Optimized use of prophylactic or therapeutic donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) is aimed at improving clinical outcomes in patients with malignant and non-malignant hematological diseases who have undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Memory T-lymphocytes (CD45RA-/CD45RO+) play a crucial role in immune reconstitution post-HSCT. The infusion of memory T cells is proven to be safe and effective in improving outcomes due to the enhanced reconstitution of immunity and increased protection against viremia, without exacerbating graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) risks. Studies indicate their persistence and efficacy in combating viral pathogens, suggesting a viable therapeutic avenue for patients. Conversely, using virus-specific T cells for viremia control presents challenges, such as regulatory hurdles, cost, and production time compared to CD45RA-memory T lymphocytes. Additionally, the modulation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) for therapeutic use has become an important area of investigation in GVHD, playing a pivotal role in immune tolerance modulation, potentially mitigating GVHD and reducing pharmacological immunosuppression requirements. Finally, donor T cell-mediated graft-versus-leukemia immune responses hold promise in curbing relapse rates post-HSCT, providing a multifaceted approach to therapeutic intervention in high-risk disease scenarios. This comprehensive review underscores the multifaceted roles of T lymphocytes in HSCT outcomes and identifies avenues for further research and clinical application.

BACKGROUND: Relapse remains a challenge after transplantation in pediatric patients with hematological malignancies. Myeloablative regimens used for disease control are associated with acute and long-term adverse effects. We used a CD45RA-depleted haploidentical graft for adoptive transfer of memory T cells combined with NK-cell addback and hypothesized that maximizing the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect might allow for reduction in intensity of conditioning regimen.
METHODS: In this phase II clinical trial (NCT01807611), 72 patients with hematological malignancies (complete remission (CR)1: 25, ≥ CR2: 28, refractory disease: 19) received haploidentical CD34 + enriched and CD45RA-depleted hematopoietic progenitor cell grafts followed by NK-cell infusion. Conditioning included fludarabine, thiotepa, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, total lymphoid irradiation, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of a short-course sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil without serotherapy.
RESULTS: The 3-year overall survival (OS) and event-free-survival (EFS) for patients in CR1 were 92% (95% CI:72-98) and 88% (95% CI: 67-96); ≥ CR2 were 81% (95% CI: 61-92) and 68% (95% CI: 47-82) and refractory disease were 32% (95% CI: 11-54) and 20% (95% CI: 6-40). The 3-year EFS for all patients in morphological CR was 77% (95% CI: 64-87) with no difference amongst recipients with or without minimal residual disease (P = 0.2992). Immune reconstitution was rapid, with mean CD3 and CD4 T-cell counts of 410/μL and 140/μL at day + 30. Cumulative incidence of acute GVHD and chronic GVHD was 36% and 26% but most patients with acute GVHD recovered rapidly with therapy. Lower rates of grade III-IV acute GVHD were observed with NK-cell alloreactive donors (P = 0.004), and higher rates of moderate/severe chronic GVHD occurred with maternal donors (P = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of a CD45RA-depleted graft and NK-cell addback led to robust immune reconstitution maximizing the GVL effect and allowed for use of a submyeloablative, TBI-free conditioning regimen that was associated with excellent EFS resulting in promising long-term outcomes in this high-risk population. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01807611).

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has transformed over the past several decades through enhanced supportive care, reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), improved human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing, and novel graft-versus-host disease (GVHD)-prevention and treatment strategies. Most notably, the implementation of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) has dramatically increased the safety and availability of this life-saving therapy. Given reductions in nonrelapse mortality (NRM) with these advances, the HCT community has placed even greater emphasis on developing ways to reduce relapse - the leading cause of death after HCT. When using RIC HCT, protection from relapse relies predominantly on graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) reactions. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI), adoptive cellular therapy, checkpoint inhibition, and post-HCT maintenance strategies represent approaches under study that aim to augment or synergize with the GVL effects of HCT. Optimizing donor selection algorithms to leverage GVL represents another active area of research. Many of these strategies seek to harness the effects of T cells, which for decades were felt to be the primary mediators of GVL and the focus of investigation in relapse reduction. However, there is growing interest in capitalizing on the ability of natural killer (NK) cells to yield potent anti-tumor effects. A potential advantage of NK cell-based approaches over T cell-mediated is the potential to reduce NRM in addition to relapse. By decreasing infection, without increasing the risk of GVHD, NK cells may mitigate NRM, while still yielding relapse reduction through identification and clearance of cancer cells. Most T cell-focused relapse-prevention strategies must weigh the benefits of relapse reduction against the increased risk of NRM from GVHD. In contrast, NK cells have the potential to reduce both, potentially tipping the scales significantly in favor of survival. Here, we will review the role of NK cells in GVL, optimization of NK cell match or mismatch, and burgeoning areas of research in NK cell therapy such as adoptive transfer and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) NK cells.

