health care use

卫生保健使用
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在COVID-19大流行期间,患有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)的患者尤其脆弱,医疗服务模式迅速转变。这项研究评估了大流行对ADRD患者护理的影响,检查主要的使用,紧急情况,和长期护理,以及因新冠肺炎和其他原因造成的死亡。
    方法:在传统医疗保险中,有420万66岁及以上的ADRD受益人中,每月死亡和日常护理索赔(医生办公室和远程健康访问),住院/急诊科(ED)就诊,将2020年3月或6月至2022年12月的长期护理设施使用率与使用OLS和逻辑/负二项回归的2019年1月至12月预测的月费率进行比较。相关分析检查了因COVID和非COVID原因导致的超额死亡与受益人居住州护理使用变化之间的关联。
    结果:远程医疗访问次数的增加抵消了办公室访问次数的减少,初级保健就诊率总体上升(从2020年6月起,相对于2019年的预测率,上升9%,p<.001)。急诊/住院次数下降(下降了9%,p<.001)和长期护理设施使用率下降,从2020年6月起,仍比2019年趋势低14%(p<.001)。COVID和非COVID死亡人数均上升,超过231,000例死亡(比2019年的预测高出16%),其中80%以上归因于COVID。女性死亡人数过多,非白人患者,那些在农村和孤立的邮政编码,以及社会剥夺指数得分较高的人。初级保健就诊次数增加最多的州的超额死亡人数最低(相关性-0.49)。
    结论:在COVID-19大流行期间,患有ADRD的老年人的大量死亡高于大流行前的预测,其中80%归因于COVID-19。由于远程医疗访问的急剧增加,常规护理总体上有所增加,但这在各州之间是不平衡的,在就诊次数高于大流行前的州,死亡率明显较低。
    BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with Alzheimer\'s disease and related dementias (ADRD) were especially vulnerable, and modes of medical care delivery shifted rapidly. This study assessed the impact of the pandemic on care for people with ADRD, examining the use of primary, emergency, and long-term care, as well as deaths due to COVID and to other causes.
    METHODS: Among 4.2 million beneficiaries aged 66 and older with ADRD in traditional Medicare, monthly deaths and claims for routine care (doctors\' office and telehealth visits), inpatient/emergency department (ED) visits, and long-term care facility use from March or June 2020 through December 2022 are compared to monthly rates predicted from January-December 2019 using OLS and logistic/negative binomial regression. Correlation analyses examine the association between excess deaths - due to COVID and non-COVID causes - and changes in care use in the beneficiary\'s state of residence.
    RESULTS: Increased telehealth visits more than offset reduced office visits, with primary care visits increasing overall (by 9 percent from June 2020 onward relative to the predicted rate from 2019, p < .001). Emergency/inpatient visits declined (by 9 percent, p < .001) and long-term care facility use declined, remaining 14% below the 2019 trend from June 2020 onward (p < .001). Both COVID and non-COVID deaths rose, with 231,000 excess deaths (16% above the prediction from 2019), over 80 percent of which were attributable to COVID. Excess deaths were higher among women, non-White patients, those in rural and isolated zip codes, and those with higher social deprivation index scores. States with the largest increases in primary care visits had the lowest excess deaths (correlation -0.49).
