Background Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and reproductive tract infections (RTIs) pose significant public health challenges globally, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to investigate the challenges faced by healthcare providers in managing and preventing STIs/RTIs in India. Materials and methods In-depth interviews were conducted with eight healthcare providers, including counselors, gynecologists, and dermatologists, working in government settings. A semi-structured interview guide was used to explore challenges related to patient care and healthcare system resources. Results The study revealed significant gaps in patient knowledge and awareness about STIs/RTIs, with misconceptions affecting treatment-seeking behavior. Social stigma and cultural barriers were identified as major obstacles to open communication and timely care. Gender-specific challenges in healthcare-seeking behavior and partner notification were noted. Healthcare providers reported inconsistent availability of treatment kits and medications, as well as challenges in ensuring patient compliance. The need for improved healthcare infrastructure, including specialized clinics and better interdepartmental coordination, was highlighted. Conclusion Addressing STI/RTI management challenges requires a multifaceted approach, including enhancing public awareness, ensuring consistent medication supply, establishing specialized clinics, and improving interdepartmental coordination. These findings provide valuable insights for developing targeted interventions to improve STI/RTI management and prevention in resource-limited settings.

BACKGROUND: The demand for COVID-19 vaccines has diminished as the pandemic lingers. Understanding vaccine hesitancy among essential workers is important in reducing the impact of future pandemics by providing effective immunization programs delivered expeditiously.
METHODS: Two surveys exploring COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in 2021 and 2022 were conducted in cohorts of health care providers (HCP) and education workers participating in prospective studies of COVID-19 illnesses and vaccine uptake. Demographic factors and opinions about vaccines (monovalent and bivalent) and public health measures were collected in these self-reported surveys. Modified multivariable Poisson regression was used to determine factors associated with hesitancy.
RESULTS: In 2021, 3 % of 2061 HCP and 6 % of 3417 education workers reported hesitancy (p < 0.001). In December 2022, 21 % of 868 HCP and 24 % of 1457 education workers reported being hesitant to receive a bivalent vaccine (p = 0.09). Hesitance to be vaccinated with the monovalent vaccines was associated with earlier date of survey completion, later receipt of first COVID-19 vaccine dose, no influenza vaccination, and less worry about becoming ill with COVID-19. Factors associated with hesitance to be vaccinated with a bivalent vaccine that were common to both cohorts were receipt of two or fewer previous COVID-19 doses and lower certainty that the vaccines were safe and effective.
CONCLUSIONS: Education workers were somewhat more likely than HCP to report being hesitant to receive COVID-19 vaccines but reasons for hesitancy were similar. Hesitancy was associated with non-receipt of previous vaccines (i.e., previous behaviour), less concern about being infected with SARS-CoV-2, and concerns about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines for both cohorts. Maintaining inter-pandemic trust in vaccines, ensuring rapid data generation during pandemics regarding vaccine safety and effectiveness, and effective and transparent communication about these data are all needed to support pandemic vaccination programs.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of respectful maternity care (RMC) training of health care providers on RMC and birth satisfaction in mothers undergoing normal vaginal birth.
METHODS: A prospective interventional study was performed comparing RMC and birth satisfaction in women undergoing vaginal births before and after RMC training of health care providers from November 2021 to March 2023 in a tertiary care center in India. Person-centered maternity care (PCMC) and birth satisfaction scale-revised (BSSR) scales were used to study women\'s RMC and birth satisfaction, respectively.
RESULTS: A total of 100 women undergoing normal vaginal birth were enrolled in pre- and post-intervention phases. The intervention was done through formal and onsite training of health care providers in RMC. The mean total PCMC scale score in the post-training group demonstrated a remarkable increase to 51.95 ± 6.50, significantly higher than the pre-training mean of 32.82 ± 8.47 (P < 0.0001). The mean ± SD of the BSSR scale total score in the post-training group increased significantly to 27.17 ± 3.67, surpassing the pre-training mean of 21.19 ± 5.48 (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The study showed significant improvement in RMC and birth satisfaction score in the post-training group thereby emphasizing the importance of RMC training of health care providers in the facility.

