genitourinary cancer

泌尿生殖系统癌症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:膀胱癌(BC)和肾细胞癌(RCC)是男女最常见的泌尿生殖道癌症,每年全球发病率约为50万。BC和RCC都与糖尿病有关。血糖控制不良(低血糖)是糖尿病的严重后果,也是BC和RCC中使用的全身治疗的可能后果。这项研究的目的是调查BC或RCC患者的糖尿病患病率和基于医院的血糖管理。
    方法:这项瑞典基于人群的回顾性登记研究使用国家健康数据登记来获取15年癌症发病率的纵向数据,使用以医院为基础的医疗保健,并填写了门诊药物的处方。研究终点包括BC/RCC个体中糖尿病的共同患病率,由于血糖不良而导致的医疗保健资源利用,使用全身性皮质类固醇,以及合并2型糖尿病患者的糖尿病管理变化。
    结果:我们确定了36,620和15,581名诊断为BC和RCC的个体,分别,2006年至2019年。在BC中,糖尿病患者的比例为24%,在RCC中为23%。发现BC/RCC与血糖控制不良之间存在关联,尽管医院护理中的血糖不良事件数量很少(糖尿病患者和BC/RCC患者中分别有65/59例,至少有1起事件).与2型糖尿病但没有癌症的匹配个体相比,在BC/RCC中观察到更早地转换为基于胰岛素的糖尿病管理。结果还表明类固醇治疗与血糖控制不良之间存在关联,与糖尿病对照组相比,全身性皮质类固醇在BC/RCC患者中更常见。
    结论:在这项大型国家研究中观察到的糖尿病的高患病率和全身性皮质类固醇治疗的增加,突出了对特定临床管理的需求。风险评估,并监测BC/RCC和糖尿病患者。
    BACKGROUND: Bladder cancer (BC) and Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are the most common urogenital cancers among both sexes, with a yearly global incidence of around 500 000 each. Both BC and RCC have been linked to diabetes. Poor glycemic control (malglycemia) is a serious consequence of diabetes and a possible consequence of systemic treatments used in BC and RCC. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of diabetes and use of hospital-based care for malglycemia in people with BC or RCC.
    METHODS: This Swedish retrospective population-based register study used national health-data registers for longitudinal data on cancer incidence covering 15 years, use of hospital-based health care, and filled prescriptions of outpatient medications. Study endpoints included co-prevalence of diabetes in individuals with BC/RCC, healthcare resource utilization due to malglycemia, use of systemic corticosteroids, and changes in diabetes management for people with concomitant type 2 diabetes.
    RESULTS: We identified 36,620 and 15,581 individuals diagnosed with BC and RCC, respectively, between 2006 and 2019. The proportion of individuals registered with diabetes was 24% in BC and 23% in RCC. An association between BC/RCC and poor glycemic control was found, although the number of malglycemic events in hospital-based care were few (65/59 per 1000 individuals with diabetes and BC/RCC respectively with at least one event). An earlier switch to insulin-based diabetes management was observed in BC/RCC compared to matched individuals with type 2 diabetes but no cancer. The results also indicated an association between steroid treatment and poor glycemic control, and that systemic corticosteroids were more common among people with BC/RCC compared to diabetes controls.
    CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of diabetes and increased use of systemic corticosteroid treatment observed in this large national study highlights the need for specific clinical management, risk-assessment, and monitoring of individuals with BC/RCC and diabetes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人工智能(AI)有望成为现代社会的下一个革命性步骤。然而,它在工业和科学所有领域的作用需要确定。一个非常有前途的领域是临床肿瘤学中基于AI的决策工具,导致更全面的,个性化治疗方法。在这次审查中,作者概述了AI在肿瘤学中的所有相关技术应用,需要了解未来的挑战和决策工具的现实观点。近年来,已经开发了AI在医学中的各种应用,重点是分析放射学和病理学图像。人工智能应用程序包含大量复杂数据,支持临床决策,并通过客观量化收集的数据的各个方面来减少错误。在临床肿瘤学中,几乎所有患者在开始时和治疗期间都会在多学科癌症会议上接受治疗建议.这些高度复杂的决定是基于大量的信息(患者和各种治疗方案),需要在短时间内进行分析和正确分类。在这次审查中,作者描述了人工智能的技术和医学要求,以多学科的方式应对这些科学挑战。在肿瘤学和决策工具中使用AI的主要挑战是数据安全。数据表示,以及基于人工智能的结果预测的可解释性,特别是在多学科癌症会议的决策过程中。最后,描述了局限性和潜在的解决方案,并对当前和未来的研究尝试进行了比较。
    Artificial intelligence (AI) promises to be the next revolutionary step in modern society. Yet, its role in all fields of industry and science need to be determined. One very promising field is represented by AI-based decision-making tools in clinical oncology leading to more comprehensive, personalized therapy approaches. In this review, the authors provide an overview on all relevant technical applications of AI in oncology, which are required to understand the future challenges and realistic perspectives for decision-making tools. In recent years, various applications of AI in medicine have been developed focusing on the analysis of radiological and pathological images. AI applications encompass large amounts of complex data supporting clinical decision-making and reducing errors by objectively quantifying all aspects of the data collected. In clinical oncology, almost all patients receive a treatment recommendation in a multidisciplinary cancer conference at the beginning and during their treatment periods. These highly complex decisions are based on a large amount of information (of the patients and of the various treatment options), which need to be analyzed and correctly classified in a short time. In this review, the authors describe the technical and medical requirements of AI to address these scientific challenges in a multidisciplinary manner. Major challenges in the use of AI in oncology and decision-making tools are data security, data representation, and explainability of AI-based outcome predictions, in particular for decision-making processes in multidisciplinary cancer conferences. Finally, limitations and potential solutions are described and compared for current and future research attempts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:泌尿生殖系统癌症(GUC)包括影响泌尿和生殖系统的恶性肿瘤,包括肾细胞癌(RCC),尿路上皮癌(UC),前列腺癌(PC)。随着这些癌症治疗领域的快速发展,皮肤不良事件(AE)仍然是观察到的最多的毒性。
    目的:探讨与新型GUC治疗相关的皮肤病学不良事件,它们潜在的病理生理学,临床表现,和风险因素。
    方法:对PubMed和Embase数据库中的文献进行叙述性综述。搜索策略包括皮肤病/皮肤不良事件,危险因素,和病理生理学结合以下类别的疗法;免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs),抗血管生成疗法,enfortumabvedotin(EV),erdafitinib,和雄激素受体拮抗剂(ARAs)。
    结果:斑丘疹,瘙痒,脱发出现在五类疗法中。ICIs显示包括StevenJohnson综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症在内的严重药物AE的发生率最高。独特的皮肤AE表现为特定疗法,包括手足皮肤反应和抗血管生成药物的甲下碎片出血。用erdafitinib治疗口腔炎/粘膜炎和甲溶解。皮肤AE的发生率和类型在相同类别的治疗中也不同,如阿帕鲁胺在ARA中显示出皮肤AE的最高风险。发生皮肤AE的危险因素可能是治疗的一般因素,或具体,包括年龄,免疫状态,BMI,和性别。
    结论:皮肤不良事件可能会影响患者的生活质量,并增加维持或停止挽救生命疗法的趋势,强调需要警惕监测,早期识别,和医学肿瘤学家之间的协作管理,药剂师,和皮肤科医生。
    BACKGROUND: Genitourinary cancers (GUCs) encompass malignancies affecting the urinary and reproductive systems, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), urothelial carcinoma (UC), and prostate cancer (PC). With the rapidly evolving therapeutic domain of these cancers, cutaneous adverse events (AEs) remain among the most observed toxicities.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore the dermatologic AEs linked to novel GUC treatments, their underlying pathophysiology, clinical presentations, and risk factors.