    CONCLUSIONS: Older adults with ADRD had substantial deaths above pre-pandemic projections during the COVID-19 pandemic, 80 percent of which were attributed to COVID-19. Routine care increased overall due to a dramatic increase in telehealth visits, but this was uneven across states, and mortality rates were significantly lower in states with higher than pre-pandemic visits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)对哮喘结局有重大影响,收入水平和邻里环境等因素起着至关重要的作用。
    目的:本研究旨在评估社区剥夺指数(NDI)和总犯罪指数(TCI)对轻度哮喘成人急性哮喘加重(AAE)和哮喘相关急诊和紧急护理(ED/UC)就诊的影响。
    方法:这项回顾性队列研究利用了2013年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间来自南加州KaiserPermanente的198,873名轻度成年哮喘患者的管理数据。鲁棒泊松回归模型,根据年龄和性别调整,研究了NDI和TCI与AAE和哮喘相关ED/UC就诊的相关性.数据分析包括按种族和民族以及BMI类别进行的亚组评估,以探索哮喘结局的潜在差异。
    结果:在队列中,12,906名患者(6.5%)在一年内经历了AAE,黑人患者的AAE百分比最高(7.1%)。较高的NDI五分位数与AAE风险增加相关(ARR:1.11-1.27),BMI类别和种族或族裔的趋势相似,除了黑人患者.TCI显示与AAE的相关性较弱。关于ED/UC访问,5.0%的人在一年内接受过此类访问。较高的NDI五分位数与较高的ED/UC访问风险相关(aRRs:1.23-1.75),而TCI关联较弱。
    结论:解决社会经济差异,如NDI所示,可能对缓解哮喘恶化和降低医疗保健利用率至关重要,强调将社会决定因素纳入哮喘管理策略的重要性,即使是轻度哮喘患者。
    BACKGROUND: Social determinants of health have a significant impact on asthma outcomes, and factors such as income level and neighborhood environment have crucial roles.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the impact of the Neighborhood Deprivation Index (NDI) and Total Crime Index (TCI) on acute asthma exacerbation (AAE) and asthma-related emergency department and urgent care (ED/UC) visits in adults with mild asthma.
    METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used administrative data from Kaiser Permanente Southern California among 198,873 adult patients with mild asthma between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018. We employed robust Poisson regression models, adjusted for age and sex, to investigate the associations of NDI and TCI with AAE and asthma-related ED/UC visits. Data analysis included subgroup assessments by race and ethnicity and body mass index categories to explore potential disparities in asthma outcomes.
    RESULTS: Among the cohort, 12,906 patients (6.5%) experienced AAE in 1 year, and Black patients had the highest AAE percentage (7.1%). Higher NDI quintiles were associated with increased AAE risk (adjusted risk ratio = 1.11-1.27), with similar trends across body mass index categories and race or ethnicity, except for Black patients. The TCI showed weaker associations with AAE. Regarding ED/UC visits, 5.0% had such visits within 1 year. Higher NDI quintiles were associated with higher ED/UC visit risk (adjusted risk ratio = 1.23-1.75) whereas TCI associations were weaker.
    CONCLUSIONS: Addressing socioeconomic disparities, as indicated by NDI, may be crucial in mitigating asthma exacerbations and reducing health care use, highlighting the importance of incorporating social determinants into asthma management strategies even in patients with mild asthma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于与虚拟访问相关的医疗保健使用的证据是相互矛盾的。关于基于文本的虚拟访问(eVisits)的有效性,需要进行更多的研究。因此,我们调查了病人的特征,诊断,以及在对初级保健进行电子访问后的后续保健接触。
    方法:我们在14天内对瑞典的一个全虚拟公共初级保健单位和随后的医疗保健接触者进行了一项基于注册的队列研究。2021年的数据来自区域医疗保健数据库。将诊断分为相关诊断组,如皮肤诊断和呼吸道诊断。进行多重逻辑回归,以随后的医疗保健联系作为结果变量,以eVisit的诊断组为预测变量。分析根据年龄进行了调整,性别,和社会经济指数。
    结果:对护士进行了5817次访问,对全科医生进行了4267次访问(N=10084)。大多数患者年龄为20至39岁(41.8%)。皮肤诊断最常见(47.3%),其次是呼吸道诊断(19.9%)。大约四分之一(25.8%)的患者完成了与护士或全科医生的电子访问,随后在14天内进行了面对面访问,主要是初级保健。与全科医生相比,与护士进行电子访问后,随后的接触更频繁。在电子拜访全科医生后,与有各种其他诊断的患者相比,有感染(尤其是呼吸道和泌尿道)和未明确诊断(尤其是皮肤相关)的患者更有可能需要进一步的卫生保健联系.