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the only curative therapy for many hematologic malignancies, whereby the Graft-versus-Leukemia (GVL) effect plays a pivotal role in controlling relapse. However, the success of GVL is hindered by Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD), where donor T cells attack healthy tissues in the recipient. The ability of natural regulatory T cells (Treg) to suppress immune responses has been exploited as a therapeutical option against GVHD. Still, it is crucial to evaluate if the ability of Treg to suppress GVHD does not compromise the benefits of GVL. Initial studies in animal models suggest that Treg can attenuate GVHD while preserving GVL, but results vary according to tumor type. Human trials using Treg as GVHD prophylaxis or treatment show promising results, emphasizing the importance of infusion timing and Treg/Tcon ratios. In this review, we discuss strategies that can be used aiming to enhance GVL post-Treg infusion and the proposed mechanisms for the maintenance of the GVL effect upon the adoptive Treg transfer. In order to optimize the therapeutic outcomes of Treg administration in allo-HSCT, future efforts should focus on refining Treg sources for infusion and evaluating their specificity for antigens mediating GVHD while preserving GVL responses.

BACKGROUND: Disease relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) is the main challenge for curing acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). We investigated the overall survival (OS) after allo-SCT relapse according to different therapeutic approaches.
METHODS: We analyzed 134 patients who relapsed after allo-SCT performed between 2015 and 2021 at Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Paris and Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia. Of these, 103 (77%) were treated, comprising 69/103 (67%) who received therapy in overt relapse and 34/103 (33%) who were treated in a pre-emptive manner when molecular/cytogenetics recurrence or mixed chimerism occurred. The treatment was donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI)-based for 40/103 (39%) patients.
RESULTS: The 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS of patients treated with DLI (n = 40) was 67%, 34%, and 34%, respectively, for those treated preventively (n = 20) and 43%, 20%, and 20%, respectively, for those treated in overt relapse (n = 20) (p < 0.01). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS of patients treated without DLI (n = 63) was 54%, 40%, and 26%, respectively, for those treated preventively (n = 14) and 17%, 5%, and 0%, respectively, for those treated in overt relapse (n = 49) (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Relapse treatment with a pre-emptive strategy was associated with improved outcomes, particularly when DLI was employed.

Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is the prototype of cancer genomics as it was the first published cancer genome. Large-scale next generation/massively parallel sequencing efforts have identified recurrent alterations that inform prognosis and have guided the development of targeted therapies. Despite changes in the frontline and relapsed standard of care stemming from the success of small molecules targeting FLT3, IDH1/2, and apoptotic pathways, allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) and the resulting graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect remains the only curative path for most patients. Advances in conditioning regimens, graft-vs-host disease prophylaxis, anti-infective agents, and supportive care have made this modality feasible, reducing transplant related mortality even among patients with advanced age or medical comorbidities. As such, relapse has emerged now as the most common cause of transplant failure. Relapse may occur after alloHSCT because residual disease clones persist after transplant, and develop immune escape from GVL, or such clones may proliferate rapidly early after alloHSCT, and outpace donor immune reconstitution, leading to relapse before any GVL effect could set in. To address this issue, genomically informed therapies are increasingly being incorporated into pre-transplant conditioning, or as post-transplant maintenance or pre-emptive therapy in the setting of mixed/falling donor chimerism or persistent detectable measurable residual disease (MRD). There is an urgent need to better understand how these emerging therapies modulate the two sides of the GVHD vs. GVL coin: 1) how molecularly or immunologically targeted therapies affect engraftment, GVHD potential, and function of the donor graft and 2) how these therapies affect the immunogenicity and sensitivity of leukemic clones to the GVL effect. By maximizing the synergistic action of molecularly targeted agents, immunomodulating agents, conventional chemotherapy, and the GVL effect, there is hope for improving outcomes for patients with this often-devastating disease.

