暂无摘要。

Mexico\'s national human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination program was established in 2008, providing free access to HPV vaccines and quickly becoming an immense success story, achieving significant coverage among young Mexican females. However, despite these efforts and notable achievements, cervical cancer caused mainly by HPV remains a challenging issue among Mexican women aged 15 years or older. A critical obstacle faced by women in the country is a lack of early detection and screening resources, coupled with delays in diagnosis and treatment, exacerbated by the poor distribution of already insufficient healthcare resources. This situation creates adverse conditions for the female demographic in the country. Our editorial aims to draw attention to the urgent need to improve access to adequate prevention, screening, and treatment for cervical cancer patients in Mexico, advocating for a collective effort between the Mexican government, public health professionals, and civil society.

OBJECTIVE: Our prospective international survey evaluated the impact of the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management gynaecological malignancies from the multidisciplinary physicians\' perspective with particular focus on clinical infrastructures and trial participation.
METHODS: Our survey consisted of 53 COVID-related questions. It was sent to healthcare professionals in gynaecological oncology centres across Europe and Pan-Arabian region via the study groups and gynaecological societies from April 2020 to October 2020. All healthcare professionals treating gynaecological cancers were able to participate in our survey.
RESULTS: A total of 255 answers were collected from 30 countries. The majority (73%) of participants were gynaecological oncologists from university hospitals (71%) with at least an Intensive Care Unit with cardiopulmonary support available at their institutions. Most institutions continued to perform elective surgeries only for oncological cases (98%). Patients had to wait on average 2 weeks longer for their surgery appointments compared to previous years (range 0-12 weeks). Most cases that were prioritised for surgical intervention across all gynaecological tumours were early-stage disease (74%), primary situation (61%) and good ECOG status (63%). The radicality of surgery did not change in the majority of cases (78%) across all tumour types. During the pandemic, only 38% of clinicians stated they would start a new clinical trial. Almost half of the participants stated the pandemic negatively impacted the financial structure and support for clinical trials. Approximately 20% of clinicians did not feel well-informed regarding clinical algorithm for COVID-19 patients throughout the pandemic. Thirty percent stated that they are currently having trouble in providing adequate medical care due to staff shortage.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite well-established guidelines, pandemic clearly affected clinical research and patientcare. Our survey underlines the necessity for building robust emergency algorithms tailored to gynaecological oncology to minimise negative impact in crises and to preserve access to clinical trials.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: A well-known complication of laparoscopic management of gynaecologic masses and cancers is the need to perform an intraoperative conversion to laparotomy. The purpose of this study was to identify novel patient risk factors for conversion from minimally invasive to open surgeries for gynaecologic oncology operations.
UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective cohort study of 1356 patients ≥18 years of age who underwent surgeries for gynaecologic masses or malignancies between February 2015 and May 2020 at a single academic medical centre. Multivariable logistic regression was used to study the effects of older age, higher body mass index (BMI), higher American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) physical status, and lower preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) on odds of converting from minimally invasive to open surgery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis assessed the discriminatory ability of a risk prediction model for conversion.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 704 planned minimally invasive surgeries were included with an overall conversion rate of 6.1% (43/704). Preoperative Hb was lowest for conversion cases, compared to minimally invasive and open cases (11.6 ± 1.9 vs 12.8 ± 1.5 vs 11.8 ± 1.9 g/dL, p<.001). Patients with preoperative Hb <10 g/dL had an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 3.94 (CI: 1.65-9.41, p=.002) for conversion while patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 had an adjusted OR of 2.86 (CI: 1.50-5.46, p=.001) for conversion. ROC curve analysis using predictive variables of age >50 years, BMI ≥30 kg/m2, ASA physical status >2, and preoperative haemoglobin <10 g/dL resulted in an area under the ROC curve of 0.71. Patients with 2 or more risk factors were at highest risk of requiring an intraoperative conversion (12.0%).
UNASSIGNED: Lower preoperative haemoglobin is a novel risk factor for conversion from minimally invasive to open gynaecologic oncology surgeries and stratifying patients based on conversion risk may be helpful for preoperative planning.
Minimally invasive surgery for management of gynaecologic masses (masses that affect the female reproductive organs) is often preferred over more invasive surgery, because it involves smaller surgical incisions and can have overall better recovery time. However, one unwanted complication of minimally invasive surgery is the need to unexpectedly convert the surgery to an open surgery, which entails a larger incision and is a higher risk procedure. In our study, we aimed to find patient characteristics that are associated with higher risk of converting a minimally invasive surgery to an open surgery. Our study identified that lower levels of preoperative haemoglobin, the protein that carries oxygen within red blood cells, is correlated with higher risk for conversion. This new risk factor was used with other known risk factors, including having higher age, higher body mass index, and higher baseline medical complexity to create a model to help surgical teams identify high risk patients for conversion. This model may be useful for surgical planning before and during the operation to improve patient outcomes.