    结论:对于不复杂的医疗投诉,到全虚拟的初级保健单位就诊可能是合适的。尽管如此,eVisits在替代实物访问方面的有效性,以及与初级保健人群更复杂的护理需求相关的资源利用,应该进一步研究。
    BACKGROUND: Evidence concerning health care use related to virtual visits is conflicting. More research has been called for regarding the effectiveness of text-based virtual visits (eVisits). Therefore, we investigated patient characteristics, diagnoses, and subsequent health care contacts after eVisits to primary care.
    METHODS: We conducted a register-based cohort study of eVisits to an all-virtual public primary care unit in Sweden and subsequent health care contacts within 14 days. Data for 2021 were acquired from the regional health care databases. Diagnoses were sorted into relevant diagnostic groups, such as skin diagnoses and respiratory tract diagnoses. Multiple logistic regression was performed with subsequent health care contact as the outcome variable and diagnostic group for the eVisit as the predictor variable. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and socioeconomic index.
    RESULTS: There were 5817 eVisits to a nurse and 4267 eVisits to a general practitioner (N = 10 084). Most patients were 20 to 39 years of age (41.8%). Skin diagnoses were most frequent (47.3%), followed by respiratory tract diagnoses (19.9%). Approximately one-fourth (25.8%) of the patients who completed an eVisit with a nurse or a general practitioner had a subsequent face-to-face visit within 14 days, mostly in primary care. Subsequent contacts were more frequent after an eVisit to a nurse than to a general practitioner. After an eVisit to a general practitioner, patients with infections (especially respiratory tract but also urinary tract) and unspecified diagnoses (especially skin-related) were more likely to require further health care contact compared to a group with various other diagnoses.
    CONCLUSIONS: eVisits to an all-virtual primary care unit may be appropriate for uncomplicated medical complaints. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of eVisits in terms of substitution of physical visits, and resource utilization in relation to the more complex care needs of a primary care population, should be further studied.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:缺乏子宫内膜癌后最佳随访方案的证据。该研究的目的是比较接受减少随访护理的妇女和接受手术后三年常规指南指导的随访护理的妇女对护理的满意度。
    方法:ENSURE(EndometrialcancerServivors''follow-upcarE)试验是一项在荷兰42家医院开展的非劣效性随机对照多中心试验。干预组接受的随访护理减少(4次/3年),而对照组接受常规随访(8-11次/3年)。主要结果是对护理的总体满意度,PSQIII评分,三年多的随访,非劣效性为6。混合线性回归,使用了意向治疗和符合方案分析(如下所示).
    结果:在316名女性中,与常规随访组(平均80;SD=15)(B=1.80(-2.09;5.68))相比,减少随访组(平均82;SD=15)对护理的总体满意度并没有降低.在6、12和36个月时,与常规随访组相比,减少随访组的女性(93/94/90%)更多(79/79/82%;p<0.001;p<0.001;p=0.050).
    结论:低风险女性,接受减少随访护理的早期子宫内膜癌患者对护理的满意度不亚于接受常规随访护理的女性.与常规随访相比,减少随访组的女性临床就诊次数较少,同时,更经常报告对他们的后续时间表感到满意。研究结果表明,减少后续护理可能是新的标准,但应该量身定做,以满足额外的需求。
    BACKGROUND: Evidence on the optimal follow-up schedule after endometrial cancer is lacking. The study aim was to compare satisfaction with care between women who received reduced follow-up care and women who received usual guideline-directed follow-up care for three years after surgery.
    METHODS: The ENSURE (ENdometrial cancer SURvivors\' follow-up carE) trial was a non-inferiority randomized controlled multicenter trial in 42 hospitals in the Netherlands. The intervention arm received reduced follow-up care (4 visits/3 years), while the control group received usual follow-up care (8-11 visits/3 years). Primary outcome was overall satisfaction with care, PSQIII score, over three years follow-up, with a non-inferiority margin of 6. Mixed linear regression, intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses (presented below) were used.