    METHODS: A narrative review of the literature from PubMed and Embase databases was conducted. The search strategy included dermatologic/cutaneous adverse events, risk factors, and pathophysiology in conjunction with the following classes of therapies; immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antiangiogenic therapies, enfortumab vedotin (EV), erdafitinib, and androgen receptor antagonists (ARAs).
    RESULTS: Maculopapular rash, pruritus, and alopecia are present among the five classes of therapies. ICIs demonstrate the highest incidence of severe drug AEs including Steven Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Unique cutaneous AEs present with specific therapies including hand-foot skin reaction and subungual splinter hemorrhage with antiangiogenic drugs, stomatitis/mucositis and onycholysis with erdafitinib. Incidence and type of cutaneous AE also differed within therapies in the same class as seen with apalutamide displaying the highest risk of cutaneous AEs within ARAs. Risk factors for development of cutaneous AEs can be general to therapies, or specific, and include age, immune status, BMI, and gender.
    CONCLUSIONS: Dermatologic AEs may impact patients\' quality of life and increase the tendency to dose reduce, hold or discontinue life-saving therapies, underscoring the need for vigilant monitoring, early recognition, and collaborative management between medical oncologists, pharmacists, dermatologists and other specialists.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    每年都有越来越多的美国人在网上搜索与泌尿外科肿瘤护理相关的健康信息。美国医学协会建议医学信息应以最高六年级的水平书写,以便大多数患者能够理解。因此,评估患者接触的在线患者教育材料的质量和可读性非常重要。
    使用术语“睾丸癌,前列腺癌,肾癌,“和”膀胱癌,“并审查了每个的前30名结果。网站根据其来源进行分类。使用Flesch-Kincaid等级等级评估可读性,Gobbledygook的射击频率,和Gobbledygook指数的简单度量。使用DISCERN质量指数(1-5量表)评估质量。
    我们的分析中包括了91个网站。平均而言,关于泌尿系癌症的在线健康信息是以10至11年级的阅读水平编写的,显著高于美国普通成年人和美国医学协会推荐的水平(P<0.01)。网站的总体质量为3.4±0.7,代表中等到高质量。根据癌症类型或信息来源,可读性没有显着差异。
    尽管质量适中,与常见泌尿系癌症相关的在线患者教育材料通常以超过普通美国成年人的阅读水平的等级编写。这成为在线健康素养的障碍,并质疑这些资源的效用。
    UNASSIGNED: A growing number of Americans search online for health information related to urologic oncologic care each year. The American Medical Association recommends that medical information be written at a maximum sixth-grade level in order to be comprehensible by the majority of patients. As such, it is important to assess the quality and readability of online patient education material that patients are being exposed to.
    UNASSIGNED: A Google search was performed using the terms \"testicular cancer,\" \"prostate cancer,\" \"kidney cancer,\" and \"bladder cancer,\" and the top 30 results for each were reviewed. Websites were categorized based on their source. Readability was assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, the Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook, and the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook indices. Quality was assessed using the DISCERN Quality Index (1-5 scale).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 91 websites were included in our analysis. On average, online health information pertaining to urologic cancers is written at a 10th- to 11th-grade reading level, which is significantly higher than that of an average American adult and that recommended by the American Medical Association (P < .01). The overall quality of websites was 3.4 ± 0.7, representing moderate to high quality. There was no significant difference in readability based on cancer type or information source.