BACKGROUND: Legalization has increased cannabis availability in Canada. Research shows complex relationships between cannabis use and mental health, and a need for health care providers to engage with patients about cannabis use. Providers have noted gaps in knowledge and research on the medical effects of cannabis as barriers to service delivery. It is unclear how providers and patients in mental health care settings have been impacted by legalization.
METHODS: From June 1 to July 2, 2021, we conducted a qualitative study involving semi-structured interviews with 20 health care providers in a range of roles (e.g., physicians, pharmacists, nurses) within a psychiatric hospital setting. Participants responded to open-ended questions with follow-up probes on various topics related to cannabis legalization. Topics included impacts on patient mental and physical health, clinical impacts, education and training, legal cannabis retail system and the medical cannabis access system.
RESULTS: Thematic analysis identified several themes in the data. Participants reported that legalization has had some positive impacts relating to clinical care and cannabis safety. They also expressed concerns with increased rates of cannabis use, risks to mental health and ongoing challenges engaging with patients about cannabis. Participants made recommendations for medical educators and regulators (e.g., updated curriculums, clinical guidelines), the mental health care sector (e.g., implementation of standardized screening), government (e.g., public health campaigns, safe use guidelines), the medical cannabis access system (e.g., increased regulation, research), and the legal cannabis system (e.g., zoning changes, point-of-sale information).
CONCLUSIONS: This study begins to address the paucity of data on impacts of legalization from mental health service delivery settings. Findings show that although legalization has had some positive impacts, there are ongoing patient concerns and unmet provider needs. More research is needed to understand the experiences of providers delivering care to populations experiencing mental health and/or substance use concerns who use cannabis in the post-legalization era.

BACKGROUND: The burden of disease, as well as social and epidemiological factors, have a clear impact on a patient\'s quality of life. Especially in neurosurgery, patients commonly experience a decline in their quality of life. This study aims to assess the quality of life of neurosurgical patients and evaluate the impact of epidemiologic and disease-related factors.
METHODS: Adult, non-trauma neurosurgical patients were included in the study, which took place in the Neurosurgical Department at AHEPA University Hospital. Self-administered questionnaires including the 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36) and the EQ-5D-5L were used to assess the overall patient\'s quality of life. Additionally, all patients were asked to provide data on the perceived severity of the disease and the extent of information regarding their health condition. Epidemiologic factors including gender, age, education level, and rural or urban living environment were also taken into account. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the impact of the aforementioned parameters on the patient\'s quality of life.
RESULTS: In total, 74 patients were included in the study (56.9% male, mean age: 51 years). In general, better mean scores were observed in general health perception, vitality, social role functioning, and mental health, whereas the lowest values were detected in the reported physical and emotional role functioning. No statistically significant differences were observed among genders. Age was found to impact the general health perception and EQ-VAS (visual analog scale) score, while physical functioning presented significant differences depending on the patient\'s living environment and education level, with better scores for rural residents and secondary education graduates. The perceived severity of the health condition presented a significant negative effect on the EQ-VAS score, while it affected significantly physical functioning, with better outcomes reported by patients dealing with more serious diseases. Finally, in most of the evaluated categories, the level of information seemed to increase the reported quality of life, even though statistical significance was not confirmed.
CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life should be taken into account when treating neurosurgical patients, and utilizing measuring tools assists in objectively evaluating their well-being. Most parameters that influence the patient\'s quality of life are fixed. Therefore, based on our study results, healthcare professionals should prioritize providing comprehensive information regarding the patient\'s disease and treatment, as the level of information seems to improve the overall patient\'s quality of life.