    RESULTS: Among 316 women included, overall satisfaction with care was not lower in the reduced follow-up (mean 82; SD = 15) compared with the usual follow-up group (mean 80; SD = 15) group (B = 1.80(-2.09;5.68)). At 6, 12 and 36 months, more women (93/94/90%) in the reduced follow-up group were satisfied with their follow-up schedule than in the usual follow-up group (79/79/82%; p < 0.001; p < 0.001; p = 0.050).
    CONCLUSIONS: Women with low-risk, early-stage endometrial cancer who received reduced follow-up care were no less satisfied with their care than women receiving usual follow-up care. Compared with usual follow-up, women in the reduced follow-up group had fewer clinical visits and, at the same time, more often reported being satisfied with their follow-up schedule. Findings suggest that reduced follow-up care may be the new standard, but should be tailored to meet additional needs where indicated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:腕管松解术(CTR)后使用疗法很常见,触发手指释放,神经节囊肿切除术,DeQuervain腱鞘炎释放,腕掌关节成形术,桡骨远端骨折,切开复位内固定或经皮钉扎(DRF)。提高覆盖率的政策会影响医疗保健服务的成本和使用。
    目的:本研究旨在通过种族和程序来评估在废除长期的年度Medicare门诊治疗上限后,术后手治疗的费用和使用的变化。
    方法:回顾性队列研究。
    方法:这是一项纵向回顾性队列研究,使用准实验中断时间序列设计,包括2016年1月1日至2019年12月31日接受普通手部手术的患者.
    结果:本研究纳入203,672例患者,平均年龄71.4岁。White(1.00,95%置信区间[CI]:0.999-1.007,p=0.45)和非White(1.00,95%CI:1.00-1.01,p=0.06)患者在政策实施前每月都没有经历治疗使用的变化。CTR后治疗频率增加(比值比[OR]1.12,95%CI:1.11-1.14,p<0.001),触发手指释放(OR1.09,95%CI:1.07-1.10,p<0.001),和DRF(OR1.05,95%CI:1.03-1.06,p<0.001)。
    结论:这项研究发现,在某些亚组中,覆盖率提高与术后治疗使用增加相关,包括CTR和DRF,建议需要通过事先授权或捆绑支付等方式优化覆盖范围,而不仅仅是增加保险福利。
    BACKGROUND: Therapy use is common following carpal tunnel release (CTR), trigger finger release, ganglion cyst excision, De Quervain tenosynovitis release, carpometacarpal arthroplasty, and distal radius fracture, open reduction internal fixation or percutaneous pinning (DRF). Policy that improves coverage influences the cost and use of health care services.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate changes to the cost and use of postoperative hand therapy by race and procedure following the repeal of a longstanding annual Medicare outpatient therapy cap.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
    METHODS: This is a longitudinal retrospective cohort study using a quasi-experimental interrupted time series design, including patients who underwent common hand surgeries from January 1, 2016-December 31, 2019.
    RESULTS: This study included 203,672 patients with a mean age of 71.4 years. Neither White (1.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.999-1.007, p = 0.45) nor non-White (1.00, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01, p = 0.06) patients experienced monthly changes in therapy use before policy implementation. Therapy frequency increased following CTR (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% CI: 1.11-1.14, p < 0.001), trigger finger release (OR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.07-1.10, p < 0.001), and DRF (OR 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03-1.06, p < 0.001) following implementation.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study found that improved coverage was associated with increased postoperative therapy use among some subsets, including CTR and DRF, suggesting the need to optimize coverage by means such as prior authorization or bundled payments, rather than only increasing coverage benefits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:与普通人群相比,精神分裂症或双相情感障碍患者患躯体疾病的风险增加,并且躯体疾病更多。