    UNASSIGNED: Despite being of moderate to high quality, online patient education materials related to common urologic cancers are often written at a grade level that exceeds the reading level of an average American adult. This presents as a barrier to online health literacy and calls into question the utility of these resources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    认识到性取向和性别认同(SOGI)在泌尿生殖系统癌症的管理中至关重要,因为性和性别少数群体(SGM)个体遇到独特的医疗保健挑战,导致差异。SGM患者经常面临系统性障碍,提供者偏见,和定制资源的稀缺性,导致满意度下降和不良的健康结果。SGM患者泌尿生殖系统癌症的评估和治疗需要细微差别,多学科方法,侧重于医疗保健系统经常忽略的独特健康决定因素。这篇综述强调了临床中SGM患者包容性的建议,从包容性标牌到性别包容性语言。对于患有泌尿生殖系统癌症的SGM患者的评估和治疗,建议使用基于器官的语言,为了利用包含心理健康的有效问卷,性行为,和患者报告的结果,并在适当时及时转介社会工作和生育。最终,通过针对SGM患者和医疗保健提供者的教育来接近包容性,对于以患者为中心的护理至关重要,改善面临泌尿生殖系统癌症的SGM患者的生活质量和预后。
    Recognizing sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) is paramount in the management of genitourinary cancers, as sexual and gender minority (SGM) individuals encounter unique healthcare challenges leading to disparities. SGM patients often confront systemic barriers, provider biases, and scarcity of tailored resources, resulting in diminished satisfaction and adverse health outcomes. The evaluation and treatment of genitourinary cancers in SGM patients demand a nuanced, multidisciplinary approach that focuses on the unique health determinants often overlooked by the healthcare system. This review highlights recommendations for the inclusivity of SGM patients within the clinic, from inclusive signage to gender inclusive language. For the evaluation and treatment of SGM patients with genitourinary cancers, it is recommended to employ organ-based language, to utilize validated questionnaires encompassing mental health, sexual behavior, and patient-reported outcomes, and to provide timely referrals to social work and onco-fertility when appropriate. Ultimately, approaching inclusivity through education targeted at both SGM patients and healthcare providers is pivotal for centering care around the patient, improving the quality of life and outcomes for SGM patients facing genitourinary cancers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了改善转移性泌尿生殖系统癌症患者的临床结果,包括转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC),重点往往是寻找新的靶向治疗.然而,Jordan等人的两项研究。(肿瘤发生2020年)和Wang等人。(癌细胞Int2022)证明了通过攻击RCC细胞劫持的使索拉非尼失活的机制来提高适度有效的药物索拉非尼对mRCC的功效的可行性。研究还确定透明质酸合酶-3(HAS3)是RCC细胞中索拉非尼的真正靶标。研究表明,非处方药高美酮(4-甲基伞形酮)可阻断RCC细胞中索拉非尼的失活,并通过抑制HAS3表达和HA信号传导来提高其抗mRCC的功效。在更广泛的背景下,提高具有良好安全性的“旧的和失败的药物”的疗效应增加对晚期癌症患者有效治疗的可用性。
    In the quest for improving the clinical outcome of patients with metastatic genitourinary cancers, including metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the emphasis often is on finding new targeted therapies. However, two studies by Jordan et al. (Oncogenesis 2020) and Wang et al. (Cancer Cell Int 2022) demonstrate the feasibility of improving the efficacy of a modestly effective drug Sorafenib against mRCC by attacking a mechanism hijacked by RCC cells for inactivating Sorafenib. The studies also identified hyaluronic acid synthase -3 (HAS3) as a bonafide target of Sorafenib in RCC cells. The studies demonstrate that an over-the-counter drug Hymecromone (4-methylumbelliferone) blocks inactivation of Sorafenib in RCC cells and improves its efficacy against mRCC through the inhibition of HAS3 expression and HA signaling. In the broader context, improving the efficacy of \"old and failed drugs\" that have favorable safety profiles should increase the availability of effective treatments for patients with advanced cancers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    静脉免疫检查点抑制在BCG无反应的非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)原位癌中实现了40%的3个月反应。