guideline

Guideline
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胆管导管内乳头状肿瘤是一种罕见的肿瘤。特征包括胆管扩张,与胆管相通的囊性病变,和胆管壁产生的腔内实性结节。与胰腺导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤一样,肠,胰胆管,胃,描述了嗜酸细胞类型。胆管导管内乳头状肿瘤具有很高的恶性可能性,患者应尽可能手术切除。在这次审查中,提出了复杂的影像学诊断。主要集中在超声造影,一种用于许多其他适应症的既定方法,这些适应症对胆道系统的潜力应得到更好的利用。在本文中,证实了胆管导管内乳头状肿瘤的典型超声造影表现。
    Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts is a rare tumor. Characteristic features include bile duct dilatation, cystic lesions with communication to the bile ducts, and intraluminal solid nodules arising from the bile duct wall. As in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia, intestinal, pancreaticobiliary, gastric, and oncocytic types are described. Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts has a high potential for malignancy, and patients should be surgically resected when possible. In this review, the complex imaging diagnosis is presented. The main focus is on contrast-enhanced ultrasound, an established method for many other indications whose potential on the biliary system should be better exploited. In the present article, typical contrast-enhanced ultrasound findings in intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile ducts are demonstrated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    此病例报告探讨了一名64岁男性出现偶然收缩期杂音的无症状二尖瓣反流(MR)的诊断和管理中涉及的复杂性。通过综合影像学和临床评估,确定了具有连尾二尖瓣(MV)节段的房性MR。包括超声心动图和导管插入术。讨论突出了手术时机的细微差别,强调基于左心室(LV)功能和扩张的定制方法的重要性。本报告揭示了无症状MR管理的不断发展的前景,强调需要平衡监测和主动干预以优化患者预后。
    This case report explores the complexities involved in the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR) in a 64-year-old male presenting with an incidental systolic murmur. Torrential MR with flail mitral valve (MV) segments was identified through comprehensive imaging and clinical evaluation, including echocardiography and catheterization. The discussion highlights the nuances of surgical timing, emphasizing the importance of tailored approaches based on left ventricular (LV) function and dilation. This report sheds light on the evolving landscape of managing asymptomatic MR, underscoring the need for balancing surveillance with proactive intervention to optimize patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    澳大利亚复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)的调查和管理指南的第二部分为RPL的管理提供了基于证据的指导。提供了遗传性和获得性血栓形成倾向对RPL的影响以及临床管理建议。自身免疫因素,包括人类白细胞抗原,细胞因子,抗核抗体和腹腔抗体,并对管理指导进行了讨论。感染,详细讨论了RPL的炎症和子宫内膜原因。环境和生活方式因素,概述了男性因素和无法解释的原因。所有基于证据的陈述都提供了证据水平和共识等级。
    Part II of the Australasian guideline for the investigation and management of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) provides evidence-based guidance on the management of RPL provided. The implications of inherited and acquired thrombophilia with respect to RPL and suggestions for clinical management are provided. Autoimmune factors, including human leukocyte antigen, cytokines, antinuclear antibodies and coeliac antibodies, and guidance for management are discussed. Infective, inflammatory and endometrial causes of RPL are discussed in detail. Environmental and lifestyle factors, male factor and unexplained causes are outlined. Levels of evidence and grades of consensus are provided for all evidence-based statements.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    欧洲已经制定了复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)的调查和管理指南,美国和英国,但目前没有澳大利亚指南。澳大利亚生殖内分泌学和不孕症共识专家小组审判证据小组编写了一份两部分指南,为RPL的管理提供指导。在第一部分染色体中,解剖学,概述了内分泌因素以及相关的临床管理建议,证据水平和共识等级。在第二部分血栓形成倾向中,自身免疫因素,感染,炎症,和子宫内膜的原因,环境和生活方式因素,男性因素和无法解释的原因将被概述。
    Guidelines for the investigation and management of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) have been developed in Europe, USA and UK, but there is currently no Australasian guideline. The Australasian Certificate of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Consensus Expert Panel on Trial Evidence group has prepared a two-part guideline to provide guidance on the management of RPL. In Part I chromosomal, anatomical, and endocrine factors are outlined along with relevant recommendations for clinical management, levels of evidence and grades of consensus. In Part II thrombophilia, autoimmune factors, infective, inflammatory, and endometrial causes, environmental and lifestyle factors, male factor and unexplained causes will be outlined.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在临床试验的执行过程中,不良事件(AE)的报告是必需的,并且是明确定义的,但在以创伤性损伤为重点的院前试验中表现不佳.在院前创伤试验中,目前尚无文献分析AE的临床意义及其与死亡率和发病率的关系.我们试图分析三项院前出血性休克试验的AEs,并描述它们的时间过程。发病率,严重程度,相关临床结果,和亲密关系。
    我们对三项院前随机临床试验进行了二次分析。我们分析了患者水平以及个体AE水平的AE。我们对没有AE的患者进行了分类,单个记录的AE和多个事件(>1AE)。我们表征了AE时机,严重程度,相关性和归因死亡率结果。
    我们纳入了来自三项协调临床试验的1490名患者,299例(20.1%)患者至少有一次AE记录,总体上有529例AE记录,占患者有多次事件的比例.超过44%的患者患有与死亡相关的错误分类的AE。与没有记录AE的患者相比,至少有一次记录AE的患者的28天死亡率明显更高(log-rankχ2=81.27,p<0.001)。单个AE患者的死亡率明显高于多个AE患者,可能是由于生存偏差(对数秩χ2=11.80,p=0.006)。当表征每个单独的AE的相关性时,超过97%的AE被归类为“绝对不相关”或“可能与干预无关”。
    失血性休克试验中的不良事件很常见,早期发生,并与死亡率和生存偏差相关。存在不准确报告的可能性,教育和培训对于适当的治疗手臂比较仍然至关重要。目前的结果与损伤相关的临床试验具有重要的相关性。
    NCT01818427、NCT02086500和NCT03477006。
    II.