精神分裂症和双相情感障碍是高度遗传性的。已经在童年,患有精神分裂症(FHR-SZ)或双相情感障碍(FHR-BD)的家族性高危儿童患精神疾病以及认知和社交障碍的风险增加.关于物理条件的知识很少。材料和方法:通过血液测试(n=293),采访,和问卷,我们评估了炎症标志物,躯体投诉,FHR-SZ11岁儿童的药物和医疗保健使用,FHR-BD,和基于人群的控制(PBC)。结果:FHR-SZ的儿童白细胞浓度(平均6.41,SD0.73)高于PBC(平均5.78,SD0.27,p=0.005)和中性粒细胞浓度(FHR-SZ:平均3.11,SD1.32,PBC:平均2.70,SD0.96,p=0.024)。与PBC(26.6%)相比,更多儿童在FHR-SZ(40.5%,p=0.007)报告躯体不适。FHR-BD的儿童看护者和老师也是如此。躯体投诉,更高浓度的白细胞,中性粒细胞与较低水平的体力活动有关。患有精神疾病的FHR-BD儿童与没有精神疾病的儿童相比,报告的躯体不适更多。结论:FHR-SZ患儿白细胞和中性粒细胞浓度高于PBC。FHR-SZ或FHR-BP的儿童比对照组表现出更多的躯体不适。我们的研究强调很少探索父母患有精神分裂症或躁郁症的缺点。为了提高对FHR-SZ和FHR-BD儿童的身体状况与后来向精神障碍过渡的相互作用的理解,需要进一步的研究。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder are at increased risk of somatic illnesses and have more somatic complaints compared with the general population. Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder are highly heritable. Already during childhood, children at familial high risk of schizophrenia (FHR-SZ) or bipolar disorder (FHR-BD) are at increased risk of psychiatric disorders and cognitive and social impairments. Knowledge about physical conditions is sparse.
    UNASSIGNED: Through blood tests (n = 293), interviews, and questionnaires, we assessed inflammatory markers, somatic complaints, medication - and health care use in 11-year-old children at FHR-SZ, FHR-BD, and population-based controls (PBC).
    UNASSIGNED: Children at FHR-SZ had higher concentrations of leucocytes (mean 6.41, SD 0.73) compared with PBC (mean 5.78, SD 0.27, p = 0.005) and of neutrophilocytes (FHR-SZ: mean 3.11, SD 1.32, PBC: mean 2.70, SD 0.96, p = 0.024). Compared with PBC (26.6%), more children at FHR-SZ (40.5%, p = 0.007) reported somatic complaints. So did caregivers and teachers to children at FHR-BD. Somatic complaints, higher concentrations of leucocytes, and neutrophilocytes were associated with lower levels of physical activity. Children at FHR-BD with psychiatric disorders reported more somatic complaints compared with those without.
    UNASSIGNED: Children at FHR-SZ had higher concentrations of leucocytes and neutrophilocytes than PBC. Children at FHR-SZ or FHR-BP displayed more somatic complaints than controls. Our study highlights rarely explored disadvantage of being born to parents with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. To enhance understanding of how physical conditions in childhood may interplay with later transition to mental disorders in children at FHR-SZ and FHR-BD, further research is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胆结石病是美国最常见的消化系统疾病之一,可导致严重的发病率,死亡率,和医疗保健利用。
    目的:使用国家调查和索赔数据库,扩大早期发现并调查美国胆结石疾病负担的前流行率和趋势。
    方法:全国门诊医疗调查,全国住院患者样本,全国急诊科样本,全国门诊手术样本,美国的生命统计,OptumClinformatics®DataMart,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心使用医疗保险5%样本和医疗补助文件来估计基于索赔的患病率,包括胆囊切除术在内的医疗护理,和死亡率与原发性或其他胆结石诊断。比率是按年龄调整的(针对国家数据库),并显示为每100000人口。
    结果:胆结石病患病率(基于索赔,2019年)在商业保险参保人中为0.70%,1.03%的医疗补助受益人,医疗保险受益人中的2.09%,在过去十年中有所上升。最近,在美国人口中,胆结石疾病促成了大约220万次动态护理就诊,120万急诊就诊,625000医院出院,每年有2000人死亡。女性胆结石疾病诊断的医疗护理率较高,但男性死亡率较高。与白人相比,西班牙裔美国人的门诊就诊和出院率更高,但不是死亡率。黑人的门诊就诊和死亡率较低,但与白人相似的出院率。在学习期间,有胆结石疾病诊断的门诊护理和急诊科就诊率上升,而出院和死亡率下降。在商业保险参保人员中,与全国门诊就诊和住院数据相比,发病率更高,但急诊室就诊的比例较低。在美国进行的胆囊切除术包括605000动态腹腔镜,280000例住院腹腔镜,和每年49000例住院开放程序。在商业保险参保人员中,与腹腔镜手术的国家数据相比,比率更高。
    结论:美国的胆结石疾病负担巨大且不断增加,尤其是在女性中,西班牙裔,以腹腔镜胆囊切除术为主要治疗手段的老年人。应监测当前的实践模式,以更好地获得医疗保健。
    BACKGROUND: Gallstone disease is one of the most common digestive disorders in the United States and leads to significant morbidity, mortality, and health care utilization.