然而,只有一半的早期反应者将在12个月内继续无病,抗性机制定义不清。我们对来自对静脉pembrolizumab治疗有反应或有抗性的患者的BCG无反应肿瘤进行了空间分析,在开始静脉pembrolizumab治疗前和3个月后分析样本.我们分析了119个感兴趣的区域,其中包括5名患者的59对上皮和邻近基质节段:2名应答者和3名非应答者。我们证明,具有发炎的PanCK肿瘤区域和浸润的基质节段的BCG无反应肿瘤对静脉内pembrolizumab反应更好。此外,使用从一组BCG无反应的NMIBC产生的片段特异性基因签名,这些NMIBC用膀胱内BCG+pembrolizumab治疗,我们发现没有发炎,对静脉内pembrolizumab无反应的免疫冷肿瘤对BCG和pembrolizumab的联合应用表现出良好的结局.第一次,我们在卡介苗无反应的NMIBCs中发现了与静脉内pembrolizumab应答和耐药相关的肿瘤分子特征.对更多患者和替代检查点抑制剂的进一步研究对于验证我们的发现至关重要。我们预计,使用像这里描述的转录组学特征可以帮助识别对静脉内pembrolizumab有更高反应可能性的肿瘤。
    Intravenous immune checkpoint inhibition achieves a 40% 3-month response in BCG-unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with carcinoma in situ. Yet, only half of the early responders will continue to be disease-free by 12 months, and resistance mechanisms are poorly defined. We performed spatial profiling of BCG-unresponsive tumors from patients responsive or resistant to intravenous pembrolizumab treatment, analyzing samples both before initiating and 3 months post-intravenous pembrolizumab treatment. We analyzed 119 regions of interest, which included 59 pairs of epithelial and adjacent stromal segments across five patients: two responders and three non-responders. We demonstrate that BCG unresponsive tumors with an inflamed PanCK+ tumor area and an infiltrated stromal segment respond better to intravenous pembrolizumab. Furthermore, using segment-specific gene signatures generated from a cohort of BCG unresponsive NMIBC treated with intravesical BCG+pembrolizumab, we find that non-inflamed, immune-cold tumors that do not respond to intravenous pembrolizumab exhibit a favorable outcome to the combined application of BCG and pembrolizumab. For the first time, we have identified molecular features of tumors associated with response and resistance to intravenous pembrolizumab in BCG unresponsive NMIBCs. Further research with more patients and alternative checkpoint inhibitors is essential to validate our findings. We anticipate that using a transcriptomics signature like the one described here can help identify tumors with a higher possibility of responding to intravenous pembrolizumab.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    大细胞神经内分泌癌(LCNEC)是前列腺癌的一种罕见亚型。发病机制,临床表现,治疗方案,预后不确定且报告不足。
    2022年4月通过PubMed进行了系统搜索,Embase,还有Cochrane.我们回顾了LCNEC从头或从前列腺腺癌转变而发展的病例,并总结了相关的病理生理过程。治疗方案,和结果。
    本综述共纳入18项研究中的25例患者,平均年龄70.4岁(范围43~87岁)。13例患者被诊断为前列腺从头LCNEC。12例患者来自激素治疗后的腺癌转化。初步诊断后,诊断为从头前列腺LCNEC的患者的平均血清PSA值为24.6ng/ml(范围:0.09-170ng/ml,中位数5.5ng/ml),而转化病例在3.3ng/ml(范围:0-9.3ng/ml,中位数0.05ng/ml)。转移的模式与前列腺腺癌非常相似。23例中有6例显示脑转移,这与神经内分泌肿瘤和脑转移的相关性相匹配。三种值得注意的副肿瘤综合征包括库辛斯综合征,皮肌炎,和红细胞增多症。大多数晚期转移性疾病患者接受常规铂类化疗,平均生存期为5个月。在具有体细胞BRCA2突变的转化队列中,有一个例外,他接受了M6620和基于铂的化疗的组合治疗,PFS为20个月。与具有混合LCNEC和腺癌表型的患者相比,具有纯LCNEC表型的患者具有更差的生存结果。尚不清楚在纯病理中施用ADT是否有生存益处。
    前列腺的LCNEC是一种罕见的疾病,可以从头发生或从前列腺腺癌转变。大多数患者处于晚期,预后不良,并接受常规化疗方案治疗。结果较好的患者是早期诊断并接受手术或放射和雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)治疗的患者。有一例具有异常结果的病例包括M6620治疗方案和化疗。
