gender‐related differences

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的主要目的是探讨七个埃及临床和非临床样本在死亡抑郁症中的差异。以及估计与性别有关的差异。
    横断面研究。
    对七组(N=765)埃及正常(非临床)患者进行了死亡抑郁量表(DDS),焦虑门诊患者,个别会议中的精神分裂症住院患者(男性和女性)和成瘾者(仅限男性)。
    焦虑门诊男女患者的死亡抑郁评分明显高于其他五组,而男性精神分裂症患者,男性瘾君子,男性和女性非临床组的死亡抑郁评分最低.女性精神分裂症患者的死亡抑郁评分明显高于男性精神分裂症患者,成瘾者和非临床参与者。女性焦虑症门诊患者和精神分裂症患者的死亡抑郁平均得分高于男性。
    目前的发现是一致的,总的来说,与先前关于死亡焦虑和死亡痴迷的研究。适用于死亡焦虑的方法也与死亡抑郁和死亡痴迷相一致。也就是说,死亡困扰的概念。
    The main aims of this study were to explore the differences between seven Egyptian clinical and non-clinical samples in death depression, as well as to estimate gender-related differences.
    A cross-sectional study.
    The Death Depression Scale (DDS) was administered to seven groups (N = 765) of Egyptian normal (non-clinical) patients, anxiety outpatients, schizophrenic inpatients (men and women) and addicts (men only) in individual sessions.
    Anxiety outpatients of both sexes obtained significantly and greatly higher death depression scores than did the other five groups, whereas the male schizophrenics, the male addicts, and the male and female non-clinical groups had the lowest death depression scores. Female schizophrenics obtained a significantly higher death depression scores than did male schizophrenics, addicts and non-clinical participants. Female anxiety outpatients and schizophrenics had higher death depression mean scores than did their male counterparts.
    The present finding is consistent, in general, with previous studies on death anxiety and death obsession. What applied to death anxiety was consistent also with death depression and death obsession. That is, the death distress concept.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的研究表明,在影响输赢结果的风险和竞争策略中,与性别相关的心理生物学差异。此外,一些研究发现了决策过程中的差异,女性需要更长的时间才能达到与男性相同的表现。然而,潜在的神经机制仍不清楚.本研究旨在调查决策任务中行为表现和神经相关性的性别差异,爱荷华州赌博任务(IGT)。40名健康的年轻人(23名男性和17名女性)进行了IGT,而反馈相关的负性(FRN)和P3被记录为反馈处理的神经相关性。在100和150项试验后,IGT的行为表现没有观察到性别差异,或在P3组件中。在女性中,但不是男人,FRN分量的损失幅度大于胜利幅度。行为表现没有显著的性别相关差异,男性和女性在IGT上的学习过程相似。在神经层面,在FRN或P3的反馈处理阶段,未观察到男女之间的直接差异.然而,我们的结果表明,女性在决策任务中对损失的敏感性高于对胜利的敏感性,正如FRN组件所反映的那样。
    Previous research has shown gender-related psychobiological differences in risky and competitive strategies that affect win and loss outcomes. In addition, some studies have found differences in the decision-making process, with women taking longer to reach the same performance as men. However, the underlying neural mechanisms remain unclear. The present study aimed to investigate gender differences in behavioral performance and neural correlates during a decision-making task, the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT). Forty healthy young adults (23 men and 17 women) performed the IGT while the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3 were recorded as neural correlates of feedback processing. No gender differences were observed in the behavioral performance on the IGT after 100 and 150 trials, or in the P3 component. In women, but not in men, the FRN component showed a greater amplitude for losses than for wins. There were no significant gender-related differences in behavioral performance, and men and women revealed a similar learning process on the IGT. At the neural level, no direct differences between men and women were observed in the feedback processing stage for the FRN or P3. However, our results indicate that women showed greater sensitivity to losses than to wins during the decision-making task, as reflected in the FRN component.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号