    OBJECTIVE: To expand on earlier findings and investigate prepandemic rates and trends in the gallstone disease burden in the United States using national survey and claims databases.
    METHODS: The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, National Inpatient Sample, Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample, Vital Statistics of the United States, Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart, and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare 5% Sample and Medicaid files were used to estimate claims-based prevalence, medical care including cholecystectomy, and mortality with a primary or other gallstone diagnosis. Rates were age-adjusted (for national databases) and shown per 100000 population.
    RESULTS: Gallstone disease prevalence (claims-based, 2019) was 0.70% among commercial insurance enrollees, 1.03% among Medicaid beneficiaries, and 2.09% among Medicare beneficiaries and rose over the previous decade. Recently, in the United States population, gallstone disease contributed to approximately 2.2 million ambulatory care visits, 1.2 million emergency department visits, 625000 hospital discharges, and 2000 deaths annually. Women had higher medical care rates with a gallstone disease diagnosis, but mortality rates were higher among men. Hispanics had higher ambulatory care visit and hospital discharge rates compared with Whites, but not mortality rates. Blacks had lower ambulatory care visit and mortality rates, but similar hospital discharge rates compared with whites. During the study period, ambulatory care and emergency department visit rates with a gallstone disease diagnosis rose, while hospital discharge and mortality rates declined. Among commercial insurance enrollees, rates were higher compared with national data for ambulatory care visits and hospitalizations, but lower for emergency department visits. Cholecystectomies performed in the United States included 605000 ambulatory laparoscopic, 280000 inpatient laparoscopic, and 49000 inpatient open procedures annually. Among commercial insurance enrollees, rates were higher compared with national data for laparoscopic procedures.
    CONCLUSIONS: The gallstone disease burden in the United States is substantial and increasing, particularly among women, Hispanics, and older adults with laparoscopic cholecystectomy as the mainstay treatment. Current practice patterns should be monitored for better health care access.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在健康危机中,获得和使用医疗保健服务的不平等变得更加明显。这项研究的目的是分析在COVID-19健康危机的背景下,在获得和使用医疗保健服务方面的性别不平等的存在和演变。
    方法:回顾性队列研究,使用2020年3月至2022年3月在阿拉贡(西班牙)确诊为COVID-19感染的所有个体的数据(390,099例)。按性别分析了不同大流行浪潮的医疗保健获取和使用情况。进行了单因素和多因素分析,以评估性别在医疗保健中的作用。进行了Blinder-Oaxaca分解方法来解释观察到的性别差距。
    结果:在整个COVID-19大流行期间,男女之间的医疗保健有所不同。与男性相比,女性住院和重症监护病房的频率较低,住院时间也较短。在整个大流行期间,男性和女性之间的差异缩小了,但即使在调整了年龄后仍坚持,社会经济地位,发病负担或患者的居住地。社会人口统计学特征和发病率负担的差异可以部分解释所发现的性别不平等,主要是在大流行的后期,但不是在早期的浪潮中。
    结论:在COVID-19大流行期间,在获得和使用卫生服务方面存在性别不平等。在大流行的第一波中,不平等现象更大,但没有消失.对健康危机的分析必须考虑到交叉性别观点,以确保公平的医疗保健。
    BACKGROUND: In health crisis, inequalities in access to and use of health care services become more evident. The objective of this study is to analyse the existence and evolution of gender inequalities in access to and use of healthcare services in the context of the COVID-19 health crisis.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using data from all individuals with a confirmed COVID-19 infection from March 2020 to March 2022 in Aragón (Spain) (390,099 cases). Health care access and use was analysed by gender for the different pandemic waves. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate the effect of sex in health care. Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition methods were performed to explain gender gaps observed.