    UNASSIGNED: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare subtype of prostate cancer. The pathogenesis, clinical manifestation, treatment options, and prognosis are uncertain and underreported.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic search was conducted in April 2022 through PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. We reviewed cases of LCNEC developed either from de novo or transformation from prostate adenocarcinoma and summarized the relevant pathophysiological course, treatment options, and outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 25 patients with a mean age of 70.4 (range 43 87 years old) from 18 studies were included in this review. 13 patients were diagnosed with de novo LCNEC of the prostate. 12 patients were from the transformation of adenocarcinoma post-hormonal therapy treatment. Upon initial diagnosis, patients diagnosed with de novo prostatic LCNEC had a mean serum PSA value of 24.6 ng/ml (range: 0.09-170 ng/ml, median 5.5 ng/ml), while transformation cases were significantly lower at 3.3 ng/ml (range: 0-9.3 ng/ml, median 0.05 ng/ml). The pattern of metastasis closely resembles prostate adenocarcinoma. Six out of twenty-three cases displayed brain metastasis matching the correlation between neuroendocrine tumors and brain metastasis. Three notable paraneoplastic syndromes included Cushings syndrome, dermatomyositis, and polycythemia. Most patients with advanced metastatic disease received conventional platinum-based chemotherapy with a mean survival of 5 months. There was one exception in the transformation cohort with a somatic BRCA2 mutation who was treated with a combination of M6620 and platinum-based chemotherapy with an impressive PFS of 20 months. Patients with pure LCNEC phenotype have worse survival outcomes when compared to those with mixed LCNEC and adenocarcinoma phenotypes. It is unclear whether there is a survival benefit to administering ADT in pure pathologies.
    UNASSIGNED: LCNEC of the prostate is a rare disease that can occur de novo or transformation from prostatic adenocarcinoma. Most patients present at an advanced stage with poor prognosis and are treated with conventional chemotherapy regimens. Patients who had better outcomes were those who were diagnosed at an early stage and received treatment with surgery or radiation and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). There was one case with an exceptional outcome that included a treatment regimen of M6620 and chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    挥发性有机化合物(VOC)由于其在从侵入性癌症诊断方法过渡到非侵入性癌症诊断方法中的关键作用而增长。本研究旨在评估使用尿液VOC检测泌尿生殖系统癌症的金属氧化物生物传感器平台的可行性。选择了五种不同的市售半导体传感器来检测特定的VOC(甲烷,异丁烷,氢气,乙醇,硫化氢,氨,甲苯,丁烷,丙烷,三甲胺,和甲硫醇)。检查由于来自电压加热器的温度变化引起的电阻变化以表征VOC代谢。采用Logistic回归和ROC分析评估潜在的尿液VOCs,以确定泌尿生殖系统的癌症。这项研究涉及64名参与者,他们被分为癌症和非癌症组。泌尿生殖系统癌(经组织病理学证实)包括32例患者,包括肾细胞癌(3.1%),移行细胞癌(46.9%),前列腺癌(50%)。非癌症患者包括32名,9名健康受试者和23名患有其他泌尿生殖系统疾病的个体。结果表明,用于甲烷的VOC传感器,异丁烷,氢气,和乙醇,在2000mV的电压加热器下,显示了对泌尿生殖系统癌症的显着预测能力,P=0.013。这些生物标志物的ROC在预测疾病发生方面也显示出统计学意义(P<0.05)。这份报告表明甲烷,异丁烷,氢气,和乙醇VOC显示出诊断泌尿生殖系统癌症的潜力。开发适合这些化合物的气体金属氧化物传感器,监测电阻的变化,可以作为识别这种特定类型癌症的创新工具。
    Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have grown due to their crucial role in transitioning from invasive to noninvasive cancer diagnostic methods. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the metal oxide biosensor platform using urine VOCs for detecting genitourinary cancers. Five different commercially available semiconductor sensors were chosen to detect specific VOCs (methane, iso-butane, hydrogen, ethanol, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, toluene, butane, propane, trimethylamine, and methyl-mercaptan). Changes in electrical resistance due to temperature variations from the voltage heater were examined to characterize VOC metabolism. Logistic regression and ROC analysis were employed to evaluate potential urine VOCs for genitourinary cancer determination. This study involved 64 participants which were categorized into a cancer and a non-cancer group. The genitourinary cancer (confirmed by tissue pathology) comprised 32 patients, including renal cell carcinoma (3.1%), transitional cell carcinoma (46.9%), and prostate cancer (50%). The non-cancer comprised 32 patients, with 9 healthy subjects and 23 individuals with other genitourinary diseases. Results indicated that VOC sensors for methane, iso-butane, hydrogen, and ethanol, at a voltage heater of 2000 mV, demonstrated a significant predictive capability for genitourinary cancer with P = 0.013. The ROC of these biomarkers also indicated statistical significance in predicting the occurrence of the disease (P < 0.05). This report suggested that methane, iso-butane, hydrogen, and ethanol VOCs exhibited potential for diagnosing genitourinary cancer. Developing gas metal oxide sensors tailored to these compounds, and monitoring changes in electrical resistance, could serve as an innovative tool for identifying this specific type of cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:泌尿生殖系统(GU)多学科肿瘤委员会(GUMTB)是患者护理的关键组成部分,因为它们可能导致治疗计划的改变,提高生存率,并加强对准则的遵守。然而,没有关于GUMTB应如何运作或如何评估其绩效质量的指南。
    方法:进行了系统的文献综述,以确定评估GUMTB质量的标准和指标。一个由来自七个学科的12名GU癌症专家组成的科学委员会提出了一份标准清单并制定了指标,在两轮德尔菲法中进行了评估。使用9分Likert量表对指标的适当性和实用性进行评分。共识被定义为至少三分之二的Delphi受访者选择包含该组中位数得分的得分子类别。
    结果:选择了45个标准来评估GUMTB的质量,涵盖五个维度:组织,人员,协议和文档,资源,与患者互动。然后,在第一轮德尔菲中开发和评估了33个指标,导致在两个维度上选择26个指标:功能,治理和资源,和GUMTB会话。在第二轮中,就所有26项指标的适当性和其中24项指标的实用性达成了共识。开发了标准和指标的索引卡,用于临床实践。
    结论:制定了评估GUMTB质量的标准和指标,旨在作为提高GU癌症患者护理质量和健康结果的指南。
    OBJECTIVE: Genitourinary (GU) multidisciplinary tumour boards (GUMTBs) are key components of patient care, as they might lead to changes in treatment plan, improved survival, and increased adherence to guidelines. However, there are no guidelines on how GUMTBs should operate or how to assess their quality of performance.
    METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify criteria and indicators to evaluate quality in GUMTBs. A scientific committee-comprising 12 GU cancer specialists from seven disciplines-proposed a list of criteria and developed indicators, evaluated in two rounds of Delphi method. Appropriateness and utility of indicators were scored using a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus was defined as at least two-thirds of Delphi respondents selecting a score sub-category that encompassed the median score of the group.
    RESULTS: Forty-five criteria were selected to evaluate the quality of GUMTBs covering five dimensions: organisation, personnel, protocol and documentation, resources, and interaction with patients. Then, 33 indicators were developed and evaluated in the first round of Delphi, leading to a selection of 26 indicators in two dimensions: function, governance and resources, and GUMTB sessions. In the second round, consensus was reached on the appropriateness of all 26 indicators and on the utility of 24 of them. Index cards for criteria and indicators were developed to be used in clinical practice.
    CONCLUSIONS: Criteria and indicators were developed to evaluate the quality of GUMTBs, aiming to serve as a guide to improve quality of care and health outcomes in patients with GU cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号