    UNASSIGNED: The reporting of adverse events (AEs) is required and well defined in the execution of clinical trials, but is poorly characterized particularly in prehospital trials focusing on traumatic injury. In the setting of prehospital traumatic injury trials, no literature currently exists analyzing the clinical implications of AEs and their associations with mortality and morbidity. We sought to analyze AEs from three prehospital hemorrhagic shock trials and characterize their time course, incidence, severity, associated clinical outcomes, and relatedness.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a secondary analysis of three prehospital randomized clinical trials. We analyzed AEs at both the patient level as well as the individual AE level. We categorized patients who had no AEs, a single documented AE and those with multiple events (>1 AE). We characterized AE timing, severity, relatedness and attributable mortality outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 1490 patients from the three harmonized clinical trials, with 299 (20.1%) individual patients having at least a single AE documented with 529 AEs documented overall as a proportion of patients had multiple events. Over 44% of patients had a death-related misclassified AE. Patients with at least a single documented AE had a significantly higher 28-day mortality (log-rank χ2=81.27, p<0.001) compared with those without an AE documented. Patients with a single AE had a significant higher mortality than those with multiple AEs, potentially due to survival bias (log-rank χ2=11.80, p=0.006). When relatedness of each individual AE was characterized, over 97% of AEs were classified as \'definitely not related\' or \'probably not related\' to the intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: AEs in hemorrhagic shock trials are common, occur early and are associated with mortality and survival bias. The potential for inaccurate reporting exists, and education and training remain essential for appropriate treatment arm comparison. The current results have important relevance to injury-related clinical trials.
    UNASSIGNED: NCT01818427, NCT02086500 and NCT03477006.
    UNASSIGNED: II.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性低氧性呼吸衰竭(ARF)是住院的常见原因。高流量鼻氧(HFNO)越来越多地用作ARF患者的一线治疗,包括医疗病房。提供HFNO时,临床指导至关重要,和卫生服务使用当地卫生指导文件(LHGD)来实现这一目标。尚不清楚LHGD医院对HFNO的病房管理有何建议。这项研究检查了澳大利亚医院LHGD关于基于病房的HFNO管理的内容,以确定可能影响安全分娩的内容。2022年5月2日进行了范围审查,并于2024年1月29日进行了更新,以确定在澳大利亚两个州的医疗病房中向患有ARF的成年人提供HFNO的公立医院。提取并分析了有关HFNO起始的数据,监测,保养和断奶,和临床恶化的管理。在包括LHGD的26个中,五份文件引用了澳大利亚氧气指南。20个LHGD没有定义低氧血症的阈值水平,建议使用HFNO而不是常规氧疗。13在使用HFNO时没有提供目标氧饱和度范围。关于病房中最大吸入氧气水平和流速的建议各不相同。八个LHGD没有指定任何系统来识别和管理恶化的患者。五个LHGD没有为HFNO的断奶患者提供指导。在澳大利亚医院中,对于成人ARF患者的HFNO护理,LHGD存在很大差异。这些发现对高质量的交付,医院的安全临床护理。
    Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (ARF) is a common cause for hospital admission. High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is increasingly used as a first-line treatment for patients with ARF, including in medical wards. Clinical guidance is crucial when providing HFNO, and health services use local health guidance documents (LHGDs) to achieve this. It is unknown what hospital LHGDs recommend regarding ward administration of HFNO. This study examined Australian hospitals\' LHGDs regarding ward-based HFNO administration to determine content that may affect safe delivery. A scoping review was undertaken on 2 May 2022 and updated on 29 January 2024 to identify public hospitals\' LHGDs regarding delivery of HFNO to adults with ARF in medical wards in two Australian states. Data were extracted and analysed regarding HFNO initiation, monitoring, maintenance and weaning, and management of clinical deterioration. Of the twenty-six included LHGDs, five documents referenced Australian Oxygen Guidelines. Twenty LHGDs did not define a threshold level of hypoxaemia where HFNO use was recommended over conventional oxygen