    RESULTS: The health care received throughout the COVID-19 pandemic differed between men and women. Women were admitted to hospital and intensive care units less frequently than men and their stays were shorter. Differences observed between men and women narrowed throughout the pandemic, but persisted even after adjusting for age, socioeconomic status, morbidity burden or the patient\'s place of residence. Differences in sociodemographic characteristics and morbidity burden could explain partially the gender inequalities found, mainly in the later phases of the pandemic, but not in the earlier waves.
    CONCLUSIONS: There were gender inequalities in access to and use of health services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Inequalities were greater in the first waves of the pandemic, but did not disappear. Analysis of health crises must take into account an intersectional gender perspective to ensure equitable health care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    加拿大正在经历快速的人口老龄化,这有着广泛的影响,包括对医疗保健服务的需求增加。然而,很少有研究检查了专业医疗保健服务的使用(例如,拜访医学专家,非紧急测试,和手术)在年长的加拿大人中。
    来自2019/2020年加拿大老年人健康调查的数据用于检查老年人的专业医疗保健服务使用情况。潜在类别分析是使用具有全国代表性的39,047名65岁或65岁以上的加拿大人进行校准的,以确定与医疗保健服务使用相关的需求因素的不同模式。多变量逻辑回归,按性别分层,用于检查易感特征的关联,启用资源,并需要使用专业医疗保健服务的因素。
    在2019/2020年,估计有260万老年加拿大人(43.4%)拜访了医学专家,140万(23.2%)接受了非紧急测试,60万人(10.4%)接受了非紧急手术。其中,15.6%的受访者表示在获取服务方面遇到困难。与男性相比,女性去看医学专家并接受非紧急检查的可能性较小。较低的教育程度始终与较低的专业医疗保健服务使用几率相关。多病患者中的个体,高应激-多发病率-残疾,与相对健康的阶层相比,不良的身心健康阶层更有可能使用专门的医疗保健服务,并在获得这些服务时遇到困难。
    这项研究的结果强调了性别差异以及在检查专业医疗保健服务的使用时考虑从身体健康到心理健康再到社会心理因素的多维需求因素的重要性。
    UNASSIGNED: Canada is experiencing rapid population aging, which has a wide range of implications, including an increased need for health care services. However, very few studies have examined use of specialized health care services (e.g., visits to medical specialists, non-emergency tests, and surgeries) among older Canadians.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from the Canadian Health Survey on Seniors - 2019/2020 were used to examine specialized health care service use among older Canadians. Latent class analysis was calibrated using a nationally representative sample of 39,047 Canadians aged 65 years or older to identify distinct patterns of need factors related to health care service use. Multivariable logistic regression, stratified by gender, was used to examine the association of predisposing characteristics, enabling resources, and need factors with specialized health care service use.
    UNASSIGNED: In 2019/2020, an estimated 2.6 million older Canadians (43.4%) visited medical specialists, 1.4 million (23.2%) got non-emergency tests, and 0.6 million (10.4%) had non-emergency surgeries. Among those, 15.6% reported experiencing difficulties accessing services. Women were less likely than men to have visited medical specialists and have received non-emergency tests. Lower education was consistently associated with lower odds of specialized health care service use. Individuals in the multimorbidity, high stress-multimorbidity-disability, and poor physical and mental health classes were more likely than those in the comparatively healthy class to use specialized health care services and to experience difficulties accessing them.
    UNASSIGNED: Findings of this study highlight gender differences and the importance of considering multidimensional need factors - ranging from physical health to mental health to psychosocial factors - in examining use of specialized health care services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号