Lethal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is the major complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT). Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) is essential for CD4+ T-cell differentiation. Using the well-characterized mouse models of Allo-HSCT, we explored the effects of TEPP-46-induced PKM2 tetramerization on GVHD and graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) activity. TEPP-46 administration significantly improved the survival rate of GVHD. The severity of GVHD and histopathological damage of GVHD-targeted organs were obviously alleviated by PKM2 tetramerization. Additionally, tetramerized PKM2 inhibited the activation of NF-κB pathway and decreased the inflammation level of GVHD mice. PKM2 tetramerization blocked Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokine (IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-17). Meanwhile, differentiation of Treg cells and IL-10 secretion were promoted by tetramerized PKM2. These findings demonstrated that PKM2 enhanced the augment of Th1 and Th17 cells to accelerate the progression of GVHD, and allosteric activation of PKM2 targeted Th1 and Th17 cells attenuated GVHD. Furthermore, we also confirmed that TEPP-46 administration did not compromise GVL activity and resulted in slightly improvement of leukemia-free survive. Thus, targeting Th1 and Th17 cell response with PKM2 allosteric activator may be a promising therapeutic strategy for GVHD prevention while preserving the GVL activity in patients receiving Allo-HSCT.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can alleviate graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). MSCs-derived exosomes (MEXs) can mirror the biological function of their parent cells. Whether MEXs can alleviate GVHD like their parent cells or not is unclear. In this study, we investigate the effects of MEXs on GVHD and graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect in vitro and in HSCT animal models.
MSCs were produced using bone marrow mononuclear cells (MNCs), and MEXs were separated from the supernatants of MSCs. Electron microscopy, western blot, and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) were used to determine the characteristics of MEXs. The immunomodulatory function of MEXs and their effects on GVHD and GVL were examined in vitro and in vivo.
Like other cell-type derived exosomes, our data revealed that MEXs were also disc-shaped vesicles with a diameter of 100-200 nm under electron microscopy and were positive for the exosomal hallmark proteins. MEXs can notably inhibit the expression of costimulatory molecules and functional cytokine secretion of dendritic cells (DCs). Meanwhile, MEXs can exert suppressive effects on T lymphocyte proliferation and activation. Moreover, MEXs can also encourage the polarization of macrophages toward the M2 type. In animal HSCT models, MEXs can promote the differentiation of Treg cells in spleens, decrease the GVHD score, increase the survival rate of mice, and preserve the cytotoxic antileukemia effects of CD8+ T lymphocytes from recipient mice.
These findings showed that MEXs exert their effects by inhibiting the immunomodulatory function of DCs, macrophages, and T lymphocytes. In the animal model, MEXs ameliorate the clinical symptoms of GVHD, while maintaining the antitumor effects of CD8+ T lymphocytes. Therefore, it can be inferred that MEXs can separate GVHD from GVL in HSCT. Our study suggests that MEXs have broad clinical application potential in the prevention and treatment of GVHD in HSCT in the near future.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a curative therapy for various hematologic malignancies. However, alloimmune response is a double-edged sword that mediates both beneficial graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effects and harmful graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Separation of GVL effects from GVHD has been a topic of intense research to improve transplant outcomes, but reliable clinical strategies have not yet been established. Target tissues of acute GVHD are the skin, liver, and intestine, while leukemic stem cells reside in the bone marrow. Tissue specific effector T-cell migration is determined by a combination of inflammatory and chemotactic signals that interact with specific receptors on T cells. Specific inhibition of donor T cell migration to GVHD target tissues while preserving migration to the bone marrow may represent a novel strategy to separate GVL from GVHD. Furthermore, tissue specific GVHD therapy, promoting tissue tolerance, and targeting of the tumor immune microenvironment may also help to separate GVHD and GVL.

Therapeutic donor lymphocyte infusions (tDLI) are used to reinforce the graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect in relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). In contrast, the role of prophylactic DLI (proDLI) in preventing leukemia relapse has been less clearly established, although supported by retrospective, case-control, and registry analyses. We report a prospective, monocentric, ten year cohort of patients with high risk acute leukemias (AL) or myelodysplasia (MDS) in whom proDLI were applied beyond day +120 post alloSCT to compensate for lack of GvL.272 consecutive allotransplanted AL or MDS patients in complete remission and off immunosuppression at day +120 were stratified according to the prior appearance of relevant GvHD (acute GvHD °II-IV or extensive chronic GvHD) as a clinical indicator for GvL. Escalating doses of unmodified proDLI were applied to 72/272 patients without prior relevant GvHD. Conversely, 157/272 patients with prior spontaneous GvHD did not receive proDLI, nor did 43/272 patients with contraindications (uncontrolled infections, patient refusal, DLI unavailability).By day 160-landmark analysis (median day of first DLI application), proDLI recipients had significantly higher five-year overall (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) (77% and 67%) than patients with spontaneous GvHD (54% and 53%) or with contraindications (46% and 45%) (p=0.003). Relapse incidence for patients with proDLI (30%) or spontaneous GvHD (29%) was significantly lower than in patients with contraindications (39%; p=0.021). With similar GvHD incidence beyond day +160, non-relapse mortality (NRM) was less with proDLI (5%) than without proDLI (18%; p=0.036).In conclusion, proDLI may be able to compensate for lack of GvL in alloSCT recipients with high risk AL or MDS.