UNASSIGNED: Mobile health (mHealth) apps are becoming a promising tool to motivate sustainable lifestyle and behavior changes, including modifications to diet and exercise. However, most current mHealth apps do not have meaningful, and sustained user acceptance, particularly, among adolescents. They perceive mHealth apps designed for adults to be tedious and visually unexciting, which discourage adolescent usage. Researchers and adolescent mHealth app developers would benefit from a foundational understanding of which functions and features adolescents feel would most motivate app use. Capturing caregivers\' and health care providers\' inputs are also important as both groups play an integral role in adolescent health care decision-making. The purpose of the study is to explore and analyze mHealth app features identified by adolescents, caregivers, and health care providers that have the potential to inspire continued use, thereby resulting in sustained health behavior changes in adolescents.
UNASSIGNED: We used inductive thematic analysis of qualitative data obtained from semi-structured focus groups conducted via Zoom©. Important features of mHealth apps that encourage adoption and continued use were explored with 25 participants, including adolescents, their caregivers, and health care providers.
UNASSIGNED: Common features facilitating continual usage of mHealth apps that were identified as significant by participating adolescents, their caregivers and health care providers were: look and feel of the app, customization, educational information/recommendations, and integration with electronic health record. Features such as gamification and social interaction that are usually lacking in current adolescent mHealth apps were well recognized as meaningful for motivational purposes.
UNASSIGNED: The findings suggest that adolescents and caregivers identify an app as valuable when it is user-friendly and intuitive and appreciate features that are motivating and can engage users in positive behaviors. Health care providers prefer mHealth apps that are user-friendly and can be effectively integrated into the cycle of care, thereby enabling delivery of efficient and value-based health care. Thus, mHealth app designs that are informed by health care providers\' clinical experience and needs, in combination with app features that are desired and supported by both adolescents and their caregivers, have the potential to motivate widespread adoption and long-term use, which could result in improved health behaviors and outcomes among adolescents.

UNASSIGNED: A monkeypox (MPOX) outbreak occurred in May 2022. On June 3, 2022, the WHO Blueprint organized a consultation on MPOX research knowledge gaps and priority research questions because the engagement of health care providers (HCPs) in providing accurate information and the public\'s motivation to adapt protective behaviour were crucial. Thus, we conducted this study to explore the knowledge issues, animal patterns, and interactions of HCPs in the context of MPOX and COVID-19 during the MPOX outbreak.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a cross-sectional web-based survey among 816 HCPs working in governmental health facilities from many countries, mainly Syria, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Cameroon, in September 2022.
UNASSIGNED: Four hundred and sixty (56.37%) were aged between 18 and less than 35 years old. About 34.44% were physicians, while only 37.25% worked on the frontlines with patients. 37.99% and 5.88% received vaccinations against chickenpox and MPOX, respectively. In the meantime, 55.39% had taken courses or training programmes regarding COVID-19. Regarding knowledge-seeking behaviours (KSBs) about COVID-19, 38.73% were through passive attention, while only 28.8% got their information through active search. Most of the participants (56.86%) had a moderate level of knowledge regarding COVID-19. Only 8.82% had courses or training programmes regarding MPOX. Regarding KSB about MPOX, 50.86% were obtained through passive attention, while only 18.01% and 23.04% got their information through active and passive search, respectively. Most of the participants (57.60%) had a poor level of knowledge regarding MPOX. The regression analysis of the MPOX knowledge score revealed that individuals working on the frontlines with patients and those who had training programmes or courses were shown to have a higher score by 1.25 and 3.18 points, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: The studied HCPs had poorer knowledge about the MPOX virus than they did about the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Training programmes and education courses had an impact on their knowledge.