暂无摘要。

A patient with bilateral ovarian cancer, peritoneal dissemination, and multiple liver and lung metastases was found with a sudden accumulation of ascites six months after delivery. Chemotherapy was started, but the prognosis was judged to be poor, so immuno-cell therapy was combined with chemotherapy. After multiple cycles of Wilms\' tumor antigen 1 (WT1) dendritic cell vaccine therapy and highly activated natural killer (NK) cell therapy, the patient showed a disappearance of ascites and a remarkable reduction of multiple cancers in the whole body. Furthermore, there were no side effects other than reactive fever caused by the administration of immune cells, and no damage to the patient\'s body was observed. This case suggests that not only the combined effects of chemotherapy and immunotherapy but also the combined use of various types of immuno-cell therapy may provide beneficial clinical effects in patients with extremely poor prognoses and few options for standard treatment.

This review aims to provide a comprehensive description of surgical approaches for the management of uterine sarcomas. Uterine sarcomas are rare uterine neoplasms. Frequently, diagnosis is made after hysterectomy or myomectomy scheduled for presumed benign leiomyomas. The gold standard for surgical treatment of uterine sarcomas is hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. It is possible to adopt a fertility-sparing approach for those patients who wish to maintain their fertility. The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy is controversial; in fact, removal of lymph nodes is only recommended in the case of radiological suspicion of nodal involvement. Use of a morcellator is associated with increased risk of total recurrence, intra-abdominal recurrence and death. Advanced disease management should be customized based on the patient\'s performance status given the uncertain role of adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment of advanced or recurrent disease remains a subject of debate, but surgery is the best approach in terms of morbidity and mortality. There are few options for management of these uterine tumours, and further studies are needed to clarify the diagnostic and therapeutic pathways of patients with a first diagnosis of uterine sarcoma and patients with relapse of uterine sarcoma. No specific evidence supports the adoption of adjuvant therapy in uterine-confined disease, and molecular/genomic profiling may be useful to identify patients at risk of recurrence.

Cervical cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality in women globally. Neuroendocrine carcinomas are among the rarest and least studied histopathological types of cervical cancers, accounting for 1.4% of all cervical cancers. Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix (NECCs) are aggressive tumors that can be associated with several high-risk features such as early lymphovascular invasion and multiple systemic metastases, at early stages. Here, we present a case series of five patients with NECC who have been diagnosed and managed at a tertiary care hospital in coastal Andhra Pradesh, South India. Using the hospital records, we made a list of patients with NECC who were diagnosed by histopathological findings between 2019 and 2022. Details regarding their demographic variables, presenting complaints, staging, and treatment given were noted down using a pre-defined proforma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy offers superior survival rates in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), tubal, or peritoneal cancer.
METHODS: We searched the electronic databases PubMed (from 1996), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (from 1996), and Scopus (from 2004) to September 2021. We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy with no lymphadenectomy in patients with advanced EOC. Primary outcomes were overall survival and progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes were peri-operative morbidity and operative mortality. The revised Cochrane tool for randomised trials (RoB 2 tool) was utilised for the risk of bias assessment in the included studies. We performed time-to-event and standard pairwise meta-analyses, as appropriate.
RESULTS: Two RCTs with a total of 1074 patients were included in our review. Meta-analysis demonstrated similar overall survival (HR = 1.03, 95% CI [0.85-1.24]; low certainty) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.63-1.35]; very low certainty). Regarding peri-operative morbidity, systematic lymphadenectomy was associated with higher rates of lymphoedema and lymphocysts formation (RR = 7.31, 95% CI [1.89-28.20]; moderate certainty) and need for blood transfusion (RR = 1.17, 95% CI [1.06-1.29]; moderate certainty). No statistically significant differences were observed in regard to other peri-operative adverse events between the two arms.
CONCLUSIONS: Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is likely associated with similar overall survival and progression-free survival compared to no lymphadenectomy in optimally debulked patients with advanced EOC. Systematic lymphadenectomy is also associated with an increased risk for certain peri-operative adverse events. Further research needs to be conducted on whether we should abandon systematic lymphadenectomy in completely debulked patients during primary debulking surgery.