness, and white supremacy ideologies that perpetuate harmful and lethal outcomes for racialized individuals and communities.
RESULTS: This framework conceptualizes learning, unlearning, relearning, and reflective practice as the fundamental process needed to transformative nursing education and advance health equity.
CONCLUSIONS: Methodological application is given for 1) unlearning harmful white supremacy ideology 2) learning that racism as it is embedded in every sector of American life and racial inequities are inherent in the health care system 3) relearning the importance of counternarratives and building structural competency and 4) engaging in reflective practice to challenge deficit paradigms assigned to racialized people and their communities.
CONCLUSIONS: The Antiracism Framework provides foundational principles, guiding steps, and rationale for curricula that acknowledges the critical role of racism as a barrier to achieving health equity.

Education is correlated with health literacy, which is a combination of reading and listening skills, data analysis, and decision-making during the necessary health situations. This study aims to evaluate the effect of education on the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This is a population-based cross-sectional study using the 2019 nationwide survey data in Korea. There were 3951 study subjects, after excluding participants with missing data for key exposures and outcome variables. Descriptive statistics, χ2 (chi-square) test, and logistic regression were performed to analyze the data. The prevalence of T2DM was associated with educational attainment, sex, age, smoking status, physical activity, carbohydrate intake, and obesity. In the logistic regression model, the odds ratio (OR) of having T2DM was much lower among people educated in college or higher (OR = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 0.34-0.64) than those with only or without primary education after adjusting for biological factors (sex, age) and health behaviors (smoking status, physical activity, carbohydrate intake, and obesity). This study shows that educational attainment is a significant social determinant influencing health outcomes both directly and indirectly. Therefore, it is necessary to develop policies to reduce the health inequity of T2DM caused by differences in educational attainment.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study using claims data compared demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and clinical outcomes in Black and White patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in the United States.
UNASSIGNED: Patients (aged ≥18 years) had ≥1 pharmacy claim for PAH medication, ≥6 months\' continuous healthcare plan enrollment, ≥1 inpatient/outpatient medical claim with a pulmonary hypertension diagnosis ≤6 months before first PAH medication, and race recorded.
UNASSIGNED: This analysis included 836 Black and 2896 White patients. Black patients were younger, with lower levels of education and annual household income, and higher comorbidity scores versus White patients. Only ∼14% of Black and White patients received index combination therapy. Lower adherence to index treatment was observed in Black patients. Although adjusted regression analysis in the overall population showed no differences in outcomes between groups, Black patients <65 years were 36% less likely to receive index combination therapy (odds ratio [OR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.99), and 46% less likely to adhere to index treatment (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.33-0.90). Other disparities included 24% higher all-cause health care resource utilization, 75% higher all-cause costs, and higher risk of clinical composite outcome. Social determinants of health (education, income, health insurance plan) partially mediated these race effects.
UNASSIGNED: Differences in demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns between Black and White patients with PAH were observed. Disparities between Black and White patients <65 years were only partially mediated through social determinants of health variables, suggesting other factors may be involved.

暂无摘要。

The medical device and pharmaceutical industries include a range of drugs, machines, instruments, and apparatuses used to prevent, diagnose, treat disease and illness, or aid in rehabilitation for patients, and are expected to grow substantially in the coming years. However, they are often targets of criminal organizations who manufacture and profit from fraudulent products, infiltrating the market with counterfeit medical supply chains. In this paper, we discuss and analyze the extent and nature of this problem and make suggestions for mitigation and prevention of this worldwide challenge. Ultimately, we argue that a holistic approach is essential to addressing this problem, including the creation and dissemination of reliable and good quality data, developing healthcare systems to be more robust, establishing/enhancing intra- and international cooperation around this issue, and employing effective technological solutions, such as digital tracing.

While there has been great progress in the past few decades in the management of endocrine surgery disorders, with adoption of new technologies and approaches, standardization of practice patterns, and guideline recommendations, unequal implementation of these improvement has led to differences in access and outcomes. Health disparities are well documented in this population; however, literature lacks discussion of strategies to decrease disparities. In this article, the authors will describe the current status of health care-related disparities in endocrine surgical care, and discuss opportunities for future investigation and issue an urgent call to action items.