therapy. Thirteen did not provide target oxygen saturation ranges whilst utilising HFNO. Recommendations varied regarding maximal levels of inspired oxygen and flow rates in the medical ward. Eight LHGDs did not specify any system to identify and manage deteriorating patients. Five LHGDs did not provide guidance for weaning patients from HFNO. There was substantial variation in the LHGDs regarding HFNO care for adult patients with ARF in Australian hospitals. These findings have implications for the delivery of high-quality, safe clinical care in hospitals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:观察性研究的证据表明,肺癌筛查(LCS)指南对肺癌(LC)的低诊断率很高,尽管目前的筛查指南已经更新,筛查的资格标准也已经扩大,没有研究比较中国人群中LCS指南的效率。
    方法:在2005年至2022年之间,在我们机构使用低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查了31,394名无症状个体。收集人口统计学数据和相关LC危险因素。每个指导标准的LCS效率表示为效率比(ER)。包容率,合格率,LC检测率,并根据ER的不同合格标准对4个指南进行了比较分析。四个指南如下:中国肺癌筛查和早期发现指南(CGSL),国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)美国预防服务工作队(USPSTF),和国际早期肺癌行动计划(I-ELCAP)。
    结果:在31,394名参与者中,298(155名妇女,143名男性)被诊断为LC。对于CGSL,NCCN,USPSTF,和I-ELCAP指南,准则的合格率为13.92%,6.97%,6.81%,和53.46%;资格标准的ERe为1.46%,1.64%,1.51%,和1.13%,分别是;对于包容率,他们是19.0%,9.5%,9.3%,73.0%,分别。符合CGSL筛选标准的LC,NCCN,USPSTF,I-ELCAP指南为29.2%,16.4%,14.8%,和86.6%,分别。CGSL的年龄和吸烟标准更严格,因此导致符合筛查标准的LC比率较低。CGSL,NCCN,USPSTF指南显示,45-49岁年龄组的漏诊率最高(17.4%),而I-ELCAP指南显示35-39岁年龄组的漏诊率最高(3.0%)。根据四个指南的标准,男性和女性的资格显着不同(P<0.001)。
    结论:I-ELCAP指南对男性和女性的合格率最高。但是对于指南认为合格的人,其实际效率比率最低。而NCCN指南对于那些被指南认为符合条件的人具有最高的ERe值。
    BACKGROUND: Evidence from observational studies indicates that lung cancer screening (LCS) guidelines with high rates of lung cancer (LC) underdiagnosis, and although current screening guidelines have been updated and eligibility criteria for screening have been expanded, there are no studies comparing the efficiency of LCS guidelines in Chinese population.
    METHODS: Between 2005 and 2022, 31,394 asymptomatic individuals were screened using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) at our institution. Demographic data and relevant LC risk factors were collected. The efficiency of the LCS for each guideline criteria was expressed as the efficiency ratio (ER). The inclusion rates, eligibility rates, LC detection rates, and ER based on the different eligibility criteria of the four guidelines were comparatively analyzed. The four guidelines were as follows: China guideline for the screening and early detection of lung cancer (CGSL), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and International Early Lung Cancer Action Program (I-ELCAP).
    RESULTS: Of 31,394 participants, 298 (155 women, 143 men) were diagnosed with LC. For CGSL, NCCN, USPSTF, and I-ELCAP guidelines, the eligibility rates for guidelines were 13.92%, 6.97%, 6.81%, and 53.46%; ERe for eligibility criteria were 1.46%, 1.64%, 1.51%, and 1.13%, respectively; and for the inclusion rates, they were 19.0%, 9.5%, 9.3%, and 73.0%, respectively. LCs which met the screening criteria of CGSL, NCCN, USPSTF, and I-ELCAP guidelines were 29.2%, 16.4%, 14.8%, and 86.6%, respectively. The age and smoking criteria for CGSL were stricter, hence resulting in lower rates of LC meeting the screening criteria. The CGSL, NCCN, and USPSTF guidelines showed the highest underdiagnosis in the 45-49 age group (17.4%), while the I-ELCAP guideline displayed the highest missed diagnosis rate (3.0%) in the 35-39 age group. Males and females significantly differed in eligibility based on the criteria of the four guidelines (P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The I-ELCAP guideline has the highest eligibility rate for both males and females. But its actual efficiency ratio for those deemed eligible by the guideline was the lowest. Whereas the NCCN guideline has the highest ERe value for those deemed eligible by the guideline.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Introductory Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号