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the way in which end-of-life care was provided, underwent a lot of changes and therefor different domains of end-of-life care were impacted. The aim of this study is to describe whether health care providers considered end-of-life care (in medical, nursing, psychosocial and spiritual care) limited by the pandemic through the first 18 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and examine associations with COVID-19 related circumstances of care (e.g. visit restrictions) and health care providers\' characteristics.
METHODS: A longitudinal survey study among healthcare providers from different healthcare settings who provided end-of-life care during the pandemic\'s first 18 months. Data of four time periods were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Generalized Estimating Equation.
RESULTS: Of the respondents (n = 302) the majority had a nursing background (71.8%) and most worked in a hospital (30.3%). Especially in the first wave end-of-life care in all aspects was limited according to a substantial part of health care providers (between 29.7 and 57.7%). Psychosocial and spiritual care were more limited than medical and nursing care during all time periods. Care being limited according to health care providers was associated with visit restrictions, shortness of personal protective equipment or restrictions in caring for the deceased and decreased over time.
CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted different aspects of end-of-life care throughout the pandemic\'s first 18 months. Over the course of the pandemic health care providers seemed to have invented ways to adjust their work in order to minimize the effect of limiting measures. More involvement of health care providers in decision-making may improve the prioritization of measures to deal with crisis situations in care. These reflections highlight priorities during crises and the role healthcare providers could play in maintaining good end-of-life care. This remains relevant in new health crises, where care may differ from what is considered good quality of care.

BACKGROUND: Women in menopause are at a higher risk of developing oral health problems, affecting their overall quality of life. Several studies have identified the role of health care providers in addressing women\'s oral health needs across various phases of their lives, yet a review in the area of perimenopause and menopause has not been undertaken. Therefore, the aim of this review was to explore current evidence regarding the oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices of women in perimenopause or menopause and their health care providers. Additionally, guidelines and recommendations to inform strategies for oral health promotion are included.
METHODS: A systematic search was carried out across 5 databases. Inclusion criteria included articles published in English that examined at least one study outcome: oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices of either women in perimenopause or menopause or of health care providers or guidelines around oral health care. Qualitative, quantitative, mixed-methods, and experimental studies with survey components were included with no restrictions on publication period, quality, or setting.
RESULTS: A total of 12 articles met the inclusion criteria, with a majority being of poor quality and mostly from low-income and middle-income countries. Overall findings indicated that there was a lack of knowledge and limited practices in maintaining oral hygiene and visiting the dentist among women in perimenopause or menopause. Health care providers exhibited poor attitudes in advising the importance of periodic dental check-ups and informing oral health changes during this period. There were also insufficient guidelines to adopt care for women and guide health care providers in their practice.
CONCLUSIONS: Women in perimenopause or menopause have limited oral health knowledge and unmet oral health needs. Appropriate guidelines and supportive strategies are required to assist health care providers in providing comprehensive care and encouragement to women in perimenopause or menopause to improve their oral health.

BACKGROUND: Access and use of contraception services by adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) remains suboptimal, exposing AGYW to early and often unexpected pregnancy. Unexpected pregnancies are a public health concern, associated with poor neonatal and maternal health outcomes, as well as school dropout, which may result in economic hardships. This study aimed to explore (a) AGYW perceptions and experiences of receiving contraception services from health care providers and (b) health care providers\' perceptions and experiences of providing contraception services to AGYW.
METHODS: Data were collected through semi-structured individual interviews with AGYW aged 15-24 years old and health care providers working in eight health care facilities around the Cape Town metropolitan area, in South Africa\'s Western Cape Province. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.
RESULTS: AGYW and health care providers voiced varying, and often contrasting, perceptions of some of the barriers that hinder AGYW\'s access to contraception services. AGYW indicated that provider-imposed rules about when to access contraceptive services hindered access, while health care providers felt that these rules were necessary for coordinating their work. In addition, AGYW highlighted health care providers\' hostile attitudes towards them as an important factor discouraging access. On the contrary, health care providers did not think that their attitudes hampered AGYW\'s access to and use of contraception services, instead they emphasised that challenges at the health system level were a major issue, which they feel they have little control over. Such challenges made health care providers\' work unpleasant and frustrating, impacting on their work approach and how they receive and offer services to AGYW.
CONCLUSIONS: The expectation of negative attitudes from health care providers continues to be at the centre of AGYW discouragement towards accessing contraception services. System challenges are among some of the key drivers of health care provider\'s hostile attitudes, posing challenges to the efficient provision of services. In order to improve AGYW\'s access to and use of contraception services, and subsequently achieve the country\'s SDGs, conscious efforts need to be directed towards improving the workload and working conditions of health care providers.